{ "model": { "rank": 5012, "code": "thing-q172748", "model_id": "vr.tr.antipope", "name": "antipope", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify, assess and contextualise a disputed claimant to the Roman papacy without treating contested legitimacy as an intrinsic property of the person.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "SOC", "domain": "SOC.PER", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q172748/", "tier": 2, "score": 70, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 70, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q172748", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q172748", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T21:28:38Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 17.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08811-ba38-75e2-880e-d12100d39d17\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: antipope\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: SOC.PER\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 regist", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 60.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08811-ba2a-7331-8fab-a4638bbb40b3\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: antipope\nRegistry id: vr.tr.antipope\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.PER\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q172748", "registryId": "vr.tr.antipope", "name": "antipope", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.PER" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q172748/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.antipope", "name": "antipope", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify, assess and contextualise a disputed claimant to the Roman papacy without treating contested legitimacy as an intrinsic property of the person.", "definition": "An antipope is a claimant to the papal office whose claim is judged illegitimate by the Roman Catholic Church, typically in opposition to a pope it recognizes as legitimate.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the antipope role associated with vr.tr.antipope in SOC / SOC.PER: a person's claim to the Roman papacy, the rival succession context, recognition by particular communities and the grounds on which identified authorities classify that claim as illegitimate.", "in_scope": [ "The distinction between a person, a papal claim and an antipope classification", "The claimant's asserted basis of accession and the challenges to it", "Rival papal claims and their temporal relationships", "Recognition, obedience and practical authority associated with the claim", "Termination of the claim and subsequent assessments of its legitimacy" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The claimant's complete biography", "The papacy's general institutional structure and responsibilities", "Comprehensive models of canon law or papal election procedures", "Entire schisms, councils or political conflicts surrounding the claim", "Claims to other religious offices using the title pope" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The contested office is the Roman papacy, rather than another episcopal office or an unrelated use of the title pope.", "There is evidence of an asserted or accepted claim to hold the office; opposition to a pope alone is insufficient.", "The antipope designation concerns the legitimacy of accession or succession, rather than moral criticism of an otherwise recognised pope.", "The designation must be attributable to a source or recognition framework; the claimant and supporters need not have accepted it.", "A disputed election is not automatically resolved by calling one participant an antipope; uncertainty about the recognised succession must remain expressible." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Claim-bearing person", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Person associated with a distinct claim to the Roman papacy", "why_it_matters": "Keeps the historical person separate from a role whose recognition may change." }, { "name": "Claimed papal identity", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Claimed papal name and numbering, with source-specific variants", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification without assuming that names or numbering establish legitimate succession." }, { "name": "Accession basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Reported election, appointment, restoration, other asserted basis or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the mechanism the claimant or supporters offered as justification." }, { "name": "Claim interval", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Start and end dates or bounded date ranges, with calendar and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Enables comparison with rival claims while preserving disputed chronology." }, { "name": "Classification by authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Assessing authority or source → classification → assessment date", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an attributed legitimacy judgment from becoming an unqualified label." }, { "name": "Recognition relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Recognising or rejecting actor, relevant interval and evidence of recognition", "why_it_matters": "Separates support by particular communities from universal recognition." }, { "name": "Rival succession relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Competing claimant, disputed predecessor or contested successor", "why_it_matters": "Locates the claim within the succession dispute that makes the classification intelligible." }, { "name": "Claim disposition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Asserted, withdrawn, abandoned, ended by death, contested after purported termination or uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes the end of practical activity from settlement of legitimacy." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify a claimant across personal names, claimed papal names and source variants.", "Compare rival claims and show where their dates, accession accounts and recognition overlap.", "Explain an antipope classification using the authority, criteria and evidence behind it.", "Trace changes in allegiance without treating political support as proof of legitimacy.", "Assess whether an attributed act belongs to this claim and how its authority was received.", "Flag unresolved classifications and produce accounts that distinguish contemporary claims from later judgments." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "papal-claim-identity", "name": "Papal claim identity", "description": "Establishes who claimed the Roman papacy and which particular claim is being assessed.", "rationale": "Antipope is a classification of a papal claim associated with a person, requiring more precision than a biographical label.", "layers": [ { "id": "person-and-papal-persona", "name": "Person and papal persona", "description": "Connects the person to the identity used in asserting the papacy.", "findings": [ { "id": "claimant-identity", "name": "Claimant identity", "description": "Record personal identity and claimed papal names while preserving variants and uncertain identifications.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which person asserted or accepted this papal claim, and under which papal name?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claimant-identity-q01" }, { "text": "Which evidence connects the personal identity with the claimed papal identity?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claimant-identity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "existence-and-target-of-claim", "name": "Existence and target of claim", "description": "Distinguishes an actual claim to the Roman papacy from nomination, opposition or an unrelated title.", "findings": [ { "id": "papal-claim-threshold", "name": "Papal claim threshold", "description": "Establish whether the person claimed or accepted the office, rather than merely being proposed by others.", "questions": [ { "text": "What conduct or declaration establishes a claim to the Roman papacy?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "papal-claim-threshold-q01" }, { "text": "Did the proposed claimant accept the position, and what remains uncertain if acceptance is undocumented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "papal-claim-threshold-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "accession-and-legitimacy-dispute", "name": "Accession and legitimacy dispute", "description": "Captures the asserted route to office and the specific reasons it was challenged.", "rationale": "The model must explain why a papal claim was disputed instead of substituting an antipope label for the dispute itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "asserted-accession", "name": "Asserted accession", "description": "Records the event and participants presented as establishing entitlement to the papacy.", "findings": [ { "id": "accession-justification", "name": "Accession justification", "description": "Connect the claimant's accession account to the actors and rules invoked in its support.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which election, appointment, restoration or other event was said to establish the claim?", "kind": "definition", "id": "accession-justification-q01" }, { "text": "Who asserted that the participants and procedure had authority under the rules applicable at that time?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "accession-justification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "grounds-of-contestation", "name": "Grounds of contestation", "description": "Separates procedural objections, disputed vacancies and rival succession arguments.", "findings": [ { "id": "specific-legitimacy-objections", "name": "Specific legitimacy objections", "description": "Record each objection with its proponent and historical legal context, without deciding validity from political outcomes alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was the objection about the vacancy, electors, procedure, coercion, eligibility or another specified ground?", "kind": "definition", "id": "specific-legitimacy-objections-q01" }, { "text": "Which objections concern entitlement to the office, and which concern only the claimant's conduct or policies?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "specific-legitimacy-objections-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "rival-claims-and-obediences", "name": "Rival claims and obediences", "description": "Places the claimant within competing succession accounts and changing communities of recognition.", "rationale": "A papal claimant's support and opposition must be represented relationally and over time.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-succession", "name": "Competing succession", "description": "Relates the claim to rival claimants and disputed predecessor or successor relationships.", "findings": [ { "id": "succession-conflict", "name": "Succession conflict", "description": "Identify the conflicting succession accounts without assuming that every dispute consists of exactly two simultaneous claimants.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which other claims or succession accounts conflict with this claim?", "kind": "definition", "id": "succession-conflict-q01" }, { "text": "During which evidenced intervals did the claims overlap or otherwise remain incompatible?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "succession-conflict-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognition-and-allegiance", "name": "Recognition and allegiance", "description": "Tracks recognition by ecclesiastical communities, rulers and other relevant actors.", "findings": [ { "id": "recognition-map", "name": "Recognition map", "description": "Record who recognised the claimant, when and through what observable acts, distinguishing allegiance from incidental contact.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which actors recognised or rejected the claimant, and when did their positions change?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recognition-map-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes recognition of papal authority from diplomacy, military assistance or mere correspondence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recognition-map-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "exercise-and-reception-of-authority", "name": "Exercise and reception of authority", "description": "Describes the papal authority claimed in practice and the reception of acts performed under it.", "rationale": "Practical influence, claimed jurisdiction and the recognised effects of particular acts are different questions.", "layers": [ { "id": "claimed-papal-government", "name": "Claimed papal government", "description": "Connects reported acts and administrative arrangements to the particular papal claim.", "findings": [ { "id": "exercise-of-papal-functions", "name": "Exercise of papal functions", "description": "Record evidenced appointments, judgments, decrees or other claimed papal acts and the machinery used to issue them.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which acts did the claimant issue explicitly through claimed papal authority?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "exercise-of-papal-functions-q01" }, { "text": "Where and among whom could the claimant's decisions actually be implemented?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "exercise-of-papal-functions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reception-of-claimed-acts", "name": "Reception of claimed acts", "description": "Tracks how specific communities and subsequent authorities treated acts attributed to the claimant.", "findings": [ { "id": "act-specific-assessment", "name": "Act-specific assessment", "description": "Preserve separate assessments of particular acts instead of inferring their effects solely from the claimant's classification.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which authority accepted, rejected, confirmed or otherwise addressed this particular act?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "act-specific-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "What further evidence is required before an agent can describe the act's institutional effects?", "kind": "action", "id": "act-specific-assessment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "termination-and-historical-classification", "name": "Termination and historical classification", "description": "Separates the ending of the claim from contemporary and retrospective judgments about its legitimacy.", "rationale": "A claim may cease while its classification remains disputed, and later labels must retain their provenance.", "layers": [ { "id": "claim-ending", "name": "Claim ending", "description": "Records events said to terminate the claim and evidence of continued assertion or recognition.", "findings": [ { "id": "termination-event-and-continuity", "name": "Termination event and continuity", "description": "Distinguish withdrawal, death and purported removal from the actual cessation of claims and allegiance.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which event is used to date the end of the claim, and how certain is that date?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "termination-event-and-continuity-q01" }, { "text": "Did the claimant or supporters continue asserting papal authority after the purported termination?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "termination-event-and-continuity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "attributed-antipope-classification", "name": "Attributed antipope classification", "description": "Preserves the sources, dates and criteria behind the antipope designation.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-provenance", "name": "Classification provenance", "description": "Treat antipope status as an attributed assessment whose agreement, disagreement and uncertainty can be inspected.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which contemporary or later authorities classify this claimant as an antipope, and on what stated basis?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "classification-provenance-q01" }, { "text": "How should an agent present the claimant when consulted sources disagree or leave the succession unresolved?", "kind": "action", "id": "classification-provenance-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes a disputed religious status, not a licensed occupation or the individual bearing that status.", "The classification of some early and medieval claimants is historically contested; verify individual cases before assigning the label.", "These statements are recalled knowledge, not findings from sources consulted for this response." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of antipope this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Catholic Church's Code of Canon Law addresses the acquisition of papal authority through legitimate election and acceptance; it does not make antipope a separate ecclesiastical office.", "Universi Dominici Gregis, promulgated by Pope John Paul II and subsequently amended, governs modern papal elections; historical claims require assessment under the rules applicable at the time." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of antipope this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Classifying disputed papal claimants in church history and papal succession lists.", "Studying competing ecclesiastical allegiances during the Western Schism.", "Distinguishing a claimant's asserted authority from the legitimacy subsequently recognized by the Catholic Church." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of antipope this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating antipope as an occupation, qualification or formally constituted office.", "Assuming that contemporaries could always identify the legitimate pope unambiguously.", "Applying modern election rules retrospectively to medieval succession disputes.", "Equating an unpopular or morally compromised pope with an antipope.", "Treating every eccentric papal self-claimant as equivalent to historically significant rival claimants." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of antipope this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "During historical schisms, recognition of rival claimants varied among kingdoms, dioceses and political alliances.", "The designation reflects Catholic judgments about succession; other historical accounts may emphasize competing contemporary claims." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of antipope this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "pope", "difference": "In Catholic succession terminology, a pope is recognized as legitimately holding the papal office; an antipope's claim is rejected." }, { "name": "papal candidate", "difference": "A candidate may be considered for election without claiming to hold the office." }, { "name": "sedevacantist", "difference": "A sedevacantist holds that the papal see is vacant; this belief does not itself constitute a competing claim to the papacy." }, { "name": "schismatic", "difference": "Schism concerns a rupture of ecclesiastical communion; a schismatic need not claim the papal office." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of antipope this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which institutional and scholarly sources should anchor the working definition, and how do they handle uncertain papal successions?", "What evidentiary threshold distinguishes an accepted papal claim from an unsuccessful nomination, imposed candidacy or hostile allegation?", "Should isolated modern self-proclaimed papal claimants fall within this entry, and which source-supported boundary would govern their inclusion?", "How should renewed claims by the same person be divided into episodes without creating duplicate models of the person or role?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this concept or its papal-claim structure, requiring this registry entry to link to it?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "occupation or role", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a antipope, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to identify, assess and contextualise a disputed claimant to the Roman papacy without treating contested legitimacy as an intrinsic property of the person.", "characteristics": { "substance": "social", "origin": "natural", "agency": "autonomous", "mobility": "self-moving" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 70 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a antipope, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "a social arrangement between people", "physicalCharacter": [ "Moves under its own power or of its own accord.", "Acts on its own behalf.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by appearance, and guessing from dress or setting is how an agent gets this wrong. Recognised by qualification, licence or engagement." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 70 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one antipope from another, and a antipope from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a antipope sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a antipope from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a antipope is, how it got there and where it may go (self-moving).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a antipope is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a antipope moves on its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a antipope passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a antipope between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a antipope, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a antipope is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "people-and-responsibility", "name": "People, roles and responsibility", "description": "Who stands in what relation to a antipope.", "rationale": "Social things are defined by the relations people hold to them, and those relations change without the thing changing.", "layers": [ { "id": "roles-and-parties", "name": "Roles and parties", "description": "The roles that exist around a antipope and who fills them.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-assignments", "name": "Role assignments and their validity", "description": "Who holds which role over a antipope, from when, and on whose authority.", "questions": [ { "id": "role-assignments-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a role over a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a role over a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a role over a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "ownership-and-accountability", "name": "Ownership and accountability", "description": "Who answers for a antipope and who may decide about it.", "findings": [ { "id": "accountability", "name": "Accountability and decision rights", "description": "Where responsibility for a antipope sits when something goes wrong.", "questions": [ { "id": "accountability-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes responsibility for a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about responsibility for a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once responsibility for a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "competence-and-licence", "name": "Competence, qualification and licence", "description": "What someone must be able to do, and be permitted to do, as antipope.", "rationale": "The permission is jurisdictional and the competence is not, and conflating them is how an agent concludes someone may practise when they may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "competences", "name": "Competences and qualifications", "description": "Skills and credentials the role assumes.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualification-record", "name": "Qualifications and how they are evidenced", "description": "What counts as qualified, and what proves it.", "questions": [ { "id": "qualification-record-q01", "text": "What competences and qualifications does antipope require, and how is each evidenced?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "qualification-record-q02", "text": "Which qualifications transfer between jurisdictions and which do not?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "licensing", "name": "Licensing and the right to practise", "description": "Who grants permission, where it holds, and when it lapses.", "findings": [ { "id": "licence-record", "name": "Licence, issuer and validity", "description": "The permission, its issuer, its territory and its expiry.", "questions": [ { "id": "licence-record-q01", "text": "Who licenses antipope, in which territory, and for how long?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "licence-record-q02", "text": "What may an unlicensed person not do, and what must an agent refuse to assume?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "tasks-and-accountability", "name": "Tasks, employment and accountability", "description": "What antipope actually does and who answers for it.", "rationale": "A role is filled by people under an arrangement, and the arrangement decides liability, supervision and who may instruct whom.", "layers": [ { "id": "tasks", "name": "Tasks and typical duties", "description": "The work itself, and how it differs by setting.", "findings": [ { "id": "duty-record", "name": "Duties and setting", "description": "What the role does and where the work varies.", "questions": [ { "id": "duty-record-q01", "text": "What tasks define antipope, and how do they differ between settings or seniority?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "duty-record-q02", "text": "Which tasks may only be done by this role, and which are shared with neighbouring roles?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "accountability", "name": "Employment and accountability", "description": "The relation under which the work is done and where responsibility sits.", "findings": [ { "id": "responsibility", "name": "Responsibility and supervision", "description": "Who instructs, who supervises, who is liable.", "questions": [ { "id": "responsibility-q01", "text": "Under what arrangement does someone act as antipope, and who supervises or is liable?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "responsibility-q02", "text": "When something goes wrong, what does the model need to have recorded to answer who was responsible?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a antipope came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a antipope and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a antipope is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a antipope, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a antipope, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a antipope is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 7, "layers": 14, "findings": 16, "questions": 44 } } } }