{ "model": { "rank": 5667, "code": "thing-q185000", "model_id": "vr.tr.boeing-b-17-flying-fortress", "name": "Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, assess a particular airframe's documented configuration and condition, and determine which preservation, access or operating actions its evidence supports.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Physical world and living systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "PHY", "domain": "PHY.MAT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q185000/", "tier": 2, "score": 65, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Boeing PB-1 Flying Fortress", "Model 299", "Y1B-17 Flying Fortress", "Y1B-17A Flying Fortress", "B-17B Flying Fortress", "B-17C Flying Fortress", "B-17D Flying Fortress", "B-17E Flying Fortress", "B-17F Flying Fortress", "Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress", "Fortress Mk.III", "F-9 Flying Fortress", "SB-17G Flying Fortress", "C-108 Flying Fortress", "QB-17 Flying Fortress", "XB-38 Flying Fortress" ], "aliasCount": 16, "merged": 16, "knownIn": 65, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q185000", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q185000", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T08:57:33Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "missingProviders": [ "Grok" ], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": null, "turns": null, "seconds": 15.8, "error": "Error: Internal error: {\n \"message\": \"API error (status 402 Payment Required): Grok Build usage balance exhausted\",\n \"http_status\": 402\n}", "retried": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 107.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b14-a939-7500-a3d9-3dcf2f08e913\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress\nRegistry id: vr.tr.boeing-b-17-flying-fortress\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames f" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q185000", "registryId": "vr.tr.boeing-b-17-flying-fortress", "name": "Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q185000/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.boeing-b-17-flying-fortress", "name": "Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, assess a particular airframe's documented configuration and condition, and determine which preservation, access or operating actions its evidence supports.", "definition": "", "scope_statement": "This model owns the recognition criteria and airframe-level assessment of vr.tr.boeing-b-17-flying-fortress within PHY / PHY.OBJ, distinguishing family characteristics, production configuration, subsequent modifications and present physical state.", "in_scope": [ "B-17 family membership, variant attribution and individual airframe identity", "Production configuration, installed equipment and documented conversions", "Airframe integrity, completeness and subsystem serviceability", "Evidence connecting surviving material, markings and service history", "Aircraft-specific constraints on conservation, access, movement and operation" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Campaign histories, bombing doctrine and individual combat missions as independent subjects", "Crew biographies, squadron organizations and operator histories beyond their relationship to an airframe", "Detailed standalone models of engines, propellers, weapons and avionics", "Airport infrastructure, museum management and maintenance organizations", "Flight instruction, combat employment and jurisdiction-wide aviation rules", "Scale models, fictional depictions and replicas as independently classified objects" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require production identifiers and documentary lineage consistent with the B-17 family; Boeing branding alone is insufficient because Douglas and Vega also manufactured B-17s. [Museum of Flight](https://www.museumofflight.org/exhibits-and-events/aircraft/boeing-b-17f-flying-fortress)", "Compare the observed engine arrangement, wing position, landing gear and tail profile against a documented B-17 variant reference and competing B-24 or B-29 identifications; do not identify it solely as a four-engine bomber.", "Use the nose turret as a configuration clue when distinguishing a B-17G from a B-17F, then check modification history before assigning the variant. [National Museum of the U.S. Air Force](https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195966/boeing-b-17f-memphis-belle/)", "Cross-check structural identity against painted names and serials to distinguish a historical aircraft from another B-17 portraying it; film use and repainting can change represented identity. [Museum of Flight](https://www.museumofflight.org/exhibits-and-events/aircraft/boeing-b-17f-flying-fortress)", "Separate original aircraft, composite restorations and replicas by tracing surviving structure and replacement provenance; external resemblance alone does not establish airframe continuity." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Identity confidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "confirmed; provisional; disputed; unidentified, with supporting evidence", "why_it_matters": "Prevents assigning a famous B-17's history to an aircraft carrying its markings." }, { "name": "Production attribution", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "documented variant, production block and manufacturer; unknown where unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines which configuration references and parts evidence apply." }, { "name": "Airframe identifier continuity", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "links among construction number, military serial, civil registration and surviving structure", "why_it_matters": "Connects records across military service, disposal, conversion and preservation." }, { "name": "Configuration at assessment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "dated inventory of nose, tail, turret, bomb-bay, crew-station and conversion features", "why_it_matters": "Separates the present aircraft from its factory configuration and displayed historical appearance." }, { "name": "Dimensional envelope", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "metres for span, length, height and movement clearances, with configuration", "why_it_matters": "Supports identification checks, hangar fit and transport planning." }, { "name": "Mass and balance", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "kg and centre-of-gravity position relative to a documented datum, with loading state and date", "why_it_matters": "Equipment removal and restoration changes affect handling and operating suitability." }, { "name": "Structural condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "location-specific inspected condition, defects, repairs, inaccessible areas and inspection date", "why_it_matters": "A complete-looking B-17 may have unresolved damage in load-bearing structure." }, { "name": "Powerplant installation", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "engine and propeller identities, installation positions and associated maintenance records", "why_it_matters": "Serviceability and historical correctness must be assessed for each installed unit." }, { "name": "Military equipment condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "absent; replica; documented inert; unresolved; functional, assessed per item", "why_it_matters": "A turret or bomb-bay exhibit does not establish equipment functionality or safe access." }, { "name": "Action eligibility", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "supported; conditional; unsupported; unknown, separately for display, entry, towing, engine running and flight", "why_it_matters": "Preservation quality, mechanical capability and current authorization answer different questions." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify a candidate B-17 and reconcile contradictory variant, serial and marking evidence.", "Compare the installed configuration with a selected, documented period of the airframe's history.", "Prioritize inspections and conservation work for missing, deteriorated or undocumented B-17 assemblies.", "Assess proposed visitor access, towing or transport against the aircraft's measured condition and configuration.", "Assemble the evidence required for qualified personnel to evaluate engine running or flight.", "Explain which displayed features are original, replaced, reconstructed or historically representative." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "b-17-identity", "name": "B-17 identity", "description": "Establish family membership and the identity of the particular physical aircraft.", "rationale": "Variant resemblance and commemorative markings can obscure which B-17 survives.", "layers": [ { "id": "family-and-variant", "name": "Family and variant", "description": "Test B-17 attribution against documented configuration evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "variant-attribution", "name": "Variant attribution", "description": "Record the evidence supporting family, variant and production-block identification, including conflicting features.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which documented B-17 variant matches the observed nose, tail, wing, landing-gear and defensive-station configuration?", "kind": "definition", "id": "variant-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Which mismatches reflect documented alterations, and which leave the B-17 attribution uncertain?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "variant-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "individual-airframe", "name": "Individual airframe", "description": "Connect identifiers to surviving material rather than appearance alone.", "findings": [ { "id": "serial-and-material-continuity", "name": "Serial and material continuity", "description": "Distinguish the physical airframe's identity from registrations, nicknames and identities represented by paint.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which construction records, military serials and civil registrations can be linked to this surviving structure?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "serial-and-material-continuity-q01" }, { "text": "Do the displayed serial and nose art identify this airframe or commemorate another B-17?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "serial-and-material-continuity-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-17-configuration", "name": "B-17 configuration", "description": "Describe the aircraft's dated physical arrangement and departures from its production baseline.", "rationale": "A variant label cannot fully describe a modified or restored B-17.", "layers": [ { "id": "production-baseline", "name": "Production baseline", "description": "Establish the applicable factory arrangement without assuming all B-17s shared it.", "findings": [ { "id": "as-built-arrangement", "name": "As-built arrangement", "description": "Identify the documented original defensive stations, crew spaces, bomb bay and major assemblies.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which factory records or applicable manuals establish this production block's original equipment and arrangement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "as-built-arrangement-q01" }, { "text": "Which observed nose, waist, ventral and tail installations agree with that baseline?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "as-built-arrangement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "conversion-and-restoration", "name": "Conversion and restoration", "description": "Track alterations and the historical configuration a restoration intends to represent.", "findings": [ { "id": "configuration-change-history", "name": "Configuration change history", "description": "Separate documented service changes, civil conversions and restoration choices from unexplained differences.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which changes to the bomb bay, turrets, crew spaces or installed systems are documented, and when were they made?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "configuration-change-history-q01" }, { "text": "Which historical date or role is the present restoration intended to represent, and which features depart from it?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "configuration-change-history-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-17-structural-integrity", "name": "B-17 structural integrity", "description": "Assess surviving load-bearing structure and the geometry relevant to supporting or moving the aircraft.", "rationale": "The condition of wings, fuselage and landing-gear attachments determines which interventions are supportable.", "layers": [ { "id": "load-bearing-structure", "name": "Load-bearing structure", "description": "Locate deterioration, damage and repairs in the B-17 airframe.", "findings": [ { "id": "structural-evidence", "name": "Structural evidence", "description": "Associate inspection results with wing attachments, spars, fuselage frames, tail structure and landing-gear supports.", "questions": [ { "text": "What do dated inspections establish about corrosion, cracking, deformation and repair condition at these locations?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "structural-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which load-bearing areas remain inaccessible or insufficiently documented for the proposed action?", "kind": "action", "id": "structural-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ground-support-and-envelope", "name": "Ground support and envelope", "description": "Assess the aircraft in its actual assembled, stored or transport configuration.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-and-support-constraints", "name": "Movement and support constraints", "description": "Record measured clearances, support condition and applicable handling evidence.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the aircraft's present dimensions, mass distribution and landing-gear or cradle support conditions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "movement-and-support-constraints-q01" }, { "text": "Which documented B-17 handling provisions and current restrictions govern towing, lifting or disassembly?", "kind": "action", "id": "movement-and-support-constraints-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-17-installed-systems", "name": "B-17 installed systems", "description": "Assess installed propulsion and aircraft systems through configuration-specific evidence.", "rationale": "An assembled B-17 can contain functional, disconnected, substituted and display-only systems simultaneously.", "layers": [ { "id": "engines-and-propellers", "name": "Engines and propellers", "description": "Evaluate each installed powerplant and its supporting interfaces.", "findings": [ { "id": "powerplant-status", "name": "Powerplant status", "description": "Link engine and propeller positions to identity, maintenance evidence and unresolved defects.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which engine and propeller assemblies occupy each position, and what records establish their installation and maintenance status?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "powerplant-status-q01" }, { "text": "What inspection evidence supports the condition of their mounts, fuel and oil connections, controls and fire-protection provisions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "powerplant-status-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "controls-and-support-systems", "name": "Controls and support systems", "description": "Distinguish installed completeness from demonstrated aircraft-system function.", "findings": [ { "id": "system-function-evidence", "name": "System function evidence", "description": "Record evidence for flight controls, landing gear, brakes, electrical equipment and crew-support installations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which systems have documented functional checks, and which are disconnected, incomplete or represented by display components?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "system-function-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which defects or configuration uncertainties prevent the particular proposed ground or flight activity?", "kind": "action", "id": "system-function-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-17-military-interior", "name": "B-17 military interior", "description": "Describe the condition and accessibility of defensive stations, bomb-bay equipment and crew spaces.", "rationale": "Restored military equipment and constrained internal access require judgments beyond exterior completeness.", "layers": [ { "id": "defensive-and-bomb-bay-equipment", "name": "Defensive and bomb-bay equipment", "description": "Identify installed military equipment and the evidence establishing its present state.", "findings": [ { "id": "equipment-authenticity-and-condition", "name": "Equipment authenticity and condition", "description": "Separate original equipment, reproductions, missing assemblies and documented inert items.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which turret, gun-mount, sighting and bomb-bay components are original, replacements, replicas or absent?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "equipment-authenticity-and-condition-q01" }, { "text": "What item-specific evidence establishes inert status, isolation or restrictions on handling and demonstration?", "kind": "action", "id": "equipment-authenticity-and-condition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "crew-space-access", "name": "Crew-space access", "description": "Assess access through the aircraft's actual hatches, passages and occupied stations.", "findings": [ { "id": "interior-access-conditions", "name": "Interior access conditions", "description": "Record the physical constraints and conservation limits governing entry into the cockpit, nose, waist and other retained spaces.", "questions": [ { "text": "What are the measured access clearances and inspected conditions of floors, steps, handholds and exit routes?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "interior-access-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "Which stations may visitors or maintainers enter under the current support arrangements and conservation restrictions?", "kind": "action", "id": "interior-access-conditions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "b-17-preservation-and-use", "name": "B-17 preservation and use", "description": "Connect historical significance and current evidence to decisions about the surviving aircraft.", "rationale": "A B-17 can be historically authentic, mechanically complete or authorized for a particular activity to different degrees.", "layers": [ { "id": "historical-material", "name": "Historical material", "description": "Identify the surviving fabric that substantiates this airframe's history.", "findings": [ { "id": "conservation-significance", "name": "Conservation significance", "description": "Associate service claims with records and identify material that an intervention could erase.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which service episodes are supported by records tied to this serial rather than to its displayed identity?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "conservation-significance-q01" }, { "text": "Which markings, repairs or original assemblies should be documented or conserved before replacement or refinishing?", "kind": "action", "id": "conservation-significance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "activity-specific-eligibility", "name": "Activity-specific eligibility", "description": "Judge a proposed activity using dated condition evidence and applicable approvals.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-use-decision", "name": "Supported use decision", "description": "Record what supports display, visitor entry, towing, engine running or flight, including unresolved prerequisites.", "questions": [ { "text": "For the requested activity, which current inspections, configuration records and responsible-party approvals apply to this airframe?", "kind": "action", "id": "supported-use-decision-q01" }, { "text": "Which missing evidence, defects or restrictions require the decision to remain conditional or unknown?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "supported-use-decision-q02" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does an existing Vercy world model already own the B-17 concept, requiring this registry entry to link to it?", "Where should this entry's boundary fall for the Model 299 prototype, experimental derivatives and extensively converted B-17 airframes?", "Which authoritative references establish reliable recognition criteria across early variants, production blocks and field modifications?", "What evidence threshold should establish identity continuity for composite restorations incorporating structure from several B-17s?", "Which current, airframe-specific technical records and applicable approvals are necessary to distinguish display condition, ground operability and eligibility for flight?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 12, "questions": 24 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "chemical substance or material", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to identify a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, assess a particular airframe's documented configuration and condition, and determine which preservation, access or operating actions its evidence supports.", "characteristics": { "substance": "material", "origin": "natural", "agency": "inert", "mobility": "varies" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured", "consumed or used up" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Boeing PB-1 Flying Fortress, Model 299, Y1B-17 Flying Fortress, Y1B-17A Flying Fortress, B-17B Flying Fortress, B-17C Flying Fortress, B-17D Flying Fortress, B-17E Flying Fortress, B-17F Flying Fortress, Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress, Fortress Mk.III, F-9 Flying Fortress.", "16 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 65 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "matter you can touch", "physicalCharacter": [ "Mobility varies between examples.", "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state", "use it up, and then need more of it" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by sight in any reliable way. Appearance varies with grade, form and additives; identification is by label, by documentation, or by assay." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Boeing PB-1 Flying Fortress", "Model 299", "Y1B-17 Flying Fortress", "Y1B-17A Flying Fortress", "B-17B Flying Fortress", "B-17C Flying Fortress", "B-17D Flying Fortress", "B-17E Flying Fortress", "B-17F Flying Fortress", "Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress", "Fortress Mk.III", "F-9 Flying Fortress" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 65 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 16 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress from another, and a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "form-and-composition", "name": "Form, composition and condition", "description": "What a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is made of, what shape and size it takes, and what state it is in.", "rationale": "A physical thing can be measured, and a model that cannot record its measurements cannot support any decision that depends on them.", "layers": [ { "id": "form-and-dimensions", "name": "Form and dimensions", "description": "Shape, size, mass and the ranges these take across examples.", "findings": [ { "id": "measurable-dimensions", "name": "Measurable dimensions and their units", "description": "The quantities worth recording and the units they are recorded in.", "questions": [ { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the dimensions of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the dimensions of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the dimensions of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "material-and-composition", "name": "Material and composition", "description": "Materials, parts and how they are put together.", "findings": [ { "id": "parts-and-materials", "name": "Parts and materials", "description": "What a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is built from and which parts are replaceable.", "questions": [ { "id": "parts-and-materials-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the composition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "parts-and-materials-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the composition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "parts-and-materials-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the composition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-integrity", "name": "Condition and integrity", "description": "Wear, damage, health and the difference between working and broken.", "findings": [ { "id": "condition-assessment", "name": "Condition, damage and health", "description": "How the condition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is judged and by whom.", "questions": [ { "id": "condition-assessment-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the condition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "condition-assessment-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the condition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "condition-assessment-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the condition of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is, how it got there and where it may go (varies).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is carried, installed or relocated.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "use-and-operation", "name": "Use and operation", "description": "What can be done with a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress and what it takes to do it.", "rationale": "An agent that can recognise a thing but not act on it has only half a model.", "layers": [ { "id": "intended-use", "name": "Intended use and function", "description": "What a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is for, and what it is used for anyway.", "findings": [ { "id": "function-and-purpose", "name": "Function, purpose and misuse", "description": "The function a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress performs and the uses that fall outside it.", "questions": [ { "id": "function-and-purpose-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the use of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "function-and-purpose-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the use of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "function-and-purpose-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the use of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "handling-and-procedure", "name": "Handling and procedure", "description": "The steps, skills and tools involved in using a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress.", "findings": [ { "id": "procedures-and-skills", "name": "Procedures, skills and required tools", "description": "What an agent needs before it can act on a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress at all.", "questions": [ { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes handling a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about handling a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once handling a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "supply-and-consumption", "name": "Supply and consumption", "description": "Quantities, rates and what running out means.", "findings": [ { "id": "consumption-and-stock", "name": "Consumption, stock and replenishment", "description": "How much of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress there is and how fast it goes.", "questions": [ { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the supply of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the supply of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the supply of a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "composition-and-identity", "name": "Composition, grade and chemical identity", "description": "What Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is made of and how pure the thing in hand is.", "rationale": "Grade decides what a substance may be used for, so a model that records only the name cannot support any decision about use.", "layers": [ { "id": "chemical-identity", "name": "Chemical identity", "description": "Formula, structure and the registry numbers that name it unambiguously.", "findings": [ { "id": "identity-record", "name": "Identity and registry numbers", "description": "What identifies this substance across suppliers and regulators.", "questions": [ { "id": "identity-record-q01", "text": "What formula, structure and registry identifiers name Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress unambiguously?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "identity-record-q02", "text": "Which related substances share a name in common use but not an identifier?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "grade-and-impurities", "name": "Grade, purity and impurities", "description": "The specification a batch meets and what else is in it.", "findings": [ { "id": "specification", "name": "Specification and assay", "description": "How purity is stated and measured, and which impurities matter.", "questions": [ { "id": "specification-q01", "text": "What grades of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress exist, how is purity assayed, and which impurities are limited?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "specification-q02", "text": "Which use requires which grade, and what happens when a lower grade is substituted?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "properties-and-behaviour", "name": "Properties and behaviour", "description": "How Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress behaves under conditions an agent can measure or change.", "rationale": "Physical constants are the part of a substance model that transfers between contexts, and each needs its unit and its conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "physical-constants", "name": "Physical constants", "description": "Values that hold for the pure substance, with their conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "constants-record", "name": "Constants and conditions", "description": "The quantities worth recording and the state they apply in.", "questions": [ { "id": "constants-record-q01", "text": "What are the defining physical constants of Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, in what units and under what conditions?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "constants-record-q02", "text": "Which of these values change with grade or form rather than being fixed?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "stability-and-reactivity", "name": "Stability and reactivity", "description": "What it reacts with, degrades into, and how it is stored.", "findings": [ { "id": "incompatibilities", "name": "Incompatibilities and degradation", "description": "What must not meet it, and what it becomes over time.", "questions": [ { "id": "incompatibilities-q01", "text": "What is Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress incompatible with, and what does it degrade into under storage?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "incompatibilities-q02", "text": "What storage and handling does that require, and who is competent to do it?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "hazard-and-regulation", "name": "Hazard classification and regulation", "description": "How Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress can harm, and what the law says about holding and moving it.", "rationale": "A substance model without its hazard class and its regulatory identity is unusable in exactly the situations that matter.", "layers": [ { "id": "hazard-class", "name": "Hazard classification", "description": "Classified hazards, exposure limits and protective measures.", "findings": [ { "id": "classified-hazards", "name": "Classified hazards and limits", "description": "The classification, the scheme it belongs to, and the limits set.", "questions": [ { "id": "classified-hazards-q01", "text": "How is Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress classified for hazard, under which scheme, and what exposure limits apply?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classified-hazards-q02", "text": "What protection does handling require, and what must an agent refuse to do without it?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "regulatory-identity", "name": "Regulatory identity and control", "description": "Registration, restriction and transport rules by jurisdiction.", "findings": [ { "id": "controls", "name": "Controls and jurisdiction", "description": "Where it is restricted and what the restriction attaches to.", "questions": [ { "id": "controls-q01", "text": "Which registrations, restrictions or transport rules cover Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and where?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "controls-q02", "text": "Does the control attach to the substance, its concentration, or its intended use?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 9, "layers": 20, "findings": 22, "questions": 60 } } } }