{ "model": { "rank": 6778, "code": "thing-q191250", "model_id": "vr.tr.breccia", "name": "breccia", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise breccia, record its fragmental fabric and geological context, assess its condition, and select investigations or uses appropriate to the available evidence.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Physical world and living systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "PHY", "domain": "PHY.MAT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q191250/", "tier": 2, "score": 58, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "megabreccia", "injection breccia", "volcanic breccia", "ophicalcite", "Neugrund breccia", "bone breccia", "fault breccia", "Gardnos breccia", "vacuolar dolomite", "Hötting breccia", "crackle breccia", "tuff breccia", "Heavitree stone", "Kolmården Marble", "Marmo verde di Prato" ], "aliasCount": 15, "merged": 15, "knownIn": 58, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q191250", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q191250", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:29:04Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0887f-ff04-7f33-a47e-caab088e4203\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: breccia\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.OBJ\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 1001 registe", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 59.5, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0887f-ff01-7f33-8d8d-04ad9ef36410\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: breccia\nRegistry id: vr.tr.breccia\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.OBJ\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q191250", "registryId": "vr.tr.breccia", "name": "breccia", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.OBJ" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q191250/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.breccia", "name": "breccia", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise breccia, record its fragmental fabric and geological context, assess its condition, and select investigations or uses appropriate to the available evidence.", "definition": "Breccia is a rock composed of angular to subangular fragments, predominantly larger than 2 millimetres, bound together by a finer-grained matrix, mineral cement, or both.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the identifying fabric, constituents, formation evidence, spatial relationships and material condition of breccia under registry entry vr.tr.breccia in PHY / PHY.OBJ, distinguishing observed features from inferred origin.", "in_scope": [ "Angular to subangular coarse fragments and their relationships to matrix, cement and voids", "Clast composition, size distribution, shape, sorting and arrangement", "Evidence supporting sedimentary, fault-related, volcanic, hydrothermal, impact or collapse interpretations", "Breccia-body geometry, contacts and relationships to surrounding rock", "Weathering, fracture connectivity, cohesion and sampling representativeness" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Rounded-clast conglomerate except where needed to assess a transitional classification", "Loose angular debris without sufficient evidence to classify it as breccia", "Faults, volcanoes, impact structures and cave systems as complete geological entities", "Individual minerals and parent lithologies as independently modelled materials", "Engineered concrete and manufactured stone that merely resemble breccia", "Quarry operations, mineral deposits and construction products as complete operational or commercial entities" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Check that the apparent fragments are discrete clasts with identifiable boundaries rather than an optical pattern, mineral banding or surface staining.", "Assess whether coarse clasts are predominantly angular or subangular; predominantly rounded clasts favour conglomerate, while mixed fabrics require an explicit classification convention.", "Establish whether the material forms a coherent geological rock or brecciated rock body, and record uncertainty where it grades into loose rubble.", "Distinguish a fragmental rock fabric from an intact rock cut by veins: record whether fractures actually partition the host into displaced or separated fragments.", "Treat angular fragments as evidence of fabric, not sufficient evidence by themselves for a particular formation mechanism." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Clast size distribution", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "mm or cm; distribution, maximum observed size and measurement method", "why_it_matters": "Establishes the coarse-fragment component and makes observations at different scales comparable." }, { "name": "Clast angularity", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "angular, subangular, subrounded, rounded or mixed; named assessment scheme", "why_it_matters": "Supports the distinction from conglomerate and records transitional fabrics." }, { "name": "Clast lithological diversity", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "monomict, polymict or unresolved; identified lithologies", "why_it_matters": "Constrains constituent diversity and possible source rocks without assuming a formation process." }, { "name": "Fabric component proportions", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "area % or volume % of clasts, matrix, cement and voids; basis stated", "why_it_matters": "Describes the fabric quantitatively while avoiding confusion between section measurements and bulk composition." }, { "name": "Support fabric", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "clast-supported, matrix-supported, mixed or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Records how fragments contact one another and how the intervening material contributes to cohesion." }, { "name": "Clast fit and arrangement", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "jigsaw-fit, rotated, dispersed, aligned or mixed", "why_it_matters": "Helps evaluate fragmentation and displacement histories." }, { "name": "Formation interpretation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "sedimentary, fault-related, volcanic, hydrothermal, impact, collapse, multiprocess or unresolved; evidence and confidence recorded", "why_it_matters": "Keeps genetic interpretation separate from direct description and permits competing explanations." }, { "name": "Relationship to enclosing rock", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "host lithology, contact type, cross-cutting relationships and observed continuity", "why_it_matters": "Places the breccia in geological context and constrains relative timing." }, { "name": "Material integrity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "coherent, friable, weathered, fractured or mixed; affected fabric component identified", "why_it_matters": "Guides handling and investigation without assigning unsupported engineering performance." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a specimen or exposure provisionally from its observed clast and matrix fabric.", "Compare competing formation interpretations against recorded field and petrographic evidence.", "Map breccia contacts and internal fabric changes to define sampling domains.", "Select samples that preserve clast-matrix-cement relationships and document their orientation.", "Identify whether weathering or connected fractures warrant additional testing before handling or proposed use." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "fragmental-identity", "name": "Fragmental identity", "description": "Establish whether the material has a breccia fabric and document the basis for that classification.", "rationale": "A breccia label must be supported by fragment observations and explicit boundaries with similar-looking materials.", "layers": [ { "id": "clast-recognition", "name": "Clast recognition", "description": "Resolve fragment boundaries, scale and angularity.", "findings": [ { "id": "coarse-angular-fragment-evidence", "name": "Coarse angular fragment evidence", "description": "Record the observations needed to establish that apparent fragments are coarse geological clasts.", "questions": [ { "text": "What clast boundaries, sizes and angularity classes are visible on a fresh surface or section?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "coarse-angular-fragment-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which classification convention and coarse-size threshold support calling this material breccia?", "kind": "definition", "id": "coarse-angular-fragment-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-boundaries", "name": "Classification boundaries", "description": "Identify transitions and look-alikes that could change the assigned rock name.", "findings": [ { "id": "breccia-versus-neighbouring-materials", "name": "Breccia versus neighbouring materials", "description": "Test the label against conglomerate, rubble, veined rock and artificial composites.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the observed angularity distribution support breccia, conglomerate or a transitional description?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "breccia-versus-neighbouring-materials-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes this material from loose rubble, a vein network in intact rock or an engineered aggregate?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "breccia-versus-neighbouring-materials-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "constituents-and-fabric", "name": "Constituents and fabric", "description": "Describe what the fragments and intervening material are and how they are arranged.", "rationale": "Breccias with similar outward appearance can differ substantially in constituent diversity, support fabric and cohesion.", "layers": [ { "id": "clast-population", "name": "Clast population", "description": "Characterise fragment lithologies and their size-dependent variation.", "findings": [ { "id": "lithology-size-and-sorting", "name": "Lithology, size and sorting", "description": "Record clast diversity and distributions without treating a single conspicuous fragment as representative.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which clast lithologies are identified, and does the evidence support a monomict or polymict description?", "kind": "definition", "id": "lithology-size-and-sorting-q01" }, { "text": "How do clast size, abundance and sorting vary across the measured surface or exposure?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "lithology-size-and-sorting-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interclast-material-and-support", "name": "Interclast material and support", "description": "Separate matrix, cement and voids and describe their relationships to fragments.", "findings": [ { "id": "matrix-cement-and-clast-contacts", "name": "Matrix, cement and clast contacts", "description": "Record the material between clasts and whether clasts form a contacting framework.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observations distinguish fine fragmental matrix from precipitated cement and later vein fillings?", "kind": "definition", "id": "matrix-cement-and-clast-contacts-q01" }, { "text": "What proportions of clasts, matrix, cement and voids are measured, and is the fabric clast-supported or matrix-supported?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "matrix-cement-and-clast-contacts-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "formation-and-geological-context", "name": "Formation and geological context", "description": "Evaluate formation hypotheses using internal textures and relationships to surrounding rock.", "rationale": "Breccia is not a unique genetic diagnosis, and successive processes may modify or re-brecciate the same material.", "layers": [ { "id": "process-evidence", "name": "Process evidence", "description": "Link proposed formation mechanisms to diagnostic observations and alternatives.", "findings": [ { "id": "competing-origin-hypotheses", "name": "Competing origin hypotheses", "description": "Maintain an evidence-based interpretation that can remain unresolved or involve several processes.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which observed features support or weaken sedimentary, fault-related, volcanic, hydrothermal, impact and collapse interpretations?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "competing-origin-hypotheses-q01" }, { "text": "What additional field observation or laboratory examination would best distinguish the leading interpretations?", "kind": "action", "id": "competing-origin-hypotheses-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "body-relationships-and-sequence", "name": "Body relationships and sequence", "description": "Record geometry, contacts and evidence for the order of fragmentation and mineral filling.", "findings": [ { "id": "contacts-and-brecciation-history", "name": "Contacts and brecciation history", "description": "Use spatial and cross-cutting relationships to constrain the extent and relative history of the breccia.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does the breccia contact enclosing rock, and which boundaries are observed rather than inferred?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "contacts-and-brecciation-history-q01" }, { "text": "Do broken cement, clasts containing older breccia or cross-cutting veins establish successive fragmentation and filling episodes?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contacts-and-brecciation-history-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-investigation", "name": "Condition and investigation", "description": "Assess current integrity and plan observations or tests that account for heterogeneous breccia fabric.", "rationale": "A strong clast does not establish the strength of the whole rock, and small samples may miss controlling matrix or fracture features.", "layers": [ { "id": "fabric-controlled-condition", "name": "Fabric-controlled condition", "description": "Locate deterioration and connected openings within the clast-matrix-cement system.", "findings": [ { "id": "weak-components-and-connected-openings", "name": "Weak components and connected openings", "description": "Record whether loss of integrity occurs within clasts, intervening material or their interfaces.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is weathering, crumbling or separation concentrated in clasts, matrix, cement or clast boundaries?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "weak-components-and-connected-openings-q01" }, { "text": "What observations establish whether fractures and voids connect through the rock rather than terminate locally?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "weak-components-and-connected-openings-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "representative-sampling-and-use", "name": "Representative sampling and use", "description": "Match specimen selection and testing to fabric variability and the proposed decision.", "findings": [ { "id": "sample-scale-and-decision-evidence", "name": "Sample scale and decision evidence", "description": "Determine whether the available samples capture the features governing interpretation or material performance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What sample dimensions, locations and orientations are needed to represent the largest clasts and contrasting fabric domains?", "kind": "action", "id": "sample-scale-and-decision-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Which properties require direct testing before the proposed use, given the observed matrix, cement and fracture variability?", "kind": "action", "id": "sample-scale-and-decision-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Breccia describes a fragmental texture and does not by itself establish composition or origin; a genetic label requires additional evidence.", "Detailed fragment-size and abundance criteria depend on the classification system, particularly for volcanic rocks.", "Strength, porosity, durability and suitability for construction vary widely and require testing of the actual material." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of breccia this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Sedimentary breccia", "Fault breccia", "Volcanic breccia", "Impact breccia", "Hydrothermal breccia", "Collapse breccia" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of breccia this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Decorative facing, flooring and ornamental stone where the rock is sufficiently sound.", "Construction aggregate where tested material meets the requirements of the intended application.", "Geological evidence for fragmentation, transport, faulting, collapse, volcanism or impact processes.", "Mineral exploration, because some hydrothermal breccias host ore mineralization." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of breccia this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Coarse fragment size", "typical_range": "Greater than 2 mm is the conventional size criterion; there is no universal upper limit.", "unit": "mm" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of breccia this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Weak matrix or cement can permit fragments to detach under loading or weathering.", "Contrasts between fragments and matrix can cause uneven wear and deterioration.", "Fractured or poorly cemented breccia can contribute to unstable slopes and excavation faces.", "Cutting or crushing silica-bearing breccia can generate respirable crystalline silica dust." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of breccia this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Conglomerate", "difference": "Conglomerate contains predominantly rounded gravel-sized clasts; breccia contains predominantly angular to subangular fragments." }, { "name": "Sandstone", "difference": "Sandstone is dominated by sand-sized grains, whereas breccia is characterized by angular fragments larger than 2 mm." }, { "name": "Fault gouge", "difference": "Fault gouge is predominantly fine-grained fault material; fault breccia retains conspicuous coarse angular fragments." }, { "name": "Tuff", "difference": "Tuff is consolidated volcanic ash; volcanic breccia is characterized by coarse angular volcanic fragments." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of breccia this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative classification convention should govern coarse-clast thresholds, angularity and transitional breccia-conglomerate terminology?", "Does the registry intend breccia to include unconsolidated fault breccia and partially brecciated in-place rock, or only coherent fragmental rock?", "What minimum evidence should support each genetic subtype, especially where several fragmentation or alteration processes overlap?", "Which sampling and measurement methods adequately represent breccias whose largest clasts approach or exceed specimen dimensions?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this concept, requiring the registry entry to link to that model?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 14, "questions": 22 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "chemical substance or material", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a breccia, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise breccia, record its fragmental fabric and geological context, assess its condition, and select investigations or uses appropriate to the available evidence.", "characteristics": { "substance": "material", "origin": "natural", "agency": "inert", "mobility": "varies" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured", "consumed or used up" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: megabreccia, injection breccia, volcanic breccia, ophicalcite, Neugrund breccia, bone breccia, fault breccia, Gardnos breccia, vacuolar dolomite, Hötting breccia, crackle breccia, tuff breccia.", "15 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 58 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a breccia, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "matter you can touch", "physicalCharacter": [ "Mobility varies between examples.", "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state", "use it up, and then need more of it" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by sight in any reliable way. Appearance varies with grade, form and additives; identification is by label, by documentation, or by assay." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "megabreccia", "injection breccia", "volcanic breccia", "ophicalcite", "Neugrund breccia", "bone breccia", "fault breccia", "Gardnos breccia", "vacuolar dolomite", "Hötting breccia", "crackle breccia", "tuff breccia" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 58 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 15 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one breccia from another, and a breccia from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a breccia sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a breccia from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "form-and-composition", "name": "Form, composition and condition", "description": "What a breccia is made of, what shape and size it takes, and what state it is in.", "rationale": "A physical thing can be measured, and a model that cannot record its measurements cannot support any decision that depends on them.", "layers": [ { "id": "form-and-dimensions", "name": "Form and dimensions", "description": "Shape, size, mass and the ranges these take across examples.", "findings": [ { "id": "measurable-dimensions", "name": "Measurable dimensions and their units", "description": "The quantities worth recording and the units they are recorded in.", "questions": [ { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the dimensions of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the dimensions of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the dimensions of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "material-and-composition", "name": "Material and composition", "description": "Materials, parts and how they are put together.", "findings": [ { "id": "parts-and-materials", "name": "Parts and materials", "description": "What a breccia is built from and which parts are replaceable.", "questions": [ { "id": "parts-and-materials-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the composition of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "parts-and-materials-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the composition of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "parts-and-materials-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the composition of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-integrity", "name": "Condition and integrity", "description": "Wear, damage, health and the difference between working and broken.", "findings": [ { "id": "condition-assessment", "name": "Condition, damage and health", "description": "How the condition of a breccia is judged and by whom.", "questions": [ { "id": "condition-assessment-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the condition of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "condition-assessment-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the condition of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "condition-assessment-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the condition of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a breccia is, how it got there and where it may go (varies).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a breccia is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a breccia is carried, installed or relocated.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a breccia passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a breccia between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a breccia, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a breccia is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "use-and-operation", "name": "Use and operation", "description": "What can be done with a breccia and what it takes to do it.", "rationale": "An agent that can recognise a thing but not act on it has only half a model.", "layers": [ { "id": "intended-use", "name": "Intended use and function", "description": "What a breccia is for, and what it is used for anyway.", "findings": [ { "id": "function-and-purpose", "name": "Function, purpose and misuse", "description": "The function a breccia performs and the uses that fall outside it.", "questions": [ { "id": "function-and-purpose-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the use of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "function-and-purpose-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the use of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "function-and-purpose-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the use of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "handling-and-procedure", "name": "Handling and procedure", "description": "The steps, skills and tools involved in using a breccia.", "findings": [ { "id": "procedures-and-skills", "name": "Procedures, skills and required tools", "description": "What an agent needs before it can act on a breccia at all.", "questions": [ { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes handling a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about handling a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once handling a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "supply-and-consumption", "name": "Supply and consumption", "description": "Quantities, rates and what running out means.", "findings": [ { "id": "consumption-and-stock", "name": "Consumption, stock and replenishment", "description": "How much of a breccia there is and how fast it goes.", "questions": [ { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the supply of a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the supply of a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the supply of a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "composition-and-identity", "name": "Composition, grade and chemical identity", "description": "What breccia is made of and how pure the thing in hand is.", "rationale": "Grade decides what a substance may be used for, so a model that records only the name cannot support any decision about use.", "layers": [ { "id": "chemical-identity", "name": "Chemical identity", "description": "Formula, structure and the registry numbers that name it unambiguously.", "findings": [ { "id": "identity-record", "name": "Identity and registry numbers", "description": "What identifies this substance across suppliers and regulators.", "questions": [ { "id": "identity-record-q01", "text": "What formula, structure and registry identifiers name breccia unambiguously?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "identity-record-q02", "text": "Which related substances share a name in common use but not an identifier?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "grade-and-impurities", "name": "Grade, purity and impurities", "description": "The specification a batch meets and what else is in it.", "findings": [ { "id": "specification", "name": "Specification and assay", "description": "How purity is stated and measured, and which impurities matter.", "questions": [ { "id": "specification-q01", "text": "What grades of breccia exist, how is purity assayed, and which impurities are limited?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "specification-q02", "text": "Which use requires which grade, and what happens when a lower grade is substituted?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "properties-and-behaviour", "name": "Properties and behaviour", "description": "How breccia behaves under conditions an agent can measure or change.", "rationale": "Physical constants are the part of a substance model that transfers between contexts, and each needs its unit and its conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "physical-constants", "name": "Physical constants", "description": "Values that hold for the pure substance, with their conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "constants-record", "name": "Constants and conditions", "description": "The quantities worth recording and the state they apply in.", "questions": [ { "id": "constants-record-q01", "text": "What are the defining physical constants of breccia, in what units and under what conditions?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "constants-record-q02", "text": "Which of these values change with grade or form rather than being fixed?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "stability-and-reactivity", "name": "Stability and reactivity", "description": "What it reacts with, degrades into, and how it is stored.", "findings": [ { "id": "incompatibilities", "name": "Incompatibilities and degradation", "description": "What must not meet it, and what it becomes over time.", "questions": [ { "id": "incompatibilities-q01", "text": "What is breccia incompatible with, and what does it degrade into under storage?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "incompatibilities-q02", "text": "What storage and handling does that require, and who is competent to do it?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "hazard-and-regulation", "name": "Hazard classification and regulation", "description": "How breccia can harm, and what the law says about holding and moving it.", "rationale": "A substance model without its hazard class and its regulatory identity is unusable in exactly the situations that matter.", "layers": [ { "id": "hazard-class", "name": "Hazard classification", "description": "Classified hazards, exposure limits and protective measures.", "findings": [ { "id": "classified-hazards", "name": "Classified hazards and limits", "description": "The classification, the scheme it belongs to, and the limits set.", "questions": [ { "id": "classified-hazards-q01", "text": "How is breccia classified for hazard, under which scheme, and what exposure limits apply?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classified-hazards-q02", "text": "What protection does handling require, and what must an agent refuse to do without it?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "regulatory-identity", "name": "Regulatory identity and control", "description": "Registration, restriction and transport rules by jurisdiction.", "findings": [ { "id": "controls", "name": "Controls and jurisdiction", "description": "Where it is restricted and what the restriction attaches to.", "questions": [ { "id": "controls-q01", "text": "Which registrations, restrictions or transport rules cover breccia, and where?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "controls-q02", "text": "Does the control attach to the substance, its concentration, or its intended use?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a breccia came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a breccia and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a breccia is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a breccia, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a breccia, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a breccia is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 9, "layers": 20, "findings": 22, "questions": 60 } } } }