{ "model": { "rank": 4593, "code": "thing-q177716", "model_id": "vr.tr.pogrom", "name": "pogrom", "purpose": "Enable an agent to assess whether an episode plausibly constitutes a pogrom, record contested evidence and ongoing danger, and support protection, documentation and accountability.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q177716/", "tier": 2, "score": 74, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire", "Basel massacre", "Storms in the South" ], "aliasCount": 3, "merged": 3, "knownIn": 74, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q177716", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q177716", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T20:34:39Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 21.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e0-51fa-7fc1-a9ae-3eba40d5441e\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: pogrom\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 register", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 59.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087e0-51ed-7ce3-bc27-ae6905b054b5\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: pogrom\nRegistry id: vr.tr.pogrom\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext fo" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q177716", "registryId": "vr.tr.pogrom", "name": "pogrom", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q177716/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.pogrom", "name": "pogrom", "purpose": "Enable an agent to assess whether an episode plausibly constitutes a pogrom, record contested evidence and ongoing danger, and support protection, documentation and accountability.", "definition": "A pogrom is an episode of collective violence directed against an ethnic or religious minority, historically especially Jews, typically involving attacks on people and property and often enabled by official tolerance or complicity, although scholars dispute its precise boundaries.", "scope_statement": "This model owns pogrom as a category of identity-targeted collective violence and the assessment of particular episodes, preserving disagreements over terminology, event boundaries and institutional involvement.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of pogrom and criteria used to classify an episode", "Collective attacks on people selected through attributed communal identity", "Violence against homes, livelihoods, religious sites and communal institutions within the episode", "Participation, instigation, protection, tolerance and intervention by identifiable actors", "Event progression, civilian consequences and evidence supporting disputed accounts" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Prejudice and discriminatory ideology outside their relationship to the episode", "The complete history or identity of the targeted community", "Military campaigns and battlefield engagements as broader processes", "Genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity as independently assessed categories", "Individual criminal liability and judicial determinations", "Operational methods for organizing attacks or identifying potential victims" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Assess whether victims were selected through attributed communal identity; proximity to unrelated disorder alone does not establish a pogrom.", "Assess whether collective violence was directed against a community and its civilian life; a protest, isolated hate crime or property disturbance alone is insufficient.", "Examine targeting, power and protection asymmetries before accepting descriptions of reciprocal communal fighting.", "Record whether the classifier restricts the term to anti-Jewish violence or extends it to attacks on other communities.", "Do not infer or exclude a pogrom solely from state involvement, casualty totals or apparent spontaneity; record which definition makes each criterion relevant." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Classification and definition used", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Proposed, supported, disputed, rejected or unresolved; attributed definition and classifier", "why_it_matters": "The label must remain traceable to criteria and evidence rather than becoming an assumed fact." }, { "name": "Attributed target identity", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Community targeted, identity attributed by attackers, and affected people's self-identification where safely documented", "why_it_matters": "Explains victim selection without adopting perpetrators' identity claims." }, { "name": "Episode boundaries", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Start and end timestamps or intervals; geographic extent; uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Separates a local episode from a connected series and prevents duplicate counting." }, { "name": "Forms of attack", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Physical assault, killing, sexual violence, threats, confinement, looting, arson, destruction or other documented forms", "why_it_matters": "Captures attacks on people and communal life without reducing severity to deaths." }, { "name": "Actor involvement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Actor linked to alleged or documented participation, instigation, assistance, protection or intervention", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes roles and evidential strength without assigning collective guilt." }, { "name": "Authority response", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Protective intervention, ineffective response, non-intervention, obstruction, assistance, direct participation, mixed or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Separates observable conduct from claims about intent or responsibility." }, { "name": "Human and communal consequences", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Reported counts or ranges of people killed, injured, missing or displaced and properties or institutions damaged; source, date and counting method", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of harm while exposing uncertainty and incompatible estimates." }, { "name": "Continuing threat", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Active attacks, attacks paused with threats continuing, attacks ceased with unresolved protection needs, or unknown", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes the cessation of immediate violence from the restoration of safety." }, { "name": "Evidence support", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Claim-level source attribution, independence, corroboration, contradiction and verification status", "why_it_matters": "Prevents repeated allegations from being mistaken for independent confirmation." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare an episode against explicitly attributed definitions of pogrom.", "Construct a sourced chronology that separates observations, allegations and interpretations.", "Identify documented protection and assistance needs without exposing vulnerable people.", "Assess competing accounts of targeting, collective participation and authority conduct.", "Link related episodes and neighbouring classifications while preserving separate evidence requirements.", "Prepare uncertainty-aware summaries for research, humanitarian referral or accountability review." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "classification-and-boundaries", "name": "Classification and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which sense of pogrom is being applied and what qualifies as an instance.", "rationale": "A contested category requires visible criteria rather than an unqualified label.", "layers": [ { "id": "definitions-and-usage", "name": "Definitions and usage", "description": "Records the scope and provenance of competing uses of the term.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-classification", "name": "Attributed classification", "description": "Treat classification as an assessment made by an identifiable source under stated criteria.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the definition restrict pogrom to anti-Jewish attacks or include attacks on other communities?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-classification-q01" }, { "text": "Who applies or disputes the label for this episode, and what evidence and criteria do they cite?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-classification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "adjacent-violence-categories", "name": "Adjacent violence categories", "description": "Tests the distinction from other forms of collective or identity-targeted violence.", "findings": [ { "id": "differential-assessment", "name": "Differential assessment", "description": "Evaluate competing and overlapping classifications without treating their names as interchangeable.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence distinguishes this episode from an isolated hate crime, generalized riot or armed engagement?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "differential-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Which additional criteria would need separate assessment before applying labels such as massacre, ethnic cleansing or genocide?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "differential-assessment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "targeting-and-communal-harm", "name": "Targeting and communal harm", "description": "Examines how people and places were selected and how attacks affected communal life.", "rationale": "Identity-based selection and attacks on a community are central classification questions.", "layers": [ { "id": "selection-of-victims", "name": "Selection of victims", "description": "Separates evidence of communal targeting from assumptions based on victim demographics.", "findings": [ { "id": "identity-linked-selection", "name": "Identity-linked selection", "description": "Document evidence that attributed identity influenced who or what was attacked.", "questions": [ { "text": "What testimony, statements or attack patterns support the claim that people were selected because of attributed communal identity?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "identity-linked-selection-q01" }, { "text": "Were similarly situated people or premises treated differently, and what alternative explanations remain?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "identity-linked-selection-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "people-and-communal-sites", "name": "People and communal sites", "description": "Records interpersonal violence alongside attacks on homes, livelihoods and institutions.", "findings": [ { "id": "distribution-of-harm", "name": "Distribution of harm", "description": "Assess the kinds and distribution of harm without assuming that every loss had the same motive.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which attacks affected people, homes, businesses, religious sites or other communal institutions, and how securely is each documented?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "distribution-of-harm-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence connects looting or property destruction to communal targeting rather than unrelated opportunistic activity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "distribution-of-harm-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "participation-and-authority-conduct", "name": "Participation and authority conduct", "description": "Distinguishes collective participation, coordination and institutional responses.", "rationale": "Accounts of spontaneous crowds or state orchestration must be tested rather than presumed.", "layers": [ { "id": "collective-action", "name": "Collective action", "description": "Assesses actor roles and evidence of coordination at an explanatory level.", "findings": [ { "id": "roles-and-coordination", "name": "Roles and coordination", "description": "Separate direct participation, incitement, assistance and inferred organization.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which actors are linked to direct attacks, instigation or assistance, and what supports each attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "roles-and-coordination-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports advance coordination, coordination during the episode or largely uncoordinated participation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "roles-and-coordination-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "protection-and-complicity", "name": "Protection and complicity", "description": "Examines the conduct of authorities and other actors capable of offering protection.", "findings": [ { "id": "response-capacity-and-conduct", "name": "Response capacity and conduct", "description": "Distinguish failures of protection from documented assistance or participation in attacks.", "questions": [ { "text": "What did relevant authorities know, what capacity did they have, and what did they do at each stage?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "response-capacity-and-conduct-q01" }, { "text": "Which observations support protection, incapacity, tolerance, assistance or direct participation, and which conclusions remain disputed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "response-capacity-and-conduct-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "episode-development-and-consequences", "name": "Episode development and consequences", "description": "Bounds the episode and tracks violence, displacement and continuing insecurity.", "rationale": "An event can end in a chronology while its victims remain unsafe or unable to return.", "layers": [ { "id": "chronology-and-linkage", "name": "Chronology and linkage", "description": "Separates contextual conditions, reported triggers, attacks and related episodes.", "findings": [ { "id": "bounded-event-sequence", "name": "Bounded event sequence", "description": "Maintain an uncertain chronology without converting alleged triggers into justifications.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the earliest and latest supported attack times, and where are the chronological gaps?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "bounded-event-sequence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence warrants grouping attacks across locations or dates into one pogrom rather than a series of related episodes?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "bounded-event-sequence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "loss-displacement-and-safety", "name": "Loss, displacement and safety", "description": "Records immediate losses and unresolved conditions affecting survivors.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-estimates", "name": "Consequence estimates", "description": "Keep harm estimates attributable and distinguish recorded losses from incomplete ascertainment.", "questions": [ { "text": "How were deaths, injuries, missing people, displacement and property losses counted, and where might omissions or duplicate counts occur?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "consequence-estimates-q01" }, { "text": "What current evidence establishes whether survivors face renewed attacks, barriers to return or unmet protection needs?", "kind": "action", "id": "consequence-estimates-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-responsible-use", "name": "Evidence and responsible use", "description": "Supports defensible interpretation and careful handling of sensitive records.", "rationale": "Pogrom documentation may contain contested narratives and information that could expose survivors to further harm.", "layers": [ { "id": "claims-and-source-dependence", "name": "Claims and source dependence", "description": "Tests the provenance and independence of accounts of the episode.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-level-evidence", "name": "Claim-level evidence", "description": "Attach support and contradiction to individual claims rather than assigning blanket certainty to an account.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which claims derive from direct observation, later testimony, official records or repeated secondary reporting?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claim-level-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which apparently corroborating accounts share an original source, and which contradictions remain unresolved?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claim-level-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "documentation-and-referral", "name": "Documentation and referral", "description": "Guides protective use of evidence and bounded referral for further assessment.", "findings": [ { "id": "safe-use-of-records", "name": "Safe use of records", "description": "Make documentation useful while limiting exposure of survivors and preserving uncertainty about responsibility.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which identities, locations or testimony details require restricted access or consent before disclosure?", "kind": "action", "id": "safe-use-of-records-q01" }, { "text": "What verified information can support protection or accountability referral, and which allegations must remain explicitly qualified?", "kind": "action", "id": "safe-use-of-records-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes a category of violent events, not a particular historical pogrom.", "There is no universally accepted operational definition; researchers should specify the roles of minority status, asymmetry, organisation and official complicity.", "Classification of particular events, especially beyond anti-Jewish violence, requires checking the relevant historiography." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Anti-Jewish pogroms", "Pogroms against other ethnic or religious minorities" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Historical analysis of anti-Jewish violence in the Russian Empire and elsewhere.", "Comparative study of collective violence against minority communities.", "Investigation of relationships between civilian attackers, political organisers, police and state authorities.", "Documentation and commemoration of persecution, displacement and community destruction." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "People killed, injured or displaced", "typical_range": "Event-specific; estimates depend on source coverage and counting rules.", "unit": "people" }, { "quantity": "Homes, businesses or religious buildings damaged or destroyed", "typical_range": "Event-specific; surviving records may be incomplete.", "unit": "properties or buildings" }, { "quantity": "Duration", "typical_range": "Depends on whether an individual attack or a connected wave of attacks is counted.", "unit": "hours or days" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Killing, injury, sexual violence, looting and destruction of homes or communal institutions.", "Forced displacement, loss of livelihoods and lasting trauma.", "Official inaction or participation enabling attacks and impunity.", "Descriptions of violence as spontaneous obscuring organisation, incitement or official involvement.", "Inconsistent use of the label obscuring differences between targeted persecution, reciprocal communal fighting and state-directed campaigns." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The term derives from Russian and is closely associated with anti-Jewish violence in the Russian Empire.", "Historians also apply the term to anti-Jewish violence elsewhere in Europe, including Nazi Germany.", "Application to attacks on other minorities varies across scholarly traditions and political contexts." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "riot", "difference": "A riot need not target a minority community; a pogrom centres on violence against such a community." }, { "name": "massacre", "difference": "A massacre centres on the killing of numerous people; a pogrom can include extensive assault, looting and destruction without mass killing." }, { "name": "communal violence", "difference": "Communal violence is broader and can involve reciprocal fighting; a pogrom generally denotes an asymmetrical attack on a targeted community." }, { "name": "genocide", "difference": "Genocide requires intent to destroy a protected group in whole or in part; the label pogrom alone does not establish that intent, though a pogrom may form part of genocide." }, { "name": "ethnic cleansing", "difference": "Ethnic cleansing centres on removing a population from a territory; a pogrom may cause or facilitate removal without territorial expulsion being its defining feature." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of pogrom this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which scholarly and community definitions should anchor the model, particularly regarding extension beyond anti-Jewish violence?", "How do competing definitions treat collective participation, asymmetry, property-only attacks and the scale or duration of violence?", "When is authority tolerance or involvement a defining criterion, and when is it a contextual characteristic?", "What event-grouping rules best distinguish one geographically dispersed pogrom from a sequence of related attacks?", "How should classification confidence be expressed when survivor testimony, official accounts and later scholarship conflict or survive unevenly?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a pogrom, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to assess whether an episode plausibly constitutes a pogrom, record contested evidence and ongoing danger, and support protection, documentation and accountability.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire, Basel massacre, Storms in the South.", "3 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 74 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a pogrom, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire", "Basel massacre", "Storms in the South" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 74 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 3 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one pogrom from another, and a pogrom from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a pogrom sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a pogrom from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a pogrom passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a pogrom between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a pogrom, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a pogrom is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a pogrom proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a pogrom, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a pogrom and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a pogrom consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a pogrom takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What pogrom is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of pogrom are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is pogrom operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of pogrom and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of pogrom?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as pogrom?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a pogrom came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a pogrom and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a pogrom is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a pogrom, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a pogrom, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a pogrom is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }