{ "model": { "rank": 5300, "code": "thing-q181543", "model_id": "vr.tr.iconoclasm", "name": "iconoclasm", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, document and assess iconoclasm by connecting opposition to images or symbols with its targets, justifications, interventions and consequences.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q181543/", "tier": 2, "score": 68, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "destruction or removal of monuments", "Beeldenstorm" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 68, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q181543", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q181543", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T22:05:22Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 17.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08833-572e-7423-ad99-2aba2e7d724b\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: iconoclasm\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 regi", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 61.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08833-5720-7790-b4be-0fd99e45d32d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: iconoclasm\nRegistry id: vr.tr.iconoclasm\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q181543", "registryId": "vr.tr.iconoclasm", "name": "iconoclasm", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q181543/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.iconoclasm", "name": "iconoclasm", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, document and assess iconoclasm by connecting opposition to images or symbols with its targets, justifications, interventions and consequences.", "definition": "Iconoclasm is the deliberate destruction, defacement, or rejection of images and monuments because of their religious, political, or cultural significance, and, by extension, the challenging of established beliefs or revered authorities.", "scope_statement": "This model owns iconoclasm as a position or practice directed against images, representations or symbolic objects because of their attributed religious, political or cultural authority; it distinguishes positions, episodes and campaigns, while treating figurative attacks on established ideas as a related sense requiring explicit qualification.", "in_scope": [ "Opposition to the production, display, veneration or authority of images and symbolic objects", "Acts and campaigns that remove, deface, destroy, conceal or otherwise negate targeted representations", "Actors, stated justifications and authority claims associated with iconoclastic positions and interventions", "Relationships among a target's representation, material carrier, setting and attributed significance", "Contested classifications, surviving evidence and responses to iconoclastic interventions" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete descriptions and catalogues of artworks, monuments or religious objects", "Religious doctrines and political ideologies beyond their relationship to image opposition", "Accidental damage, ordinary deterioration and disposal without an established symbolic connection", "General censorship unrelated to the status or authority of representations", "Conservation procedures and legal determinations governed by neighbouring specialist models", "General intellectual nonconformity without an explicitly recorded figurative use of iconoclasm" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The target is opposed because of what it represents or the authority attributed to it; physical damage alone does not establish iconoclasm.", "An image-opposing position can exist without a destructive event, so statements of doctrine and observed interventions must be distinguished.", "Nonproduction or avoidance of images does not by itself establish an intervention against existing images or their authority.", "Removal for relocation, protection or routine replacement requires different classification unless evidence connects it to rejection of symbolic authority.", "Classification must distinguish participants' own descriptions from labels assigned by opponents, witnesses or later interpreters." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Unit of analysis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "position; individual act; episode; campaign; disputed grouping", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an isolated intervention from being treated as an organised movement or a doctrine as proof of action." }, { "name": "Sense of iconoclasm", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "opposition to representations or symbolic objects; figurative intellectual challenge; mixed; uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Keeps the represented phenomenon distinct from metaphorical uses of the term." }, { "name": "Targeted symbolic relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "target linked to represented subject, attributed authority and attributing community", "why_it_matters": "Explains why this representation became a target." }, { "name": "Stated grounds of opposition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "religious; political; cultural; aesthetic; multiple; other stated grounds; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation while keeping stated grounds separate from inferred motives." }, { "name": "Intervention form", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "prohibition; removal; concealment; defacement; destruction; replacement; symbolic negation; other; none documented", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes mechanisms that affect visibility, material survival and symbolic standing differently." }, { "name": "Intervention status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "advocated; ordered; attempted; executed; interrupted; reversed; uncertain", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an instruction or threat from being recorded as a completed act." }, { "name": "Extent of intervention", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "number of documented targets affected, with target-counting rule, period and uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Permits comparison without equating fragments, complete objects and sites." }, { "name": "Attribution support", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "supported; provisionally supported; contested; insufficient evidence, assessed separately for actor, motive and act", "why_it_matters": "Avoids transferring confidence in visible damage to confidence about who caused it or why." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess whether a reported position or intervention meets explicit iconoclasm criteria and record competing classifications.", "Connect targeted representations with the communities, practices and authority claims implicated in their rejection.", "Reconstruct the sequence from advocacy or orders to interventions and subsequent responses.", "Compare intended symbolic effects with documented material and social outcomes.", "Identify missing evidence before attributing agency, motive or campaign membership.", "Route proposed treatment of affected objects to relevant custodians, conservation expertise and authority checks." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "recognition-and-boundaries", "name": "Recognition and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which sense and unit of iconoclasm an account concerns.", "rationale": "Neither damage to an image nor disagreement with an established idea is sufficient on its own to classify the phenomenon.", "layers": [ { "id": "sense-and-unit", "name": "Sense and unit", "description": "Separates image opposition, interventions and figurative usage.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-subject", "name": "Classification subject", "description": "Record whether the subject is a position, act, episode or campaign and whether iconoclasm is used literally or figuratively.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does iconoclasm here refer to opposition to representations, an intervention against them or a figurative challenge to established ideas?", "kind": "definition", "id": "classification-subject-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence warrants grouping the documented acts into one episode or campaign?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-subject-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-practices", "name": "Neighbouring practices", "description": "Tests alternative explanations for image absence, removal or damage.", "findings": [ { "id": "symbolic-rejection-test", "name": "Symbolic rejection test", "description": "Record evidence connecting opposition to the target's representational role rather than assuming it from the object's condition.", "questions": [ { "text": "What connects the intervention to rejection of the image's meaning, use or attributed authority?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "symbolic-rejection-test-q01" }, { "text": "Could avoidance of images, protective relocation, theft, reuse or incidental damage better explain the available evidence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "symbolic-rejection-test-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "targets-and-symbolic-authority", "name": "Targets and symbolic authority", "description": "Connects targeted representations to what they signify and how they function in a setting.", "rationale": "An iconoclastic target cannot be understood solely as a damaged material object.", "layers": [ { "id": "representation-and-carrier", "name": "Representation and carrier", "description": "Distinguishes the represented subject, image, inscription and physical or digital carrier.", "findings": [ { "id": "targeted-element", "name": "Targeted element", "description": "Identify whether the intervention targets a whole object, a recognisable feature, a name, an image type or its public presentation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which represented subject or identifying element was selected for rejection?", "kind": "definition", "id": "targeted-element-q01" }, { "text": "Was the carrier itself rejected, or was it retained while its imagery, inscription or use was altered?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "targeted-element-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "authority-and-setting", "name": "Authority and setting", "description": "Records whose authority or commitments the target was understood to embody.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-symbolic-role", "name": "Attributed symbolic role", "description": "Connect claims about a target's significance to particular actors, communities, practices and locations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who regarded the target as sacred, legitimate, oppressive, commemorative or otherwise authoritative, and what supports that attribution?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-symbolic-role-q01" }, { "text": "How did placement, ritual use or public visibility contribute to the role being challenged?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-symbolic-role-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "actors-and-justifications", "name": "Actors and justifications", "description": "Separates participation, responsibility and stated reasons for opposing representations.", "rationale": "Those who advocate, order, execute and interpret an intervention may have different roles and aims.", "layers": [ { "id": "participation-and-command", "name": "Participation and command", "description": "Maps documented roles without assuming that collective labels establish individual responsibility.", "findings": [ { "id": "agency-and-orders", "name": "Agency and orders", "description": "Record advocates, authorisers, executors, custodians and opponents, with separate evidence for each relationship.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which actors advocated, ordered or carried out the intervention, and which sources distinguish those roles?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "agency-and-orders-q01" }, { "text": "What connects local interventions to a common directive rather than independent action?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "agency-and-orders-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "grounds-and-counterclaims", "name": "Grounds and counterclaims", "description": "Preserves participants' justifications and competing interpretations of the same conduct.", "findings": [ { "id": "claimed-reasons", "name": "Claimed reasons", "description": "Record stated reasons, inferred motives and opponents' explanations as distinct, attributed claims.", "questions": [ { "text": "What reasons did participants give for opposing these representations, and where are those reasons documented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claimed-reasons-q01" }, { "text": "Which explanations come from opponents or later interpreters rather than participants?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claimed-reasons-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "intervention-and-material-traces", "name": "Intervention and material traces", "description": "Records what was proposed and what happened to targets, including selective alteration and survival.", "rationale": "Symbolic rejection can operate through several interventions whose material effects and evidential traces differ.", "layers": [ { "id": "operation-and-sequence", "name": "Operation and sequence", "description": "Distinguishes instructions, attempts and completed interventions over time.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-intervention", "name": "Documented intervention", "description": "Describe the intervention form, timing and execution status without treating an order as evidence of completion.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was the target prohibited, removed, concealed, defaced, destroyed, replaced or otherwise symbolically negated?", "kind": "definition", "id": "documented-intervention-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes whether the intervention was proposed, attempted or completed, and when?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-intervention-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "selectivity-and-survival", "name": "Selectivity and survival", "description": "Records affected features, surviving material and limits on damage attribution.", "findings": [ { "id": "pattern-of-alteration", "name": "Pattern of alteration", "description": "Document what was affected and spared, separating observed traces from explanations of their origin.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which features or targets were affected or spared, and how is the extent counted or measured?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "pattern-of-alteration-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes the attributed iconoclastic alteration from later damage, repair or reuse?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "pattern-of-alteration-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequences-and-subsequent-treatment", "name": "Consequences and subsequent treatment", "description": "Assesses the fate of challenged representations and the evidence needed for subsequent decisions.", "rationale": "Material destruction does not by itself establish the disappearance of symbolic authority, and later treatment can change both meaning and evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "symbolic-and-social-outcomes", "name": "Symbolic and social outcomes", "description": "Separates intended effects from documented responses and changes in representation.", "findings": [ { "id": "intended-and-observed-effects", "name": "Intended and observed effects", "description": "Record whether the intervention changed visibility, use or authority, including replacement, resistance and renewed commemoration.", "questions": [ { "text": "What change in the target's use or authority was intended, and what subsequent evidence supports an actual change?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intended-and-observed-effects-q01" }, { "text": "Did surviving fragments, copies, replacement images or accounts sustain or transform what the intervention opposed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "intended-and-observed-effects-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-treatment-decisions", "name": "Evidence and treatment decisions", "description": "Connects uncertainty and contested meaning to documentation, interpretation and treatment choices.", "findings": [ { "id": "decision-relevant-uncertainty", "name": "Decision-relevant uncertainty", "description": "Record unresolved attribution and competing claims before recommending changes to an affected target or its presentation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence and affected-community perspectives must be recorded before restoration, redisplay or reinterpretation is considered?", "kind": "action", "id": "decision-relevant-uncertainty-q01" }, { "text": "Which custodian or competent authority can decide the proposed treatment, and what unresolved claims require referral?", "kind": "action", "id": "decision-relevant-uncertainty-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense was recorded: this description prioritizes historical and social practices while distinguishing the figurative intellectual sense.", "Iconoclasm is a practice or stance, not itself a work, medium, or creative form; the supplied domain and batch classification warrant review.", "Attribution of iconoclastic intent requires case-specific evidence; these statements are recalled knowledge, not findings from consulted sources." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of iconoclasm this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Religious iconoclasm", "Political iconoclasm", "Figurative or intellectual iconoclasm" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of iconoclasm this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "A category for studying Byzantine disputes over religious images.", "Analysis of attacks on religious imagery during the Protestant Reformation.", "Interpretation of the destruction or removal of monuments associated with displaced regimes.", "Description of challenges to established intellectual or cultural authority." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of iconoclasm this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Irreversible loss of artworks, monuments, and historical evidence.", "Intimidation or persecution of communities whose sacred images or symbols are targeted.", "Escalation of religious or political conflict.", "Misclassifying accidental damage, theft, or ordinary demolition as iconoclasm without evidence of symbolic motivation.", "Treating all image restrictions or monument removals as equivalent to destructive campaigns." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of iconoclasm this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In Byzantine history, the term particularly concerns eighth- and ninth-century conflicts over the legitimacy and veneration of religious images.", "In European Reformation history, iconoclasm includes attacks on church imagery, with substantial differences among territories and Protestant traditions.", "Restrictions on religious imagery in Islamic contexts vary across periods, regions, media, and settings; they should not be treated as evidence of uniform iconoclastic practice." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of iconoclasm this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "aniconism", "difference": "Aniconism avoids or restricts certain representations; iconoclasm actively opposes or attacks images and their authority." }, { "name": "vandalism", "difference": "Vandalism describes damage without necessarily specifying its ideological purpose; iconoclasm targets an object's symbolic significance." }, { "name": "censorship", "difference": "Censorship suppresses expression or access; iconoclasm specifically contests images, monuments, or, figuratively, established authority." }, { "name": "damnatio memoriae", "difference": "Damnatio memoriae concerns sanctions against a person's public remembrance; destruction of that person's images can overlap with iconoclasm." }, { "name": "iconolatry", "difference": "Iconolatry denotes worship of images, often as an accusation; iconoclasm opposes images or the practices associated with them." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of iconoclasm this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend iconoclasm primarily as a practice concerning representations, or also as figurative opposition to established ideas?", "What evidence threshold should support an iconoclasm classification when physical traces survive but participants' reasons do not?", "Where should the boundary fall for attacks on inscriptions, digital representations and symbolic objects that are not images?", "How should the model represent historically specific categories of image opposition without treating iconoclasm as the participants' own term?", "Does an existing world model already own this concept or part of its scope, requiring linkage rather than a separate publication?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 16, "questions": 26 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a iconoclasm, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise, document and assess iconoclasm by connecting opposition to images or symbols with its targets, justifications, interventions and consequences.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: destruction or removal of monuments, Beeldenstorm.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 68 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a iconoclasm, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "destruction or removal of monuments", "Beeldenstorm" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 68 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one iconoclasm from another, and a iconoclasm from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a iconoclasm sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a iconoclasm from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a iconoclasm passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a iconoclasm between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a iconoclasm, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a iconoclasm is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a iconoclasm says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a iconoclasm contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a iconoclasm and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of iconoclasm a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For iconoclasm, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of iconoclasm exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made iconoclasm and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to iconoclasm, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in iconoclasm, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a iconoclasm came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a iconoclasm and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a iconoclasm is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a iconoclasm, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a iconoclasm, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a iconoclasm is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }