{ "model": { "rank": 6637, "code": "thing-q191355", "model_id": "vr.tr.hunger-strike", "name": "hunger strike", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a hunger strike, record its demands and evolving state, and distinguish authorised support from actions that override participants' choices.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q191355/", "tier": 2, "score": 59, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "dry hunger strike" ], "aliasCount": 1, "merged": 1, "knownIn": 59, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q191355", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q191355", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:11:05Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 20.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0886f-877c-78f2-89d6-b1ca9765b093\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: hunger strike\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 1001 r", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 59.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a0886f-8779-7e62-bb3e-75ff5512f950\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: hunger strike\nRegistry id: vr.tr.hunger-strike\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q191355", "registryId": "vr.tr.hunger-strike", "name": "hunger strike", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q191355/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.hunger-strike", "name": "hunger strike", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a hunger strike, record its demands and evolving state, and distinguish authorised support from actions that override participants' choices.", "definition": "A hunger strike is a deliberate refusal of food by a person or group as a form of protest intended to press demands, draw attention to grievances, or influence an authority or audience.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the hunger strike as an episode of deliberate food refusal used to communicate a grievance or press a demand, including participation, declared intake boundaries, audiences, responses, and termination; it preserves the registry placement INF / INF.MED while linking to collective action, institutional conditions, and individual care.", "in_scope": [ "The grievance, demands, intended audience, and communicative use of food refusal", "Individual participation, collective coordination, and freedom to join or withdraw", "Declared food-refusal terms and reported intake over time", "Participant-specific welfare concerns, expressed care preferences, and access to independent support", "Negotiations, institutional responses, suspension, termination, and disputed outcomes" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Religious fasting, dietary restriction, or food refusal without an established protest purpose", "Food deprivation caused by scarcity, confinement, or another actor withholding food", "Diagnosis and treatment of malnutrition, dehydration, or other medical conditions", "The complete political campaign, movement, or dispute surrounding the strike", "General detention administration and jurisdiction-wide legal rules", "News reports, photographs, and other media works as independently managed artifacts" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Food refusal is connected to an expressed or credibly documented grievance or demand; duration without eating alone does not identify a hunger strike.", "Evidence distinguishes participant-chosen refusal from unavailable food or externally imposed deprivation, while allowing mixed or disputed circumstances.", "A bounded episode of refusal can be identified separately from the wider campaign that uses it.", "The participant's declared intake terms are recorded explicitly; the label does not establish whether fluids, supplements, or intermittent intake are included.", "Collective designation does not establish each participant's consent, start time, intake pattern, or decision to continue." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Episode status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "announced | underway | suspended | ended | disputed | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Separates a threatened or announced strike from an episode with evidence of participation." }, { "name": "Demand and addressee", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Participant or authorised representative → stated demand → intended respondent", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what the refusal seeks to change and who is being asked to act." }, { "name": "Declared intake terms", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Participant-stated exclusions and allowances for food, fluids, supplements, and medicines; unspecified where unknown", "why_it_matters": "Prevents the strike label from substituting for the actual terms of refusal." }, { "name": "Participation interval", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Start and end timestamps with precision and uncertainty; elapsed hours or days", "why_it_matters": "Supports timelines without treating all participants as having identical exposure." }, { "name": "Reported intake", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Timestamped substance, amount when known, reporting source, and confidence", "why_it_matters": "Keeps observed or reported behaviour distinct from announced terms and allegations." }, { "name": "Participation voluntariness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "affirmed by participant | concerns reported | disputed | not assessed", "why_it_matters": "Makes pressure to participate, continue, or stop visible without inferring consent from membership." }, { "name": "Care preferences and consent", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Participant → specific proposed assessment or intervention → expressed preference or consent record, with date", "why_it_matters": "Avoids treating refusal of food as a blanket decision about every form of care." }, { "name": "Demand outcome", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "unanswered | rejected | negotiating | promised | partly implemented | implemented | disputed | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes an announcement or concession from verified change." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify candidate hunger-strike episodes and flag uncertain protest intent or involuntary deprivation.", "Construct participant-specific timelines of declarations, reported intake, withdrawals, and institutional responses.", "Compare demands with attributed promises and evidence of implementation.", "Prepare an attributed briefing that preserves conflicting accounts and protects sensitive participant information.", "Route requests for independent care, representation, or communication through authorised contacts.", "Record suspension or termination without assuming either a successful campaign or completed recovery." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "refusal-as-protest", "name": "Refusal as protest", "description": "Establishes why the food refusal constitutes a hunger strike and what it seeks to communicate.", "rationale": "Food refusal alone cannot establish protest intent, a demand, or an intended respondent.", "layers": [ { "id": "intent-and-boundary", "name": "Intent and boundary", "description": "Distinguishes protest refusal from other reasons for not eating.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-protest-purpose", "name": "Documented protest purpose", "description": "Records attributed evidence connecting refusal to a grievance while retaining uncertainty about motive.", "questions": [ { "text": "What participant statement or other evidence connects the refusal to a grievance or demand?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-protest-purpose-q01" }, { "text": "What distinguishes this episode from religious fasting, illness-related refusal, unavailable food, or imposed deprivation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-protest-purpose-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "demands-and-audiences", "name": "Demands and audiences", "description": "Captures requested changes and the actors expected to respond or bear witness.", "findings": [ { "id": "demand-to-respondent-link", "name": "Demand-to-respondent link", "description": "Keeps each demand, its author, its intended respondent, and revisions identifiable.", "questions": [ { "text": "What change is requested, and which actor is addressed as able to deliver it?", "kind": "definition", "id": "demand-to-respondent-link-q01" }, { "text": "Who issued or revised the demand, and what evidence establishes their authority to speak for the named participants?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "demand-to-respondent-link-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "participants-and-agency", "name": "Participants and agency", "description": "Represents individual participation within solitary, coordinated, or rotating strikes.", "rationale": "Collective accounts can obscure differences in consent, exposure, representation, and withdrawal.", "layers": [ { "id": "participation-membership", "name": "Participation membership", "description": "Separates participants from organisers, supporters, representatives, and observers.", "findings": [ { "id": "individual-participation-record", "name": "Individual participation record", "description": "Records who is reported to be refusing food and during which intervals, with appropriate identity protection.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who is participating directly, and who is acting only as an organiser, supporter, or spokesperson?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "individual-participation-record-q01" }, { "text": "What source establishes each participant's start, pauses, withdrawal, or re-entry?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "individual-participation-record-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "voluntariness-and-representation", "name": "Voluntariness and representation", "description": "Captures participants' own choices and the limits of collective authority.", "findings": [ { "id": "choice-to-continue-or-withdraw", "name": "Choice to continue or withdraw", "description": "Preserves individual statements about participation and reports of pressure from any actor.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence records the participant's current choice and any pressure to begin, continue, or end the refusal?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "choice-to-continue-or-withdraw-q01" }, { "text": "Which decisions may a representative communicate, and which require the participant's own instruction?", "kind": "action", "id": "choice-to-continue-or-withdraw-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "intake-and-episode-course", "name": "Intake and episode course", "description": "Tracks declared refusal terms, reported behaviour, and changes over time.", "rationale": "The meaning and course of a hunger strike cannot be inferred from its label or a single collective day count.", "layers": [ { "id": "declared-refusal-terms", "name": "Declared refusal terms", "description": "Records the participant's stated boundaries for intake and their revisions.", "findings": [ { "id": "food-and-fluid-boundaries", "name": "Food and fluid boundaries", "description": "Makes explicit what is refused, permitted, or unspecified without imposing a universal strike protocol.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which foods, fluids, supplements, or medicines does the participant say they will refuse or accept?", "kind": "definition", "id": "food-and-fluid-boundaries-q01" }, { "text": "When did these terms change, and who documented the change?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "food-and-fluid-boundaries-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reported-course", "name": "Reported course", "description": "Maintains an evidence-based chronology without equating every intake event with termination.", "findings": [ { "id": "intake-and-interruption-timeline", "name": "Intake and interruption timeline", "description": "Separates declarations, self-reports, observations, disputed allegations, and imposed intake.", "questions": [ { "text": "What intake or interruption was reported, at what time, by which source, and with what uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "intake-and-interruption-timeline-q01" }, { "text": "Was the event participant-chosen, imposed, or unclear, and how did it affect the declared episode status?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "intake-and-interruption-timeline-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "welfare-consent-and-care", "name": "Welfare, consent, and care", "description": "Links participant welfare and care decisions to appropriately attributed assessments and expressed preferences.", "rationale": "An agent must recognise care needs and autonomy questions without deriving clinical decisions from protest status.", "layers": [ { "id": "welfare-and-care-access", "name": "Welfare and care access", "description": "Records reported concerns and access to qualified, independent assistance.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-welfare-assessment", "name": "Attributed welfare assessment", "description": "Links concerns and professional assessments while keeping clinical interpretation in the care model.", "questions": [ { "text": "What welfare concerns or professional assessments are available, when were they recorded, and who supplied them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-welfare-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "What assistance has the participant requested, and what barriers affect access to independent assessment or care?", "kind": "action", "id": "attributed-welfare-assessment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "care-decision-boundaries", "name": "Care decision boundaries", "description": "Distinguishes consent to particular interventions from participation in the strike.", "findings": [ { "id": "intervention-specific-preferences", "name": "Intervention-specific preferences", "description": "Records current and prior expressed wishes, relevant assessments, and contested interventions without inventing authority.", "questions": [ { "text": "What has the participant expressed about each proposed assessment, treatment, or feeding intervention, and when?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intervention-specific-preferences-q01" }, { "text": "What qualified review of consent, decision-making capacity, and applicable requirements is needed before acting on a contested intervention?", "kind": "action", "id": "intervention-specific-preferences-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "responses-and-resolution", "name": "Responses and resolution", "description": "Tracks communication, negotiation, institutional action, and the end of the episode.", "rationale": "Stopping food refusal, securing a promise, implementing a demand, and recovering are distinct developments.", "layers": [ { "id": "communications-and-responses", "name": "Communications and responses", "description": "Connects participant-authorised messages with attributed responses and observable actions.", "findings": [ { "id": "response-to-stated-demands", "name": "Response to stated demands", "description": "Records offers, refusals, restrictions, and other responses alongside their sources and contested interpretations.", "questions": [ { "text": "What did each respondent say or do in response to the strike, and what evidence supports that account?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "response-to-stated-demands-q01" }, { "text": "Which strike statements or participant details may the agent share, with whom, and under whose authorisation?", "kind": "action", "id": "response-to-stated-demands-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ending-and-follow-through", "name": "Ending and follow-through", "description": "Separates individual cessation, collective closure, demand implementation, and continuing care.", "findings": [ { "id": "termination-and-outcome-evidence", "name": "Termination and outcome evidence", "description": "Records how the episode ended and which claimed outcomes remain unverified.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who ended or suspended participation, when, and on what stated grounds, including any disagreement with a collective announcement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "termination-and-outcome-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence distinguishes promised concessions from implemented changes, and what follow-up remains unresolved?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "termination-and-outcome-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the protest practice; the supplied domain code INF.MED does not establish a narrower sense.", "Terminology and permitted intake vary; a reported hunger strike does not necessarily mean complete abstention from calories or fluids.", "Named ethical instruments are recalled without source verification; their current wording and jurisdiction-specific legal application require checking." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Individual hunger strike", "Collective hunger strike", "Time-limited hunger strike", "Indefinite hunger strike", "Relay hunger strike", "Dry hunger strike, involving refusal of fluids as well as food" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "World Medical Association Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikers: ethical guidance concerning autonomy, informed refusal, clinical independence, and artificial feeding.", "World Medical Association Declaration of Tokyo: ethical guidance for physicians concerning detention and torture, including refusal of nourishment by prisoners capable of an unimpaired and rational judgment.", "United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, known as the Nelson Mandela Rules: general standards for prison health care, clinical independence, and informed consent." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Protesting prison conditions, detention, or treatment in custody.", "Pressing political demands or seeking recognition of rights.", "Drawing public and media attention to grievances.", "Expressing solidarity through coordinated or relay protests." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Duration of food refusal", "typical_range": "No defining duration threshold or universal typical range", "unit": "days" }, { "quantity": "Number of participants", "typical_range": "One person to large groups", "unit": "persons" }, { "quantity": "Change in body mass from baseline", "typical_range": "Variable; does not by itself establish severity", "unit": "%" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Prolonged food refusal can cause malnutrition, muscle loss, organ dysfunction, and death.", "Refusal of fluids adds a risk of rapid dehydration and kidney injury.", "Electrolyte disturbances can cause dangerous cardiac and neurological complications.", "Resumption of nutrition after prolonged deprivation can cause refeeding syndrome.", "Coercion, disputed decision-making capacity, and non-consensual feeding can create serious ethical conflicts and risks of harm." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Legal approaches to artificial feeding, refusal of treatment, and state duties toward detained people vary by jurisdiction.", "The political significance and customary forms of hunger strikes vary across protest traditions and detention settings." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Fasting", "difference": "Fasting includes abstention for religious, medical, or personal reasons; a hunger strike uses food refusal as protest." }, { "name": "Starvation", "difference": "Starvation is a physiological state caused by inadequate nutrition; a hunger strike is an intentional protest action that may produce that state." }, { "name": "Food insecurity", "difference": "Food insecurity concerns unreliable access to adequate food; a hunger strike concerns intentional refusal as protest." }, { "name": "Eating disorder", "difference": "An eating disorder is a clinical condition; protest-motivated food refusal alone does not establish such a diagnosis." }, { "name": "Labor strike", "difference": "A labor strike applies pressure through withdrawal of labor; a hunger strike applies pressure through refusal of food." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of hunger strike this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "What rationale supports the registry placement INF / INF.MED, and does an existing world model already own hunger strikes as protest episodes?", "Which evidence standard should establish protest intent when a participant cannot communicate directly or accounts conflict?", "How should episode identity handle rotating participants, temporary pauses, changed intake terms, and renewed strikes over the same demands?", "Which jurisdiction-specific legal requirements and professional ethical guidance govern disputed care, capacity assessments, confidentiality, and feeding interventions?", "What minimum participant-level information is necessary for useful tracking without exposing identities, health details, or communications beyond their authorised audience?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 28 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a hunger strike, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a hunger strike, record its demands and evolving state, and distinguish authorised support from actions that override participants' choices.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: dry hunger strike.", "1 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a hunger strike, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "dry hunger strike" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 1 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one hunger strike from another, and a hunger strike from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a hunger strike sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a hunger strike from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a hunger strike passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a hunger strike between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a hunger strike, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a hunger strike is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a hunger strike says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a hunger strike contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a hunger strike and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of hunger strike a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For hunger strike, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of hunger strike exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made hunger strike and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to hunger strike, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in hunger strike, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a hunger strike came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a hunger strike and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a hunger strike is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a hunger strike, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a hunger strike, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a hunger strike is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }