← Back to catalogue
Research draft

strategy

vr.tr.strategy · XCT.QLT

Let an agent handle strategy by domain, goals, options, analysis and evaluation, keeping discussion general and without operational military detail.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent handle strategy by domain, goals, options, analysis and evaluation, keeping discussion general and without operational military detail.

A plan of action designed to achieve long-term or overall goals under uncertainty, in business, public policy, games, military theory and personal life; related to but broader than tactics.

What it is for: Choosing how to achieve goals with limited resources.

It can be set strategic goals; analyse options and trade-offs; use frameworks carefully; evaluate outcomes.

Distinguishing features

Long-term and goal-oriented

Chooses among options

Adapts to others actions

Distinct from tactics

What it looks like

Documents, plans, frameworks and decisions.

How it is recognised

Strategy documents and roadmaps

Frameworks such as SWOT

Tactics are shorter-term actions

Related models

is a kind of - category

plan

is contrasted with - short-term

tactics

is studied by - fields

management and game theory

guides - application

decision

In practice

Families and kinds

business strategy

public policy strategy

game strategy

military strategy (theory)

personal strategy

Standards and regulation

Corporate governance codes (board oversight of strategy)

Failure modes and hazards

Buzzword strategies without choices

Ignoring evidence and feedback

Providing operational military detail

Also called

engineering controlsmilitary deceptionmilitary diversionfeigned retreatcommon strategyBlue Ocean Strategytariff systembrand strategyfare systemPorter generic strategiesexit fareDARVOlearning strategylist priceeffective learning strategysacrificeprevention strategylight abatementnoise controlhuman mating strategystrategic intelligencebusiness strategyproof techniquenoise abatementacoustic quietingconquesttakeover defense tacticcounter-insurgencyrepartimentcounterinsurgency mathematicssearch and destroyAxis anti-partisan operations in World War IIself-exclusioneducational strategyferal segmentationmarket segmentationpersonauser personabrinkmanshipAdventurism

+78

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Source repository Registry entry point

Also registered as vr.tr.strategy

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Goals What for.

Goals frame strategy.

Aim

Objectives.

Aim

Goals.

  1. What long-term goals does the strategy serve? definition
  2. How will success be measured? measurement

Domain

Business, policy, games.

Domain

Domain.

  1. In which domain is strategy meant? definition
  2. Which specific entry fits? action
Analysis Options.

Strategy is choice.

Options

Alternatives.

Options

Options.

  1. What options exist, and what are their trade-offs? definition
  2. What does each require? measurement

Frameworks

Tools.

Frameworks

Frameworks.

  1. Which analysis framework is useful here? action
  2. What are its limits? boundary
Execution From plan to action.

Execution decides results.

Plan

Implementation.

Plan

Implementation.

  1. How will the strategy be implemented? action
  2. Who is responsible? provenance

Review

Adaptation.

Review

Review.

  1. How will progress be reviewed and the strategy adapted? action
  2. What signals would trigger change? definition
Limits Scope.

Some detail is out of scope.

Military

No operational detail.

Military

Content limits.

  1. Is the request for operational military or deception planning? boundary
  2. How should the agent decline? action

Evidence

Claims.

Evidence

Evidence.

  1. Is a strategy claim supported by evidence? provenance
  2. Which studies assess it? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should strategy domains be separate entries?
  • How should frameworks be linked?
  • How should military theory be bounded?
Draft as JSON