{ "model": { "rank": 3910, "code": "thing-q169973", "model_id": "vr.tr.coriolis-force", "name": "Coriolis force", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify, quantify and assess Coriolis force in a specified rotating reference frame and decide when it must be included in an explanation, calculation or measurement.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Cross-cutting context", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "XCT", "domain": "XCT.QLT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q169973/", "tier": 2, "score": 80, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 80, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q169973", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q169973", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T19:03:01Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0878c-692f-7140-8c6b-68e4f95ef194\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Coriolis force\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001 r", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 60.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0878c-6921-7003-8f1b-734dc8db5c92\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Coriolis force\nRegistry id: vr.tr.coriolis-force\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (no" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q169973", "registryId": "vr.tr.coriolis-force", "name": "Coriolis force", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q169973/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.coriolis-force", "name": "Coriolis force", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify, quantify and assess Coriolis force in a specified rotating reference frame and decide when it must be included in an explanation, calculation or measurement.", "definition": "The Coriolis force is the velocity-dependent inertial force −2mΩ × v introduced when describing a particle of mass m and velocity v relative to a reference frame rotating with angular velocity Ω relative to an inertial frame.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Coriolis force as the velocity-dependent inertial force introduced when Newtonian motion is described in a rotating reference frame, including its mathematical definition, frame dependence, operational identification and limits of useful approximation.", "in_scope": [ "The rotating reference frame, its angular velocity and the object's velocity relative to it.", "The vector force F_C = -2m(Ω × v_rel) and the corresponding acceleration a_C = -2(Ω × v_rel).", "Conditions under which Coriolis contributions vanish, become significant or require a full three-dimensional treatment.", "Distinction from centrifugal force, Euler force and forces arising from physical interactions.", "Earth-based and engineered applications insofar as they establish how the Coriolis contribution is identified or used." ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete models of atmospheric circulation, ocean circulation or weather prediction.", "Complete dynamics of rotating machinery, projectiles or spacecraft.", "Detailed construction, calibration and maintenance models for Coriolis flowmeters and vibratory gyroscopes.", "Gravitation, electromagnetism, friction and other interaction forces considered independently.", "General-relativistic frame dragging and curved-spacetime dynamics." ], "distinguishing_features": [ "At a given instant, the contribution follows F_C = -2m(Ω × v_rel), using velocity measured in the selected rotating frame.", "It vanishes when rotation or relative velocity vanishes, and also when relative velocity is parallel to the rotation axis.", "Reversing relative velocity reverses the Coriolis force for unchanged angular velocity; centrifugal force has no such velocity dependence.", "It is perpendicular to relative velocity and contributes zero instantaneous power F_C · v_rel, unlike forces with a component along that velocity.", "Its explicit force term is absent in an inertial-frame description of the same Newtonian motion; this distinguishes it from an interaction force that must still be represented." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Reference frame and coordinate convention", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Selected rotating frame, reference inertial frame, origin motion, basis orientation and handedness", "why_it_matters": "The force cannot be assigned independently of a frame, and coordinate choices determine component signs." }, { "name": "Frame angular velocity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Vector Ω in rad/s, with direction and time dependence", "why_it_matters": "Angular velocity sets the magnitude and direction of the Coriolis contribution." }, { "name": "Velocity relative to the rotating frame", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Vector v_rel in m/s, expressed in the same basis as Ω", "why_it_matters": "Using inertial velocity in place of relative velocity produces an incorrect force." }, { "name": "Affected mass or mass basis", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Mass m in kg; alternatively acceleration per unit mass or force density using density in kg/m³", "why_it_matters": "Mass determines force magnitude, while Coriolis acceleration is independent of mass." }, { "name": "Coriolis contribution", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Force vector in N, acceleration vector in m/s² or force density in N/m³", "why_it_matters": "The chosen representation must match the particle or continuum equation being evaluated." }, { "name": "Velocity orientation relative to the rotation axis", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Angle θ in radians or degrees; perpendicular speed |v_rel| sin θ in m/s", "why_it_matters": "Only the velocity component perpendicular to Ω contributes, giving |F_C| = 2m|Ω||v_rel| sin θ." }, { "name": "Dynamical representation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Full three-dimensional rotating-frame equation; local horizontal approximation; application-specific projection", "why_it_matters": "A reduced representation can omit components that matter for the intended prediction." }, { "name": "Relative dynamical importance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Ratios to competing acceleration terms; Rossby number U/(|f|L) where the local horizontal scaling applies", "why_it_matters": "Importance depends on motion scales and the governing balance, rather than the mere presence of rotation." } ], "affordances": [ "Compute the Coriolis force or acceleration from consistent frame, velocity and mass information.", "Check a claimed deflection against cross-product direction, hemisphere conventions and zero-force cases.", "Translate a motion account between rotating and inertial frames while preserving the physical trajectory.", "Assess whether neglecting Coriolis contributions meets a specified prediction tolerance.", "Design velocity-reversal or rotation-reversal comparisons to help distinguish Coriolis responses from other effects.", "Identify which additional forces, measurements or boundary conditions are needed before predicting an actual trajectory." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "frame-and-definition", "name": "Frame and definition", "description": "Establishes what the term denotes and the rotating frame in which an instance is assigned.", "rationale": "A Coriolis force is a term in a frame-specific equation of motion, so identifying the frame is part of identifying the phenomenon.", "layers": [ { "id": "rotating-frame-identification", "name": "Rotating-frame identification", "description": "Records the frame rotation and the velocity convention needed to instantiate the force.", "findings": [ { "id": "frame-relative-motion", "name": "Frame-relative motion", "description": "An instance requires angular velocity relative to an inertial frame and object velocity relative to the rotating frame, expressed in a common basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which rotating frame is used, and how are its angular velocity, origin motion and coordinate handedness specified?", "kind": "definition", "id": "frame-relative-motion-q01" }, { "text": "How was the object's velocity relative to that rotating frame obtained or transformed from the available measurements?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "frame-relative-motion-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "force-term-interpretation", "name": "Force-term interpretation", "description": "Separates force, acceleration and equation-placement conventions.", "findings": [ { "id": "inertial-force-convention", "name": "Inertial-force convention", "description": "When written as a force on the right-hand side of the rotating-frame equation, the term is -2m(Ω × v_rel); moving the corresponding acceleration term to the other side changes its written sign.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the cited formulation represent force, acceleration or force per unit volume, and on which side of the equation is it written?", "kind": "definition", "id": "inertial-force-convention-q01" }, { "text": "Which derivation or reference establishes the sign and frame conventions used in this application?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "inertial-force-convention-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "vector-response-and-checks", "name": "Vector response and checks", "description": "Captures the quantitative response and identities that constrain valid calculations.", "rationale": "Cross-product geometry supplies concrete recognition tests and catches common sign, axis and velocity errors.", "layers": [ { "id": "magnitude-and-direction", "name": "Magnitude and direction", "description": "Determines the force from the component of motion perpendicular to the rotation axis.", "findings": [ { "id": "cross-product-response", "name": "Cross-product response", "description": "The magnitude is 2m|Ω||v_rel| sin θ, and direction follows the negative of Ω × v_rel in a right-handed basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the angular velocity, relative velocity, mass and their measurement uncertainties at the time being evaluated?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "cross-product-response-q01" }, { "text": "Does the calculated vector have the expected perpendicular direction and vanish for motion parallel to the rotation axis?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cross-product-response-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reversal-and-power-tests", "name": "Reversal and power tests", "description": "Uses symmetry and instantaneous power to assess whether a proposed term behaves as Coriolis force.", "findings": [ { "id": "odd-velocity-zero-power", "name": "Velocity reversal and zero power", "description": "For fixed Ω, reversing v_rel reverses the force, and F_C · v_rel = 0. These properties constrain the Coriolis contribution without implying that the complete system conserves rotating-frame energy.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the proposed Coriolis contribution reverse under relative-velocity reversal and yield zero instantaneous power in the rotating frame?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "odd-velocity-zero-power-q01" }, { "text": "If the object's speed or energy changes, which other force or frame-dependent term accounts for that change?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "odd-velocity-zero-power-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "dynamical-context-and-attribution", "name": "Dynamical context and attribution", "description": "Locates the Coriolis term among the other contributions needed to explain motion.", "rationale": "An observed curved path or lateral load does not by itself identify Coriolis force or establish its importance.", "layers": [ { "id": "neighbouring-force-terms", "name": "Neighbouring force terms", "description": "Separates velocity-dependent rotation effects from position-dependent, angular-acceleration and interaction terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "rotating-frame-force-separation", "name": "Rotating-frame force separation", "description": "Centrifugal force depends on position relative to the rotation axis, Euler force on angular acceleration and position, and translational inertial force on origin acceleration; interaction forces must also be included as applicable.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which centrifugal, Euler, origin-acceleration and interaction terms accompany the Coriolis term in the selected equation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "rotating-frame-force-separation-q01" }, { "text": "What observations or controlled comparisons distinguish the claimed Coriolis response from these accompanying contributions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "rotating-frame-force-separation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "trajectory-and-significance", "name": "Trajectory and significance", "description": "Assesses the contribution within a complete motion model and an explicit accuracy requirement.", "findings": [ { "id": "context-dependent-deflection", "name": "Context-dependent deflection", "description": "Predicting a trajectory requires initial conditions and the full force balance; deciding whether Coriolis force matters also requires a timescale, length scale and acceptable error.", "questions": [ { "text": "Over what time and distance must motion be predicted, and what error would omitting the Coriolis term introduce?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "context-dependent-deflection-q01" }, { "text": "Should the agent retain the full term, use an approximation or neglect it to meet the stated accuracy requirement?", "kind": "action", "id": "context-dependent-deflection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "earth-and-instrument-operationalisations", "name": "Earth and instrument operationalisations", "description": "Connects the general vector definition to common geographical approximations and engineered observations.", "rationale": "Practical uses often rely on projected equations or indirect measurements whose assumptions must remain visible.", "layers": [ { "id": "earth-local-approximations", "name": "Earth-local approximations", "description": "Specifies the latitude-dependent horizontal approximation and its limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "latitude-and-coriolis-parameter", "name": "Latitude and Coriolis parameter", "description": "In the usual local horizontal approximation, f = 2Ω_E sin φ and horizontal deflection is to the right of motion in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere. At the equator f vanishes, but the full three-dimensional Coriolis acceleration need not vanish.", "questions": [ { "text": "What latitude, local axes and retained velocity components define the geographical calculation?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "latitude-and-coriolis-parameter-q01" }, { "text": "Are omitted components and spatial variation of f negligible at the required accuracy, especially near the equator or over large distances?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "latitude-and-coriolis-parameter-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "engineered-detection-and-use", "name": "Engineered detection and use", "description": "Records how a device converts Coriolis coupling into an observable response.", "findings": [ { "id": "observable-coriolis-coupling", "name": "Observable Coriolis coupling", "description": "Vibratory gyroscopes and Coriolis flowmeters use motion-dependent coupling, but the mapping from measured response to angular rate or mass flow depends on device dynamics and calibration.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which driven motion and effective rotation produce the coupling, and which displacement, phase or load signal is measured?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "observable-coriolis-coupling-q01" }, { "text": "What device-specific derivation and calibration support attributing the measured signal to angular rate or mass flow?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "observable-coriolis-coupling-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the classical-mechanics sense; the definition is broadly settled, while applications differ in their approximations.", "Force signs assume Ω is the frame's angular velocity relative to an inertial frame and v is measured in the rotating frame.", "The terrestrial parameter f describes the conventional horizontal contribution, not the complete three-dimensional effect." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Coriolis force this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Weather and ocean models include Coriolis acceleration to describe large-scale winds and currents.", "Long-range ballistic calculations account for Earth's rotation.", "Foucault pendulums demonstrate effects of Earth's rotation on motion.", "Coriolis flowmeters use the response of vibrating tubes carrying fluid to measure mass flow.", "Vibrating gyroscopes use Coriolis coupling to measure angular velocity." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Coriolis force this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Coriolis force magnitude", "typical_range": "2mΩv sin θ, where θ is the angle between rotation and relative velocity; no universal numerical range", "unit": "N" }, { "quantity": "Earth's angular rotation rate", "typical_range": "Approximately 7.292 × 10⁻⁵", "unit": "rad/s" }, { "quantity": "Terrestrial Coriolis parameter f = 2Ω sin φ", "typical_range": "Approximately −1.458 × 10⁻⁴ to +1.458 × 10⁻⁴ across latitudes φ from the South Pole to the North Pole", "unit": "s⁻¹" }, { "quantity": "Rossby number U/(|f|L)", "typical_range": "Much less than 1 indicates strong rotational influence relative to advective inertia; much greater than 1 indicates weak influence by this comparison", "unit": "dimensionless" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Coriolis force this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Using velocity measured in an inertial frame in the rotating-frame force formula gives an incorrect result.", "Confusing Coriolis force with centrifugal force obscures their different dependence on velocity and position.", "Neglecting Coriolis acceleration can produce substantial errors in large-scale circulation models and long-range trajectories.", "Applying the usual horizontal approximation near the equator can omit relevant components of the full Coriolis acceleration.", "Attributing household drain rotation reliably to hemisphere ignores the usually dominant effects of basin geometry and initial flow." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Coriolis force this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "For horizontal motion under the usual local approximation, deflection is to the right of motion in the Northern Hemisphere and to the left in the Southern Hemisphere.", "The terrestrial Coriolis parameter vanishes at the equator and reaches its greatest absolute value at the poles; the full Coriolis acceleration need not vanish at the equator." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Coriolis force this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Coriolis acceleration", "difference": "The acceleration −2Ω × v is force per unit mass and does not depend on the particle's mass." }, { "name": "Centrifugal force", "difference": "It depends on position relative to the rotation axis and can act on an object stationary in the rotating frame; Coriolis force requires relative motion." }, { "name": "Euler force", "difference": "It arises from a changing angular velocity of the reference frame; Coriolis force also occurs during steady rotation." }, { "name": "Lorentz force", "difference": "Its magnetic component also involves a velocity cross product, but acts on electric charge in a magnetic field rather than arising from a rotating reference frame." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Coriolis force this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative references and derivations should anchor the published model's frame, sign and terminology conventions?", "Which intended applications require treatment beyond rigid rotating Cartesian frames, such as deforming structures or curvilinear coordinates?", "What application-specific error tolerances justify neglecting Coriolis contributions or using local horizontal approximations?", "Which documented experiments or device calibrations provide suitable operational examples with quantified confounding effects and uncertainty?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Coriolis force, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to identify, quantify and assess Coriolis force in a specified rotating reference frame and decide when it must be included in an explanation, calculation or measurement.", "characteristics": { "substance": "abstract", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 80 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Coriolis force, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "an abstraction with no physical instance", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 80 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Coriolis force from another, and a Coriolis force from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Coriolis force sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Coriolis force from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Coriolis force passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Coriolis force between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Coriolis force, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Coriolis force is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What Coriolis force is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of Coriolis force are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is Coriolis force operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of Coriolis force and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of Coriolis force?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as Coriolis force?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Coriolis force came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Coriolis force and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Coriolis force is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Coriolis force, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Coriolis force, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Coriolis force is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 12, "questions": 32 } } } }