{ "model": { "rank": 4691, "code": "thing-q181800", "model_id": "vr.tr.juche", "name": "Juche", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, contextualise and assess claims about Juche while distinguishing authoritative doctrine, scholarly interpretation and evidence of practice.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Cross-cutting context", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "XCT", "domain": "XCT.QLT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q181800/", "tier": 2, "score": 73, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 73, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q181800", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q181800", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T20:48:14Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 23.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087ec-92b3-7ee2-b42f-57e35bfffdaf\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Juche\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 registere", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 71.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087ec-92bc-7cf1-9230-891a20f6d2b1\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Juche\nRegistry id: vr.tr.juche\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext for " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q181800", "registryId": "vr.tr.juche", "name": "Juche", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q181800/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.juche", "name": "Juche", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise, contextualise and assess claims about Juche while distinguishing authoritative doctrine, scholarly interpretation and evidence of practice.", "definition": "Juche is the North Korean state ideology attributed to Kim Il Sung that presents people as masters of their destiny and advocates ideological autonomy, political independence, economic self-sustenance and military self-defence within a system centred on the party and supreme leader.", "scope_statement": "This model owns Juche as the historically situated political and philosophical ideology associated with North Korea and the Kim leadership, under registry entry vr.tr.juche in XCT / XCT.QLT; it covers meanings, doctrinal versions, contested interpretations and criteria for identifying applications.", "in_scope": [ "Attributed definitions of Juche and the limits of translating it as self-reliance", "Dated doctrinal formulations and their textual provenance", "Relationships among human agency, popular masses, ideological consciousness and leadership", "Ideological, political, economic and defence interpretations of independence", "Institutional invocation, scholarly disagreement and evidence of implementation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "A comprehensive history or institutional model of North Korea", "Biographies of Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il or their successors", "Marxism-Leninism, nationalism and authoritarianism as independent concepts", "Songun and Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism except where their relationship to Juche requires clarification", "The Juche calendar, monuments and named organisations as independently modelled things" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require a documented connection to Juche terminology, recognised texts or an explicitly attributed interpretation; generic self-sufficiency alone does not establish an instance.", "Distinguish the doctrine's claims about human and collective agency from ordinary personal independence or individualist autonomy.", "Identify which dimension of independence is invoked; economic isolation alone is insufficient to identify Juche.", "Record the dated relationship claimed with Marxism-Leninism, Songun or Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism rather than treating these labels as interchangeable.", "Separate an actor's declaration of fidelity to Juche from independently supported evidence that a practice implements a specified doctrinal principle." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Definition holder", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Claim linked to author, institution or scholarly interpreter", "why_it_matters": "Official self-description and external interpretation can assign different meanings to the same term." }, { "name": "Doctrinal reference period", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Calendar year or bounded date interval, with uncertainty recorded", "why_it_matters": "A formulation must not be projected across all periods of Juche's development." }, { "name": "Meaning of independence", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Ideological; political; economic; defence; philosophical agency; mixed; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Different uses of self-reliance imply different recognition and assessment criteria." }, { "name": "Attributed subject of agency", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Human being; popular masses; nation; party; leader; explicitly specified relationship; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "It exposes ambiguity about who is understood to direct action." }, { "name": "Institutional standing", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Explicitly codified; officially invoked; pedagogically prescribed; externally attributed; uncertain, each dated", "why_it_matters": "Textual presence, institutional authority and outside classification are distinct." }, { "name": "Relationship to adjacent ideology", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Attributed continuity, adaptation, incorporation, distinction or replacement, linked to a dated source", "why_it_matters": "Ideological relationships are claims to investigate rather than fixed equivalences." }, { "name": "Application evidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Declared application; documented mechanism; corroborated practice; disputed attribution; insufficient evidence", "why_it_matters": "An ideological justification does not by itself demonstrate implementation or causal influence." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a passage or policy justification by its attributed Juche meaning and doctrinal period.", "Compare official and scholarly definitions without collapsing their disagreements.", "Trace a doctrinal assertion to a dated text and identify translation or edition uncertainty.", "Assess whether a claimed application has evidence beyond the use of the Juche label.", "Identify contradictions or tensions between a specified principle and documented practice.", "Route adjacent concepts to their own models while preserving their relationships to Juche." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meanings-and-recognition", "name": "Meanings and recognition", "description": "Establish which sense of Juche a claim uses and what warrants recognising it as an instance.", "rationale": "The absent registry definition must not be replaced by an unqualified synonym such as self-reliance.", "layers": [ { "id": "attributed-definitions", "name": "Attributed definitions", "description": "Separate doctrinal self-description, translation and analytical definition.", "findings": [ { "id": "self-reliance-translation", "name": "Self-reliance as a partial gloss", "description": "Record the scope of the translation rather than assuming it exhausts Juche. A reference-work overview distinguishes ideological, political, economic and military dimensions: [Juche (Self-Reliance) in North Korea](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118430873.est0820).", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this source use Juche to mean self-reliance, a philosophical system, a political ideology or a combination?", "kind": "definition", "id": "self-reliance-translation-q01" }, { "text": "Whose definition is being recorded, and what Korean expression and translation support it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "self-reliance-translation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "instance-boundaries", "name": "Instance boundaries", "description": "Determine when texts, claims or practices qualify as Juche-related.", "findings": [ { "id": "explicit-and-inferred-instances", "name": "Explicit invocation versus inferred resemblance", "description": "Distinguish a text naming Juche from a researcher identifying a resemblance to it; require an explicit rationale for the latter.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the actor explicitly invoke Juche, or is the connection supplied by an observer?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "explicit-and-inferred-instances-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes this case from generic nationalism, sovereignty or economic self-sufficiency?", "kind": "definition", "id": "explicit-and-inferred-instances-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "textual-authority-and-change", "name": "Textual authority and change", "description": "Locate formulations within a dated and attributable doctrinal record.", "rationale": "Recognition depends on distinguishing contemporary wording from later accounts of doctrinal origins.", "layers": [ { "id": "canonical-formulations", "name": "Canonical formulations", "description": "Identify authoritative texts while preserving edition and attribution limits.", "findings": [ { "id": "systematisation-reference", "name": "The 1982 formulation as a reference point", "description": "An official Juche research organisation presents Kim Jong Il's 1982 On the Juche Idea as a systematisation of the doctrine; record this as an institutional account of authority: [Further Development of Juche Idea](https://www.kass.org.kp/index.php/great/view/1549?lang=eng).", "questions": [ { "text": "Which edition, language and passage establish the formulation being modelled?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "systematisation-reference-q01" }, { "text": "Who treats this text as authoritative, and for which doctrinal period?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "systematisation-reference-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "historical-redefinition", "name": "Historical redefinition", "description": "Track changes in meaning and retrospective origin claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "origin-versus-retrospective-lineage", "name": "Origin claim versus demonstrated continuity", "description": "Keep first documented usage, later systematic exposition and retrospective founding narratives separate until their relationships are established.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the earliest available passage carry the same meaning as the later doctrine?", "kind": "definition", "id": "origin-versus-retrospective-lineage-q01" }, { "text": "What contemporary evidence supports the claimed origin, as distinct from a later historical account?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "origin-versus-retrospective-lineage-q02" }, { "text": "Which revisions require separate doctrinal versions rather than a single undated definition?", "kind": "action", "id": "origin-versus-retrospective-lineage-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "agency-masses-and-leadership", "name": "Agency, masses and leadership", "description": "Examine how Juche attributes agency and relates it to political direction.", "rationale": "The relationship between human agency and organised leadership is central to distinguishing philosophical claims from institutional authority.", "layers": [ { "id": "human-agency", "name": "Human agency", "description": "Record the doctrine's account of human capacities and historical action.", "findings": [ { "id": "human-centred-principle", "name": "Human-centred philosophical claim", "description": "The 1982 treatise presents humans as determining their relation to the world; represent this as a doctrinal proposition, not an established empirical finding: [The Philosophical Principle of the Juche Idea](https://www.kldr.info/1982_treatise_on-the-juche-idea_kim-jong-il_chapter-2_the-philosophical-principle-of-the-juche-idea/).", "questions": [ { "text": "How does the passage define independence, creativity and consciousness?", "kind": "definition", "id": "human-centred-principle-q01" }, { "text": "Does its subject denote individual persons, socially constituted humans or an organised collective?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "human-centred-principle-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "collective-direction", "name": "Collective direction", "description": "Investigate how masses, party and leader are related in each formulation.", "findings": [ { "id": "agency-and-authority-relation", "name": "Agency and authority relationship", "description": "Require source-specific accounts of how popular agency relates to leadership, including whether interpreters see mediation, dependency or contradiction.", "questions": [ { "text": "What roles does this formulation assign to the masses, party and leader in producing independent action?", "kind": "definition", "id": "agency-and-authority-relation-q01" }, { "text": "Which interpreter regards these roles as compatible or contradictory, and on what textual basis?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "agency-and-authority-relation-q02" }, { "text": "Does the passage support individual discretion, collective sovereignty or obedience to authorised direction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "agency-and-authority-relation-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "independence-and-policy-application", "name": "Independence and policy application", "description": "Distinguish Juche's dimensions of independence and assess claims of implementation.", "rationale": "Self-reliance needs domain-specific interpretation before an agent can evaluate a policy or apparent contradiction.", "layers": [ { "id": "dimensions-of-independence", "name": "Dimensions of independence", "description": "Separate ideological judgement, political authority, economic capacity and defence capability.", "findings": [ { "id": "domain-specific-independence", "name": "Domain-specific independence", "description": "The guiding-principles section distinguishes ideology, politics, economy and defence; an application should identify the relevant dimension: [The Guiding Principles of the Juche Idea](https://www.kldr.info/1982_treatise_on-the-juche-idea_kim-jong-il_chapter-4_the-guiding-principles-of-the-juche-idea/).", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dimension of independence does the claim concern, and what does independence mean there?", "kind": "definition", "id": "domain-specific-independence-q01" }, { "text": "What source-defined conditions would distinguish self-directed cooperation from disallowed dependence?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "domain-specific-independence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "implementation-assessment", "name": "Implementation assessment", "description": "Test a claimed application against explicit criteria and independent observations.", "findings": [ { "id": "practice-versus-justification", "name": "Practice versus ideological justification", "description": "Treat policy rhetoric, decision mechanisms and outcomes as separate evidence; do not infer either success or doctrinal abandonment from one economic indicator.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observable decision, capability or dependency would test this particular application claim?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "practice-versus-justification-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence shows Juche influenced the decision rather than being invoked to justify it afterward?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "practice-versus-justification-q02" }, { "text": "Should the agent classify this case as declared, corroborated, disputed or unresolved?", "kind": "action", "id": "practice-versus-justification-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretation-and-institutional-standing", "name": "Interpretation and institutional standing", "description": "Compare competing explanations and establish the dated authority of Juche invocations.", "rationale": "A model must preserve disagreement about what Juche does and avoid equating doctrinal language with public belief.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-explanations", "name": "Competing explanations", "description": "Organise attributed interpretations and their relationships to neighbouring ideologies.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpretive-hypotheses", "name": "Interpretive hypotheses", "description": "Investigate interpretations of Juche as philosophy, adaptation of socialism, nationalism or political legitimation; identify actual proponents before treating any interpretation as an established school.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which named authors advance each interpretation, and what evidence do they use?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "interpretive-hypotheses-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence could discriminate between explanations rather than merely support several at once?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "interpretive-hypotheses-q02" }, { "text": "How does each account distinguish Juche from Marxism-Leninism, Songun and Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "interpretive-hypotheses-q03" } ] } ] }, { "id": "authority-and-reception", "name": "Authority and reception", "description": "Distinguish formal status, prescribed expression and demonstrated reception.", "findings": [ { "id": "codification-and-belief", "name": "Codification does not establish belief", "description": "Record constitutional, party, educational and ceremonial uses separately; public repetition alone cannot establish private acceptance.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which dated constitutional provision, party document or curriculum establishes the claimed institutional standing?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "codification-and-belief-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes required public expression from personal endorsement or practical influence?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "codification-and-belief-q02" }, { "text": "When evidence establishes only an institutional invocation, how should the agent limit claims about wider acceptance?", "kind": "action", "id": "codification-and-belief-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This account covers the political ideology, not the ordinary Korean noun or the Juche calendar.", "Researchers should check the relevant dated constitutional and party-rule texts before quoting their ideological provisions.", "The doctrine's origins, intellectual coherence and importance relative to nationalism and regime legitimation remain disputed; official attribution does not settle those questions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Korean Hangul", "value_or_pattern": "주체", "note": "The term conventionally rendered as Juche; 주체사상 denotes the Juche idea or ideology." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea's Socialist Constitution has codified Juche's ideological role; wording has changed across constitutional revisions.", "Workers' Party of Korea rules establish the party's guiding ideology and organisational obligations; its formulations have evolved." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Provides an official framework for political education and ideological instruction in North Korea.", "Legitimates the authority and historical role of the Kim leadership.", "Frames economic policy in terms of self-sustenance and national control, without necessarily excluding foreign trade or assistance.", "Supports official arguments for sovereignty, independent diplomacy and military self-defence.", "Serves as the subject of international solidarity organisations and Juche study groups." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating the usual translation 'self-reliance' as a complete definition obscures its philosophical claims and leadership doctrine.", "Equating official claims of popular mastery with actual popular control confuses ideological assertions with institutional practice.", "Treating Juche as unchanged since its emergence obscures its successive reformulations.", "Reading self-sustenance as complete economic isolation overlooks North Korea's foreign economic relationships.", "Using official ideological texts alone to explain government behaviour risks overlooking strategic interests, institutions and material constraints." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In North Korea, Juche functions as an authoritative state doctrine embedded in education, political institutions and public symbolism.", "Outside North Korea, sympathetic study groups promote it, while scholars disagree over the relative importance of its philosophical content, nationalism and role in legitimating rule." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Marxism-Leninism", "difference": "Juche developed within a communist political setting but official formulations increasingly asserted its distinctiveness, emphasising human agency, national independence and leadership." }, { "name": "Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism", "difference": "This is the broader official ideological designation associated with the teachings of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il; Juche is a central component rather than an interchangeable label." }, { "name": "Songun", "difference": "Songun specifically prioritises the military in politics and state organisation; Juche articulates a broader ideological framework." }, { "name": "Autarky", "difference": "Autarky concerns economic self-sufficiency or exclusion of external exchange; Juche also encompasses philosophy, sovereignty, defence and political leadership." }, { "name": "Korean nationalism", "difference": "Korean nationalism encompasses diverse movements centred on Korean nationhood; Juche is a particular North Korean doctrine tied to its ruling institutions." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Juche this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "How do Korean-language usages and competing translations alter the boundaries among subjecthood, independence and self-reliance?", "Which origin claims and doctrinal transitions are supported by contemporary texts rather than retrospective editions or official narratives?", "Which named scholars represent the major competing interpretations, and where do their disagreements concern definitions rather than historical evidence?", "What do verified constitutional and party texts establish about Juche's institutional standing across periods and its relationship to Kimilsungism-Kimjongilism and Songun?", "Which accessible observations can distinguish doctrinal influence, strategic justification and personal reception without treating official rhetoric as evidence of all three?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 32 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Juche, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise, contextualise and assess claims about Juche while distinguishing authoritative doctrine, scholarly interpretation and evidence of practice.", "characteristics": { "substance": "abstract", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 73 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Juche, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "an abstraction with no physical instance", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 73 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Juche from another, and a Juche from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Juche sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Juche from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Juche passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Juche between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Juche, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Juche is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What Juche is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of Juche are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is Juche operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of Juche and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of Juche?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as Juche?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Juche came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Juche and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Juche is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Juche, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Juche, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Juche is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 12, "questions": 32 } } } }