{ "model": { "rank": 6788, "code": "thing-q205805", "model_id": "vr.tr.conservation-law", "name": "conservation law", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify a conservation law, record its conserved quantity and conditions, assess its justification, and determine when it can constrain a physical model or calculation.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q205805/", "tier": 2, "score": 58, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "continuity equation" ], "aliasCount": 1, "merged": 1, "knownIn": 58, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q205805", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q205805", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:30:18Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 17.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08881-2c39-71b2-93b8-2b3c8c65e3a4\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: conservation law\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.KNW\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 100", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 57, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08881-2c39-70b0-96c9-fddf1639e907\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: conservation law\nRegistry id: vr.tr.conservation-law\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry:" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q205805", "registryId": "vr.tr.conservation-law", "name": "conservation law", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q205805/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.conservation-law", "name": "conservation law", "purpose": "Enable an agent to identify a conservation law, record its conserved quantity and conditions, assess its justification, and determine when it can constrain a physical model or calculation.", "definition": "A conservation law is a physical principle or mathematical statement that a specified quantity remains constant during a system's evolution under stated conditions, or that its local change is balanced by transport across boundaries.", "scope_statement": "This model owns conservation laws as knowledge claims that a specified quantity is preserved under specified dynamics, including their mathematical expression, applicability, justification, and use; it does not own the physical systems or quantities themselves.", "in_scope": [ "Identity and definition of the conserved quantity", "Local, integral, and global formulations of conservation", "System boundaries, exchanges, and conditions for conservation", "Derivations, supporting evidence, and status within a theory", "Application to predictions, consistency checks, and interpretation of apparent violations" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Physical systems, processes, and experiments as independently modelled things", "Physical quantities and units beyond their role in a conservation statement", "Complete physical theories and their equations of motion", "Symmetries and mathematical invariants without a specified conservation claim", "Environmental conservation practices and statutory conservation requirements" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identifies a quantity preserved during an allowed evolution, rather than merely asserting that two quantities are related.", "States conditions under which preservation holds; constancy in one observed trajectory alone does not establish a conservation law.", "Distinguishes conservation from a balance equation containing production or destruction terms.", "For an open system, distinguishes changes caused by boundary exchange from failure of the conservation claim.", "Separates conservation of a total from constancy of every component, density, or subsystem contribution." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Conserved quantity", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Reference to the quantity, its definition, and the contributions included", "why_it_matters": "Determines what must be counted before a conservation claim can be evaluated." }, { "name": "Quantity units and normalization", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Units appropriate to the quantity; normalization and sign conventions", "why_it_matters": "Prevents incompatible terms or conventions from producing apparent conservation failures." }, { "name": "Formulation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Local differential; integral balance; global invariant; discrete update invariant", "why_it_matters": "Determines which mathematical objects and boundary information an application requires." }, { "name": "Conservation status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Exact within stated theory; approximate within stated regime; proposed; disputed", "why_it_matters": "Separates mathematical exactness within a model from empirical validity and approximation." }, { "name": "Applicability conditions", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Theory, dynamics, regime, boundary conditions, and required exclusions", "why_it_matters": "Controls whether the law can be applied to a particular system." }, { "name": "Symmetry connection", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Specified symmetry and derivation assumptions; absent; not established", "why_it_matters": "Records a possible explanatory basis without assuming every conservation statement has the same derivation." }, { "name": "Conservation residual", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Quantity units for an integrated residual; quantity per time for a rate residual; dimensionless if explicitly normalized", "why_it_matters": "Makes deviations assessable against measurement uncertainty, approximation error, and numerical tolerance." } ], "affordances": [ "Determine whether a proposed application satisfies the law's conditions.", "Construct a quantity ledger covering storage, transfers, and included contributions.", "Infer missing transfers or constrain possible outcomes from a conservation statement.", "Check experimental data or simulation output for conservation residuals.", "Trace an apparent violation to boundary exchange, omitted contributions, approximation, numerical error, or a challenge to the law.", "Translate between formulations when their mathematical and boundary assumptions permit it." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "conserved-quantity-and-claim", "name": "Conserved quantity and claim", "description": "Identifies what is preserved and the precise assertion made about its evolution.", "rationale": "A conservation law cannot be recognized or tested until its quantity and preservation claim are explicit.", "layers": [ { "id": "quantity-definition", "name": "Quantity definition", "description": "Records the quantity and the accounting conventions that define its total.", "findings": [ { "id": "quantity-composition", "name": "Quantity composition", "description": "Establish the expression, units, and constituent contributions of the proposed conserved quantity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What quantity is claimed to be conserved, and how is it calculated from the system's state?", "kind": "definition", "id": "quantity-composition-q01" }, { "text": "Which subsystem, interaction, and field contributions must be included in its total?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "quantity-composition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "preservation-meaning", "name": "Preservation meaning", "description": "Clarifies the sense in which the quantity remains unchanged.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-strength", "name": "Claim strength", "description": "Distinguish exact preservation from approximate or statistical statements and from constancy specific to one solution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the claim concern a total, an operator, an expectation value, or another explicitly defined object?", "kind": "definition", "id": "claim-strength-q01" }, { "text": "Is preservation asserted for every admissible evolution or only for a restricted class of states or solutions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "claim-strength-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "mathematical-conservation-form", "name": "Mathematical conservation form", "description": "Records how preservation is expressed through densities, currents, integrals, or state invariants.", "rationale": "Different formulations support different calculations and require explicit conditions before they can be treated as equivalent.", "layers": [ { "id": "local-balance", "name": "Local balance", "description": "Examines the relation between local accumulation, transport, and source terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "density-current-source", "name": "Density, current, and source", "description": "Identify the terms in any local balance equation and determine which terms represent transport or genuine production.", "questions": [ { "text": "If a local formulation exists, what density and current appear in it, and what mathematical derivative is required by the setting?", "kind": "definition", "id": "density-current-source-q01" }, { "text": "Do any source terms represent exchange with omitted components, or do they express nonconservation of the stated quantity?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "density-current-source-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "integrated-and-global-forms", "name": "Integrated and global forms", "description": "Connects local statements to region totals or globally defined conserved quantities.", "findings": [ { "id": "global-quantity-existence", "name": "Global quantity existence", "description": "Establish whether a finite, well-defined total exists and which assumptions make it constant.", "questions": [ { "text": "Over what region or hypersurface is the quantity integrated, or how is a nonintegral invariant defined?", "kind": "definition", "id": "global-quantity-existence-q01" }, { "text": "What boundary, regularity, geometric, or convergence assumptions are needed to obtain a constant global total?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "global-quantity-existence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "system-boundaries-and-validity", "name": "System boundaries and validity", "description": "Defines the accounting boundary and the theoretical or physical regime in which the law applies.", "rationale": "A changing subsystem total can be compatible with conservation, while a familiar law may require modification outside its stated regime.", "layers": [ { "id": "exchange-accounting", "name": "Exchange accounting", "description": "Tracks transfers through boundaries and between components.", "findings": [ { "id": "boundary-completeness", "name": "Boundary completeness", "description": "Determine whether the chosen system includes all relevant carriers and exchanges of the quantity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What defines the system boundary, and can it move or deform during the interval being assessed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "boundary-completeness-q01" }, { "text": "Which measured or modelled transfers must be included before a change in stored quantity can be interpreted?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "boundary-completeness-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "regime-and-approximation", "name": "Regime and approximation", "description": "Records the law's dependence on a theory, scale, approximation, or restricted dynamics.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-envelope", "name": "Validity envelope", "description": "Specify where the conservation claim is exact within its formulation and where it is only an approximation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which theory, interactions, and dynamical assumptions support the stated conservation law?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "validity-envelope-q01" }, { "text": "If conservation is approximate, what neglected effects, time interval, and error bound define an acceptable application?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "validity-envelope-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "derivation-and-evidence", "name": "Derivation and evidence", "description": "Separates formal justification, symmetry connections, and empirical support.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish a theorem under assumptions from evidence that those assumptions describe a physical situation.", "layers": [ { "id": "formal-justification", "name": "Formal justification", "description": "Records the derivation and any symmetry or structural identity on which it depends.", "findings": [ { "id": "derivation-assumptions", "name": "Derivation assumptions", "description": "Trace the conservation statement to its mathematical premises without presuming a symmetry-based origin.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the law postulated, derived from equations of motion, obtained from a structural identity, or connected to a symmetry?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "derivation-assumptions-q01" }, { "text": "If a Noether-type argument is used, which symmetry, action, and boundary assumptions make that argument applicable?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "derivation-assumptions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "empirical-support", "name": "Empirical support", "description": "Records what observations test and how strongly they constrain departures.", "findings": [ { "id": "test-independence-and-limits", "name": "Test independence and limits", "description": "Distinguish independent tests from measurements or reconstructions that already impose conservation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which read sources report tests of this law, and did their reconstruction or calibration assume the law being tested?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "test-independence-and-limits-q01" }, { "text": "What departure was tested, with what uncertainty, sensitivity, and range of physical conditions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "test-independence-and-limits-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "application-and-violation-diagnosis", "name": "Application and violation diagnosis", "description": "Supports valid inferences and disciplined interpretation of conservation residuals.", "rationale": "The practical value of a conservation law lies in constraining outcomes while recognizing incomplete accounting and limits on inference.", "layers": [ { "id": "constraint-use", "name": "Constraint use", "description": "Determines which unknowns can be constrained by conservation and what additional information is required.", "findings": [ { "id": "inference-sufficiency", "name": "Inference sufficiency", "description": "Check whether conservation supplies enough independent constraints for the intended conclusion.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which unknown quantity or proposed outcome can this conservation statement constrain?", "kind": "action", "id": "inference-sufficiency-q01" }, { "text": "What additional dynamical equations, measurements, or initial conditions are required to obtain a unique result?", "kind": "action", "id": "inference-sufficiency-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "residual-interpretation", "name": "Residual interpretation", "description": "Evaluates mismatches between predicted balance and observed or computed change.", "findings": [ { "id": "apparent-violation-triage", "name": "Apparent violation triage", "description": "Assess a residual against uncertainties, omitted transfers, model limitations, and numerical behavior.", "questions": [ { "text": "How is the conservation residual calculated, and how does it compare with propagated uncertainty or numerical error?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "apparent-violation-triage-q01" }, { "text": "Which checks for missing contributions, boundary flux, approximation failure, and discretization error are required before treating the residual as evidence against the law?", "kind": "action", "id": "apparent-violation-triage-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The recorded name has no sense; this description assumes the physical and mathematical meaning, not environmental legislation.", "Conservation law is a concept used across disciplines, rather than itself a discipline.", "Each specific law requires its own assumptions about system boundaries, interactions and theoretical regime; no universal measurement unit or numerical range applies." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of conservation law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Conservation of energy", "Conservation of linear momentum", "Conservation of angular momentum", "Conservation of electric charge", "Local conservation laws", "Global conservation laws" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of conservation law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Balancing energy and material flows in engineering systems.", "Predicting motion, collisions and orbital dynamics.", "Constraining possible particle reactions and decays.", "Formulating equations for fluid flow and electromagnetic fields.", "Checking numerical simulations for unphysical losses or gains of conserved quantities." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of conservation law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating an open system as isolated and overlooking fluxes across its boundary.", "Applying an approximate conservation rule outside its valid regime, such as separate conservation of rest mass in nuclear reactions.", "Confusing conservation of total energy with conservation of mechanical energy when dissipation occurs.", "Assuming a local conservation equation guarantees a globally conserved total without checking boundaries and mathematical conditions.", "Assuming general relativity always admits a uniquely defined, globally conserved total energy." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of conservation law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Symmetry", "difference": "A symmetry leaves a theory or system unchanged under a transformation; a conservation law constrains a quantity during evolution, with Noether's theorem connecting continuous variational symmetries to conservation laws under appropriate assumptions." }, { "name": "Balance law", "difference": "A balance law may include internal production or destruction terms; a local conservation law has no net internal source for the conserved quantity." }, { "name": "Constant of motion", "difference": "A constant of motion is a particular function that stays constant along a system's trajectories; a conservation law states the corresponding invariant relationship or local transport constraint." }, { "name": "Conservation equation", "difference": "A conservation equation is a mathematical expression of a conservation law; the law is the underlying principle or constraint." }, { "name": "Environmental conservation law", "difference": "Environmental conservation law consists of legal rules protecting natural resources; the physical and mathematical sense describes invariant quantities." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of conservation law this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry intend only physical conservation principles, or also the mathematical class of conservation-law equations?", "Which existing Vercy models already cover this concept or its named instances, and should this entry link to one of them?", "Should statistical conservation and conserved quantum observables be included as variants within this model or handled through specialized related models?", "Which authoritative sources should establish the treatment of local versus global conservation in curved spacetime and other settings where a global total requires additional structure?", "How should the catalogue distinguish approximate conservation, explicitly broken conservation, and disputed empirical claims without conflating their evidential status?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 15, "questions": 25 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a conservation law, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to identify a conservation law, record its conserved quantity and conditions, assess its justification, and determine when it can constrain a physical model or calculation.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: continuity equation.", "1 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 58 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a conservation law, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "continuity equation" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 58 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 1 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one conservation law from another, and a conservation law from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a conservation law sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a conservation law from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a conservation law passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a conservation law between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a conservation law, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a conservation law is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a conservation law says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a conservation law contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a conservation law and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What conservation law studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does conservation law take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does conservation law establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where conservation law is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark conservation law as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place conservation law, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a conservation law came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a conservation law and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a conservation law is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a conservation law, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a conservation law, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a conservation law is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }