audit
Let an agent handle audits by type, scope, standards, process and outcomes, and help people prepare for audits, without legal or tax advice on individual cases.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent handle audits by type, scope, standards, process and outcomes, and help people prepare for audits, without legal or tax advice on individual cases.
A systematic, independent examination of records, processes or systems against criteria, such as financial audits of accounts, tax audits, quality and compliance audits, IT and security audits and government audits.
What it is for: Assurance, compliance and improvement.
It can be explain audit types and standards; prepare for an audit; understand audit opinions and findings; find public audit reports.
Distinguishing features
Independent examination
Against defined criteria
Evidence-based
Produces findings and opinions
What it looks like
Documents, interviews, sampling and audit reports.
How it is recognised
Audit reports and opinions
Internal and external audits
Reviews and inspections are related but different
Related models
is a kind of - category
is performed by - professional
follows - standards
produces - output
In practice
Families and kinds
financial audits
tax audits
quality and compliance audits
IT and security audits
public sector audits
Standards and regulation
International Standards on Auditing (ISA)
ISO 19011 auditing management systems
Public audit legislation
Failure modes and hazards
Lack of independence
Agents giving tax or legal advice
Misreading audit opinions
Also called
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Type Which audit.
Types differ.
Kind
Scope.
Kind
Audit type.
- What type of audit is it and what is its scope? definition
- Which standard applies? provenance
Auditor
Independence.
Auditor
Auditor.
- Who is carrying out the audit, and are they independent? provenance
- Are they registered or accredited? provenance
Process Stages.
Audits follow steps.
Stages
Planning to reporting.
Stages
Audit stages.
- What are the stages of this audit? definition
- What evidence will be requested? provenance
Prepare
Readiness.
Prepare
Preparation.
- How can an organisation prepare records for the audit? action
- Who should be involved? action
Outcomes Findings.
Findings need follow-up.
Opinion
Audit opinion.
Opinion
Audit opinion.
- What does the audit opinion or rating mean? definition
- What are the key findings? provenance
Actions
Remediation.
Actions
Remediation.
- What corrective actions are required, and by when? provenance
- Who owns them? provenance
Limits Advice.
Professionals advise.
Tax audits
Individuals.
Tax audits
Tax audit advice.
- Is the user facing a tax audit and asking for personal advice? boundary
- How should they be referred to a tax adviser? action
Public
Public audit reports.
Public
Public audits.
- Where are public sector audit reports published? provenance
- How can citizens use them? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should audit types be separate entries?
- How should public audit reports be linked?
- How should standards be linked?