{ "model": { "rank": 3638, "code": "thing-q1821239", "model_id": "vr.tr.day-of-judgment", "name": "Day of Judgment", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify the creative work registered as Day of Judgment, distinguish it from similarly titled works and the religious concept, and determine which versions and uses are supported by evidence.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q1821239/", "tier": 2, "score": 83, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 83, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q1821239", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1821239", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:45:21Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c53-a5b5-7a80-9bb5-d6ddd25fb310\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Day of Judgment\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 69.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c53-a5c3-72f3-addb-c78e1ab5401f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Day of Judgment\nRegistry id: vr.tr.day-of-judgment\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q1821239", "registryId": "vr.tr.day-of-judgment", "name": "Day of Judgment", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q1821239/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.day-of-judgment", "name": "Day of Judgment", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify the creative work registered as Day of Judgment, distinguish it from similarly titled works and the religious concept, and determine which versions and uses are supported by evidence.", "definition": "Day of Judgment commonly denotes the anticipated divine judgment of humanity in religious eschatology, but it also occurs as a title of creative works, and this registry record does not establish which sense is intended.", "scope_statement": "This model provisionally owns Day of Judgment as a titled creative work, following the supplied INF / INF.MED classification and batch context; its creator, medium and exact referent remain unresolved because the registry provides no definition.", "in_scope": [ "Evidence identifying the work represented by vr.tr.day-of-judgment", "Original, translated and alternative titles associated with the identified work", "The work's treatment of judgment and related themes, where established by its content", "Relationships among the work, its expressions, editions and adaptations", "Evidence governing access, quotation, reproduction and other proposed uses" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The Day of Judgment as a religious doctrine or anticipated event", "Other works sharing this title unless evidence establishes an identity or version relationship", "Independent adaptations, which require related work records", "Physical copies and individual digital files as owned or stored items", "General biographies of creators and histories of religious traditions" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identification requires a supported combination of title, creator, medium and release or publication context; the title alone is insufficient.", "The supplied classification provisionally points to a mediated work, while a record describing divine final judgment without a particular work would challenge that interpretation.", "A translated title matching Day of Judgment does not establish identity without a link to the original work.", "An adaptation depicting the same judgment narrative is distinguishable from a translation or edition of the identified work.", "Religious imagery or terminology in the work must be distinguished from claims that the work represents an entire tradition's doctrine." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Referent resolution", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unresolved | candidate identified | corroborated | conflicting evidence", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether an agent may attach work-specific descriptions and relationships to this registry entry." }, { "name": "Attested title and language", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Source-attested title strings with language and original, translated or alternative title role", "why_it_matters": "Day of Judgment may be an English title shared by unrelated works or used to translate different original titles." }, { "name": "Creative medium", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Unresolved until evidenced; possible categories include literary work, film, visual artwork or musical work", "why_it_matters": "Determines which content units, version distinctions and identifiers are appropriate." }, { "name": "Creator attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Attributed person or organisation, creative role, supporting source and attribution status", "why_it_matters": "Separates title collisions and prevents attribution from a different work being imported." }, { "name": "Judgment referent", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Religious final judgment | secular reckoning | metaphorical judgment | multiple | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes the work's evidenced subject from associations suggested only by its title." }, { "name": "Version relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Original expression | translation | revision | edition | adaptation | relationship unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Prevents a particular translation, release or adaptation from silently standing for the whole work." }, { "name": "Proposed-use clearance", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unassessed | supported for specified use and jurisdiction | permission required | conflicting evidence", "why_it_matters": "Makes an agent assess the selected expression and intended use before reproducing content." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare candidate works titled Day of Judgment and record why each matches or fails to match the registry entry.", "Attach corroborated title, creator and medium evidence to the resolved work.", "Describe how the identified work portrays judgment while separating content evidence from interpretation.", "Link translations, editions and adaptations with explicit relationship types.", "Select and cite a particular expression or edition for a requested passage or analysis.", "Assess a proposed quotation or reproduction using evidence specific to the selected material and jurisdiction." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "day-of-judgment-identity", "name": "Day of Judgment identity", "description": "Establish which titled work the registry entry denotes before describing its content.", "rationale": "The missing definition and potentially ambiguous title make referent resolution a prerequisite for reliable modeling.", "layers": [ { "id": "registry-sense", "name": "Registry sense", "description": "Test the provisional creative-work interpretation against registry provenance.", "findings": [ { "id": "work-or-doctrine", "name": "Work or doctrine", "description": "Record evidence determining whether this entry names a particular work or has been classified under an inappropriate sense.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which upstream record or identifier supplied Day of Judgment to vr.tr.day-of-judgment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "work-or-doctrine-q01" }, { "text": "Does that record identify a particular creative work or the religious concept of final judgment?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "work-or-doctrine-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "title-collision-resolution", "name": "Title collision resolution", "description": "Disambiguate the intended work using evidence beyond its English label.", "findings": [ { "id": "identifying-title-context", "name": "Identifying title context", "description": "Capture the supported title, creator, medium and publication or release context that distinguish the intended referent.", "questions": [ { "text": "What source establishes the creator, medium and publication or release context of the intended Day of Judgment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "identifying-title-context-q01" }, { "text": "Is Day of Judgment an original title, a translated title or an alternative title, and which similarly titled works must be excluded?", "kind": "definition", "id": "identifying-title-context-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "judgment-in-the-work", "name": "Judgment in the work", "description": "Describe the evidenced meaning and presentation of judgment in the identified work.", "rationale": "The title invites religious and apocalyptic assumptions that the work's actual content may not support.", "layers": [ { "id": "judgment-subject", "name": "Judgment subject", "description": "Establish what judgment means within this particular work.", "findings": [ { "id": "judgment-agency-and-stakes", "name": "Judgment agency and stakes", "description": "Record who or what judges, who or what is judged, and what consequences are represented, where these elements exist.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the work depict divine final judgment, human reckoning, a metaphorical judgment or another subject?", "kind": "definition", "id": "judgment-agency-and-stakes-q01" }, { "text": "Which passages, scenes or visual elements support identifying the judging authority, subjects and consequences?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "judgment-agency-and-stakes-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "portrayal-and-interpretation", "name": "Portrayal and interpretation", "description": "Separate what the work presents from interpretations applied to it.", "findings": [ { "id": "religious-and-critical-attribution", "name": "Religious and critical attribution", "description": "Attribute claims about religious traditions, symbolism and authorial intent to evidence rather than inferring them from the title.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which connections to religious texts or traditions are explicit in the work, and which are proposed by commentators?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "religious-and-critical-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Whose interpretation supports each claim about the meaning of judgment, and where can that interpretation be checked?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "religious-and-critical-attribution-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "titles-versions-and-adaptations", "name": "Titles, versions and adaptations", "description": "Maintain the identity of Day of Judgment across language, editorial and medium changes.", "rationale": "An English title can conceal a translated expression, while retellings and adaptations may be separate works.", "layers": [ { "id": "expression-lineage", "name": "Expression lineage", "description": "Identify translations and revisions and their relationship to the work.", "findings": [ { "id": "original-and-translated-expressions", "name": "Original and translated expressions", "description": "Record the expression consulted, its language and contributors, and evidence connecting it to the identified work.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which original-language expression is associated with this work, and what evidence links any English-titled expression to it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "original-and-translated-expressions-q01" }, { "text": "Do translations or revisions alter wording, sequence or judgment-related imagery enough to require expression-specific descriptions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "original-and-translated-expressions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "edition-and-adaptation-boundaries", "name": "Edition and adaptation boundaries", "description": "Distinguish issued versions from independent creative transformations.", "findings": [ { "id": "related-object-classification", "name": "Related object classification", "description": "Classify a related publication, release or retelling by its evidenced relationship to Day of Judgment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is each related object an edition, release, reproduction or independent adaptation, and what evidence supports that classification?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "related-object-classification-q01" }, { "text": "Which edition or release identifiers locate the expression an agent actually consulted?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "related-object-classification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-access-and-use", "name": "Evidence, access and use", "description": "Support verifiable analysis and justified use of the identified Day of Judgment material.", "rationale": "A catalogue description cannot substitute for examining the work, and availability does not establish reproduction rights.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-evidence", "name": "Content evidence", "description": "Make descriptions traceable to the specific material examined.", "findings": [ { "id": "inspection-and-citation", "name": "Inspection and citation", "description": "Record whether an agent examined the complete work, an excerpt, a reproduction or only secondary descriptions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was Day of Judgment examined directly, and was the available material complete or partial?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "inspection-and-citation-q01" }, { "text": "What medium-appropriate locator allows another agent to verify each cited passage, scene or visual detail?", "kind": "action", "id": "inspection-and-citation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "use-specific-rights", "name": "Use-specific rights", "description": "Assess the selected work material against a concrete proposed use.", "findings": [ { "id": "quotation-and-reproduction-basis", "name": "Quotation and reproduction basis", "description": "Record the evidence relevant to quoting, displaying, distributing or adapting the selected expression or reproduction.", "questions": [ { "text": "What rights or licence evidence applies to the selected Day of Judgment expression and any translation or reproduction being used?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "quotation-and-reproduction-basis-q01" }, { "text": "For the intended jurisdiction and use, what evidence supports proceeding or establishes that permission is required?", "kind": "action", "id": "quotation-and-reproduction-basis-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The INF.MED domain and creative-work context suggest a titled work may be intended; establish its creator, date, medium or registry identifier first.", "The substantive description here covers the common religious meaning, not an identified creative work.", "No sources were consulted, and no work-specific identifiers, rights claims or edition details are asserted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Day of Judgment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The religious concept informs teachings about moral accountability, resurrection and humanity's ultimate destiny.", "Judgment imagery appears in literature, visual art and other creative works." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Day of Judgment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Assigning the religious meaning to a registry entry intended to identify a particular creative work.", "Conflating distinct religious accounts of final judgment.", "Treating a work, its edition and an individual copy as the same entity." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Day of Judgment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Last Judgment", "difference": "Often names the same religious concept; equivalence cannot establish which titled work this record might denote." }, { "name": "Resurrection of the dead", "difference": "Concerns restoration to life; judgment concerns divine assessment, although traditions may connect them." }, { "name": "Eschatology", "difference": "The broader study or doctrine of ultimate things, including judgment and other final events." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Day of Judgment this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which exact work or concept does vr.tr.day-of-judgment identify, and does its upstream record support the supplied INF / INF.MED classification?", "Who created the intended work, in which medium and language, and is Day of Judgment its original or translated title?", "Does an existing Vercy model already cover this referent, requiring a registry link instead of a separate model?", "Which judgment-related themes and religious associations are established by direct examination rather than inferred from the title?", "Which expressions and editions provide reliable access, and what rights evidence applies to their intended uses?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 12, "questions": 20 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Day of Judgment, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to identify the creative work registered as Day of Judgment, distinguish it from similarly titled works and the religious concept, and determine which versions and uses are supported by evidence.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 83 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Day of Judgment, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 83 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Day of Judgment from another, and a Day of Judgment from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Day of Judgment sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Day of Judgment from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Day of Judgment passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Day of Judgment between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Day of Judgment, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Day of Judgment is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a Day of Judgment says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a Day of Judgment contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a Day of Judgment and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What Day of Judgment studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does Day of Judgment take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does Day of Judgment establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where Day of Judgment is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark Day of Judgment as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place Day of Judgment, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Day of Judgment came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Day of Judgment and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Day of Judgment is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Day of Judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Day of Judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Day of Judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }