{ "model": { "rank": 5452, "code": "thing-q189329", "model_id": "vr.tr.liberal-arts-education", "name": "liberal arts education", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed instance of liberal arts education, assess how its curriculum and teaching support its stated educational aims, and identify justified improvements without treating one interpretation as universal.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Cross-cutting context", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "XCT", "domain": "XCT.QLT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q189329/", "tier": 2, "score": 67, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 67, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q189329", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q189329", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T22:24:24Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08844-9c3f-7c70-a53b-31f82c217e0d\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: liberal arts education\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 00", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 71.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08844-9c42-7001-81a7-f47c7acb635f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: liberal arts education\nRegistry id: vr.tr.liberal-arts-education\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q189329", "registryId": "vr.tr.liberal-arts-education", "name": "liberal arts education", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q189329/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.liberal-arts-education", "name": "liberal arts education", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed instance of liberal arts education, assess how its curriculum and teaching support its stated educational aims, and identify justified improvements without treating one interpretation as universal.", "definition": "Liberal arts education is an approach to education that develops broad intellectual capacities through study across disciplines, historically associated with the liberal arts and now commonly encompassing the humanities, social sciences, natural sciences, and mathematics, with differing emphases on intellectual cultivation, civic participation, and preparation for adaptable working lives.", "scope_statement": "This model owns liberal arts education as a contested educational ideal and its enactment in programmes: the relationships among breadth, disciplinary depth, intellectual autonomy, learning practices and purposes beyond preparation for a single occupation.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions of liberal arts education, their proponents and the disagreements that affect recognition of an instance", "Curricular relationships among humanities, arts, sciences, social sciences and disciplinary specialisation", "Teaching and learning practices intended to develop inquiry, interpretation, argument and intellectual autonomy", "Operational definitions and evidence for claimed intellectual, civic, personal and occupational outcomes", "Access to the educational experience and tensions among educational ideals, institutional constraints and learner purposes" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Institutional governance, finance and accreditation except where they constrain delivery of the educational ideal", "Detailed models of individual academic disciplines and their subject matter", "The liberal arts college as an organisational type", "Individual learner cognition, wellbeing and biography beyond their relevance to participation and assessment", "Occupational competency standards and professional licensing requirements" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Examine whether breadth across forms of inquiry is connected to an articulated educational purpose; a miscellaneous set of elective courses alone is insufficient evidence.", "Check whether arts refers to liberal learning across fields rather than exclusively to fine or performing arts.", "Distinguish the educational approach from the institution's name: a liberal arts college label does not establish that every programme enacts the approach.", "Determine whether general education requirements constitute the whole claimed instance or one component of a broader relationship between breadth and specialisation.", "Check whether the programme values capacities that extend beyond a single occupation while allowing professional or technical study to contribute to those capacities." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Interpretation of liberal arts education", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Locally articulated interpretation, such as canonical study, disciplinary breadth, intellectual autonomy, civic learning or an explicit combination; record the proponent and wording", "why_it_matters": "Recognition and evaluation depend on which educational ideal is claimed." }, { "name": "Claimed instance and implementation status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Educational ideal only; programme proposed; programme operating; programme revised; programme discontinued; implementation unknown", "why_it_matters": "An aspiration, an approved curriculum and a delivered educational experience support different conclusions." }, { "name": "Breadth across forms of inquiry", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Required credits or learning hours by locally defined field and method of inquiry, with denominator and classification rules", "why_it_matters": "Makes breadth inspectable without assuming that course titles or department counts establish intellectual diversity." }, { "name": "Relationship between breadth and depth", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Connections among common study, distribution requirements, electives, concentrations and integrative work", "why_it_matters": "Shows whether broad study and disciplinary expertise reinforce each other or remain disconnected." }, { "name": "Learner curricular discretion", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Proportion of credits freely chosen, chosen within requirements and prescribed; record advising and prerequisite constraints", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes freedom to select courses from supported development of intellectual autonomy." }, { "name": "Opportunity to practise liberal learning", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Frequency and distribution of documented opportunities for sustained reading, interpretation, discussion, writing, quantitative reasoning and revision", "why_it_matters": "Connects educational claims to what learners are actually asked and enabled to do." }, { "name": "Outcome evidence status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Claim only; assessment planned; learner work assessed; change over time examined; comparative evidence available; findings mixed", "why_it_matters": "Separates intended benefits from observed attainment and from evidence that the programme caused an outcome." }, { "name": "Participation constraints", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Documented relationships between learner circumstances, programme requirements and access to courses, advising and integrative experiences", "why_it_matters": "A nominally shared curriculum may offer substantially different educational opportunities to different learners." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare competing definitions and explain how each changes the classification of a candidate programme.", "Map a programme's requirements and delivered learning activities to its declared liberal arts aims.", "Identify disconnected breadth requirements, unsupported outcome claims and missing opportunities for sustained inquiry.", "Propose curriculum or assessment changes with explicit tradeoffs among common study, learner choice, disciplinary depth and professional preparation.", "Assess whether learners can access the experiences on which programme claims depend.", "Report uncertainty and specify what evidence would support recognition, revision or rejection of a particular claim." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "educational-ideal-and-boundaries", "name": "Educational ideal and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which interpretation of liberal arts education is being claimed and what would qualify under it.", "rationale": "The concept cannot be evaluated coherently if different parties silently use different definitions.", "layers": [ { "id": "definitions-and-proponents", "name": "Definitions and proponents", "description": "Records attributed definitions, educational purposes and substantive disagreements.", "findings": [ { "id": "declared-conception-of-liberal-learning", "name": "Declared conception of liberal learning", "description": "Record how the relevant proponents connect liberal arts education to knowledge, intellectual freedom, personal formation, citizenship or work, preserving disagreement rather than merging it into a synthetic consensus.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does each relevant proponent mean by liberal arts education, and which purposes do they regard as essential?", "kind": "definition", "id": "declared-conception-of-liberal-learning-q01" }, { "text": "Which texts, institutional statements or documented practices establish that attribution, and when did it apply?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "declared-conception-of-liberal-learning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recognition-and-neighbouring-concepts", "name": "Recognition and neighbouring concepts", "description": "Sets the unit of analysis and distinguishes the educational approach from adjacent labels.", "findings": [ { "id": "candidate-instance-boundary", "name": "Candidate instance boundary", "description": "Identify whether the candidate is a programme, curricular component or educational practice and test its claim independently of institutional branding.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observable commitments would make this candidate an instance of the stated interpretation of liberal arts education?", "kind": "definition", "id": "candidate-instance-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "How does this instance relate to general education, humanities education, liberal education and professional education, and where do the local terms overlap?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "candidate-instance-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "breadth-depth-and-curricular-coherence", "name": "Breadth, depth and curricular coherence", "description": "Examines how the curriculum combines multiple forms of inquiry with sustained disciplinary study.", "rationale": "A model must distinguish purposeful breadth from course accumulation and identify how specialisation contributes to the educational ideal.", "layers": [ { "id": "coverage-and-common-study", "name": "Coverage and common study", "description": "Examines the knowledge traditions and methods learners encounter through common requirements and choices.", "findings": [ { "id": "substantive-breadth", "name": "Substantive breadth", "description": "Record required encounters with different ways of knowing, distinguishing formal curricular categories from the methods and materials actually studied.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which forms of inquiry must every learner encounter, and how are courses classified as satisfying each requirement?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "substantive-breadth-q01" }, { "text": "What educational argument supports a common core, distribution requirements or an open curriculum in this particular programme?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "substantive-breadth-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "specialisation-and-integration", "name": "Specialisation and integration", "description": "Examines sustained study and opportunities to connect knowledge across curricular boundaries.", "findings": [ { "id": "connections-between-breadth-and-depth", "name": "Connections between breadth and depth", "description": "Record how concentrations, sequences, interdisciplinary work and culminating projects require learners to connect perspectives while respecting differences in disciplinary standards.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where must learners use sustained disciplinary understanding together with a substantially different method or perspective?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "connections-between-breadth-and-depth-q01" }, { "text": "What curricular change would strengthen those connections without sacrificing necessary disciplinary depth?", "kind": "action", "id": "connections-between-breadth-and-depth-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inquiry-teaching-and-intellectual-autonomy", "name": "Inquiry, teaching and intellectual autonomy", "description": "Connects liberal arts aims to learning activities and the development of independent judgment.", "rationale": "Breadth of content alone cannot establish whether learners practise the intellectual capacities a programme claims to cultivate.", "layers": [ { "id": "practices-of-inquiry", "name": "Practices of inquiry", "description": "Examines what learners do with texts, evidence, arguments, quantities and competing interpretations.", "findings": [ { "id": "sustained-and-revisable-reasoning", "name": "Sustained and revisable reasoning", "description": "Record opportunities to formulate questions, examine evidence, defend interpretations and revise judgments in response to criticism, using standards appropriate to each field.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which assignments require learners to justify and revise a position rather than only reproduce material?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "sustained-and-revisable-reasoning-q01" }, { "text": "How do teaching and feedback help learners distinguish warranted disagreement from unsupported assertion?", "kind": "action", "id": "sustained-and-revisable-reasoning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "guided-development-of-autonomy", "name": "Guided development of autonomy", "description": "Examines the relationship among curricular choice, advising, academic authority and independent inquiry.", "findings": [ { "id": "intellectual-agency-beyond-course-choice", "name": "Intellectual agency beyond course choice", "description": "Distinguish the ability to choose courses from the ability to frame questions, evaluate authorities and take responsibility for reasoned educational decisions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What counts as intellectual autonomy here, and how is it distinguished from unrestricted choice or agreement with an instructor?", "kind": "definition", "id": "intellectual-agency-beyond-course-choice-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence shows a progression from guided exercises to learner-framed inquiry, and who receives the support needed for that progression?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "intellectual-agency-beyond-course-choice-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "purposes-outcomes-and-evidence", "name": "Purposes, outcomes and evidence", "description": "Separates educational commitments, assessable learner capacities and claims about later effects.", "rationale": "Claims about critical thinking, citizenship, flourishing or employability require different operational definitions and different kinds of evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "learning-outcome-operationalisation", "name": "Learning outcome operationalisation", "description": "Translates broad intellectual aims into inspectable performances while recording the limits of each assessment.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-of-liberal-learning", "name": "Evidence of liberal learning", "description": "Record how learner work is used to assess capacities such as interpretation, argument, quantitative reasoning and integration, including whether performance transfers to unfamiliar contexts.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observable performance represents each claimed capacity, and what assessment criteria distinguish stronger from weaker performance?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "evidence-of-liberal-learning-q01" }, { "text": "Does the evidence establish performance on a familiar task, development over time or application in a new setting?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "evidence-of-liberal-learning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "longer-term-purpose-and-attribution", "name": "Longer-term purpose and attribution", "description": "Examines civic, personal and occupational claims without assuming that aspirations are demonstrated effects.", "findings": [ { "id": "claims-beyond-the-classroom", "name": "Claims beyond the classroom", "description": "Record the intended beneficiaries, timescales and evidence for broader benefits, distinguishing observed associations from causal attribution to liberal arts education.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whose conception of civic contribution, personal flourishing or occupational adaptability defines the claimed benefit?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claims-beyond-the-classroom-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence connects the educational experience to that benefit, and how does it address prior learner differences and other influences?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "claims-beyond-the-classroom-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-representation-and-practical-tensions", "name": "Access, representation and practical tensions", "description": "Examines who can participate fully, whose knowledge is represented and how competing purposes shape delivery.", "rationale": "A liberal arts ideal must be assessed through accessible educational experiences and explicit choices about knowledge and resources.", "layers": [ { "id": "participation-and-knowledge-selection", "name": "Participation and knowledge selection", "description": "Examines access to required experiences alongside the grounds for including or excluding intellectual traditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "accessible-and-defensible-common-learning", "name": "Accessible and defensible common learning", "description": "Record barriers to participation and the justification for curricular selections, including how disputed canons and alternative traditions are considered.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which learners face barriers to the courses, discussion settings, advising or integrative work required for the programme's promised experience?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "accessible-and-defensible-common-learning-q01" }, { "text": "Who selects the works and traditions studied, and how can the educational reasons for omissions or requirements be challenged?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "accessible-and-defensible-common-learning-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "tradeoffs-and-programme-revision", "name": "Tradeoffs and programme revision", "description": "Makes conflicts among educational purposes and delivery constraints available for reasoned action.", "findings": [ { "id": "justified-adaptation-of-the-ideal", "name": "Justified adaptation of the ideal", "description": "Record decisions involving breadth, specialisation, cost, time, professional preparation and learner choice, together with the educational commitments each decision preserves or weakens.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which specific requirements compete for learner time or programme resources, and which declared liberal arts aims depend on them?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "justified-adaptation-of-the-ideal-q01" }, { "text": "What revision is feasible, who may authorise it, and what evidence would show whether it preserves the programme's stated educational commitments?", "kind": "action", "id": "justified-adaptation-of-the-ideal-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "There is no universally settled boundary between liberal arts education and liberal education; definitions differ over canonical knowledge, transferable capacities, civic purposes, and career preparation.", "Curricular varieties overlap, and a programme's title alone does not establish its content or educational outcomes.", "No universal credit distribution or outcome measurement applies; institutional requirements and evidence for claimed benefits need checking in context." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Classical liberal arts education organised around the trivium and quadrivium", "Great Books programmes centred on sustained engagement with influential texts", "Core-curriculum programmes with shared required courses", "Distribution-based programmes requiring study across disciplinary areas", "Open-curriculum programmes emphasising student-designed breadth", "Interdisciplinary liberal arts and sciences programmes" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP), US National Center for Education Statistics", "value_or_pattern": "24.0101", "note": "Identifies Liberal Arts and Sciences/Liberal Studies instructional programmes; it does not identify every programme practising liberal arts education." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Organising undergraduate education around breadth of study alongside disciplinary specialisation", "Designing general education requirements within universities", "Developing reasoning, written and oral communication, quantitative literacy, and interpretive skills", "Preparing students for civic participation and engagement with competing perspectives", "Providing foundations for varied careers and subsequent professional or graduate study" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Breadth requirements can become disconnected course sampling without cumulative intellectual development.", "Claims about improved reasoning or civic engagement can exceed evidence that separates educational effects from student selection.", "Canonical curricula can exclude intellectual traditions or reproduce social hierarchies when their selection is treated as beyond debate.", "Weak advising can leave students without coherent progression or sufficient disciplinary depth.", "High costs and unclear connections to employment can create access barriers and financial risks." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In the United States, liberal arts education is associated with both dedicated liberal arts colleges and university curricula combining general education with a major.", "In Europe, specialised degree structures coexist with liberal arts and sciences programmes, including university colleges in the Netherlands.", "In India, liberal arts programmes coexist with established arts and science degree traditions; institutional usage of the label varies." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Liberal arts", "difference": "Names a grouping or tradition of subjects; liberal arts education names an educational approach using such study." }, { "name": "Liberal education", "difference": "Often overlaps or is used synonymously; when distinguished, liberal education names the broader educational aims and may be pursued within professional programmes." }, { "name": "General education", "difference": "Usually denotes a shared or breadth component of a degree; liberal arts education can describe the orientation of the entire programme." }, { "name": "Humanities", "difference": "A family of disciplines; modern liberal arts education commonly also includes social sciences, natural sciences, and mathematics." }, { "name": "Vocational education", "difference": "Primarily prepares learners for particular occupations or occupational tasks; liberal arts education primarily emphasises broadly applicable intellectual development, although programmes can combine both." }, { "name": "Liberal arts college", "difference": "An institutional type; liberal arts education is an approach that can also be offered within other institutions." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of liberal arts education this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which reference works and educational traditions provide the most appropriate definitions for this registry entry, and how do their uses of liberal arts education differ from liberal education?", "Is any minimum combination of breadth, depth and intellectual autonomy defensible across contexts, or must recognition remain explicitly interpretation-dependent?", "Which assessments provide credible evidence that reasoning and integrative capacities transfer beyond the disciplines and tasks in which they were taught?", "What comparative evidence can distinguish effects of liberal arts education from learner selection, institutional resources and other educational experiences?", "How should the model evaluate programmes that combine liberal arts aims with professional preparation or substantially different cultural traditions of broad education?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a liberal arts education, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a claimed instance of liberal arts education, assess how its curriculum and teaching support its stated educational aims, and identify justified improvements without treating one interpretation as universal.", "characteristics": { "substance": "abstract", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 67 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a liberal arts education, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "an abstraction with no physical instance", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 67 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one liberal arts education from another, and a liberal arts education from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a liberal arts education sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a liberal arts education from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a liberal arts education passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a liberal arts education between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a liberal arts education, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a liberal arts education is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What liberal arts education is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of liberal arts education are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is liberal arts education operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of liberal arts education and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of liberal arts education?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as liberal arts education?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a liberal arts education came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a liberal arts education and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a liberal arts education is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a liberal arts education, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a liberal arts education, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a liberal arts education is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 12, "questions": 32 } } } }