← Back to catalogue
Research draft

axiom

vr.tr.axiom · INF.MED

Let an agent explain axioms and their role in logic and mathematics, relay axiom systems and their history from mathematical and philosophical sources, describe the specific axioms and assumptions the registry aliases name, and distinguish axioms from theorems, definitions, postulates in the older sense and assumptions in everyday reasoning.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain axioms and their role in logic and mathematics, relay axiom systems and their history from mathematical and philosophical sources, describe the specific axioms and assumptions the registry aliases name, and distinguish axioms from theorems, definitions, postulates in the older sense and assumptions in everyday reasoning.

A statement accepted as true without proof and taken as a starting point for reasoning, whether a logical axiom valid in all interpretations or a non-logical axiom specific to a theory, such as the axioms of set theory including the axiom of empty set, the axiom schema of replacement and the naive axiom schema of unrestricted comprehension that leads to Russell s paradox, the fundamental geometric entities and postulates of Euclid, and the closed-world assumption used in logic programming and databases.

What it is for: Founding a formal theory.

It can be explain the concept; relay axiom systems; describe specific axioms; distinguish related concepts.

Distinguishing features

Accepted without proof

Starting point

Logical and non-logical

Consistency matters

What it looks like

Not a visible object; a formal statement.

Physical character

Euclid s Elements: about 300 BCE note - five postulates

ZFC set theory: 1908-1922 note - Zermelo, Fraenkel, Skolem

Russell s paradox: 1901 year - from unrestricted comprehension

How it is recognised

Unproven starting statement of a theory

Logical axiom, axiom of empty set, axiom schema of replacement, unrestricted comprehension, closed-world assumption, Euclid s postulates

Theorems are proved; definitions introduce terms; assumptions in everyday reasoning are informal

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

postulate

is a kind of - in registry terms

first principle

is contrasted with - which is proved

theorem

is exemplified by - in set theory

axiom of choice

In practice

Families and kinds

logical axioms

axioms of set theory such as empty set and replacement

axioms of geometry and arithmetic

axioms of algebraic structures

assumptions in computing such as the closed-world assumption

historical postulates

Standards and regulation

No regulation

Failure modes and hazards

Inconsistent axiom systems such as unrestricted comprehension

Confusing axioms with self-evident truths

Registry aliases mixing axioms with database assumptions

Also called

closed-world assumptionaxiom schema of unrestricted comprehensionaxiom schema of replacementaxiom of empty setfundamental geometric entitieslogical axiomaxiom of set theoryproper axiomprinciple of explosionHuzita–Hatori axiomsTarski's axiomatization of the realsaxiom schema of specificationHilbert's axiomsopen-world assumptionprobability axioms

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What an axiom is.

Science.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is an axiom, and how does it differ from a theorem, definition, postulate and everyday assumption? definition
  2. Is the question about logic, set theory, geometry, computing or philosophy? boundary

Examples

Examples.

Examples

Examples.

  1. What are the axiom of empty set, the axiom schema of replacement, unrestricted comprehension and the closed-world assumption? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific axiom? action
Logic Logic and set theory.

Science.

Systems

Axiom systems.

Systems

Systems.

  1. How do ZFC, Peano arithmetic and Hilbert s geometry axiomatise their fields? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Consistency

Consistency and independence.

Consistency

Consistency.

  1. What do Russell s paradox and Godel s theorems show about axiom systems? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Philosophy Philosophy.

Attribution.

Status

Status of axioms.

Status

Status.

  1. Are axioms self-evident, conventional or justified by consequences, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation attributed? boundary

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did the axiomatic method develop from Euclid to Hilbert? provenance
  2. Which entry fits axiomatic system? action
Context Computing and beyond.

Context.

Computing

Computing.

Computing

Computing.

  1. How are axioms and assumptions such as the closed-world assumption used in databases and logic programming? provenance
  2. Which entry fits closed-world assumption? action

Usage

Everyday usage.

Usage

Usage.

  1. How is axiom used in ordinary language for accepted principles? provenance
  2. Which entry fits maxim? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should the set theory axioms and the closed-world assumption be separate primary entries?
  • How should mathematical sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific axioms and a computing assumption; should they be split off?