{ "model": { "rank": 6296, "code": "thing-q17951", "model_id": "vr.tr.jargon", "name": "jargon", "purpose": "Let an agent explain and translate jargon, decide when specialised terms are appropriate, support plain language communication, and describe the jargon of fields neutrally.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q17951/", "tier": 2, "score": 61, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "military slang", "specialized terminology", "scientific terminology", "automobile terminology", "bureaucratic terminology", "cooking terminology", "International Electrotechnical Vocabulary", "role-playing game terms", "sports terminology", "computing terminology", "terminology of share trading", "fashion terminology", "statistical terminology", "art terminology", "accounting terminology", "nautical terminology", "linguistics terminology", "publishing terminology", "geographic terminology", "computer software terminology", "nautical language", "bartending terminology", "legal terminology", "horology terminology", "bullfighting terminology", "philosophy terminology", "film terminology", "poker terminology", "education terminology", "forest terminology", "numismatic terminology", "barrel-making terminology", "ecology terminology", "chemical terminology", "meteorological terminology", "electronics terminology", "information science terminology", "library science terminology", "ethnological terminology", "archaeological terminology" ], "aliasCount": 85, "merged": 85, "knownIn": 61, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.jargon", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q17951", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q17951", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T20:51:22Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 2, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q17951", "registryId": "vr.tr.jargon", "name": "jargon", "version": "0.2.0-wave.2", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q17951/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.jargon", "name": "jargon", "purpose": "Let an agent explain and translate jargon, decide when specialised terms are appropriate, support plain language communication, and describe the jargon of fields neutrally.", "definition": "Specialised vocabulary and expressions used by a particular profession, trade, field or group, such as scientific, legal, medical, military, bureaucratic and cooking terminology and slang, which enables precise communication among insiders but can exclude or confuse outsiders; jargon is studied in linguistics and addressed by plain language movements.", "what_it_is_for": "Specialised communication within groups.", "affordances": [ "explain a jargon term", "translate jargon into plain language", "decide when jargon is appropriate", "describe field-specific terminology" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Field-specific", "Precise for insiders", "Excluding for outsiders", "Evolving" ], "appearance": "Not physical; words and phrases.", "visual_identification": [ "Specialised vocabulary", "Group-specific usage", "Slang is informal and social rather than professional" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "scientific and technical terminology", "legal and bureaucratic jargon", "medical jargon", "military and occupational slang", "hobby and subculture jargon" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "usage", "why": "category" }, { "relation": "is related to", "target": "meaning", "why": "word senses" }, { "relation": "is related to", "target": "classification scheme", "why": "controlled terminology" }, { "relation": "is related to", "target": "dialogue", "why": "communication" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Plain language laws and standards", "Terminology standards in fields" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Excluding audiences", "Misunderstanding across fields", "Using jargon to obscure" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "explain", "name": "Explain", "description": "Understanding jargon.", "rationale": "Translate.", "layers": [ { "id": "term", "name": "Term", "description": "A jargon term.", "findings": [ { "id": "term-finding", "name": "Term", "description": "Term.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this term mean in its field, according to authoritative glossaries?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "How can it be explained in plain language?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "field", "name": "Field", "description": "Field terminology.", "findings": [ { "id": "field-finding", "name": "Field", "description": "Field terminology.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the key terms of this field, and where are they defined?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which terms differ in meaning between fields?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "write", "name": "Write", "description": "Using jargon well.", "rationale": "Audience.", "layers": [ { "id": "appropriate", "name": "Appropriate", "description": "When to use jargon.", "findings": [ { "id": "appropriate-finding", "name": "Appropriate", "description": "Appropriateness.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is jargon appropriate for this audience, or should plain language be used?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "Which terms need defining?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "plain", "name": "Plain", "description": "Plain language.", "findings": [ { "id": "plain-finding", "name": "Plain", "description": "Plain language.", "questions": [ { "text": "How can this jargon-heavy text be rewritten in plain language without losing precision?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "Which plain language standards apply?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "study", "name": "Study", "description": "Jargon in society.", "rationale": "Linguistics.", "layers": [ { "id": "function", "name": "Function", "description": "Why jargon exists.", "findings": [ { "id": "function-finding", "name": "Function", "description": "Function.", "questions": [ { "text": "What functions does jargon serve for groups, according to linguists?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "How does it create identity and exclusion?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "slang", "name": "Slang", "description": "Occupational slang.", "findings": [ { "id": "slang-finding", "name": "Slang", "description": "Occupational slang.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does occupational slang such as military or kitchen slang differ from formal terminology?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Is it described respectfully and without offensive terms presented as neutral?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "manage", "name": "Manage", "description": "Terminology management.", "rationale": "Consistency.", "layers": [ { "id": "glossary", "name": "Glossary", "description": "Building glossaries.", "findings": [ { "id": "glossary-finding", "name": "Glossary", "description": "Glossaries.", "questions": [ { "text": "How should a glossary of terms be built and maintained for this organisation?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "Which standards support terminology management?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "translate", "name": "Translate", "description": "Translating jargon.", "findings": [ { "id": "translate-finding", "name": "Translate", "description": "Translation.", "questions": [ { "text": "How should this jargon be translated into another language?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "Which equivalents are established?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should each field terminology be a separate entry?", "How should glossaries be linked?", "How should plain language standards be localised?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a jargon, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent explain and translate jargon, decide when specialised terms are appropriate, support plain language communication, and describe the jargon of fields neutrally.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: military slang, specialized terminology, scientific terminology, automobile terminology, bureaucratic terminology, cooking terminology, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary, role-playing game terms, sports terminology, computing terminology, terminology of share trading, fashion terminology.", "85 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a jargon, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "military slang", "specialized terminology", "scientific terminology", "automobile terminology", "bureaucratic terminology", "cooking terminology", "International Electrotechnical Vocabulary", "role-playing game terms", "sports terminology", "computing terminology", "terminology of share trading", "fashion terminology" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 85 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one jargon from another, and a jargon from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a jargon sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a jargon from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a jargon passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a jargon between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a jargon, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a jargon is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a jargon proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a jargon, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a jargon and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a jargon consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a jargon takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What jargon is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of jargon are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is jargon operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of jargon and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of jargon?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as jargon?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a jargon came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a jargon and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a jargon is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a jargon, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a jargon, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a jargon is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }