← Back to catalogue
Research draft

hegemony

vr.tr.hegemony · XCT.QLT

Let an agent explain hegemony in international relations and cultural theory, relay Gramsci, hegemonic stability and liberal hegemony debates from academic sources with attribution, describe dominant narratives and the Marcos historical memory debate neutrally, and distinguish hegemony from empire, domination by force and mere influence.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain hegemony in international relations and cultural theory, relay Gramsci, hegemonic stability and liberal hegemony debates from academic sources with attribution, describe dominant narratives and the Marcos historical memory debate neutrally, and distinguish hegemony from empire, domination by force and mere influence.

Dominance or leadership of one state, group or set of ideas over others, in international relations the predominance of a hegemonic power such as in the liberal hegemony debated in American foreign policy, and in Gramscian theory the cultural hegemony by which a ruling class secures consent through dominant narratives and ideological resonance; the registry aliases also name accusations of historical distortion regarding Ferdinand Marcos, a specific Philippine debate about contested narratives that the model reports with attribution.

What it is for: Not applicable; a political concept.

It can be explain senses; relay theories; describe debates with attribution; distinguish related concepts.

Distinguishing features

Leadership plus consent

International and cultural senses

Contested theory

Narrative struggles

What it looks like

Not a visible object; a relation of dominance.

Physical character

Gramsci s Prison Notebooks: 1929-1935 period

hegemonic stability theory: 1970s period - Kindleberger, Gilpin

Marcos martial law: 1972-1981 period

How it is recognised

Dominance secured by leadership and consent

Cultural hegemony, liberal hegemony, dominant narrative, ideological resonance; Marcos historical distortion debate

Empire is formal control; domination by force lacks consent; influence is weaker

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

hegemony

is a kind of - in registry terms

relation

was theorised by - as cultural hegemony

Antonio Gramsci

is contrasted with - formal control

empire

In practice

Families and kinds

hegemony in ancient Greek city states

hegemonic powers in international relations

liberal hegemony as a US foreign policy debate

cultural hegemony in Gramscian theory

dominant narratives and ideological resonance

contested historical memory such as the Marcos debate

Standards and regulation

No regulation

Failure modes and hazards

Partisan framing of hegemony debates

Registry alias naming a specific political controversy

Conflating senses

Also called

ideological resonanceLiberal Hegemonycultural hegemonydominant narrativeaccusations of historical distortion regarding Ferdinand E. E. Marcos

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Also registered as vr.tr.hegemony

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What hegemony is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is hegemony, and how does it differ from empire, domination by force and influence? definition
  2. Is the question about international relations, cultural theory or a specific debate? boundary

Senses

Senses.

Senses

Senses.

  1. What are cultural hegemony, liberal hegemony, dominant narratives and ideological resonance? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific sense? action
Theory Theory.

Attribution.

Gramsci

Gramsci.

Gramsci

Gramsci.

  1. What did Gramsci argue about cultural hegemony and consent, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

IR

International relations.

IR

IR.

  1. What do hegemonic stability theory and its critics say, and what is the liberal hegemony debate, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Narratives Narratives and memory.

Attribution.

Dominant

Dominant narratives.

Dominant

Dominant.

  1. How do dominant narratives and ideological resonance work in media and politics, as scholars describe? provenance
  2. Which entry fits narrative? action

Marcos

Marcos memory debate.

Marcos

Marcos.

  1. What is the debate about historical distortion regarding Ferdinand Marcos, with positions of historians and political actors attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral and attributed? boundary
Context History and today.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How has hegemony been used from ancient Greece to modern great powers? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of international relations? action

Today

Today.

Today

Today.

  1. What debates exist about hegemonic transition today, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits great power competition? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should cultural hegemony and liberal hegemony be separate primary entries?
  • How should academic sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has a Marcos historical distortion alias that names a specific debate; should it be split off?