← Back to catalogue
Published

Global Positioning System

vr.tr.global-positioning-system · thing-q18822

Enable an AI agent to recognise the Global Positioning System, assess its positioning and timing service for a stated place, time and task, and decide whether to use, corroborate or suspend reliance on it.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

5 bundles · 10 layers · 10 findings · 20 questions

GPS identity and service boundary Establish which system and GPS service the entry denotes and where receiver and augmentation responsibilities begin.

Named system identity

Anchor the registry entry to the named GPS infrastructure and service.

GPS referent

Record evidence that the referent is the U.S.-owned PNT utility and identify its system boundary. [GPS overview](https://www.gps.gov/gps)

  1. Does this record denote the GPS system itself, a GPS service, or equipment colloquially called a GPS? definition
  2. Which authoritative description anchors the identity and infrastructure boundary? provenance

Service and augmentation boundaries

Separate the GPS service under assessment from externally supplied improvements.

Service attribution

Record the applicable GPS service and attribute assistance, corrections and mixed-constellation contributions separately.

  1. Which GPS service and access conditions apply to the intended user? definition
  2. Which claimed capabilities depend on augmentation, external corrections or another constellation? boundary
Constellation and control condition Represent the space and ground-control conditions that support usable GPS broadcasts.

Satellite service contribution

Distinguish operational constellation membership from local usability.

Usable satellite set

Record satellite and signal identities, dated status evidence and their contribution to the assessed service.

  1. Which satellites and signals are reported operational at the assessment epoch, and by which source? provenance
  2. Which are visible, tracked and actually used at the assessed location, and what geometry results? measurement

Navigation data maintenance

Assess the evidence that broadcast orbit, clock and health information remains usable.

Broadcast data condition

Record relevant data epochs, validity conditions and notices affecting confidence in maintained broadcasts.

  1. How old are the applicable orbit and clock data, and do they meet the governing validity conditions? measurement
  2. Which dated operational notices identify maintenance, outages or control-related limitations affecting these signals? provenance
Ranging and reference interpretation Capture the signal, navigation-message and reference conventions needed to interpret GPS observations.

Signal and message compatibility

Relate available GPS broadcasts to the user's receiving and decoding capabilities.

Observation compatibility

Record the applicable broadcast interface and evidence of receiver compatibility. [GPS interface specifications](https://www.gps.gov/interface-control-documents-icds-interface-specifications-iss)

  1. Which GPS signals and navigation-message formats are required and supported for this use? definition
  2. Which interface specification revision and receiver capability evidence support that compatibility judgment? provenance

Coordinate and time references

Make position and time outputs interpretable across connected systems.

Reference consistency

Record the coordinate frame, height convention, epoch, time scale and transformations relevant to the requested output.

  1. What coordinate frame, height convention and time scale does the output actually use? definition
  2. Which transformations, time offsets or height conversions must be verified before combining this output with the target system? action
Service performance and local reception Distinguish system service commitments from performance experienced under particular receiving conditions.

Performance evidence

Assess positioning and timing results against explicit service and task criteria.

Qualified performance assessment

Record applicable performance criteria, measurement conditions and observed compliance; GPS publishes service-specific performance standards. [GPS performance standards](https://www.gps.gov/performance-standards-specifications)

  1. Which accuracy, availability, continuity and timing criteria apply, over what interval and under which assumptions? definition
  2. What measured evidence or uncertainty estimates show whether the local output meets the task's thresholds? measurement

Local reception limitations

Record environmental and equipment conditions that may explain a local loss of performance.

Reception cause separation

Keep observations of obstruction, reflected signals, propagation conditions and receiver limitations distinct from confirmed constellation faults.

  1. What evidence characterises obstruction, multipath, propagation disturbance or receiver limitations at this location? measurement
  2. What observations distinguish a local reception problem from a satellite, signal or broader service problem? boundary
Trust and reliance decisions Translate signal and solution evidence into bounded decisions about using GPS.

Anomaly and integrity evidence

Assess inconsistent or suspect GPS observations without asserting an unsupported cause.

Trustworthiness assessment

Record health indications, receiver alerts, independent comparisons and evidence for suspected interference or deceptive signals.

  1. Which health indications, integrity alerts or independent position and time comparisons support or challenge the output? measurement
  2. What evidence supports a diagnosis of interference or spoofing rather than ordinary reception error, and what remains uncertain? provenance

Use, suspension and recovery

Define task-specific reliance decisions and the evidence required to change them.

Reliance transition rules

Record acceptance thresholds, permitted interventions, fallback dependencies and conditions for restoring GPS reliance.

  1. Under what evidence thresholds should the agent accept the output, seek corroboration, exclude observations or suspend reliance? action
  2. What independent fallback is available, who may change operational use, and what evidence permits recovery? action

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ
Other names and narrower kinds
Magnavox A-RPX-5, differential GPS, Virtual Reference Station

What it is Filled

This model owns the system-level identity, service boundaries, space and ground-control dependencies, broadcast interfaces, operational condition and conditions of reliance of Global Positioning System, registry id vr.tr.global-positioning-system, in PHY / PHY.OBJ; receiver observations provide evidence about service use without making individual receivers part of this model.

In scope

  • GPS identity and the boundary between the infrastructure, its services and participating user equipment
  • Constellation and ground-control contributions to usable satellite ranging and timing signals
  • Broadcast signal compatibility, navigation data, coordinate references and time references
  • Service health, coverage, availability and performance assessed for an explicit location and interval
  • Conditions for accepting, corroborating, rejecting or restoring reliance on GPS-derived outputs
  • Dependencies on external corrections, augmentation and other navigation systems

Out of scope

  • Individual satellite construction, propulsion and maintenance procedures
  • Receiver hardware design, firmware implementation and antenna installation procedures
  • Independent models of Galileo, GLONASS, BeiDou and GNSS as a general class
  • Operation of augmentation systems, correction networks and precise positioning services
  • Maps, route planning, geocoding and vehicle guidance policies
  • Tracking applications, location-history storage and personal-data governance

Why it exists Filled

Enable an AI agent to recognise the Global Positioning System, assess its positioning and timing service for a stated place, time and task, and decide whether to use, corroborate or suspend reliance on it.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • The referent is the named U.S.-owned positioning, navigation and timing utility, rather than GNSS as a class or another constellation. [GPS overview](https://www.gps.gov/gps)
  • The referent includes the satellite broadcast infrastructure and ground-control functions; a handset, antenna or dashboard navigator is equipment that uses it.
  • Basic GPS reception obtains one-way satellite broadcasts; a device transmitting its position to a tracking server is using an additional communications service. [GPS overview](https://www.gps.gov/gps)
  • A result described as GPS must identify whether GPS observations actually contributed; a device location label alone does not establish the positioning source.
  • Corrections or integrity information supplied by an augmentation service must be attributed separately from the underlying GPS service.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Jam or spoof satellite navigation signals.
  • Track a person through their device location without consent or legal basis.
  • Rely on it alone for safety-critical navigation without integrity checks.
  • Hide signs that positions have been spoofed.

Only with a human decision

  • Navigation decisions when signals are degraded in safety-critical operation.

May

  • Use positioning and timing data and report its accuracy and integrity.
  • Warn users of outages or interference from official notices.
  • Fall back to other navigation when signals are lost.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Society depends on it for transport, timing and emergency services.
  • Location data reveals people's lives in detail.

Who is affected

  • Navigators and travellers
  • Emergency services
  • People tracked by location

Owners Filled

Steward

The national operator of the system; users answer for their receivers.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q11886377 - registry parent class
  • Q221329 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.global-positioning-system
  • Wikidata: Q18822 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18822)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Service and signal profile: Named GPS service; signal and navigation-message types; applicable specification revision
  • Assessment context: Location or service region, observation interval and intended positioning or timing task
  • Satellite participation: Satellite identities linked separately to operational status, visibility, tracking and use in a solution
  • Broadcast health assessment: Reported healthy, reported unhealthy, conflicting evidence or unknown; per satellite and signal with timestamp
  • Navigation-data freshness: Seconds since relevant reference epoch or update, with message type and applicable validity rule
  • Positioning error evidence: Metres; horizontal or vertical; measured or estimated; confidence level, interval and reference truth
  • Timing error evidence: Seconds or nanoseconds relative to a named time reference, with uncertainty and calibration conditions
  • Observation geometry: Dimensionless dilution-of-precision measure with type, epoch and contributing satellite set
  • Service availability evidence: Percentage or duration meeting a declared criterion over a stated region and interval
  • Reference frame and time basis: Named coordinate frame and realization, coordinate epoch, time scale and applied conversions
  • External assistance dependence: Linked augmentation, correction, assistance or other-constellation service; contribution and freshness
  • Fitness for intended reliance: Unassessed, acceptable, corroboration required or unacceptable, with task thresholds and evidence

Recognition not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

The navigation service and its radio signals have no directly visible appearance that distinguishes them from other satellite navigation services.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Identify whether an observed positioning or timing service is GPS and record other contributing systems.
  • Match a receiver's declared capabilities to the GPS signals and service needed for a task.
  • Assess GPS availability and performance evidence for a particular location, interval and requirement.
  • Recommend exclusion of suspect observations or suspension of GPS reliance when evidence fails the task's acceptance conditions.
  • Select an independently supported fallback or corroboration method through linked neighbouring models.
  • Reassess reliance after an outage, interference report or signal-health change using explicit recovery evidence.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Jamming and spoofing lead ships and aircraft off course.
  • Timing errors disrupt networks and power grids.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • Radio Regulations, International Telecommunication Union, protecting radionavigation-satellite frequencies.

Context of use required Filled

  • The Global Positioning System supplies satellite radio signals that compatible receivers use to determine position, navigation information and time.
  • It is used in transport, surveying, mapping, robotics and infrastructure timing where sufficient satellite signals can be received.
  • Its suitability depends on reception conditions, interference and the accuracy and continuity required by the task.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q18822: Global Positioning System - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Global Positioning System - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Does an existing Vercy world-model publication already own this GPS concept, requiring this registry entry to link to it?
  • Which authoritative GPS service and interface revisions should anchor the researched publication, and which signal capabilities are operational at its reference date?
  • Which sources provide sufficiently current satellite, signal and outage status, and how should conflicts or stale reports be represented?
  • Which positioning and timing use cases require explicit integrity, continuity or recovery thresholds beyond the underlying GPS service specification?
  • How much authenticated evidence about restricted services is available to the intended agents, and which capabilities must therefore remain unassessed?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q18822/spec.json