{ "model": { "rank": 4098, "code": "thing-q165704", "model_id": "vr.tr.high-jump", "name": "high jump", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise high-jump activity, assess attempts and performance in context, and identify appropriate next actions and unresolved judgements.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q165704/", "tier": 2, "score": 78, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Rwandan high jumping", "Fosbury flop" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 78, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q165704", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q165704", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T19:28:10Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087a3-80cc-7231-baa7-21acd67d0fa2\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: high jump\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001 regist", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 56.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087a3-80d4-75d2-96c5-92a5accca522\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: high jump\nRegistry id: vr.tr.high-jump\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCont" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q165704", "registryId": "vr.tr.high-jump", "name": "high jump", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q165704/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.high-jump", "name": "high jump", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise high-jump activity, assess attempts and performance in context, and identify appropriate next actions and unresolved judgements.", "definition": "High jump is an athletics event in which competitors take off from one foot to clear a horizontal bar at progressively greater heights without dislodging it.", "scope_statement": "This model owns high jump as the athletics activity of clearing an elevated horizontal crossbar after an approach and single-foot take-off, including practice, individual attempts and competition progression.", "in_scope": [ "The distinction between high jump, other jumping events and generic jumping activity", "Approach, single-foot take-off, bar clearance and landing as phases of an attempt", "Bar heights, attempt outcomes and evidence supporting their interpretation", "Height progression, passes and remaining opportunities under the applicable competition rules", "Readiness of the approach area, crossbar assembly and landing area for an attempt" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Pole vault, long jump, triple jump and standing vertical-jump tests", "An athlete's complete biography, medical care or general fitness programme", "Engineering and manufacture of crossbars, uprights and landing mats", "Administration of an entire athletics meeting", "General theories of projectile motion and human biomechanics" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Performance concerns clearing a horizontal crossbar at a measured elevation, rather than maximising horizontal landing distance.", "The athletics event uses a single-foot take-off without a pole or other vaulting implement.", "An attempt includes an approach, take-off, clearance and landing; a standing reach or vertical-jump measurement alone is not a high-jump attempt.", "Competitive performance depends on valid clearances and an attempt history, rather than estimated body elevation alone.", "A particular clearance technique does not define the event: the model must accommodate different techniques within the applicable rules." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Activity context", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "competition; practice; demonstration; other specified context", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether outcomes are official results, training observations or informal demonstrations." }, { "name": "Applicable rules", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "governing authority, rule edition and event-specific conditions", "why_it_matters": "Provides the basis for judging validity, available attempts and placing." }, { "name": "Bar height", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "metres, with measurement method and precision", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the clearance challenge and supports comparison of performances." }, { "name": "Attempt outcome", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "pending; valid clearance; failed attempt; disputed; unrecorded", "why_it_matters": "Separates an observed movement from its adjudicated result." }, { "name": "Take-off foot", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "left; right; undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Helps interpret approach orientation and consistency across attempts." }, { "name": "Clearance technique", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Fosbury flop; straddle; scissors; other described technique; undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Changes how approach, clearance and landing observations should be interpreted." }, { "name": "Attempt history", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "ordered heights, attempts, outcomes and passes within a session or competition", "why_it_matters": "Supports reconstruction of progression and rule-dependent opportunities." }, { "name": "Best valid clearance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "metres within a stated session or result scope; none established", "why_it_matters": "Summarises achieved performance without treating passes or failures as clearances." }, { "name": "Jump-area readiness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "not checked; ready under the stated inspection; issue identified; unavailable", "why_it_matters": "Makes surface, equipment and landing-area conditions visible before another attempt." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify an observed jumping activity as high jump or a neighbouring activity.", "Record an attempt with its bar height, movement observations, outcome and supporting evidence.", "Compare attempts by phase to identify specific changes in execution.", "Reconstruct height progression and determine available next choices using verified rules.", "Identify missing measurements, disputed judgements or area-readiness issues requiring human review." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "event-identity-and-context", "name": "Event identity and context", "description": "Establishes which high-jump activity is being represented and what makes its observations interpretable.", "rationale": "An official clearance, a practice jump and a vertical-jump test cannot be interpreted interchangeably.", "layers": [ { "id": "high-jump-boundary", "name": "High-jump boundary", "description": "Separates the athletics activity from other forms of jumping.", "findings": [ { "id": "crossbar-clearance-task", "name": "Crossbar clearance task", "description": "Identify whether the activity targets elevated crossbar clearance through an approach and single-foot take-off without vaulting equipment.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observed features establish that this is high jump rather than pole vault or a vertical-jump test?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "crossbar-clearance-task-q01" }, { "text": "Is this a complete high-jump attempt or a drill practising only one of its phases?", "kind": "definition", "id": "crossbar-clearance-task-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "practice-or-competition", "name": "Practice or competition", "description": "Connects the activity to its session purpose and governing conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "result-authority", "name": "Result authority", "description": "Distinguish informal observations from results judged under an identified ruleset.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who recorded or judged the clearance, and in what practice or competition context?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "result-authority-q01" }, { "text": "Which rule edition and event-specific conditions govern this attempt?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "result-authority-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "approach-and-take-off", "name": "Approach and take-off", "description": "Represents how the jumper reaches and leaves the take-off point.", "rationale": "Bar-height outcomes alone cannot explain differences in the preparation and launch of successive jumps.", "layers": [ { "id": "approach-execution", "name": "Approach execution", "description": "Records the route and rhythm leading into take-off.", "findings": [ { "id": "approach-repeatability", "name": "Approach repeatability", "description": "Describe starting position, approach path and final-step consistency relative to the jumper's intended technique.", "questions": [ { "text": "What starting mark, approach side and path did the jumper use for this attempt?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "approach-repeatability-q01" }, { "text": "How did the final steps differ from the intended approach or a comparable successful attempt?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "approach-repeatability-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "take-off-execution", "name": "Take-off execution", "description": "Records the foot contact and location from which clearance begins.", "findings": [ { "id": "take-off-position-and-foot", "name": "Take-off position and foot", "description": "Locate take-off relative to the bar and distinguish observed foot contact from uncertain video interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which foot produced take-off, and what evidence supports that observation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "take-off-position-and-foot-q01" }, { "text": "Where was the take-off contact relative to the crossbar and uprights?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "take-off-position-and-foot-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "clearance-and-landing", "name": "Clearance and landing", "description": "Connects airborne execution, bar interaction and landing-area conditions.", "rationale": "A missed clearance and a problematic landing are different observations that may require different responses.", "layers": [ { "id": "bar-passage", "name": "Bar passage", "description": "Describes how the jumper passes the crossbar and what happens to it.", "findings": [ { "id": "clearance-sequence", "name": "Clearance sequence", "description": "Record technique, visible body passage and any bar contact without treating a single visual cue as the complete official judgement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which clearance technique was used, and which parts of the body contacted the bar, if any?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "clearance-sequence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes a clearance failure from a bar movement caused by another factor?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "clearance-sequence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "landing-and-area-readiness", "name": "Landing and area readiness", "description": "Relates the jumper's landing to the condition and availability of the jumping area.", "findings": [ { "id": "landing-zone-observation", "name": "Landing-zone observation", "description": "Record landing location and visible area issues relevant to whether another jump can proceed.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where did the jumper land relative to the intended landing area and its edges?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "landing-zone-observation-q01" }, { "text": "Do observed mat displacement, obstacles, surface conditions or equipment issues require inspection before another attempt?", "kind": "action", "id": "landing-zone-observation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "attempts-and-height-progression", "name": "Attempts and height progression", "description": "Represents the sequence of measured challenges, decisions and adjudicated outcomes.", "rationale": "High-jump results and next options depend on attempt history as well as the greatest height cleared.", "layers": [ { "id": "height-and-outcome-evidence", "name": "Height and outcome evidence", "description": "Connects each attempted height to its measurement and adjudication.", "findings": [ { "id": "verified-attempt-result", "name": "Verified attempt result", "description": "Keep the stated height, measurement evidence, official outcome and reason for failure or dispute distinguishable.", "questions": [ { "text": "How was this crossbar height measured or verified, and in what units?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "verified-attempt-result-q01" }, { "text": "What outcome was recorded, and which observation or rule supports any failure or disputed decision?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "verified-attempt-result-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "progression-and-result", "name": "Progression and result", "description": "Interprets clearances, failures and passes across successive heights.", "findings": [ { "id": "remaining-choices-and-standing", "name": "Remaining choices and standing", "description": "Use the ordered record and applicable rules to establish the jumper's current result and available next choices.", "questions": [ { "text": "Given the recorded attempts and passes, what next attempts or progression choices remain permitted?", "kind": "action", "id": "remaining-choices-and-standing-q01" }, { "text": "Does the attempt history establish a placing, or is further rule-based tie resolution required?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "remaining-choices-and-standing-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The intended sense is the athletics event, inferred from the name and activity domain.", "Standing high jump is a historical related variant; whether the registry includes it within this entry needs checking.", "This is recalled knowledge, not source-verified research; performance ranges are illustrative, and applicable rule editions should be checked." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Outdoor high jump", "Indoor high jump", "Standing high jump, a historical variant with different take-off rules" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Athletics event abbreviation", "value_or_pattern": "HJ", "note": "Common abbreviation in competition programmes and results; not a unique registry identifier." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "World Athletics Competition and Technical Rules govern high-jump competition, including take-off, valid clearances, failures, equipment and placing." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Standalone event in athletics competitions, including the Olympic Games", "Component of combined events such as the decathlon and heptathlon", "School and club athletics participation", "Assessment and development of jumping technique and explosive leg power" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Height of a successful clearance", "typical_range": "Approximately 1.80-2.40 across many elite women's and men's performances; developmental performances are lower", "unit": "m" }, { "quantity": "Approach length", "typical_range": "Often approximately 8-12 strides, depending on athlete and technique", "unit": "strides" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Dislodging the bar during an attempted clearance", "Taking off from both feet in the standard running event", "Mistiming the approach or take-off, reducing clearance height", "Landing outside the protected landing area or on inadequately arranged padding", "Acute or overuse injuries associated with repeated approaches, take-offs and landings" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "International results use metric heights; some United States school and collegiate contexts also communicate heights in feet and inches.", "School and collegiate competitions may follow national or institutional rulebooks with differences from World Athletics rules." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "pole vault", "difference": "Both seek vertical bar clearance, but pole vault uses a pole to assist the ascent." }, { "name": "long jump", "difference": "Long jump measures horizontal distance into a landing pit rather than height over a bar." }, { "name": "vertical jump test", "difference": "A vertical jump test measures elevation or reach under a testing protocol, rather than successful clearance of a competition bar." }, { "name": "Fosbury flop", "difference": "The Fosbury flop is a technique used within high jump, characterised by a back-first clearance; it is not a separate event." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of high jump this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which governing rules and local variants must be supported for attempt limits, time allowances, passes and tie resolution?", "How should modified school or training activities using elastic bars or assisted drills relate to the registered high-jump concept?", "What minimum observation quality is needed to assess take-off location, body-bar contact and clearance sequence reliably?", "Which facility inspection criteria apply to each intended competition or practice context, and who can establish readiness?", "Which technique-specific observations are sufficiently supported to guide coaching actions rather than merely describe a jump?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 17, "questions": 25 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a high jump, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise high-jump activity, assess attempts and performance in context, and identify appropriate next actions and unresolved judgements.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Rwandan high jumping, Fosbury flop.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 78 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a high jump, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Rwandan high jumping", "Fosbury flop" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 78 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one high jump from another, and a high jump from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a high jump sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a high jump from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a high jump passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a high jump between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a high jump, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a high jump is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a high jump proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a high jump, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a high jump and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a high jump consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a high jump takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What high jump is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of high jump are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is high jump operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of high jump and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of high jump?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as high jump?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a high jump came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a high jump and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a high jump is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a high jump, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a high jump, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a high jump is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }