{ "model": { "rank": 3956, "code": "thing-q165498", "model_id": "vr.tr.schr-dinger-equation", "name": "Schrödinger equation", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a Schrödinger-equation formulation, assess its physical and mathematical applicability, and select justified ways to solve and interpret it.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q165498/", "tier": 2, "score": 80, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "time-independent Schrödinger equation" ], "aliasCount": 1, "merged": 1, "knownIn": 80, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q165498", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q165498", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T19:09:24Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08792-2f03-78e2-b332-e5a279ec99b6\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Schrödinger equation\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: ", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 65.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08792-2f0b-7a93-9752-60390cc5b2ea\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Schrödinger equation\nRegistry id: vr.tr.schr-dinger-equation\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into thi" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q165498", "registryId": "vr.tr.schr-dinger-equation", "name": "Schrödinger equation", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q165498/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.schr-dinger-equation", "name": "Schrödinger equation", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a Schrödinger-equation formulation, assess its physical and mathematical applicability, and select justified ways to solve and interpret it.", "definition": "The Schrödinger equation is the quantum dynamical equation iℏ∂ψ/∂t = Ĥψ governing a state's time evolution under a Hamiltonian operator, used principally in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the Schrödinger equation as a mathematical law and its specified formulations, including state space, Hamiltonian, assumptions, solution conditions and interpretation; it distinguishes the equation from documents that express it and physical systems it describes.", "in_scope": [ "Time-dependent evolution and the conditions for deriving a time-independent energy eigenvalue problem", "Wavefunctions or state vectors, their representation, and their probability interpretation", "Hamiltonian specification, operator domain, potentials and interactions", "Initial conditions, boundary conditions, normalization and admissible solutions", "Analytical and numerical solution methods, validation and limits of applicability" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Quantum mechanics as an entire theoretical framework", "Physical particles, apparatus and experimental systems described by the equation", "Dirac, Klein-Gordon and other distinct dynamical equations", "Density-operator master equations for reduced open-system dynamics", "Articles, textbooks, editions and files containing expressions of the equation", "Software packages and computing infrastructure used to solve it" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Its time-dependent state-vector form is iℏ ∂|ψ⟩/∂t = Ĥ|ψ⟩; a second spatial derivative occurs in common position representations but is not the defining feature.", "The time-independent form Ĥφ = Eφ is an energy eigenvalue problem associated with a time-independent Hamiltonian; it does not replace the evolution equation for arbitrary states.", "For a prescribed Hamiltonian independent of the state, the equation is linear in the state, unlike explicitly nonlinear effective variants.", "The wavefunction is generally a complex probability amplitude, rather than a classical displacement field or a probability density itself.", "The equation is an abstract mathematical relation; a printed formula, historical paper or textbook edition is an expression or carrier of it." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Equation formulation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "time-dependent evolution; time-independent eigenvalue problem; explicitly identified effective variant", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether the task concerns state evolution, stationary energies or an approximation requiring additional assumptions." }, { "name": "State representation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "position-space wavefunction; momentum-space wavefunction; abstract state vector; discrete basis coefficients; multicomponent state", "why_it_matters": "Controls the meaning of coordinates, components, operators and normalization." }, { "name": "Hamiltonian specification", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "linked operator expression, parameters, interactions and operator domain", "why_it_matters": "The equation alone does not determine dynamics without a Hamiltonian." }, { "name": "Hamiltonian time dependence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "time-independent; explicitly time-dependent; unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Affects separation of variables, energy conservation and the evolution method." }, { "name": "Physical regime", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "nonrelativistic system; effective approximation with stated regime; other explicitly justified formulation", "why_it_matters": "Prevents extending familiar particle Hamiltonians beyond their justified physical assumptions." }, { "name": "System degrees of freedom", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "particle count, spatial dimensions, spin components, configuration space and exchange symmetry", "why_it_matters": "Determines the state space and prevents confusing a many-particle wavefunction with a field on ordinary three-dimensional space." }, { "name": "Solution conditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "initial state, boundary conditions, asymptotic conditions and normalization convention", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a specified problem from an equation with undetermined solutions." }, { "name": "Unit convention", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "SI; atomic units; dimensionless variables with stated reference scales; other declared convention", "why_it_matters": "Makes constants, parameters and reported energies or times interpretable." }, { "name": "Validation state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unassessed; analytically checked; numerically converged for stated observables; benchmarked; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Separates obtaining a candidate solution from establishing its reliability." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a supplied expression and identify missing Hamiltonian, state-space or solution conditions.", "Construct a stationary or time-dependent problem from explicitly recorded physical assumptions.", "Select a solution method appropriate to the spectrum, dimensionality and required observables.", "Check dimensions, normalization, boundary behaviour and applicable conservation laws.", "Extract justified probabilities, expectation values, energy levels and transition information from solutions.", "Identify when an effective variant or neighbouring dynamical model is required." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "equation-identity-and-forms", "name": "Equation identity and forms", "description": "Recognise the mathematical relation and distinguish its principal formulations.", "rationale": "An agent must avoid treating every wave equation, eigenvalue equation or printed occurrence as the same thing.", "layers": [ { "id": "evolution-law", "name": "Evolution law", "description": "Identify the state, time derivative and Hamiltonian in a stated representation.", "findings": [ { "id": "hamiltonian-generated-evolution", "name": "Hamiltonian-generated evolution", "description": "Recognition centres on iℏ ∂|ψ⟩/∂t = Ĥ|ψ⟩ and the meanings assigned to its symbols.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which expression specifies the evolving state, Hamiltonian and time variable?", "kind": "definition", "id": "hamiltonian-generated-evolution-q01" }, { "text": "Does the expression describe a quantum amplitude, or a different field governed by a superficially similar wave equation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "hamiltonian-generated-evolution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "stationary-and-effective-forms", "name": "Stationary and effective forms", "description": "Separate energy eigenvalue problems from evolution laws and explicitly modified equations.", "findings": [ { "id": "formulation-derivation", "name": "Formulation derivation", "description": "A stationary equation or effective variant needs its relationship to the underlying evolution problem recorded.", "questions": [ { "text": "If Ĥφ = Eφ is used, which assumptions permit stationary-state separation and what time dependence completes the state?", "kind": "definition", "id": "formulation-derivation-q01" }, { "text": "If nonlinear or non-Hermitian terms appear, which derivation or approximation justifies them and how is the variant named?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "formulation-derivation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "physical-system-and-hamiltonian", "name": "Physical system and Hamiltonian", "description": "Specify what dynamics the equation represents and where those dynamics apply.", "rationale": "A formally correct equation can describe the wrong system if degrees of freedom, interactions or approximations are omitted.", "layers": [ { "id": "degrees-of-freedom", "name": "Degrees of freedom", "description": "Establish the configuration space, internal components and particle statistics.", "findings": [ { "id": "state-space-content", "name": "State-space content", "description": "The variables and components of the state must correspond to the retained physical degrees of freedom.", "questions": [ { "text": "How many particles, spatial coordinates and spin or other internal components does the state contain?", "kind": "definition", "id": "state-space-content-q01" }, { "text": "Which exchange-symmetry constraints apply, and which degrees of freedom have been removed by approximation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "state-space-content-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interactions-and-regime", "name": "Interactions and regime", "description": "Record Hamiltonian terms, parameter origins and physical validity conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "hamiltonian-adequacy", "name": "Hamiltonian adequacy", "description": "Kinetic, potential, coupling and external-field terms require explicit definitions and a justified operating regime.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which Hamiltonian terms and parameter sources specify the masses, potentials, interactions and applied fields?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "hamiltonian-adequacy-q01" }, { "text": "Which physical conditions would make relativistic effects, environmental coupling or neglected interactions significant enough to change the model?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "hamiltonian-adequacy-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "mathematical-problem-and-admissibility", "name": "Mathematical problem and admissibility", "description": "Determine whether the formulation defines an appropriate evolution or spectral problem.", "rationale": "The operator expression alone cannot establish admissible states, unique evolution or a physically meaningful spectrum.", "layers": [ { "id": "operator-and-boundaries", "name": "Operator and boundaries", "description": "Connect the Hamiltonian's domain to spatial, interface and asymptotic conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "operator-domain-specification", "name": "Operator-domain specification", "description": "The domain and boundary conditions are part of the Hamiltonian specification, especially for singular potentials or constrained regions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What operator domain and boundary or interface conditions define the Hamiltonian?", "kind": "definition", "id": "operator-domain-specification-q01" }, { "text": "For intended closed-system evolution, what establishes the required self-adjointness and existence of an appropriate propagator?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "operator-domain-specification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "initial-and-spectral-conditions", "name": "Initial and spectral conditions", "description": "Specify the state or spectral target and the appropriate normalization.", "findings": [ { "id": "admissible-state-selection", "name": "Admissible state selection", "description": "Initial-value problems, bound-state searches and scattering problems require different state and asymptotic specifications.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the requested solution determined by an initial state, a bound-state spectral condition or incoming and outgoing scattering conditions?", "kind": "definition", "id": "admissible-state-selection-q01" }, { "text": "Does the solution use unit normalization, generalized continuum normalization or a normalizable wave packet?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "admissible-state-selection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "solution-methods-and-verification", "name": "Solution methods and verification", "description": "Choose computational or analytical treatments and establish the reliability of their outputs.", "rationale": "A candidate wavefunction or energy requires checks that distinguish physical predictions from approximation and numerical error.", "layers": [ { "id": "method-selection", "name": "Method selection", "description": "Match solution strategies to symmetries, scales, time dependence and desired outputs.", "findings": [ { "id": "tractable-solution-strategy", "name": "Tractable solution strategy", "description": "Exact reduction, perturbation, variational methods and numerical methods have different assumptions and error controls.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which symmetries, separable coordinates or small parameters justify the proposed analytical reduction or approximation?", "kind": "action", "id": "tractable-solution-strategy-q01" }, { "text": "Which basis, spatial discretization or time integrator is appropriate for the Hamiltonian and target observables?", "kind": "action", "id": "tractable-solution-strategy-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "error-and-consistency", "name": "Error and consistency", "description": "Assess equation residuals, convergence and physically applicable invariants.", "findings": [ { "id": "solution-reliability", "name": "Solution reliability", "description": "Validation needs problem-appropriate checks; conserving the norm alone does not establish solution accuracy.", "questions": [ { "text": "How do residuals and target observables change as the basis, grid, domain size or time step is refined?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "solution-reliability-q01" }, { "text": "Which normalization, symmetry, benchmark and conservation checks apply, including whether the Hamiltonian permits energy conservation?", "kind": "action", "id": "solution-reliability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "physical-interpretation-and-use", "name": "Physical interpretation and use", "description": "Connect mathematical solutions to permitted physical conclusions.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish amplitudes from probabilities and separate predictive evolution from additional measurement assumptions.", "layers": [ { "id": "observables-and-probabilities", "name": "Observables and probabilities", "description": "Identify the measurement representation and quantities extracted from the state.", "findings": [ { "id": "prediction-extraction", "name": "Prediction extraction", "description": "Probability and expectation calculations require specified observables, normalization and the relevant integration measure or discrete basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observable and measurement basis define the requested probability or expectation value?", "kind": "definition", "id": "prediction-extraction-q01" }, { "text": "How are amplitudes converted into probabilities using the correct measure and any required sum over internal components?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "prediction-extraction-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretive-limits", "name": "Interpretive limits", "description": "Bound conclusions about phase, measurement outcomes and environmental effects.", "findings": [ { "id": "limits-of-evolution-predictions", "name": "Limits of evolution predictions", "description": "State evolution must be distinguished from measurement-update rules; overall and relative phases also have different predictive significance.", "questions": [ { "text": "Could an apparent difference between solutions be only an overall phase, or does a relative phase change an observable prediction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "limits-of-evolution-predictions-q01" }, { "text": "Does the requested conclusion require a measurement-update rule or reduced open-system description beyond the specified equation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "limits-of-evolution-predictions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the mathematical equation, not Schrödinger's original papers, a particular edition or a physical carrier; the supplied domain classification should be checked.", "The time-independent equation Ĥφ = Eφ determines energy eigenstates; its stationary-state interpretation assumes a time-independent Hamiltonian.", "These statements are recalled knowledge, not findings checked against sources; no identifiers or governing standards are asserted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Schrödinger equation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Time-dependent Schrödinger equation", "Time-independent Schrödinger equation (Hamiltonian eigenvalue equation)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Schrödinger equation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Calculating bound-state energies and wavefunctions of atoms and molecules.", "Modelling quantum tunnelling and particle scattering.", "Predicting electronic states in solids and semiconductor structures.", "Simulating quantum wave-packet evolution.", "Providing the foundation for many approximate computational methods in quantum chemistry." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Schrödinger equation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Applying the usual nonrelativistic particle Hamiltonian where relativistic effects or particle creation are significant.", "Using a Hamiltonian that omits interactions essential to the system being modelled.", "Choosing inappropriate boundary conditions or operator domains, producing unphysical states or spectra.", "Numerical discretisation, basis truncation or unstable time integration producing inaccurate energies or evolution.", "Treating the wavefunction itself as a directly measured probability rather than using the appropriate probability rule." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Schrödinger equation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Wavefunction", "difference": "A wavefunction represents a quantum state; the Schrödinger equation constrains its evolution." }, { "name": "Hamiltonian operator", "difference": "The Hamiltonian specifies the system's energy observable and generates time evolution; the Schrödinger equation relates its action to the state's time derivative." }, { "name": "Dirac equation", "difference": "The Dirac equation provides a relativistic description of spin-1/2 particles; the usual single-particle Schrödinger equation is nonrelativistic." }, { "name": "Heisenberg equation of motion", "difference": "In the Heisenberg picture, time dependence is assigned to operators rather than states; it supplies an equivalent formulation under corresponding assumptions." }, { "name": "Classical wave equation", "difference": "The classical wave equation typically describes physical field disturbances and is second order in time; the Schrödinger equation evolves quantum probability amplitudes and is first order in time." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Schrödinger equation this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does an existing Vercy world model already own the Schrödinger equation or a broader concept that should supply this entry's canonical publication?", "Does the registry's INF.MED placement intentionally classify mathematical expressions, and how should the abstract equation be related to its documentary expressions?", "Should explicitly nonlinear Schrödinger equations and effective non-Hermitian formulations be linked neighbouring concepts or named variants within this entry?", "Which authoritative sources should establish the canonical formulations, operator-domain requirements and applicability boundaries?", "How much representation-specific detail should this entry own before delegating spin, identical-particle symmetry and relativistic formulations to neighbouring models?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Schrödinger equation, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise a Schrödinger-equation formulation, assess its physical and mathematical applicability, and select justified ways to solve and interpret it.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: time-independent Schrödinger equation.", "1 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 80 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Schrödinger equation, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "time-independent Schrödinger equation" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 80 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 1 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Schrödinger equation from another, and a Schrödinger equation from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Schrödinger equation sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Schrödinger equation from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Schrödinger equation passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Schrödinger equation between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Schrödinger equation, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Schrödinger equation is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a Schrödinger equation says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a Schrödinger equation contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a Schrödinger equation and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of Schrödinger equation a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For Schrödinger equation, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of Schrödinger equation exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made Schrödinger equation and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to Schrödinger equation, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in Schrödinger equation, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Schrödinger equation came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Schrödinger equation and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Schrödinger equation is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Schrödinger equation, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Schrödinger equation, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Schrödinger equation is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }