{ "model": { "rank": 3359, "code": "thing-q182899", "model_id": "vr.tr.quarantine", "name": "quarantine", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a quarantine arrangement, assess its containment and review state, and identify which actions require evidence or authorisation.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q182899/", "tier": 2, "score": 87, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "K-Quarantine", "reverse quarantine", "Plant quarantine", "self-quarantine" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 87, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q182899", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q182899", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:33:02Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 25.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c48-765a-7131-a90d-14593174eca4\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: quarantine\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.KNW\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 546 things:\n# Batch 003: 1001 regis", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 63.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c48-764f-7561-a5dd-69cd7cc80d2e\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: quarantine\nRegistry id: vr.tr.quarantine\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q182899", "registryId": "vr.tr.quarantine", "name": "quarantine", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q182899/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.quarantine", "name": "quarantine", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a quarantine arrangement, assess its containment and review state, and identify which actions require evidence or authorisation.", "definition": "Quarantine is the separation or restriction of movement of people, animals, plants or associated materials that may have been exposed to an infectious agent or regulated pest, to prevent its spread while their status is assessed.", "scope_statement": "This draft models quarantine as precautionary separation or restriction applied to a potentially hazardous subject pending assessment or release; the intended registry sense remains uncertain because no definition is recorded and the INF / INF.KNW placement does not establish whether public-health, biosecurity, or digital quarantine is intended.", "in_scope": [ "The subject placed under quarantine and the suspected hazard motivating it", "The boundary separating quarantined subjects from protected populations or environments", "Restrictions, permitted interactions, and controlled transfers", "Authority, responsibilities, review arrangements, and affected-party safeguards", "Evidence and decisions governing continuation, modification, escalation, or release" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Diagnosis or treatment of disease", "General cybersecurity detection and malware remediation", "Permanent imprisonment or punitive detention", "Routine storage without a hazard-related restriction", "The entire emergency response or biosecurity programme containing the quarantine" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A quarantine record identifies a suspected hazard or unresolved exposure concern; separation alone is insufficient.", "Quarantine restricts specified contact, movement, access, or execution rather than merely attaching a warning label.", "The arrangement identifies what is protected and which pathways the restriction is intended to interrupt.", "Continuation and release depend on stated review conditions rather than an assumption of permanent exclusion.", "In the public-health sense, the model must distinguish quarantine following possible exposure from isolation of people known or suspected to be ill; other senses require their own terminology." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Quarantine sense", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "human public health | animal biosecurity | plant biosecurity | digital security | other | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines which hazards, authorities, evidence, and release rules apply." }, { "name": "Quarantined subject", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Reference to a person, cohort, organism, consignment, material, digital artifact, or other identified subject", "why_it_matters": "Prevents restrictions and evidence from being applied to the wrong subject." }, { "name": "Hazard basis", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "References to exposure reports, alerts, observations, or assessments, with uncertainty recorded", "why_it_matters": "Makes the reason for precautionary restriction inspectable." }, { "name": "Containment boundary", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Protected population or environment, restricted subject, and controlled interaction pathways", "why_it_matters": "Defines what containment is supposed to prevent." }, { "name": "Restriction profile", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Explicit permitted, prohibited, and conditional movements or interactions", "why_it_matters": "Translates quarantine status into operational constraints." }, { "name": "Quarantine lifecycle state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "proposed | active | under review | released | transferred to another control", "why_it_matters": "Separates a pending decision from an imposed or ended restriction." }, { "name": "Containment integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unverified | verified within stated limits | suspected breach | confirmed breach", "why_it_matters": "An active quarantine may still fail to contain the relevant pathway." }, { "name": "Elapsed restriction time", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Hours or days since the recorded start event, with any clock-reset rule identified", "why_it_matters": "Supports scheduled review without treating elapsed time alone as proof of safety." }, { "name": "Release conditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Applicable criteria, required evidence, and authorised decision-maker", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes eligibility for release from an actual release decision." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare the recorded arrangement against the selected sense of quarantine.", "Identify missing hazard evidence, uncontrolled pathways, or ambiguous restrictions.", "Track reviews, observations, exceptions, and suspected containment breaches.", "Check whether a proposed interaction satisfies recorded restrictions and approval requirements.", "Assemble a release or continuation review with unmet conditions made explicit.", "Route decisions to the responsible authority while preserving their evidence and rationale." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "sense-and-hazard-basis", "name": "Sense and hazard basis", "description": "Establishes what quarantine means in this record and why it has been proposed or imposed.", "rationale": "The same word covers materially different controls, and the registry currently supplies no definition.", "layers": [ { "id": "quarantine-sense", "name": "Quarantine sense", "description": "Identifies the applicable usage and its neighbouring concepts.", "findings": [ { "id": "sense-and-boundary", "name": "Sense and boundary", "description": "Record the selected sense and the convention distinguishing quarantine from isolation, detention, storage, or sandboxing.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which usage of quarantine does this record represent?", "kind": "definition", "id": "sense-and-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Under the applicable terminology, what distinguishes this arrangement from its nearest neighbouring control?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "sense-and-boundary-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "precautionary-trigger", "name": "Precautionary trigger", "description": "Connects the restriction to an identified subject and unresolved hazard concern.", "findings": [ { "id": "trigger-evidence", "name": "Trigger evidence", "description": "Record the event, alert, exposure, or assessment supporting quarantine without treating suspicion as confirmation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence links this subject to the suspected hazard, and who supplied it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "trigger-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which uncertainty is quarantine intended to manage?", "kind": "definition", "id": "trigger-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "containment-and-contact", "name": "Containment and contact", "description": "Describes the protected environment and the interactions quarantine restricts.", "rationale": "A quarantine label is meaningful only when its boundary and controlled pathways are explicit.", "layers": [ { "id": "protected-boundary", "name": "Protected boundary", "description": "Identifies what must remain separated and which pathways can cross the boundary.", "findings": [ { "id": "pathway-coverage", "name": "Pathway coverage", "description": "Record the hazard-relevant pathways addressed by physical, procedural, or technical controls.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which population, system, or environment is this quarantine intended to protect?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "pathway-coverage-q01" }, { "text": "Which contact, movement, transfer, or execution pathways remain possible?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "pathway-coverage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "controlled-interactions", "name": "Controlled interactions", "description": "Makes permissions and exceptions explicit at the containment boundary.", "findings": [ { "id": "interaction-rules", "name": "Interaction rules", "description": "Record permitted interactions, prerequisites, and exception approvals specific to the quarantined subject.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which interactions are prohibited, permitted, or conditional while quarantine is active?", "kind": "action", "id": "interaction-rules-q01" }, { "text": "Who may authorise an exception, and what containment conditions must accompany it?", "kind": "action", "id": "interaction-rules-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authority-and-provision", "name": "Authority and provision", "description": "Connects restrictive powers to accountable decision-makers and the provisions needed to sustain quarantine.", "rationale": "Quarantine restricts otherwise available actions and can create needs that the restriction itself prevents subjects from meeting.", "layers": [ { "id": "decision-authority", "name": "Decision authority", "description": "Records the applicable basis for imposing, changing, and reviewing restrictions.", "findings": [ { "id": "mandate-and-review", "name": "Mandate and review", "description": "Identify the applicable policy, consent arrangement, or legal authority and its review mechanism.", "questions": [ { "text": "What documented basis authorises this quarantine, and to which subjects and setting does it apply?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "mandate-and-review-q01" }, { "text": "Who can review, challenge, modify, or end the restriction?", "kind": "action", "id": "mandate-and-review-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "sustaining-provisions", "name": "Sustaining provisions", "description": "Identifies support and preservation requirements created by separation.", "findings": [ { "id": "needs-under-restriction", "name": "Needs under restriction", "description": "Record applicable care, essential access, communication, or artifact-preservation needs and how they can be met within containment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which essential needs or preservation requirements become difficult to meet because of quarantine?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "needs-under-restriction-q01" }, { "text": "Who must provide for those needs, and through which permitted interactions?", "kind": "action", "id": "needs-under-restriction-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "monitoring-and-breaches", "name": "Monitoring and breaches", "description": "Tracks changes in hazard evidence and the integrity of containment.", "rationale": "Quarantine can remain administratively active while its justification or practical effectiveness changes.", "layers": [ { "id": "hazard-reassessment", "name": "Hazard reassessment", "description": "Collects observations relevant to continued precautionary restriction.", "findings": [ { "id": "review-observations", "name": "Review observations", "description": "Record observations with their timing, method, subject coverage, and interpretive limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observations or assessments are required at each review?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "review-observations-q01" }, { "text": "What limits prevent an observation or negative result from settling the hazard concern?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "review-observations-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "containment-incidents", "name": "Containment incidents", "description": "Distinguishes suspected boundary failures from confirmed interactions and resulting exposure concerns.", "findings": [ { "id": "breach-and-consequences", "name": "Breach and consequences", "description": "Record the affected pathway, available evidence, potentially affected subjects, and required reassessment.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence indicates that a restricted interaction occurred, and which subjects or environments were involved?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "breach-and-consequences-q01" }, { "text": "Which containment, notification, or review actions does the applicable procedure require after this incident?", "kind": "action", "id": "breach-and-consequences-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "duration-and-disposition", "name": "Duration and disposition", "description": "Defines review timing and the evidence needed to continue, release, or replace quarantine.", "rationale": "Precautionary restriction needs explicit exit conditions and a distinction between meeting criteria and executing a decision.", "layers": [ { "id": "review-clock", "name": "Review clock", "description": "Anchors review timing to the appropriate event and governing rule.", "findings": [ { "id": "time-basis", "name": "Time basis", "description": "Record the start event, next review, and any justified change to the timing basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which event starts the applicable review or duration clock, and how is its time established?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "time-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence or rule can change that clock or require an earlier review?", "kind": "action", "id": "time-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "exit-decision", "name": "Exit decision", "description": "Separates release eligibility, authorised disposition, and operational removal of restrictions.", "findings": [ { "id": "release-or-transition", "name": "Release or transition", "description": "Record whether criteria support release, continued quarantine, or transfer to another control, including unresolved concerns.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which applicable exit conditions are satisfied, unmet, or unresolved, and what evidence supports that assessment?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "release-or-transition-q01" }, { "text": "Who authorises the disposition, and how is completion of release or transfer verified?", "kind": "action", "id": "release-or-transition-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The registry supplies no sense. This description covers biological and public-health quarantine; the INF.KNW domain code and field-of-knowledge batch context do not establish that interpretation.", "Quarantine is ordinarily a practice or regulatory measure, rather than an independent academic discipline.", "Named instruments are recalled, not checked; their current editions, amendments and jurisdiction-specific application require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Human public-health quarantine", "Animal quarantine", "Plant quarantine", "Pre-entry quarantine", "Post-entry quarantine" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "International Health Regulations (2005), World Health Organization: international public-health framework that includes quarantine measures.", "Terrestrial Animal Health Code, World Organisation for Animal Health: international standards addressing animal-health measures, including quarantine.", "International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures No. 5, Glossary of phytosanitary terms, International Plant Protection Convention: defines quarantine-related plant-health terminology." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Separating exposed people during communicable-disease investigations.", "Holding imported or newly introduced animals apart from resident populations.", "Growing imported plants under containment to detect pests before release.", "Restricting movement of potentially contaminated goods or conveyances." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Quarantine duration", "typical_range": "Depends on the agent or pest, exposure history, surveillance method and release criteria; no universal range.", "unit": "days" }, { "quantity": "Compliance with quarantine requirements", "typical_range": "0-100", "unit": "%" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Release before infection or infestation becomes detectable.", "Transmission within shared quarantine facilities.", "Containment failures involving movement, ventilation, equipment or waste.", "False reassurance from negative tests taken at an unsuitable time.", "Restrictions causing psychological distress, lost income, stigma or disrupted access to care." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Legal authority, compulsory powers, review procedures and support for affected people differ between jurisdictions.", "Plant and animal quarantine requirements depend on local pest or disease status and the origin of the consignment." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Isolation", "difference": "In human public health, isolation separates people known or suspected to be infected; quarantine restricts people who may have been exposed but are not known to be infected." }, { "name": "Cordón sanitaire", "difference": "A cordon restricts movement across a geographic boundary; quarantine can apply to individual people, organisms or consignments." }, { "name": "Biosecurity", "difference": "Biosecurity encompasses measures preventing biological-agent introduction or spread; quarantine is one such measure." }, { "name": "Phytosanitary inspection", "difference": "Inspection examines plants or associated articles for pests or compliance; quarantine imposes containment or restrictions." }, { "name": "Computer-security quarantine", "difference": "This distinct computing sense segregates suspicious files or systems rather than managing biological exposure." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of quarantine this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which sense of quarantine was intended by vr.tr.quarantine, and does its INF / INF.KNW placement reflect a deliberate classification or an import artifact?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Which authoritative sources establish the definition and neighbouring-control boundaries for the intended sense?", "Which jurisdiction, institutional policy, or technical standard should govern authority, review, monitoring, and release in the intended applications?", "Is a cross-domain quarantine model useful at this registry granularity, or should the publication cover one evidenced sense and relate it to other uses?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 28 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a quarantine, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a quarantine arrangement, assess its containment and review state, and identify which actions require evidence or authorisation.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: K-Quarantine, reverse quarantine, Plant quarantine, self-quarantine.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 87 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a quarantine, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "K-Quarantine", "reverse quarantine", "Plant quarantine", "self-quarantine" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 87 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one quarantine from another, and a quarantine from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a quarantine sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a quarantine from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a quarantine passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a quarantine between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a quarantine, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a quarantine is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a quarantine proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a quarantine, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a quarantine and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a quarantine consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a quarantine takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What quarantine is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of quarantine are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is quarantine operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of quarantine and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of quarantine?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as quarantine?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a quarantine came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a quarantine and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a quarantine is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a quarantine, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a quarantine, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a quarantine is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }