{ "model": { "rank": 5190, "code": "thing-q193607", "model_id": "vr.tr.idiot", "name": "idiot", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise and contextualise the label 'idiot' without treating an insult or attributed judgment as an established property of a person.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Society, people and institutions", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "SOC", "domain": "SOC.PER", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q193607/", "tier": 2, "score": 69, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "village idiot", "Covidiot" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 69, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.idiot", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q193607", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q193607", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T21:51:28Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08826-b60e-7392-9a34-7c5383653511\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: idiot\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: SOC.PER\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 005: 1001 registere", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 55.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08826-b601-7bb0-b2f8-52a473b3a953\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: idiot\nRegistry id: vr.tr.idiot\nPlane / domain: SOC / SOC.PER\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext for " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q193607", "registryId": "vr.tr.idiot", "name": "idiot", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "SOC.PER" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q193607/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.idiot", "name": "idiot", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise and contextualise the label 'idiot' without treating an insult or attributed judgment as an established property of a person.", "definition": "An idiot is a person disparagingly characterized as extremely foolish or unintelligent, using a term that also has obsolete clinical and legal senses.", "scope_statement": "This model owns 'idiot' as a socially applied characterisation of a person, including its intended meaning, attribution, evidential limits and consequences; the registry's intended sense remains unconfirmed because no definition is recorded.", "in_scope": [ "Instances in which a person is called or described as an idiot", "Differences between contemptuous, joking, affectionate and self-directed uses", "The behaviour or incident offered as grounds for the characterisation", "Who applies the label, to whom, before which audience and in what relationship", "Quoted or historical uses requiring explicit separation from present-day endorsement" ], "out_of_scope": [ "A general model of the person receiving the label", "Clinical assessment of intellectual functioning or disability", "Occupation, professional qualifications or employment status", "General theories and measurement of intelligence, rationality or competence", "Works titled 'The Idiot' and their bibliographic identities", "General models of harassment, discrimination and interpersonal conflict" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "The expression characterises a person as an 'idiot'; criticism that only identifies a mistaken action does not by itself instantiate this label.", "The recorded characterisation belongs to an identifiable speaker, writer or source; it is not automatically a verified description of its target.", "Calling someone an idiot does not establish intellectual disability, low measured intelligence or inability to perform a particular task.", "Joking, affectionate and hostile interpretations require contextual evidence; the word alone does not distinguish them.", "A title, quotation, historical classification or discussion of the word must be distinguished from a direct present-day characterisation of someone." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Use sense", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "person-directed characterisation | self-characterisation | quoted use | historical classification | word mention | title or name | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether this model applies directly or should refer to a neighbouring model." }, { "name": "Label attribution", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "speaker or writer → expression → target, with source location", "why_it_matters": "Keeps a speaker's judgment separate from facts established about the target." }, { "name": "Claimed basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "specific mistake | alleged lack of knowledge | alleged poor judgment | general disparagement | other stated basis | unstated", "why_it_matters": "Reveals what the speaker is criticising and whether any concrete allegation can be examined." }, { "name": "Reach of judgment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "single incident | named task or domain | repeated conduct | whole-person judgment | unclear", "why_it_matters": "Exposes when criticism of an action has been expanded into a claim about the entire person." }, { "name": "Interactional force", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "contemptuous | joking | affectionate | self-deprecating | mixed | unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Supports interpretation without assuming that stated intent and received meaning coincide." }, { "name": "Basis verification", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "no concrete basis supplied | allegation unverified | underlying event supported | underlying event disputed | underlying event contradicted", "why_it_matters": "Allows verification of an alleged event without presenting the label itself as a measured conclusion." }, { "name": "Target response", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "objects | joins the joke | self-applies | requests clarification | other explicit response | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Provides evidence about reception while preventing silence from being recorded as acceptance." } ], "affordances": [ "Attribute the label to its source and preserve enough surrounding language to interpret it.", "Separate an observable mistake or allegation from the speaker's whole-person judgment.", "Flag ambiguous humour, unclear targets and unsupported interpretations for contextual review.", "Offer a behaviour-specific paraphrase when the task calls for constructive feedback.", "Refer a potentially abusive interaction to the applicable conduct policy with its context attached.", "Annotate historical or quoted usage without adopting its classification as a current description." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "idiot-sense-and-boundaries", "name": "Idiot sense and boundaries", "description": "Establishes which use of 'idiot' is present and whether it belongs to this social-label model.", "rationale": "The registry supplies no definition, and person-directed labeling must be separated from quotation, titles and possible historical senses.", "layers": [ { "id": "person-label-or-mention", "name": "Person label or mention", "description": "Distinguishes applying the label from merely mentioning the expression.", "findings": [ { "id": "application-target", "name": "Application target", "description": "Record whether the expression targets a person, repeats someone else's wording or identifies a title or name.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is someone being characterised as an idiot, or is the expression only being quoted, discussed or used as a title?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "application-target-q01" }, { "text": "Which surrounding words identify the target and distinguish the present speaker's position from a quoted position?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "application-target-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ordinary-and-historical-senses", "name": "Ordinary and historical senses", "description": "Separates the adopted social sense from usages whose meaning depends on a historical document.", "findings": [ { "id": "source-bound-meaning", "name": "Source-bound meaning", "description": "Treat any historical classificatory meaning as specific to a documented time, place and source until researched.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this occurrence express an ordinary social judgment or invoke a classification defined by its source?", "kind": "definition", "id": "source-bound-meaning-q01" }, { "text": "If a historical classification is intended, which original document establishes its meaning and period of use?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-bound-meaning-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "idiot-attribution-and-reception", "name": "Idiot attribution and reception", "description": "Records who calls whom an idiot and how the utterance functions in their interaction.", "rationale": "The same expression may function differently in an attack, friendly exchange or self-reproach, and intent alone does not settle reception.", "layers": [ { "id": "speaker-target-and-audience", "name": "Speaker, target and audience", "description": "Locates responsibility for the label and identifies the social setting in which it is applied.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-characterisation", "name": "Attributed characterisation", "description": "Represent the label as an attributed utterance rather than an unqualified person attribute.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who used 'idiot', whom did they mean, and was the target also the speaker?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-characterisation-q01" }, { "text": "Was the label delivered privately, before peers or through a public channel, and what relationship connects speaker and target?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "attributed-characterisation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "tone-and-received-meaning", "name": "Tone and received meaning", "description": "Examines evidence for hostile, playful, affectionate or self-deprecating interpretation.", "findings": [ { "id": "intent-reception-gap", "name": "Intent and reception gap", "description": "Record expressed intent and the target's observable response separately, retaining uncertainty when either is unavailable.", "questions": [ { "text": "What contextual evidence supports interpreting this use as contempt, humour, affection or self-reproach?", "kind": "definition", "id": "intent-reception-gap-q01" }, { "text": "What did the target explicitly say or do in response, and does that support or challenge the speaker's stated intent?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "intent-reception-gap-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "idiot-judgment-and-evidence", "name": "Idiot judgment and evidence", "description": "Separates the alleged reason for the label from unsupported conclusions about the person.", "rationale": "A model must allow examination of an actual mistake without converting a disparaging expression into an intelligence or competence assessment.", "layers": [ { "id": "incident-behind-the-label", "name": "Incident behind the label", "description": "Identifies the specific conduct, omission or belief cited as grounds for saying 'idiot'.", "findings": [ { "id": "checkable-underlying-allegation", "name": "Checkable underlying allegation", "description": "Extract a concrete allegation when one exists, and record general disparagement when no checkable basis is supplied.", "questions": [ { "text": "What precise action, omission or statement is offered as the reason for calling this person an idiot?", "kind": "definition", "id": "checkable-underlying-allegation-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports or contradicts that underlying allegation independently of the insult?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "checkable-underlying-allegation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "limits-of-person-inference", "name": "Limits of person inference", "description": "Identifies the reach of the speaker's claim and prevents unsupported assessment of intelligence or disability.", "findings": [ { "id": "incident-to-person-generalisation", "name": "Incident-to-person generalisation", "description": "Keep a single error, domain-specific difficulty and whole-person judgment distinct; the label supplies no measurement standard.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the speaker criticise one incident, a particular competence or the person's supposed overall capacity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "incident-to-person-generalisation-q01" }, { "text": "If a competence or intelligence claim matters to the task, what independent assessment and defined criterion would be needed to evaluate it?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "incident-to-person-generalisation-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "idiot-handling-and-consequences", "name": "Idiot handling and consequences", "description": "Guides task-specific handling of the label, including accurate quotation, constructive reformulation and review of harmful use.", "rationale": "Agents need to decide whether to preserve, attribute, paraphrase or refer the expression without amplifying an unsupported judgment.", "layers": [ { "id": "quotation-and-reformulation", "name": "Quotation and reformulation", "description": "Chooses whether exact wording is necessary and how to retain the concrete issue when paraphrasing.", "findings": [ { "id": "preserve-evidence-without-adoption", "name": "Preserve evidence without adoption", "description": "Preserve attributed wording where it is evidence; where constructive feedback is needed, describe the supported behaviour and its consequence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the task require the exact word 'idiot' as evidence, or would an attributed summary preserve the relevant meaning?", "kind": "action", "id": "preserve-evidence-without-adoption-q01" }, { "text": "What behaviour-specific wording would communicate the supported criticism without presenting the label as a fact?", "kind": "action", "id": "preserve-evidence-without-adoption-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "objection-repetition-and-review", "name": "Objection, repetition and review", "description": "Records contextual evidence relevant to interpersonal harm and applicable conduct rules.", "findings": [ { "id": "contextual-response-selection", "name": "Contextual response selection", "description": "Use documented objection, repetition, audience and power relations to select an appropriate response under the relevant policy.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this an isolated use or repeated targeting, and is there a documented objection, power imbalance or consequence for the target?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contextual-response-selection-q01" }, { "text": "Under the policy applicable to this setting, should the agent seek clarification, suggest repair or refer the interaction for review?", "kind": "action", "id": "contextual-response-selection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No registry sense was supplied; this description prioritizes the ordinary contemporary English insult.", "Any historical technical meaning requires checking the jurisdiction, date and source terminology.", "No standardized identifiers or meaningful measurement ranges are asserted for the ordinary social label." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of idiot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "An insult directed at a person perceived to have acted foolishly or shown poor judgment.", "Informal self-criticism after a mistake.", "A characterization in fiction, comedy and everyday conversation.", "An obsolete classification encountered in historical medical, institutional and legal records." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of idiot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating an insult as an objective assessment of intelligence or competence.", "Confusing a foolish action with a stable characteristic of a person.", "Using a historically stigmatizing label for people with intellectual disabilities.", "Interpreting historical classifications as equivalent to current diagnostic categories." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of idiot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Historical clinical and legal meanings varied by jurisdiction and period.", "The severity and social acceptability of the insult depend on language community, relationship and context." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of idiot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "fool", "difference": "Overlaps in ordinary usage, but more readily emphasizes imprudence or lack of judgment; there is no strict boundary between the insults." }, { "name": "intellectual disability", "difference": "A recognized condition involving limitations in intellectual functioning and adaptive functioning arising during development; calling someone an idiot does not establish that condition." }, { "name": "ignorant person", "difference": "Lacks particular knowledge or information, which does not establish low intelligence or poor judgment." }, { "name": "occupation", "difference": "An occupation denotes work or a professional role; idiot is an evaluative label, not an occupation." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of idiot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend the contemporary social label, a historical classification, or another sense of 'idiot', and what source establishes that intention?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept or the relevant social-label mechanism closely enough to require linking instead of a separate publication?", "Which authoritative lexical and historical sources should establish the sense boundaries, especially for source-specific classifications?", "What contextual evidence is sufficient to distinguish affectionate or joking use from hostile use across the languages and communities the catalogue serves?", "Which conduct policies govern the intended deployment settings, and how should the model hand off repeated or consequential labeling to neighbouring models?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 21 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "occupation or role", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a idiot, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise and contextualise the label 'idiot' without treating an insult or attributed judgment as an established property of a person.", "characteristics": { "substance": "social", "origin": "natural", "agency": "autonomous", "mobility": "self-moving" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: village idiot, Covidiot.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 69 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a idiot, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "a social arrangement between people", "physicalCharacter": [ "Moves under its own power or of its own accord.", "Acts on its own behalf.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by appearance, and guessing from dress or setting is how an agent gets this wrong. Recognised by qualification, licence or engagement." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "village idiot", "Covidiot" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 69 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one idiot from another, and a idiot from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a idiot sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a idiot from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a idiot is, how it got there and where it may go (self-moving).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a idiot is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a idiot moves on its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a idiot passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a idiot between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a idiot, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a idiot is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "people-and-responsibility", "name": "People, roles and responsibility", "description": "Who stands in what relation to a idiot.", "rationale": "Social things are defined by the relations people hold to them, and those relations change without the thing changing.", "layers": [ { "id": "roles-and-parties", "name": "Roles and parties", "description": "The roles that exist around a idiot and who fills them.", "findings": [ { "id": "role-assignments", "name": "Role assignments and their validity", "description": "Who holds which role over a idiot, from when, and on whose authority.", "questions": [ { "id": "role-assignments-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a role over a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a role over a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "role-assignments-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a role over a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "ownership-and-accountability", "name": "Ownership and accountability", "description": "Who answers for a idiot and who may decide about it.", "findings": [ { "id": "accountability", "name": "Accountability and decision rights", "description": "Where responsibility for a idiot sits when something goes wrong.", "questions": [ { "id": "accountability-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes responsibility for a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about responsibility for a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "accountability-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once responsibility for a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "competence-and-licence", "name": "Competence, qualification and licence", "description": "What someone must be able to do, and be permitted to do, as idiot.", "rationale": "The permission is jurisdictional and the competence is not, and conflating them is how an agent concludes someone may practise when they may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "competences", "name": "Competences and qualifications", "description": "Skills and credentials the role assumes.", "findings": [ { "id": "qualification-record", "name": "Qualifications and how they are evidenced", "description": "What counts as qualified, and what proves it.", "questions": [ { "id": "qualification-record-q01", "text": "What competences and qualifications does idiot require, and how is each evidenced?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "qualification-record-q02", "text": "Which qualifications transfer between jurisdictions and which do not?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "licensing", "name": "Licensing and the right to practise", "description": "Who grants permission, where it holds, and when it lapses.", "findings": [ { "id": "licence-record", "name": "Licence, issuer and validity", "description": "The permission, its issuer, its territory and its expiry.", "questions": [ { "id": "licence-record-q01", "text": "Who licenses idiot, in which territory, and for how long?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "licence-record-q02", "text": "What may an unlicensed person not do, and what must an agent refuse to assume?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "tasks-and-accountability", "name": "Tasks, employment and accountability", "description": "What idiot actually does and who answers for it.", "rationale": "A role is filled by people under an arrangement, and the arrangement decides liability, supervision and who may instruct whom.", "layers": [ { "id": "tasks", "name": "Tasks and typical duties", "description": "The work itself, and how it differs by setting.", "findings": [ { "id": "duty-record", "name": "Duties and setting", "description": "What the role does and where the work varies.", "questions": [ { "id": "duty-record-q01", "text": "What tasks define idiot, and how do they differ between settings or seniority?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "duty-record-q02", "text": "Which tasks may only be done by this role, and which are shared with neighbouring roles?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "accountability", "name": "Employment and accountability", "description": "The relation under which the work is done and where responsibility sits.", "findings": [ { "id": "responsibility", "name": "Responsibility and supervision", "description": "Who instructs, who supervises, who is liable.", "questions": [ { "id": "responsibility-q01", "text": "Under what arrangement does someone act as idiot, and who supervises or is liable?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "responsibility-q02", "text": "When something goes wrong, what does the model need to have recorded to answer who was responsible?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a idiot came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a idiot and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a idiot is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a idiot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a idiot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a idiot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 7, "layers": 14, "findings": 16, "questions": 44 } } } }