← Back to catalogue
Research draft

synchronized swimming

vr.tr.synchronized-swimming · ACT.ACT

Enable an AI agent to recognise a synchronized swimming activity, assess its planned and observed execution, and identify appropriate next actions within its participation, aquatic safety and performance constraints.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

Researched by: Codex

Purpose and description

Enable an AI agent to recognise a synchronized swimming activity, assess its planned and observed execution, and identify appropriate next actions within its participation, aquatic safety and performance constraints.

It can be Classify an observed or proposed activity and flag uncertain boundaries with adjacent aquatic disciplines.; Decompose a routine into aquatic movements, formations, transitions and musical cues.; Compare observed timing, positions and coordination with the intended choreography.; Identify participant dependencies and segments requiring qualified readiness review before rehearsal.; Record an interruption and route resumption decisions to the designated responsible person.; Assemble a performance review grounded in observations and an explicitly identified assessment framework..

Distinguishing features

The activity organises aquatic movements into a deliberate expressive or technical sequence rather than primarily pursuing speed over a distance.

Successful execution depends on specified body positions, transitions or formations rather than merely completing a swimming distance.

A routine has an intended timing relationship to music or choreographic cues; an isolated drill can qualify through its explicit relationship to synchronized swimming practice.

For multiple participants, coordinated timing and spatial relationships are part of the intended performance rather than incidental proximity in the water.

A solo performance is not excluded solely because no teammate is present; synchronization can concern the performer's movement and musical structure.

Scope

+ Identification of a practice, demonstration or competitive performance as synchronized swimming

+ Participant roles, formations and dependencies within a routine or exercise

+ Aquatic choreography, musical cues and transitions

+ Observed execution, synchronization and departures from the intended routine

+ Activity-specific readiness, interruption and recovery conditions

+ Assessment against declared training goals or an identified competition framework

- Athlete medical records, diagnosis and treatment

- Pool infrastructure design, maintenance and water-quality management

- General swimming instruction and racing performance

- Competition administration, entries, scheduling and awards

- Music composition, recording ownership and licensing

- Club governance, staffing and financial management

Characteristics

Activity context
technical exercise, routine rehearsal, demonstration, competitive performance, other declared context Determines whether recognition and assessment concern a partial skill, a complete routine or a judged performance.
Declared discipline terminology
Recorded activity name linked to the relevant organisation, rules document or participant usage Allows synchronized swimming and artistic swimming terminology to be interpreted without assuming identical usage in every context.
Participant configuration
solo, duet, team, other declared configuration; participant count recorded separately Establishes which synchronization, formation and support relationships can exist.
Routine duration
seconds, with timing start and end events identified Supports rehearsal planning, segment comparison and checks against an explicitly identified format.
Movement-to-cue offset
seconds or musical beats relative to an identified cue Makes musical synchronization assessable at particular moments.
Interparticipant timing spread
seconds between participant executions of an intended shared event Distinguishes coordinated execution from unintended timing differences while allowing deliberate staggered movement.
Formation deviation
metres or declared pool-relative coordinates against an intended formation Locates spacing and alignment problems that may affect appearance, transitions or collision risk.
Submerged segment duration
seconds for an identified participant and segment Documents underwater exposure for qualified review without treating duration as a universal safety threshold.
Execution status
planned, rehearsing, ready under declared checks, performing, interrupted, completed, abandoned Constrains whether an agent should support preparation, observation, review or escalation.
Assessment framework
Identified coaching rubric or governing rules, including version and applicable event context Prevents an agent from applying an unsupported scoring interpretation or treating one format's requirements as universal.

Also called

men's synchronized swimmingwomen's synchronized swimming

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 5 bundles · 10 layers · 10 findings · 28 questions.

Discipline and performance context Establishes what synchronized swimming activity is being modelled and which conventions apply.

An isolated drill, a solo routine and a team competition performance require different evidence of identity and completion.

Activity identity

Identifies the activity through its intended aquatic movement and synchronization demands.

Recognition and terminology

Record the declared discipline name and the observable or documented basis for recognising this activity as synchronized swimming.

  1. Which choreographed aquatic movements or explicit training objectives establish that this is synchronized swimming? definition
  2. Who names this activity synchronized swimming or artistic swimming, and what source establishes that usage here? provenance
  3. If this is a drill without music or a complete routine, what connects it to this discipline rather than general swimming practice? boundary

Performance format

Locates the activity within a declared participant configuration and performance context.

Configuration and applicable conventions

Record participant configuration, practice or performance purpose, and any externally defined format requirements.

  1. Is this a solo, duet, team or another declared configuration, and who participates in this instance? definition
  2. Which event specification or training brief establishes the required routine content and completion conditions? provenance
Aquatic choreography and music Represents the intended movement sequence and its relationship to musical or rehearsal cues.

Synchronization can only be judged against an explicit account of what should happen, where and when.

Movement composition

Describes aquatic positions, movements and connecting transitions at a useful rehearsal granularity.

Routine segments and transitions

Record intended positions, propulsion or support actions, underwater passages and transitions without assuming a universal element vocabulary.

  1. Which identifiable aquatic positions and movements occur in each segment, and in what order? definition
  2. Which transitions require a change in orientation, depth, formation or participant support? definition
  3. Which segment boundaries allow the routine to be rehearsed or revised without losing necessary entry and exit conditions? action

Musical timing

Connects movement events to the specific soundtrack, counts or other declared timing references.

Cue map and intended offsets

Record the soundtrack version, cue locations and whether movement should coincide with, precede or follow each cue.

  1. Which soundtrack version or rehearsal count sequence anchors the choreography? provenance
  2. At each selected cue, what movement event should occur and what timing offset is intended? measurement
  3. Which timing differences are deliberate choreographic effects rather than synchronization errors? boundary
Participant coordination and water space Represents how performers coordinate timing, pool positions and physical dependencies.

A routine's feasibility and execution depend on relationships among moving participants, including relationships hidden below the surface.

Formations and paths

Describes intended participant positions and movement through the available performance area.

Spatial plan and separation

Record formation geometry, travel paths and the pool reference frame used to compare intended and observed spacing.

  1. Where should each participant be at formation checkpoints relative to the pool and other performers? measurement
  2. Which crossing paths, submerged transitions or formation changes require explicit separation checks? action

Shared execution dependencies

Captures synchronized events and movements that depend on another participant's timing or physical support.

Timing and support roles

Record shared movement checkpoints and, where present, roles in lifts or other supported actions, including alternatives when a dependency fails.

  1. Which movement events must participants execute together, and which intentionally use a sequence or stagger? definition
  2. For each supported action, who depends on whom and what agreed cue initiates or cancels the action? action
  3. What observed timing spread or missed support cue occurred at the selected coordination checkpoint? measurement
Aquatic readiness and interruption Records activity-specific conditions for starting, stopping and referring resumption decisions to responsible people.

Submersion, inverted movement and participant support create dependencies that an agent must recognise before suggesting continued execution.

Segment readiness

Relates the planned choreography to confirmed supervision, usable pool conditions and participant readiness.

Underwater and supported action checks

Record qualified confirmation of conditions relevant to underwater passages, inverted positions and supported movements, with unresolved checks kept explicit.

  1. Which planned segments involve submersion, inversion or participant support and therefore require specific readiness checks? definition
  2. Who confirmed the relevant depth, clearance, supervision and participant preparation, and when? provenance
  3. Which unresolved readiness condition requires withholding or modifying the planned segment? action

Stop and recovery state

Makes interruptions, participant accountability and resumption authority explicit.

Interruption and authorised resumption

Record the agreed stop signals, observed reason for stopping, participant status and the responsible person's decision about subsequent activity.

  1. What stop signal can participants detect during submerged or music-led execution, and who may initiate it? action
  2. After an interruption, which participants have been accounted for and which observations remain unresolved? measurement
  3. Who is responsible for deciding whether this segment may resume, be modified or be abandoned? action
Execution evidence and assessment Connects observed performance with choreography, assessment criteria and justified rehearsal decisions.

An agent must distinguish an observable deviation from an interpretation or formal scoring consequence.

Performance observation

Records evidence of aquatic movement quality and synchronization with explicit observation limits.

Observed execution and visibility

Record selected body-position, timing, formation and transition observations alongside the viewpoint and confidence supporting them.

  1. At which routine moments did observed positions, timing or formations differ from the intended choreography? measurement
  2. Which recording, observer and viewpoint support each observation? provenance
  3. Which underwater actions or occluded participants cannot be assessed reliably from the available evidence? boundary

Interpretation and next practice

Applies the identified rubric and connects supported findings to appropriate review or rehearsal actions.

Criteria-linked review

Record how evidence bears on declared technical, synchronization or artistic goals and keep formal scoring claims tied to an applicable source.

  1. Which identified criterion makes each observed deviation or successful passage relevant to this performance? provenance
  2. Does the evidence support a coaching observation, a formal scoring consequence or only a question for further review? boundary
  3. Which cue, transition or formation should be reviewed next, and what observation would show improvement? action

What the second pass must settle

  • How should the registry relate synchronized swimming to artistic swimming across historical, recreational and governing-body terminology?
  • Which authoritative movement vocabularies should be adopted, and how should local coaching terms map to them?
  • Which competition formats and rule editions must this model support, and what content or assessment requirements do they impose?
  • Which qualified safety sources establish appropriate readiness, stop-signal and resumption procedures for the intended participant groups and facilities?
  • Which timing, formation and body-position measurements can be obtained reliably from available observation methods, particularly for submerged or occluded movement?