{ "model": { "rank": 2238, "code": "thing-q193526", "model_id": "vr.tr.conscience", "name": "conscience", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise reported or attributed conscience, assess how it bears on a particular choice, and identify appropriate support or action without treating moral conviction as proof of moral correctness.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q193526/", "tier": 2, "score": 111, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 111, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.conscience-feeling", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q193526", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q193526", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T11:03:33Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.0374425, "turns": 6, "seconds": 292.6, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 223.4, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07b7e-c7c2-7ae3-b0ce-3b6fb6ca4c89\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: conscience\nRegistry id: vr.tr.conscience\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA V" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q193526", "registryId": "vr.tr.conscience", "name": "conscience", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q193526/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.conscience", "name": "conscience", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise reported or attributed conscience, assess how it bears on a particular choice, and identify appropriate support or action without treating moral conviction as proof of moral correctness.", "definition": "Conscience is the first-personal faculty, and the particular judgment it issues, by which an agent recognises a contemplated or completed act as morally required, permitted, or forbidden and takes that recognition as binding on the will independently of preference, social shame, or positive law.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the situated relationship between a bearer's acknowledged moral commitments, their appraisal of their own conduct or participation, and the resulting restraint, obligation, self-assessment or demand for repair; it records evidence and uncertainty without assuming direct access to inner experience.", "in_scope": [ "The bearer and evidence supporting a report or attribution of conscience", "Moral commitments experienced as personally binding and their grounds", "Conscience-related appraisal before, during or after an action or omission", "Conflicts between conscience, competing commitments and external demands", "Responses such as restraint, refusal, acknowledgement, repair and reconsideration" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Consciousness, sentience and general awareness", "Ethical theories and independent evaluation of whether an action is morally right", "Legal rights, institutional rules and formal conscientious-objection procedures", "General personality, moral identity and value systems beyond their role in a specific conscience appraisal", "Clinical assessment and treatment of guilt, anxiety or compulsive doubt", "An agent's general planning, execution capabilities and task performance" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Determine whether the concern involves the bearer's own morally significant conduct or participation; criticism of someone else alone does not establish a conscience episode.", "Determine whether the bearer regards a demand as morally binding; awareness of a situation or a strong preference alone is insufficient.", "Distinguish remorse about perceived wrongdoing from regret about an unwanted outcome, while allowing both to coexist.", "Ask whether the concern would persist without discovery, punishment or disapproval; the answer helps distinguish conscience from external compliance but is not conclusive.", "Separate a report of conscience from an observer's attribution and from a system's rule-based refusal; similar outward behaviour does not establish equivalent inner experience." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Bearer and attribution basis", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Bearer linked to self-report, observed behaviour, third-party attribution or explicit simulation; attribution may be disputed", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an agent from presenting inferred inner states or simulated moral reasoning as established experience." }, { "name": "Appraised involvement", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Intended action, ongoing action, completed action, omission, assistance, authorisation or disputed complicity", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what the bearer believes they may do, have done or are responsible for." }, { "name": "Binding moral commitment", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Appraisal linked to an articulated duty, prohibition, ideal or moral commitment; grounds may be unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Makes the moral basis inspectable without assuming that the commitment is justified." }, { "name": "Appraisal direction", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Required, forbidden, permitted, mixed or unresolved, as judged by the bearer", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes a positive demand to act from restraint, permission or uncertainty." }, { "name": "Temporal orientation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Anticipatory, concurrent, retrospective or recurrent across stages", "why_it_matters": "Separates opportunities for prevention from questions of acknowledgement and repair." }, { "name": "Reported compellingness", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Bearer-described strength, using their own terms; unknown if not reported", "why_it_matters": "Captures how difficult the demand feels to disregard without inventing a universal conscience scale." }, { "name": "Judgement confidence", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Certain, tentative, conflicted, suspended or unreported, according to the bearer", "why_it_matters": "Keeps certainty about a moral judgement separate from the strength of the feeling attached to it." }, { "name": "Response to appraisal", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Considering, complying, refusing, overriding, seeking accommodation, repairing, revising or unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Connects conscience to actual choices without assuming conviction reliably determines behaviour." } ], "affordances": [ "Elicit and record a conscience concern in the bearer's terms, distinguishing reported experience from inference.", "Trace a judgement to the moral commitments, factual beliefs and responsibility assumptions supporting it.", "Compare available actions against the bearer's commitments and identify conflicts, uncertainty and effects on others.", "Support deliberation, refusal or accommodation while checking applicable permissions and obligations through neighbouring models.", "Track acknowledgement, proposed repair and reconsideration without declaring the bearer morally absolved.", "Challenge unsupported factual premises respectfully while preserving the distinction between assistance and moral authority." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "sep-conscience", "title": "Conscience - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University)", "url": "https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/conscience/", "what_it_supports": "Philosophical definition of conscience as a moral faculty and as a particular judgment; distinctions from related concepts; survey of theological, legal, and bioethical uses.", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "ccc-moral-conscience", "title": "Catechism of the Catholic Church, Part Three, Article 6, nos. 1776-1802 (Moral Conscience) - Libreria Editrice Vaticana / Holy See", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Canonical pastoral kinds (antecedent/consequent, true/erroneous, certain/doubtful, lax/scrupulous), conscience as a judgment of reason, and the duty to form conscience.", "url_status": "dead" }, { "id": "aquinas-st-i-79", "title": "Summa Theologiae I, q.79, aa.12-13 (synderesis and conscientia) - Thomas Aquinas; English Dominican Fathers translation", "url": "https://www.newadvent.org/summa/1079.htm", "what_it_supports": "Scholastic split between synderesis as the habitual grasp of first moral principles and conscientia as their application to a particular act.", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "iccpr-art18", "title": "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 18 - United Nations", "url": "https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights", "what_it_supports": "Treaty-level protection of freedom of conscience, including freedom from coercion to adopt a belief, and the limited grounds for restricting manifestation of that freedom.", "url_status": "blocked" }, { "id": "hrc-gc22", "title": "General Comment No. 22 on Article 18, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.4 (1993) - United Nations Human Rights Committee", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Authoritative reading that Article 18 covers theistic, non-theistic, and atheistic belief, and that conscientious objection to military service can be derived from that article." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "conscience-attribution", "name": "Conscience Attribution", "description": "Establish whose conscience is at issue and what supports that description.", "rationale": "Conscience cannot be established solely from a refusal, an emotional display or an observer's interpretation.", "layers": [ { "id": "bearer-and-evidence", "name": "Bearer and Evidence", "description": "Identify the bearer and preserve the provenance of claims about their conscience.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-of-conscience-claim", "name": "Basis of Conscience Claim", "description": "Record whether conscience is self-reported, attributed by another party or represented by a system, including uncertainty and disagreement.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whose conscience is being described, and do they recognise this description?", "kind": "definition", "id": "basis-of-conscience-claim-q01" }, { "text": "Which statements or observations support the attribution, and who supplied them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-of-conscience-claim-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "moral-concern-boundary", "name": "Moral Concern Boundary", "description": "Identify the specifically moral and self-implicating aspect of the concern.", "findings": [ { "id": "conscience-versus-adjacent-motives", "name": "Conscience Versus Adjacent Motives", "description": "Record what makes the concern a judgement about the bearer's own moral conduct, while allowing fear, shame, preference and loyalty to coexist.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does the bearer believe would be morally wrong or required in their own conduct or participation?", "kind": "definition", "id": "conscience-versus-adjacent-motives-q01" }, { "text": "Would the concern remain without punishment, reputational loss or an undesirable personal outcome, and what supports that answer?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "conscience-versus-adjacent-motives-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "binding-moral-commitments", "name": "Binding Moral Commitments", "description": "Represent the standards invoked by conscience and how the bearer understands their authority.", "rationale": "An agent needs to understand what binds the bearer without substituting its own values or endorsing every sincerely held commitment.", "layers": [ { "id": "commitment-content", "name": "Commitment Content", "description": "Clarify the duty, prohibition or ideal that gives the concern its moral meaning.", "findings": [ { "id": "personally-binding-standard", "name": "Personally Binding Standard", "description": "Record the commitment in the bearer's terms, including its intended reach and recognised exceptions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which duty, prohibition or ideal does the bearer experience as binding in this case?", "kind": "definition", "id": "personally-binding-standard-q01" }, { "text": "What exceptions or limits does the bearer recognise, and would any apply here?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "personally-binding-standard-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "commitment-authority", "name": "Commitment Authority", "description": "Distinguish a commitment's origins from the bearer's present reasons for endorsing it.", "findings": [ { "id": "origins-and-current-endorsement", "name": "Origins and Current Endorsement", "description": "Record relevant influences, such as upbringing, faith, reflection or professional practice, without treating origin as proof of validity or coercion.", "questions": [ { "text": "What experiences, teachings, relationships or reasoning does the bearer identify as shaping this commitment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "origins-and-current-endorsement-q01" }, { "text": "Does the bearer currently endorse the commitment, question it or experience it as an imposed demand?", "kind": "definition", "id": "origins-and-current-endorsement-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "situated-moral-appraisal", "name": "Situated Moral Appraisal", "description": "Connect conscience to the particular conduct, factual beliefs and responsibility claims being judged.", "rationale": "The same commitment may yield different judgements when knowledge, control, alternatives or participation differ.", "layers": [ { "id": "conduct-and-responsibility", "name": "Conduct and Responsibility", "description": "Specify the act or omission and why the bearer considers themselves implicated.", "findings": [ { "id": "perceived-moral-involvement", "name": "Perceived Moral Involvement", "description": "Record the bearer's account of their role, control and alternatives, distinguishing perceived responsibility from independently established responsibility.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which action, omission or contribution is under judgement, and is it prospective, ongoing or completed?", "kind": "definition", "id": "perceived-moral-involvement-q01" }, { "text": "What control, knowledge and alternatives did the bearer have, and which of these remain disputed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "perceived-moral-involvement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "judgement-and-premises", "name": "Judgement and Premises", "description": "Record the moral verdict and the factual assumptions on which it depends.", "findings": [ { "id": "appraisal-with-uncertainty", "name": "Appraisal With Uncertainty", "description": "Represent what conscience appears to require or forbid, including confidence, competing interpretations and potentially mistaken premises.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does the bearer judge to be required, forbidden or permitted, and how confident are they?", "kind": "definition", "id": "appraisal-with-uncertainty-q01" }, { "text": "Which factual beliefs support that judgement, and what evidence could correct them?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "appraisal-with-uncertainty-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "moral-pressure-and-conflict", "name": "Moral Pressure and Conflict", "description": "Represent how a conscience concern is experienced and how it interacts with competing demands.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish intensity from certainty and recognise conflicts that cannot be resolved by simply following the strongest feeling.", "layers": [ { "id": "experienced-moral-demand", "name": "Experienced Moral Demand", "description": "Capture the reported force and emotional expression of conscience without requiring distress as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "felt-force-and-affect", "name": "Felt Force and Affect", "description": "Record reported restraint, obligation, unease, remorse or reassurance without equating any emotion with conscience or moral correctness.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does the bearer describe the force of the moral demand and any accompanying feelings?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "felt-force-and-affect-q01" }, { "text": "Is the report about perceived wrongdoing, exposure to judgement, adverse consequences or a mixture that remains unresolved?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "felt-force-and-affect-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "competing-moral-demands", "name": "Competing Moral Demands", "description": "Identify collisions between conscience, other commitments and external expectations.", "findings": [ { "id": "conflict-and-moral-remainder", "name": "Conflict and Moral Remainder", "description": "Record what each option would honour or compromise and any obligation the bearer believes would remain after choosing.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which moral commitments, loyalties or external demands conflict, and who may be affected by each option?", "kind": "definition", "id": "conflict-and-moral-remainder-q01" }, { "text": "Could an alternative or accommodation reduce the conflict, and what moral concern would remain afterward?", "kind": "action", "id": "conflict-and-moral-remainder-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "conscientious-response-and-revision", "name": "Conscientious Response and Revision", "description": "Connect conscience to practical responses, subsequent reflection and possible repair.", "rationale": "A useful model must support decisions while allowing conscience to be overridden, mistaken, reconsidered or insufficient to settle obligations to others.", "layers": [ { "id": "response-and-agent-boundaries", "name": "Response and Agent Boundaries", "description": "Record intended conduct and the assistance the bearer authorises.", "findings": [ { "id": "action-on-conscience", "name": "Action on Conscience", "description": "Represent compliance, refusal, delay, accommodation or override, together with the agent's permitted role and relevant external constraints.", "questions": [ { "text": "What response is the bearer considering, and how would it address or override the conscience concern?", "kind": "action", "id": "action-on-conscience-q01" }, { "text": "What assistance has the bearer authorised, and which effects on others, permissions or obligations require separate assessment before acting?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "action-on-conscience-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "repair-and-reconsideration", "name": "Repair and Reconsideration", "description": "Track responses to perceived wrongdoing and changes in the underlying appraisal.", "findings": [ { "id": "accountability-and-appraisal-change", "name": "Accountability and Appraisal Change", "description": "Record proposed acknowledgement or repair, evidence prompting revision and unresolved obligations without treating relief from guilt as proof that harm has been repaired.", "questions": [ { "text": "What acknowledgement or repair does the bearer propose, and how will affected parties' perspectives be considered?", "kind": "action", "id": "accountability-and-appraisal-change-q01" }, { "text": "What new evidence or reflection would justify revising the judgement, and what remains unresolved even if the bearer feels at peace?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "accountability-and-appraisal-change-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "antecedent conscience (judgment before the act)", "consequent conscience (judgment after the act, as peace or remorse)", "true or correct conscience", "erroneous conscience (including vincible and invincible ignorance)", "certain, probable, doubtful, and perplexed conscience", "lax, tender, and scrupulous conscience", "individual versus social or collective conscience", "professional or institutional conscience (including conscientious objection)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Wikidata", "value_or_pattern": "Q1640180", "note": "Item for conscience as a moral concept; neighbouring items include Q623278 (morality) and Q9465 (ethics)." }, { "scheme": "Library of Congress Subject Headings", "value_or_pattern": "Conscience", "note": "Standard subject heading; related headings include Conscientious objection and Liberty of conscience." }, { "scheme": "Dewey Decimal Classification", "value_or_pattern": "241.1", "note": "Christian moral theology: conscience; general ethics remains in 170." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 18 - United Nations General Assembly", "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 18 - United Nations", "Human Rights Committee General Comment No. 22 (1993) on ICCPR Article 18 - United Nations Human Rights Committee", "European Convention on Human Rights, Article 9 - Council of Europe", "Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 10 - European Union", "American Convention on Human Rights, Article 12 - Organization of American States", "Catechism of the Catholic Church, nos. 1776-1802 - Holy See", "World Medical Association International Code of Medical Ethics - World Medical Association (conflicts between physician conscience and professional duty)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "A conscript files for exemption or alternative civilian service, and a board tests the sincerity of the claimed conscientious belief rather than its theological correctness.", "A clinician, pharmacist, or registrar refuses to participate in a lawful procedure or service (abortion, assisted dying, contraception, same-sex marriage) under a statutory conscience clause.", "Catholic and some other pastoral practice uses an examination of conscience before confession, applying the casuistic grades of certain, doubtful, lax, or scrupulous judgment.", "Military and veteran psychiatry treats moral injury as the wound that follows a perceived violation of one's own conscience under orders.", "Amnesty International designates a 'prisoner of conscience' where detention is for identity or peaceful belief and the person neither used nor advocated violence.", "Employment and equality litigation (for example philosophical-belief claims) asks whether a conviction is genuinely held, cogent, and binding on the claimant's conduct." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "casuistic certainty of a particular conscience-judgment", "typical_range": "doubtful, probable, or morally certain (sometimes also perplexed)", "unit": "ordinal grade" }, { "quantity": "legal disposition of a conscientious-objection claim", "typical_range": "denied; granted with alternative service; granted without substitute duty", "unit": "categorical legal status" }, { "quantity": "self-reported guilt or remorse after an act judged wrong", "typical_range": "absent to severe on instrument-specific Likert scales, commonly 0-4 or 1-7", "unit": "scale points" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Erroneous conscience: a sincere verdict that is factually or morally wrong, still treated as binding in some traditions until the error is corrected.", "Vincible ignorance: culpable failure to form or inform conscience, used after the fact as an excuse.", "Scrupulosity: pathological over-attribution of guilt that impairs ordinary action and is often continuous with obsessive-compulsive presentation.", "Lax or deadened conscience: systematic under-weighting of harm, enabling repeated wrongdoing.", "Pretextual appeal to conscience to mask preference, prejudice, or commercial interest.", "Compelled violation of conscience (forced recantation, compelled speech, denied exemption), including moral injury in combat and care work.", "Unregulated professional objection that blocks patient or client access to a lawful service with no duty to refer.", "Collective 'conscience' invoked to license exclusion, moral panic, or punishment of dissenters." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Catholic and much civil-law moral theology still uses the scholastic apparatus (synderesis/conscientia; true/erroneous; lax/scrupulous); much Protestant and secular usage treats conscience as inner liberty of judgment rather than a faculty under a teaching church.", "Common-law sincerity tests (the belief need not be theistic or orthodox) differ from concordat or recognised-religion systems that channel exemptions through listed churches.", "Conscription practice diverges sharply: some states offer alternative civilian service, some historically imprisoned objectors, some grant no relief at all.", "Medical conscience clauses are wide in parts of Central and Southern Europe and some U.S. states, and narrower in Nordic and other systems that impose a duty to refer or to perform in emergency.", "Honour-and-shame cultures more often frame the analogous phenomenon as face, relational duty, or public disgrace rather than a private inner tribunal called conscience.", "Islamic ethical vocabulary more often uses ḍamīr, taqwā, qalb, or niyya than a direct equivalent of the Latin conscientia; the inner forum is not always separated from fiqh in the same way." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "morality", "difference": "Morality is the public or justified standard; conscience is the first-personal verdict about that standard. Test: two agents can have sincere, contradictory consciences without that implying two equally justified moralities." }, { "name": "conscientiousness (Big Five trait)", "difference": "Conscientiousness is diligence, order, and rule-following as a personality dimension. Test: a punctual, organised rule-follower can still lack a moral tribunal, and a conscientious objector may score low on industrial conscientiousness." }, { "name": "superego", "difference": "The psychoanalytic superego is an internalized parental or social prohibitor. Test: a conscience-judgment can criticise those same introjects; a mere superego reaction cannot." }, { "name": "shame", "difference": "Shame tracks exposure before an audience, real or imagined. Test: would the verdict still bind if no one would ever know of the act?" }, { "name": "guilt as affect", "difference": "Guilt-feeling is the affective signal; conscience is the judging process that may or may not produce that affect. Test: a cold, certain judgment of wrongness without pangs is still a conscience-verdict." }, { "name": "synderesis", "difference": "In scholastic usage, synderesis is the habitual grasp of first moral principles; conscientia applies those principles to a particular act. Test: 'do not do evil' is synderesis; 'this contract, tonight, is a lie' is conscience." }, { "name": "consciousness", "difference": "Consciousness is awareness or sentience; the words share an etymology but not a referent. Test: one can be fully conscious of an act and still issue no moral verdict on it." }, { "name": "positive law / legal duty", "difference": "Law binds as the enacted rule of a polity. Test: an act can be legal and still forbidden by conscience, or illegal and still required by it (civil disobedience, conscientious objection)." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of conscience this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which account of conscience should anchor recognition across traditions that emphasise moral judgement, inner authority, emotion or practical commitment differently?", "When, if ever, should conscience be attributed to a collective or artificial agent, and what evidence would justify more than a functional analogy?", "Can reported compellingness and confidence be compared meaningfully across bearers, or should they remain qualitative and specific to each bearer?", "How should the model represent repetitive moral doubt or disproportionate guilt without making clinical judgements or dismissing a substantive moral concern?", "Where should the boundary fall between supporting conscientious refusal and assessing obligations to people affected by that refusal?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 28 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a conscience, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise reported or attributed conscience, assess how it bears on a particular choice, and identify appropriate support or action without treating moral conviction as proof of moral correctness.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 111 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a conscience, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 111 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one conscience from another, and a conscience from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a conscience sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a conscience from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a conscience passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a conscience between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a conscience, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a conscience is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a conscience proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a conscience, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a conscience and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a conscience consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a conscience takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What conscience is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of conscience are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is conscience operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of conscience and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of conscience?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as conscience?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a conscience came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a conscience and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a conscience is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a conscience, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a conscience, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a conscience is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }