{ "model": { "rank": 3071, "code": "thing-q2200417", "model_id": "vr.tr.cognition", "name": "cognition", "purpose": "Let an agent discuss cognition as a set of processes studied by cognitive science, give only general information on cognitive difficulties, and avoid inferring impairment.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.PRC", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q2200417/", "tier": 2, "score": 91, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "music cognition", "catchiness", "executive dysfunction", "cognitive distortion", "Volitional Dysregulation", "dysexecutive syndrome", "automatic negative thoughts", "cognitive dysfunction", "jumping to conclusions", "Perseverative cognition", "bird intelligence", "cat intelligence", "dog intelligence", "animal cognition", "dinosaur intelligence", "fish intelligence", "reality testing", "sensory processing", "memorialization", "determination of affect", "determination of stimulus intensity", "determination of stimulus location", "determination of sensory modality", "World War I commemoration", "Dominion Day", "mental calculation", "learning or memory", "Ghost Mental Arithmetic", "Vedic mathematics", "volition", "conspecific individual recognition", "willpower", "Affective resonance", "temporal concept", "metacognition", "epistemic cognition", "object of cognition", "mental disability", "embodied cognition", "rumination" ], "aliasCount": 61, "merged": 61, "knownIn": 91, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.cognition", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q2200417", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2200417", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T05:22:06Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 1, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q2200417", "registryId": "vr.tr.cognition", "name": "cognition", "version": "0.2.0-wave.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.PRC" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2200417/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.cognition", "name": "cognition", "purpose": "Let an agent discuss cognition as a set of processes studied by cognitive science, give only general information on cognitive difficulties, and avoid inferring impairment.", "definition": "The mental processes of acquiring, processing, storing and using information, including perception, attention, memory, language, reasoning and decision-making.", "what_it_is_for": "Cognition is how people and animals know and think; understanding it informs education, design and health.", "affordances": [ "study it, in cognitive science", "assess it, with validated tests by professionals", "support it, with accessible design", "model it, computationally" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A family of mental processes", "Studied across psychology, neuroscience, linguistics and computing", "Distinct from emotion, though interacting", "Cognitive difficulties need professional assessment" ], "appearance": "Not visible; inferred from behaviour, tests and brain measures.", "visual_identification": [ "Performance on tasks and tests", "Brain imaging correlates", "Difficulties such as executive dysfunction are clinical concepts" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "perception and attention", "memory", "language", "reasoning and problem-solving", "executive functions", "music cognition" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is studied by", "target": "psychology and neuroscience", "why": "disciplines" }, { "relation": "includes", "target": "thought", "why": "reasoning" }, { "relation": "is confused with", "target": "intelligence", "why": "a measured construct" }, { "relation": "can be affected by", "target": "mental disorder and disease", "why": "conditions" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Clinical guidelines for cognitive assessment", "Accessibility standards for cognitive accessibility (W3C COGA)" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Inferring cognitive impairment from casual interaction", "Unvalidated brain-training claims", "Inaccessible design for people with cognitive disabilities" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "processes", "name": "Processes", "description": "Which cognitive process.", "rationale": "Processes differ in how they work and fail.", "layers": [ { "id": "process", "name": "Process", "description": "Memory, attention, reasoning.", "findings": [ { "id": "process-finding", "name": "Process", "description": "The process in question.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which cognitive process is involved?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "How does it interact with others?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "models", "name": "Models", "description": "Theories.", "findings": [ { "id": "models-finding", "name": "Models", "description": "Theoretical models.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which model explains this process?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "How well supported is it?", "kind": "measurement" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "assessment", "name": "Assessment", "description": "Measuring cognition.", "rationale": "Assessment belongs to professionals with validated tools.", "layers": [ { "id": "tests", "name": "Tests", "description": "Validated instruments.", "findings": [ { "id": "tests-finding", "name": "Tests", "description": "Tests and norms.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which validated test measures this, and for which population?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Who may administer it?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "limits", "name": "Limits", "description": "What not to infer.", "findings": [ { "id": "limits-finding", "name": "Inference limits", "description": "Limits for agents.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is an agent inferring impairment without evidence?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "When should it suggest professional assessment?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "support", "name": "Support", "description": "Design and help.", "rationale": "Good design supports different cognitive needs.", "layers": [ { "id": "design", "name": "Design", "description": "Cognitive accessibility.", "findings": [ { "id": "design-finding", "name": "Design", "description": "Accessible design.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the content understandable and predictable for people with cognitive disabilities?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "text": "Which guidelines apply?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interventions", "name": "Interventions", "description": "Evidence-based support.", "findings": [ { "id": "interventions-finding", "name": "Interventions", "description": "Supported interventions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which interventions have evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Which claims lack evidence?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "research", "name": "Research", "description": "Cognitive science.", "rationale": "Findings vary in robustness.", "layers": [ { "id": "findings", "name": "Findings", "description": "Robustness.", "findings": [ { "id": "findings-finding", "name": "Findings", "description": "Robust findings.", "questions": [ { "text": "How robust is this finding?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "text": "Has it replicated?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] }, { "id": "computation", "name": "Computational models", "description": "AI and cognition.", "findings": [ { "id": "computation-finding", "name": "Models", "description": "Computational analogies.", "questions": [ { "text": "How far do computational models explain this?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "Where does the analogy fail?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should cognitive processes be separate entries?", "How should agents support users with cognitive disabilities?", "How should validated and unvalidated claims be marked?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a cognition, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent discuss cognition as a set of processes studied by cognitive science, give only general information on cognitive difficulties, and avoid inferring impairment.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: music cognition, catchiness, executive dysfunction, cognitive distortion, Volitional Dysregulation, dysexecutive syndrome, automatic negative thoughts, cognitive dysfunction, jumping to conclusions, Perseverative cognition, bird intelligence, cat intelligence.", "61 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 91 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a cognition, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "music cognition", "catchiness", "executive dysfunction", "cognitive distortion", "Volitional Dysregulation", "dysexecutive syndrome", "automatic negative thoughts", "cognitive dysfunction", "jumping to conclusions", "Perseverative cognition", "bird intelligence", "cat intelligence" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 91 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 61 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one cognition from another, and a cognition from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a cognition sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a cognition from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a cognition passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a cognition between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a cognition, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a cognition is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a cognition proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a cognition, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a cognition and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a cognition consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a cognition takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What cognition is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of cognition are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is cognition operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of cognition and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of cognition?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as cognition?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a cognition came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a cognition and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a cognition is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a cognition, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a cognition, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a cognition is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }