{ "model": { "rank": 5292, "code": "thing-q192316", "model_id": "vr.tr.geostationary-orbit", "name": "geostationary orbit", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a geostationary orbit, assess how closely an actual trajectory maintains that condition, and identify justified monitoring or maintenance actions.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Cross-cutting context", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "XCT", "domain": "XCT.QLT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q192316/", "tier": 2, "score": 68, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 68, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q192316", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q192316", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T22:04:20Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08832-5ce2-73f0-97c0-ad2f462b8430\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: geostationary orbit\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: XCT.QLT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: ", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 64, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08832-5cda-74f1-a138-152992148e00\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: geostationary orbit\nRegistry id: vr.tr.geostationary-orbit\nPlane / domain: XCT / XCT.QLT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q192316", "registryId": "vr.tr.geostationary-orbit", "name": "geostationary orbit", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.QLT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q192316/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.geostationary-orbit", "name": "geostationary orbit", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise a geostationary orbit, assess how closely an actual trajectory maintains that condition, and identify justified monitoring or maintenance actions.", "definition": "A geostationary orbit is a circular, equatorial, prograde Earth orbit whose period equals Earth's sidereal rotation period, so an ideal satellite in it remains above a fixed longitude on the equator.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the Earth-centred geostationary orbital condition and its operational realisations, including defining constraints, reference frames, ground-relative behaviour, perturbations and maintenance requirements; it distinguishes an orbit from the spacecraft occupying it.", "in_scope": [ "The ideal circular, equatorial, prograde orbit whose angular motion matches Earth's sidereal rotation", "Orbital elements and Earth-fixed observations used to assess geostationarity", "Operational tolerances around a nominal longitude and the evidence supporting compliance", "Perturbations, longitude drift and departures from the ideal condition", "Orbit-specific maintenance, relocation and departure conditions" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Spacecraft design, payload capabilities and onboard propulsion engineering", "The broader class of geosynchronous orbits except where needed to distinguish geostationary membership", "Radio-frequency assignments, spectrum licences and legal entitlement to operate", "Ground-station engineering and communications service performance", "Detailed models of disposal or transfer orbits" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Matching Earth's sidereal rotation period is necessary but insufficient: an inclined or eccentric geosynchronous orbit is not strictly geostationary.", "The ideal orbit is circular and lies in Earth's equatorial plane; inclination and eccentricity must therefore be evaluated separately.", "Motion is prograde and matches Earth's rotational angular velocity, giving a constant position in an Earth-fixed frame.", "A nominal geostationary altitude alone does not establish geostationarity; period, orbital plane, shape and direction must also agree.", "An operational trajectory may be called geostationary within declared tolerances, but those tolerances must remain distinguishable from the ideal definition." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Central body and orbital sense", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Earth; prograde or other", "why_it_matters": "Separates the terrestrial geostationary condition from analogous synchronous orbits and incompatible directions of motion." }, { "name": "Period mismatch", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Seconds relative to the declared Earth sidereal rotation period", "why_it_matters": "Identifies a mismatch that can produce accumulated longitude drift." }, { "name": "Inclination", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Degrees relative to the specified Earth equatorial plane", "why_it_matters": "Measures departure from the equatorial condition and helps explain north-south apparent motion." }, { "name": "Eccentricity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Dimensionless; ideal value zero", "why_it_matters": "Measures departure from circularity and helps explain periodic changes in ground-relative position." }, { "name": "Semimajor axis", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Kilometres from Earth's centre, with gravitational parameter and element convention declared", "why_it_matters": "Connects orbital size to period and prevents confusion between geocentric distance and altitude." }, { "name": "Subsatellite longitude and latitude", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Degrees in a specified Earth-fixed frame at a stated epoch", "why_it_matters": "Expresses the observable location and excursions relative to Earth." }, { "name": "Longitude drift rate", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Degrees per day with a declared sign convention and estimation interval", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes stable residence near a longitude from drift or deliberate relocation." }, { "name": "Geostationary conformance", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Ideal condition; within declared operational tolerance; outside tolerance; undetermined", "why_it_matters": "Separates mathematical classification from an evidence-based operational assessment." }, { "name": "Assigned longitude and containment envelope", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Reference to a nominal longitude, permitted excursions, validity interval and issuing authority or operator", "why_it_matters": "Provides the operational target without treating physical occupancy as legal entitlement." }, { "name": "Trajectory evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Reference to orbit solution, epoch, frame, uncertainty, provenance and prediction horizon", "why_it_matters": "Makes classification and action recommendations traceable to sufficiently current evidence." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a supplied trajectory as ideally geostationary, operationally compliant, noncompliant or insufficiently evidenced.", "Compare orbital elements and Earth-fixed motion against a declared geostationary definition and containment envelope.", "Estimate longitude drift and ground-relative excursions over a stated prediction horizon.", "Identify whether a deviation concerns orbital plane, eccentricity, orbital period or multiple coupled effects.", "Propose orbit-maintenance or relocation objectives for assessment by spacecraft and mission-control models.", "Determine when a trajectory has entered or departed the declared geostationary operating condition." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "geostationary-identity", "name": "Geostationary identity", "description": "Defines the conjunction of orbital properties that produces an Earth-fixed ideal trajectory.", "rationale": "A matching period or approximate altitude can otherwise be mistaken for sufficient evidence of geostationarity.", "layers": [ { "id": "defining-orbital-constraints", "name": "Defining orbital constraints", "description": "Records the central body, orbital sense, plane, shape and rotational synchronisation.", "findings": [ { "id": "joint-geostationary-condition", "name": "Joint geostationary condition", "description": "Assess circularity, equatorial alignment, prograde motion and synchronisation together rather than classifying from a single property.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the adopted definition require a circular, equatorial, prograde Earth orbit matching Earth's sidereal rotation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "joint-geostationary-condition-q01" }, { "text": "Which defining constraints does the supplied trajectory satisfy, and with what uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "joint-geostationary-condition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "geosynchronous-boundary", "name": "Geosynchronous boundary", "description": "Separates geostationary membership from the wider family of synchronous trajectories.", "findings": [ { "id": "ideal-and-operational-membership", "name": "Ideal and operational membership", "description": "Keep strict geometric membership separate from operational usage that accepts bounded departures.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the trajectory merely geosynchronous because inclination or eccentricity prevents a fixed Earth-relative position?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "ideal-and-operational-membership-q01" }, { "text": "Who defines any accepted operational departure from the ideal, and where is that definition recorded?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "ideal-and-operational-membership-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "orbital-evidence-and-reference-frames", "name": "Orbital evidence and reference frames", "description": "Makes the quantities used to recognise geostationarity comparable and interpretable.", "rationale": "Frame, epoch and orbital-element conventions can change the meaning of apparent deviations from a nominal geostationary orbit.", "layers": [ { "id": "rotation-and-coordinate-conventions", "name": "Rotation and coordinate conventions", "description": "Identifies the inertial and Earth-fixed descriptions used to compare orbital motion with Earth rotation.", "findings": [ { "id": "synchronisation-reference", "name": "Synchronisation reference", "description": "Record the rotation reference, time conventions and coordinate transformation supporting an Earth-fixed assessment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which Earth rotation reference is used, and has a solar-day period been incorrectly substituted for a sidereal period?", "kind": "definition", "id": "synchronisation-reference-q01" }, { "text": "Which reference frames, epoch and Earth-orientation inputs connect the orbital solution to subsatellite coordinates?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "synchronisation-reference-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "orbit-solution-quality", "name": "Orbit solution quality", "description": "Records how orbital estimates and their uncertainty support a classification.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpretable-orbital-elements", "name": "Interpretable orbital elements", "description": "Declare whether elements are mean or osculating and avoid relying on individually ill-defined angles in the circular, equatorial limit.", "questions": [ { "text": "What estimation source, epoch, uncertainty and mean-or-osculating convention accompany the orbital elements?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "interpretable-orbital-elements-q01" }, { "text": "Does the representation remain meaningful near zero eccentricity and inclination, or is a nonsingular representation needed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "interpretable-orbital-elements-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "earth-fixed-residence", "name": "Earth-fixed residence", "description": "Describes the longitude occupied and the observed or predicted departures from a fixed terrestrial position.", "rationale": "Geostationarity is operationally meaningful through ground-relative residence, not orbital elements alone.", "layers": [ { "id": "longitude-target-and-excursions", "name": "Longitude target and excursions", "description": "Relates subsatellite motion to a nominal operating position.", "findings": [ { "id": "ground-relative-position-history", "name": "Ground-relative position history", "description": "Record longitude and latitude over an interval sufficient to expose periodic excursions and sustained drift.", "questions": [ { "text": "What nominal longitude is being assessed, and how are longitude wrapping and east-west signs handled?", "kind": "definition", "id": "ground-relative-position-history-q01" }, { "text": "What longitude and latitude excursions occur over the assessment interval, including uncertainty?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "ground-relative-position-history-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operational-containment", "name": "Operational containment", "description": "Assesses residence within a declared geostationary operating envelope.", "findings": [ { "id": "containment-assessment", "name": "Containment assessment", "description": "Compare the trajectory with explicit limits and distinguish sustained containment from a momentary crossing of the target position.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which angular or other orbit-specific limits define acceptable residence, over what duration, and from whose requirement?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "containment-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Does the uncertainty-bounded trajectory remain inside those limits throughout the required interval?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "containment-assessment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "perturbations-and-maintenance", "name": "Perturbations and maintenance", "description": "Connects departures from geostationarity to dynamical influences and correction objectives.", "rationale": "An actual trajectory requires prediction and management of departures from the ideal orbital condition.", "layers": [ { "id": "departure-dynamics", "name": "Departure dynamics", "description": "Separates observed deviation from explanations that depend on a force model and spacecraft properties.", "findings": [ { "id": "perturbation-attribution", "name": "Perturbation attribution", "description": "Assess relevant effects of Earth's nonuniform gravity, lunar and solar gravity, and solar radiation pressure without assuming identical responses for every occupant.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which perturbing forces are included in the prediction, and which spacecraft-dependent inputs do they require?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "perturbation-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "How much predicted longitude, inclination and eccentricity evolution is attributable to each included effect over the chosen horizon?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "perturbation-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "station-keeping-objectives", "name": "Station-keeping objectives", "description": "Expresses the orbital corrections needed to maintain the declared operating condition.", "findings": [ { "id": "correction-need-and-handoff", "name": "Correction need and handoff", "description": "Identify east-west and north-south maintenance objectives while leaving executable manoeuvre design and vehicle feasibility to linked models.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which predicted tolerance violation creates a maintenance need, and when is it expected to occur?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "correction-need-and-handoff-q01" }, { "text": "What orbital correction objective should be passed to the spacecraft and mission-control models for feasibility and execution assessment?", "kind": "action", "id": "correction-need-and-handoff-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "occupation-and-orbital-transitions", "name": "Occupation and orbital transitions", "description": "Separates the orbital condition from its occupants and tracks entry, relocation and departure.", "rationale": "A spacecraft's identity, longitude assignment and mission phase must not be confused with the physical condition of its orbit.", "layers": [ { "id": "orbit-occupant-and-assignment", "name": "Orbit, occupant and assignment", "description": "Links physical trajectories to spacecraft and operating targets without conflating them.", "findings": [ { "id": "physical-occupation-versus-entitlement", "name": "Physical occupation versus entitlement", "description": "Record who or what occupies the trajectory separately from the provenance of its target longitude or operating entitlement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which spacecraft and time-bounded trajectory instantiate the assessed orbital condition?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "physical-occupation-versus-entitlement-q01" }, { "text": "Which assertions concern measured orbital position, and which require evidence from a separate assignment or regulatory model?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "physical-occupation-versus-entitlement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "entry-relocation-and-exit", "name": "Entry, relocation and exit", "description": "Identifies when a changing trajectory acquires, temporarily leaves or ceases the declared geostationary condition.", "findings": [ { "id": "transition-classification", "name": "Transition classification", "description": "Assess acquisition, deliberate longitude drift, inclined operation and disposal departure from trajectory evidence rather than mission labels alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "During the transition, which strict geostationary constraints or operational containment limits cease to hold?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "transition-classification-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence establishes acquisition at the destination longitude or departure requiring handoff to another orbit model?", "kind": "action", "id": "transition-classification-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Real operational satellites remain within controlled position tolerances rather than occupying the exact ideal orbit.", "Numerical values are rounded nominal values; altitude and radius depend on the adopted Earth reference parameters.", "Regulatory instruments are named from recall; current provisions and mission-specific disposal requirements require verification." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Orbital longitude designation", "value_or_pattern": "Longitude in degrees east or west", "note": "Identifies a nominal geostationary position, not a unique satellite; multiple satellites may be colocated." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "ITU Radio Regulations govern international coordination, notification and use of radio frequencies and associated geostationary satellite orbital positions.", "IADC Space Debris Mitigation Guidelines address disposal of spacecraft away from the geostationary region and prevention of debris generation.", "United Nations Outer Space Treaty establishes the framework for state responsibility for space activities and prohibits national appropriation of outer space." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Satellite television and radio broadcasting.", "Fixed satellite telecommunications and broadband services.", "Continuous weather observation of the same broad region of Earth.", "Communications relay for spacecraft and remote infrastructure.", "Broadcasting navigation augmentation messages." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Nominal altitude above Earth's equator", "typical_range": "Approximately 35,786", "unit": "km" }, { "quantity": "Nominal orbital radius from Earth's centre", "typical_range": "Approximately 42,164", "unit": "km" }, { "quantity": "Orbital period", "typical_range": "Approximately 86,164, or 23 hours 56 minutes 4 seconds", "unit": "s" }, { "quantity": "Nominal orbital speed", "typical_range": "Approximately 3.07", "unit": "km/s" }, { "quantity": "Ideal orbital inclination to Earth's equator", "typical_range": "0", "unit": "degree" }, { "quantity": "Ideal orbital eccentricity", "typical_range": "0", "unit": "dimensionless" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Gravitational perturbations and solar radiation pressure cause departures from the assigned position unless corrected through station keeping.", "Propellant exhaustion or propulsion failure can prevent station keeping and end-of-life disposal.", "Collisions and fragmentation can create long-lived debris in a heavily used orbital region.", "Inadequate frequency coordination or antenna discrimination can cause interference between satellite systems.", "Energetic particles and spacecraft charging can damage electronics or disrupt operations." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Visibility depends on observer latitude and satellite longitude; satellites appear low on the horizon at high latitudes and are not visible from the poles.", "ITU frequency allocations and satellite service plans include regional differences, while national administrations implement licensing requirements." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Geosynchronous orbit", "difference": "Shares Earth's sidereal rotation period but may be inclined or eccentric; geostationary orbit additionally requires zero inclination, zero eccentricity and prograde motion." }, { "name": "Geostationary transfer orbit", "difference": "An elliptical transfer orbit used to reach geostationary orbit; it does not maintain a fixed position over Earth." }, { "name": "Graveyard orbit", "difference": "A disposal orbit, commonly above the geostationary region, that clears operational space and does not maintain geostationary synchronism." }, { "name": "Geostationary satellite", "difference": "The physical spacecraft occupying or maintained near the orbit, rather than the orbital trajectory itself." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of geostationary orbit this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative references and operator practices should define strict geostationarity and any accepted operational use of the term?", "Which longitude, latitude, drift and duration tolerances should be supported, and how should conflicting operator requirements be represented?", "Which reference frames, Earth rotation conventions and orbital-element representations should be preferred for reproducible assessments?", "What minimum observation span, solution freshness and uncertainty bounds are needed for each classification or maintenance recommendation?", "Does the existing Vercy catalogue already contain a geostationary or broader orbital model that should supply shared structure or serve as the single publication for this concept?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 28 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a geostationary orbit, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise a geostationary orbit, assess how closely an actual trajectory maintains that condition, and identify justified monitoring or maintenance actions.", "characteristics": { "substance": "abstract", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 68 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a geostationary orbit, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "an abstraction with no physical instance", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 68 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one geostationary orbit from another, and a geostationary orbit from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a geostationary orbit sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a geostationary orbit from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a geostationary orbit passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a geostationary orbit between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a geostationary orbit, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a geostationary orbit is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What geostationary orbit is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of geostationary orbit are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is geostationary orbit operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of geostationary orbit and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of geostationary orbit?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as geostationary orbit?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a geostationary orbit came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a geostationary orbit and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a geostationary orbit is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a geostationary orbit, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a geostationary orbit, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a geostationary orbit is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 12, "questions": 32 } } } }