{ "model": { "rank": 6713, "code": "thing-q194279", "model_id": "vr.tr.satyagraha", "name": "satyagraha", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise claimed instances of satyagraha, assess their fidelity to an explicitly attributed interpretation, and identify justified next actions without equating moral commitment with practical success.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q194279/", "tier": 2, "score": 59, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Satyagraha movement in Goa" ], "aliasCount": 1, "merged": 1, "knownIn": 59, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q194279", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q194279", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:20:50Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 19.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08878-50bd-7c01-ac3b-56cb89ab976c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: satyagraha\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 1001 regi", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 69, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08878-50ca-7693-ac91-726f1320dce8\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: satyagraha\nRegistry id: vr.tr.satyagraha\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nCo" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q194279", "registryId": "vr.tr.satyagraha", "name": "satyagraha", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q194279/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.satyagraha", "name": "satyagraha", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise claimed instances of satyagraha, assess their fidelity to an explicitly attributed interpretation, and identify justified next actions without equating moral commitment with practical success.", "definition": "Satyagraha is Gandhi's ethical discipline and practice of nonviolent resistance, grounded in adherence to truth, refusal to injure opponents, and willingness to suffer rather than inflict suffering in seeking to overcome injustice.", "scope_statement": "This model owns satyagraha as a practice and conception of action under vr.tr.satyagraha in ACT / ACT.ACT, including its defining commitments, contested interpretations, enactment conditions and assessment criteria.", "in_scope": [ "Attributed definitions of satyagraha and criteria for recognising instances", "Relationships among truth, nonviolence, self-discipline and resistance", "Grievances, demands and treatment of opponents", "Participant preparation, voluntary commitment and conduct", "Selection, suspension and evaluation of actions claimed as satyagraha" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Gandhi's complete biography and intellectual system", "General theories of nonviolent action, pacifism and civil resistance", "Complete histories of particular independence movements or campaigns", "Legal determinations concerning protest or civil disobedience", "Medical management of fasting and other health conditions" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Check for an attributed commitment to truth and nonviolence, rather than inferring satyagraha from the absence of weapons alone.", "Check how participants treat opponents and respond to suffering; Gandhi's normative distinction rejects hatred and injury while locating sacrifice in the resister. [Satyagraha v. Passive Resistance](https://www.mkgandhi.org/satyagraha_safrica/13passive_resistance.php)", "Check whether civil disobedience is a particular expression of the practice; breaking a law alone does not establish satyagraha. [The Practice of Satyagraha](https://www.mkgandhi.org/swmgandhi/chap03.php)", "Distinguish self-identification, demonstrated conduct and conformity to a specified interpretation; the label alone does not settle classification.", "Check whether participants actively contest a specified wrong; mere inactivity or acquiescence does not establish an instance." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Interpretive authority", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named author, practitioner or tradition linked to a dated source", "why_it_matters": "Makes classification criteria attributable and disagreements inspectable." }, { "name": "Claimed instance status", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Self-described; externally attributed; disputed; insufficient evidence", "why_it_matters": "Separates use of the name from assessment of the practice." }, { "name": "Truth claim and revisability", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Claim, supporting evidence, counterevidence and stated revision conditions", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to assess how conviction responds to correction." }, { "name": "Nonviolence commitment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Principled; conditional policy; mixed; unspecified, with attributed criteria", "why_it_matters": "Records differences in commitment without silently treating them as equivalent." }, { "name": "Opponent relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Addressed person or institution, contested conduct and available dialogue channel", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes resistance to a wrong from hostility toward a person." }, { "name": "Participant voluntariness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Documented consent; contested consent; withdrawal constrained; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Tests whether claimed sacrifice is chosen by those bearing it." }, { "name": "Conduct incidents", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Number of documented incidents by type, actor and observation period, with coverage limitations", "why_it_matters": "Supports conduct assessment without treating missing reports as proof of nonviolence." }, { "name": "Practice phase", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Inquiry; preparation; negotiation; action; suspension; settlement; reassessment", "why_it_matters": "Locates decisions within an instance without prescribing a universal sequence." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare a claimed instance against several attributed interpretations of satyagraha.", "Record a grievance alongside evidence, counterclaims and conditions for revising demands.", "Assess a proposed action against the instance's stated truthfulness, nonviolence and consent commitments.", "Identify discrepancies between participant commitments and documented conduct.", "Flag reasons to negotiate, suspend or reassess an action for human decision.", "Evaluate concessions, relationships and participant costs separately from fidelity to principles." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meaning-and-attribution", "name": "Meaning and attribution", "description": "Establish which conception of satyagraha governs an assessment.", "rationale": "The agent needs explicit interpretive criteria before accepting or rejecting a claimed instance.", "layers": [ { "id": "definitions-and-lineages", "name": "Definitions and lineages", "description": "Locate definitions in their authorship and historical setting.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-definition", "name": "Attributed definition", "description": "Record the selected definition, its source and differences from alternative formulations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who defines satyagraha here, in which text or practice, and at what date?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-definition-q01" }, { "text": "Which commitments does that definition make necessary, and which does it leave optional?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-definition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "instance-boundaries", "name": "Instance boundaries", "description": "Distinguish the concept, a claimed enactment and related forms of resistance.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-evidence", "name": "Classification evidence", "description": "Specify evidence needed to classify an action beyond its name or outward tactic.", "questions": [ { "text": "What distinguishes this instance from strategic nonviolent resistance, passive resistance or civil disobedience under the selected definition?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "classification-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "How should the agent represent disagreement between participants' self-description and external assessments?", "kind": "action", "id": "classification-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "truth-and-grievance", "name": "Truth and grievance", "description": "Represent the wrong being contested and the discipline of examining one's own claim.", "rationale": "An agent must inspect the asserted truth without assuming that the claimant possesses it.", "layers": [ { "id": "wrong-and-demand", "name": "Wrong and demand", "description": "Connect allegations of injustice to evidence and requested remedies.", "findings": [ { "id": "contestable-grievance", "name": "Contestable grievance", "description": "Record the alleged wrong, affected people, counterclaims and proposed remedy.", "questions": [ { "text": "What specific conduct or arrangement is alleged to be wrong, and what evidence supports or challenges that claim?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "contestable-grievance-q01" }, { "text": "What remedy is requested, and how do those affected understand its adequacy?", "kind": "definition", "id": "contestable-grievance-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "self-correction", "name": "Self-correction", "description": "Examine whether truth-seeking can change the resister's position.", "findings": [ { "id": "revisable-conviction", "name": "Revisable conviction", "description": "Record procedures for hearing objections, acknowledging error and revising demands.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence or argument would participants accept as grounds to revise their account of the wrong?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "revisable-conviction-q01" }, { "text": "How can an opponent's correction be considered and publicly acknowledged during the action?", "kind": "action", "id": "revisable-conviction-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "nonviolence-and-sacrifice", "name": "Nonviolence and sacrifice", "description": "Examine treatment of opponents and allocation of the burdens of resistance.", "rationale": "Visible peacefulness cannot alone establish whether conduct meets the professed ethical commitments.", "layers": [ { "id": "opponent-treatment", "name": "Opponent treatment", "description": "Assess conduct toward opponents against the interpretation being used.", "findings": [ { "id": "nonviolence-in-conduct", "name": "Nonviolence in conduct", "description": "Record operational boundaries for injury, threats, humiliation and retaliation.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does the selected interpretation assess hostile speech, property damage and indirect harm?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "nonviolence-in-conduct-q01" }, { "text": "What observed conduct supports or contradicts the stated commitment, and whose conduct is attributable to the instance?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "nonviolence-in-conduct-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "voluntary-burdens", "name": "Voluntary burdens", "description": "Distinguish chosen sacrifice from costs imposed on others.", "findings": [ { "id": "sacrifice-and-pressure", "name": "Sacrifice and pressure", "description": "Examine consent, unequal exposure and disputed boundaries between moral appeal and coercion.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who chooses the sacrifice, who actually bears its costs, and can participants decline or withdraw?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "sacrifice-and-pressure-q01" }, { "text": "When do fasting or other forms of self-suffering become coercive under the interpretations being compared?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "sacrifice-and-pressure-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "preparation-and-action", "name": "Preparation and action", "description": "Connect participant readiness with the selection and governance of resistance.", "rationale": "The model must support decisions about conduct rather than treating satyagraha as a label attached to a tactic.", "layers": [ { "id": "discipline-and-participation", "name": "Discipline and participation", "description": "Record the commitments and preparation expected of participants.", "findings": [ { "id": "readiness-for-restraint", "name": "Readiness for restraint", "description": "Identify how an instance prepares participants to sustain its commitments under provocation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which vows, training or practices are required here, and who established those requirements?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "readiness-for-restraint-q01" }, { "text": "How are breaches addressed while preserving participants' ability to dissent or withdraw?", "kind": "action", "id": "readiness-for-restraint-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "means-and-transitions", "name": "Means and transitions", "description": "Assess particular actions and transitions against declared principles and circumstances.", "findings": [ { "id": "justified-action-selection", "name": "Justified action selection", "description": "Record reasons for choosing dialogue, noncooperation, disobedience or constructive activity without assuming a fixed escalation ladder.", "questions": [ { "text": "Why is the proposed means appropriate to this grievance under the selected interpretation?", "kind": "action", "id": "justified-action-selection-q01" }, { "text": "What conditions justify beginning, changing or suspending it, and who has authority to decide?", "kind": "action", "id": "justified-action-selection-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "change-and-appraisal", "name": "Change and appraisal", "description": "Examine how an instance seeks change and what its outcomes warrant concluding.", "rationale": "Moral fidelity, opponent persuasion and practical concessions require separate evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "mechanisms-of-change", "name": "Mechanisms of change", "description": "Distinguish intended moral influence from other possible explanations of change.", "findings": [ { "id": "appeal-and-leverage", "name": "Appeal and leverage", "description": "Record competing explanations involving persuasion, public response, disrupted cooperation and institutional pressure.", "questions": [ { "text": "Whose understanding or behaviour is expected to change, and through what stated mechanism?", "kind": "definition", "id": "appeal-and-leverage-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence would distinguish a change of conviction from tactical accommodation or unrelated developments?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "appeal-and-leverage-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "settlement-and-integrity", "name": "Settlement and integrity", "description": "Assess achieved remedies alongside conduct, burdens and unresolved disagreement.", "findings": [ { "id": "multidimensional-outcome", "name": "Multidimensional outcome", "description": "Record practical results and ethical assessments without collapsing them into a single success score.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which demands were met, which burdens persisted, and how do participants, opponents and affected nonparticipants assess the result?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "multidimensional-outcome-q01" }, { "text": "What unresolved wrongs or breaches of commitment require renewed inquiry, repair or continued suspension?", "kind": "action", "id": "multidimensional-outcome-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This account is recalled knowledge, not a review of sources.", "Researchers should distinguish Gandhi's formulations from later uses of the term for nonviolent protest generally.", "Whether particular methods, especially fasting, satisfy satyagraha's rejection of coercion is contested; no formal taxonomy or standardized quantitative measure is asserted here." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Gandhi-led resistance to discriminatory laws affecting Indians in South Africa.", "The Champaran campaign concerning the treatment of indigo cultivators.", "The Kheda campaign for suspension of land revenue collection during agricultural hardship.", "The Salt Satyagraha challenging British colonial salt laws in India.", "Training participants in disciplined nonviolent resistance and negotiation." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Participants may face imprisonment, physical injury, loss of livelihood, or lethal repression.", "Violence by participants can undermine the discipline and ethical basis of a campaign.", "Treating satyagraha solely as a pressure tactic can obscure its commitments to truthfulness and regard for opponents.", "Fasting can cause serious bodily harm and raises disputed questions about coercion.", "Appeals to conscience may fail to change opponents' conduct or secure institutional reform." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "In South Africa, Gandhi developed the practice through struggles against discrimination affecting Indian communities.", "In India, satyagraha became associated with agrarian campaigns and mass resistance to colonial rule.", "International adaptations often overlap with broader nonviolent resistance traditions while differing in their acceptance of Gandhi's ethical and spiritual commitments." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "nonviolent resistance", "difference": "Nonviolent resistance can be adopted for strategic reasons alone; satyagraha additionally entails ethical commitments to truth, non-injury, and voluntary suffering." }, { "name": "civil disobedience", "difference": "Civil disobedience involves deliberate breach of law; satyagraha can include lawful action and does not require lawbreaking." }, { "name": "passive resistance", "difference": "Gandhi distinguished satyagraha as active, principled resistance from resistance understood merely as a expedient available to those lacking physical power." }, { "name": "ahimsa", "difference": "Ahimsa is the broader principle of non-injury; satyagraha applies nonviolence together with truth-seeking to resistance and conflict." }, { "name": "non-cooperation", "difference": "Non-cooperation withdraws participation or support; it is one possible method within satyagraha and can also occur outside that ethical framework." }, { "name": "pacifism", "difference": "Pacifism concerns opposition to war or violence; satyagraha specifies a practice of actively confronting injustice." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of satyagraha this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which dated formulations by Gandhi and later practitioners establish materially different criteria for recognising satyagraha?", "Can secular or primarily strategic adaptations retain the name under defensible criteria, and who accepts or rejects those criteria?", "Where should the boundary between voluntary self-suffering and coercive pressure be drawn, especially for fasting and unequal participant relationships?", "What relationship to constructive work is necessary for an instance, and when is it supplementary rather than constitutive?", "How should mixed conduct within a mass campaign affect classification without attributing every participant's behaviour to the whole?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a satyagraha, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise claimed instances of satyagraha, assess their fidelity to an explicitly attributed interpretation, and identify justified next actions without equating moral commitment with practical success.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Satyagraha movement in Goa.", "1 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a satyagraha, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Satyagraha movement in Goa" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 1 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one satyagraha from another, and a satyagraha from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a satyagraha sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a satyagraha from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a satyagraha passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a satyagraha between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a satyagraha, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a satyagraha is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a satyagraha proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a satyagraha, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a satyagraha and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a satyagraha consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a satyagraha takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What satyagraha is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of satyagraha are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is satyagraha operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of satyagraha and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of satyagraha?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as satyagraha?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a satyagraha came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a satyagraha and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a satyagraha is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a satyagraha, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a satyagraha, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a satyagraha is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }