← Back to catalogue
Research draft

pole vault

vr.tr.pole-vault · ACT.ACT

Enable an agent to recognise pole vault activity, assess attempts and readiness, and identify appropriate actions under the applicable competition or training conditions.

Thing Registry Activities and processes

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read

Researched by: Codex

Purpose and description

Enable an agent to recognise pole vault activity, assess attempts and readiness, and identify appropriate actions under the applicable competition or training conditions.

Pole vault is an athletics jumping event in which a competitor uses a pole planted in a recessed box to assist in clearing a horizontal crossbar, with performance ranked by the greatest height successfully cleared under competition rules.

It can be Classify a session as competition, full-vault practice or a specific pole vault drill.; Reconstruct an attempt from phase observations and identify where execution departed from its intended pattern.; Flag missing compatibility evidence or apparatus concerns for review by a qualified coach or official.; Track height choices, passes and outcomes under an explicitly selected ruleset.; Compare repeated attempts to support a coach's selection of a focused practice objective.; Record a hold or stop decision when observed conditions require inspection or qualified assessment..

Distinguishing features

A full vault uses a carried pole planted in a designated box to assist the athlete's ascent toward a crossbar; high jump lacks this pole-assisted phase.

The performance objective is vertical crossbar clearance rather than horizontal distance, separating pole vault from long jump and pole-assisted distance jumping.

The pole supports a distinct transition from approach and take-off into ascent and release; merely carrying a pole while jumping does not establish a vault.

An isolated plant, swing or landing drill belongs to pole vault practice through its declared training purpose, but is not itself a completed competitive attempt.

Scope

+ Pole vault discipline identity and boundaries between competition, practice and component drills

+ Approach, pole plant, take-off, supported ascent, bar clearance and landing

+ Compatibility among athlete, vaulting pole, runway, planting box, crossbar and landing area

+ Attempt records, height progression and decisions under an identified ruleset

+ Readiness, observed hazards and training priorities specific to vaulting

- Athletics meeting administration and scheduling beyond their effects on vault attempts

- General athlete identity, employment and sporting biography

- Medical diagnosis, injury treatment and rehabilitation prescriptions

- Detailed manufacture and material engineering of vaulting poles

- Other jumping events and pole-assisted activities without a raised crossbar objective

Characteristics

Activity context
competition attempt | full-vault practice | component drill Determines whether competitive validity, technical learning or a limited movement objective governs assessment.
Target crossbar height
metres, with measurement reference and verification status Identifies the clearance task and supports interpretation of recorded performance.
Approach configuration
approach distance in metres and step count, with counting convention Makes changes in approach length and rhythm interpretable across attempts.
Upper-hand grip position
metres from a stated pole reference point Relates pole use to the athlete's approach, take-off and clearance task.
Selected pole
link to identified pole with length, manufacturer markings, applicable limits and condition evidence Supports a traceable compatibility assessment without assuming markings from different manufacturers are directly comparable.
Crossbar support position
position in centimetres relative to an explicitly identified datum Connects clearance and landing observations to the actual apparatus arrangement.
Attempt disposition
planned | underway | cleared | failed | passed | aborted | unresolved, with context-specific interpretation Separates observed activity from an official decision and preserves uncertain outcomes.
Landing location
observed zone or coordinates relative to the landing area, with uncertainty Helps identify recurring landing patterns that require qualified review.
Governing rules
identified organisation, rules edition, competition category and local provisions Makes validity, progression and equipment decisions dependent on the rules actually in force.

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 6 bundles · 11 layers · 18 findings · 28 questions.

Vault identity and context Establishes which pole vault activity is being represented and what counts as its completion.

A competitive vault and an isolated pole plant share movements but require different judgments.

Discipline boundary

Separates pole vault from neighbouring jumps and pole-assisted activities.

Pole-assisted crossbar objective

Record whether a raised crossbar is the objective and how pole support contributes to the jump.

  1. Does the activity aim to clear a raised crossbar using a planted pole? definition
  2. Is this a full vault, a pole vault component drill or a different pole-assisted activity? boundary

Session purpose

Identifies the intended outcome and authority for assessing the activity.

Attempt or drill contract

Record the competitive target or stated training objective without treating drill completion as competition success.

  1. What clearance target or component movement defines success for this activity? definition
  2. Which official, coach or session plan establishes how this activity will be assessed? provenance
Vault movement sequence Relates observable phases of a vault to the resulting clearance and landing.

A single success or failure label cannot explain where a vault's execution changed.

Approach, plant and take-off

Captures how the athlete arrives at the box and enters pole support.

Entry into pole support

Record approach consistency, planting sequence and take-off position using stated observation methods.

  1. What approach distance, step pattern and take-off position were observed, and relative to which reference points? measurement
  2. What evidence shows the timing of pole placement and take-off, and which parts remain obscured? provenance

Ascent, clearance and landing

Tracks movement after take-off through pole release, crossbar passage and landing.

Supported ascent to landing

Record observed swing, body reorientation, pole release, bar interaction and landing without inferring unseen motion.

  1. Which ascent and clearance phases are visible, and where does the sequence depart from the stated technical objective? measurement
  2. Where did the athlete land relative to the landing area, and how certain is that observation? measurement
Pole and vaulting environment Connects the athlete's intended vault to the selected pole and installed apparatus.

Pole choice and apparatus arrangement are integral to whether a vault can be attempted appropriately.

Athlete-pole compatibility

Maintains evidence about the specific pole and its intended use.

Pole selection evidence

Record pole identity, markings, condition and grip alongside the qualified assessment supporting its selection.

  1. What pole length, manufacturer markings, grip limits and inspection findings are documented for this pole? provenance
  2. What qualified assessment supports using this pole and grip for this athlete's planned approach? action

Runway, box, bar and landing area

Records the physical arrangement and condition of the vaulting station.

Apparatus readiness

Capture runway condition, box condition, crossbar arrangement and landing-area assembly against identified requirements.

  1. What inspection evidence establishes the condition and arrangement of the runway, planting box, supports and landing area? provenance
  2. Which observed defect, obstruction or environmental condition requires a hold before another vault? action
Attempt adjudication and progression Connects observed attempts to official outcomes and subsequent competition choices.

Clearing a bar visually does not alone establish an official result or the athlete's remaining options.

Attempt validity

Distinguishes observed events from rulings under the applicable rules.

Ruling with evidence

Record the official disposition, cited rule and supporting observation, including unresolved or disputed cases.

  1. Which rules edition and event provisions govern this attempt? provenance
  2. What observed event and official ruling establish clearance, failure or another disposition? boundary

Height and attempt sequence

Maintains the ordered record needed to determine available choices and results.

Progression state

Record heights offered, attempts taken, passes and outcomes so eligibility and ranking can be derived from the selected rules.

  1. What is the ordered sequence of bar heights, passes and attempt outcomes for this athlete? measurement
  2. Under the applicable rules, what choices remain and what additional information is needed to determine placing? action
Readiness and technical development Supports qualified decisions about attempting, pausing and choosing a focused training task.

Vault performance must be interpreted alongside current readiness and recurring execution patterns.

Current vault readiness

Records immediate athlete and session conditions relevant to the next attempt.

Continue, hold or stop

Capture athlete-reported concerns, observed approach or landing problems and the responsible person's decision.

  1. What current concerns about pain, fatigue, confidence, approach control or landing have been reported or observed? provenance
  2. Who is responsible for deciding whether to continue, modify the task or stop, and what evidence informs that decision? action

Practice feedback

Links repeated observations to a specific learning objective and reassessment.

Targeted vault practice

Record a coach-selected drill or adjustment, its intended phase effect and the evidence used to evaluate it.

  1. Which recurring phase-specific issue is the selected drill or adjustment intended to address? definition
  2. What observable change across comparable attempts would justify retaining or revising that practice choice? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • This description covers the athletics event, not the pole itself or historical pole-assisted crossing practices.
  • Measurement ranges are approximate descriptive ranges, not regulatory limits.
  • Current rule editions should be checked for exact equipment specifications, attempt procedures and differences between governing bodies.
  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Kinds and varieties

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • Outdoor pole vault
  • Indoor pole vault
  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • World Athletics Competition and Technical Rules govern attempts, clearances, equipment and facilities in competitions conducted under those rules.
  • NCAA track and field rules govern pole vault in United States collegiate competition.
  • NFHS track and field rules govern pole vault in United States high school competitions using that rules framework.
  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • Individual track and field competition
  • One of the ten events in the decathlon
  • One of the seven events in the men's indoor heptathlon
  • Coached training in sprinting, take-off, pole handling and aerial movement
  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • Crossbar clearance height - Approximately 3-6 for trained competitive vaulters; beginners may clear less and exceptional performances may exceed this range - m
  • Pole length - Approximately 3-5.3, selected according to athlete ability, grip and technique - m
  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • Dislodging the crossbar results in a failed attempt under the applicable rules.
  • An unsuccessful plant or take-off can cause the athlete to stall, fall backward or miss the landing area.
  • Pole damage, unsuitable pole selection or improper use can contribute to pole breakage.
  • Landing in the planting box, beyond the landing mats or on inadequately protected surfaces can cause severe injury.
  • Wet conditions and adverse winds can impair grip, approach consistency and control.
  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • United States school and collegiate competitions use rulebooks distinct from World Athletics rules, with differences that can include equipment and safety requirements.
  • Heights and pole specifications may be discussed in feet and inches in United States settings, while international competition uses metric measurements.
  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  • High jump - Both measure clearance over a horizontal crossbar, but high jump does not permit a pole to assist the jump.
  • Long jump - Long jump measures horizontal distance from take-off to landing rather than clearance height.
  • Pole - The vaulting pole is equipment used in the activity; pole vault denotes the event or its performance.
  • Decathlon - Decathlon combines ten scored athletics events, of which pole vault is one.
  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of pole vault this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Which governing rules editions and competition categories must the model support, particularly for equipment restrictions, attempt validity and height progression?
  • Which manufacturer-specific pole markings and selection guidance can be interpreted reliably, and where is comparison across manufacturers unsupported?
  • Which apparatus inspection criteria and environmental stop conditions should be adopted from authoritative facility and coaching guidance?
  • Which movement phase definitions and observation methods provide sufficiently reliable comparisons across athletes and recording setups?
  • How should training clearances using substitute bars or restricted drills be represented without confusing them with official pole vault performances?