{ "model": { "rank": 6224, "code": "thing-q217602", "model_id": "vr.tr.analysis", "name": "analysis", "purpose": "Let an agent handle analysis by domain, method, data and interpretation, making assumptions explicit, and route personal medical or financial analyses to professionals.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q217602/", "tier": 2, "score": 61, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "nuclear microscopy", "blood culture", "RAST test", "microscopic angioscopy", "lactose tolerance test", "astronomical survey", "meta-analysis", "star count", "redshift survey", "combinatorial meta-analysis", "network meta-analysis", "analytics", "strategic analysis", "super-resolution microscopy", "Analysis of source process", "social media analytics", "spatial data analytics", "big data analytics", "geospatial analytics", "geospatial data analytics", "Mobile Location Analytics", "practicality", "visual analytics", "sports analytics", "news analytics", "software analytics", "behavior analysis", "social network analysis software", "economic feasibility", "Geovisual analytics", "bracketology", "log analysis", "confocal microscopy", "glogg", "isothermal titration calorimetry", "quantitative risk analysis", "confocal laser scanning microscopy", "array-scan confocal microscopy", "spinning disk confocal microscopy", "4Pi microscopy" ], "aliasCount": 374, "merged": 376, "knownIn": 61, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.analysis-cognition", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q217602", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q217602", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T11:39:18Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 1, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q217602", "registryId": "vr.tr.analysis", "name": "analysis", "version": "0.2.0-wave.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q217602/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.analysis", "name": "analysis", "purpose": "Let an agent handle analysis by domain, method, data and interpretation, making assumptions explicit, and route personal medical or financial analyses to professionals.", "definition": "The process of examining something in detail by breaking it into components to understand its nature, structure or causes, as in chemical, medical, statistical, financial, literary and system analysis.", "what_it_is_for": "Understanding, diagnosis, decision making and research.", "affordances": [ "choose an analysis method for a question", "state assumptions and limitations", "interpret results carefully", "report analyses reproducibly" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Breaks things into parts", "Method-dependent", "Needs assumptions stated", "Across all fields" ], "appearance": "Not physical; reports, charts, tables and laboratory results.", "visual_identification": [ "Methods, data and conclusions", "Laboratory, statistical or textual analysis", "Synthesis combines rather than breaks down" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "chemical and laboratory analysis", "statistical and data analysis", "financial analysis", "textual and literary analysis", "systems and requirements analysis" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "inquiry", "why": "category" }, { "relation": "uses", "target": "statistics and laboratory methods", "why": "methods" }, { "relation": "is contrasted with", "target": "synthesis", "why": "opposite" }, { "relation": "produces", "target": "report", "why": "output" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "ISO/IEC 17025 testing laboratories", "Reporting guidelines for research" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Unstated assumptions", "Overinterpreting results", "Agents interpreting personal medical tests" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "method", "name": "Method", "description": "How to analyse.", "rationale": "Methods must fit.", "layers": [ { "id": "choice", "name": "Choice", "description": "Method selection.", "findings": [ { "id": "choice-finding", "name": "Choice", "description": "Method choice.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which analysis method suits this question and data?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "What assumptions does it make?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "data", "name": "Data", "description": "Inputs.", "findings": [ { "id": "data-finding", "name": "Data", "description": "Data quality.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the data reliable and sufficient?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "Where does it come from?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "results", "name": "Results", "description": "Interpretation.", "rationale": "Interpretation needs care.", "layers": [ { "id": "interpret", "name": "Interpret", "description": "Meaning.", "findings": [ { "id": "interpret-finding", "name": "Interpret", "description": "Interpretation.", "questions": [ { "text": "What do the results show, and what do they not show?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "How uncertain are they?", "kind": "measurement" } ] } ] }, { "id": "report", "name": "Report", "description": "Communication.", "findings": [ { "id": "report-finding", "name": "Report", "description": "Reporting.", "questions": [ { "text": "How should the analysis be reported so others can reproduce it?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "Which reporting guideline applies?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "quality", "name": "Quality", "description": "Assurance.", "rationale": "Quality must be checked.", "layers": [ { "id": "lab", "name": "Laboratory", "description": "Accreditation.", "findings": [ { "id": "lab-finding", "name": "Laboratory", "description": "Laboratory quality.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the laboratory accredited for this analysis?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which standard applies?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "review", "name": "Review", "description": "Peer review.", "findings": [ { "id": "review-finding", "name": "Review", "description": "Review.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has the analysis been independently reviewed?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "What criticisms were raised?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "limits", "name": "Limits", "description": "Professional analysis.", "rationale": "Some analyses need professionals.", "layers": [ { "id": "medical", "name": "Medical", "description": "Test results.", "findings": [ { "id": "medical-finding", "name": "Medical", "description": "Medical analysis limit.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the user asking the agent to interpret personal medical results?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "How should they discuss them with a clinician?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "financial", "name": "Financial", "description": "Investment analysis.", "findings": [ { "id": "financial-finding", "name": "Financial", "description": "Financial analysis limit.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the user asking for personal investment recommendations?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "How should they be referred to a licensed adviser?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should analysis types be separate entries?", "How should methods be linked?", "How should reproducibility be recorded?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a analysis, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent handle analysis by domain, method, data and interpretation, making assumptions explicit, and route personal medical or financial analyses to professionals.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: nuclear microscopy, blood culture, RAST test, microscopic angioscopy, lactose tolerance test, astronomical survey, meta-analysis, star count, redshift survey, combinatorial meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, analytics.", "376 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a analysis, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "nuclear microscopy", "blood culture", "RAST test", "microscopic angioscopy", "lactose tolerance test", "astronomical survey", "meta-analysis", "star count", "redshift survey", "combinatorial meta-analysis", "network meta-analysis", "analytics" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 376 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one analysis from another, and a analysis from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a analysis sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a analysis from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a analysis passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a analysis between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a analysis, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a analysis is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a analysis proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a analysis, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a analysis and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a analysis consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a analysis takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What analysis is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of analysis are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is analysis operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of analysis and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of analysis?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as analysis?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a analysis came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a analysis and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a analysis is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a analysis, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a analysis, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a analysis is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }