{ "model": { "rank": 2351, "code": "thing-q22169", "model_id": "vr.tr.gnu-free-documentation-license", "name": "GNU Free Documentation License", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify the GNU Free Documentation License, resolve its application to a work, and assess the conditions and evidence needed for a proposed reuse.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q22169/", "tier": 2, "score": 108, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 108, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q22169", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22169", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T11:42:59Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00389538, "turns": 1, "seconds": 54.1, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 95.9, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07bac-4b8f-7812-a6f0-87d63ac62446\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: GNU Free Documentation License\nRegistry id: vr.tr.gnu-free-documentation-license\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nN" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q22169", "registryId": "vr.tr.gnu-free-documentation-license", "name": "GNU Free Documentation License", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q22169/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.gnu-free-documentation-license", "name": "GNU Free Documentation License", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to identify the GNU Free Documentation License, resolve its application to a work, and assess the conditions and evidence needed for a proposed reuse.", "definition": "The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is a copyleft license for manuals, textbooks, and other functional or useful documents, issued by the Free Software Foundation, that grants anyone permission to copy, redistribute, and modify a work provided that all copies and derivative works remain under the same license and that any designated invariant sections, cover texts, and acknowledgements are preserved unchanged.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the license identity, version-dependent rules, document-specific declarations, and action assessments for vr.tr.gnu-free-documentation-license in INF / INF.MED; licensed works and actors remain linked entities.", "in_scope": [ "License text identity and permitted version selection", "Evidence that a particular document invokes the license", "Invariant Sections and required Cover Text declarations", "Copying, modification, translation, and combination conditions", "Transparent-copy provision and distribution obligations", "Termination, reinstatement, and historical relicensing assessments" ], "out_of_scope": [ "The substantive content and editorial quality of licensed documents", "Ownership disputes and general copyright-law exceptions", "Software licensing under the GNU GPL", "Independent models of Creative Commons licenses", "Publisher identity, business operations, and hosting infrastructure" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Match the operative text to a GNU FDL release rather than identifying it from a generic free-documentation label.", "Check for document-specific Invariant Section and Cover Text declarations, which distinguish its application from ordinary attribution-only licensing.", "Check whether reuse invokes Transparent and Opaque copy categories rather than software source and executable categories.", "Distinguish permission to modify a licensed document from permission to alter the license text itself.", "Treat a claimed migration to CC BY-SA as a separately evidenced historical route, not general license equivalence." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Operative release", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Verified published GNU FDL version; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "An assessment must use the selected release's actual clauses." }, { "name": "Version-selection basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Specified version only; later-version option; unspecified version; authorized proxy; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "The document notice determines which release-selection routes need evaluation." }, { "name": "Application evidence", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Document edition -> license notice -> declaring rights holder -> captured evidence", "why_it_matters": "A nearby license file does not by itself establish the scope of a grant." }, { "name": "Preservation declarations", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Verified declarations; verified none; incomplete evidence; conflicting declarations", "why_it_matters": "Missing evidence must not silently become an assertion that no protected sections or cover passages exist." }, { "name": "Copy representation", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Transparent; Opaque; unresolved, with assessment evidence", "why_it_matters": "An agent needs to inspect practical editability as well as file format." }, { "name": "Distribution quantity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Number of copies, tied to edition, medium, distributor, and assessment period", "why_it_matters": "Quantity can activate additional obligations." }, { "name": "Availability commitment", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Required-through date and observed availability dates", "why_it_matters": "A download location needs a time-bounded maintenance assessment." }, { "name": "Permission assessment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Conditions evidenced; conditions unmet; evidence insufficient; rights terminated; reinstatement under assessment", "why_it_matters": "The decision belongs to a particular actor, work, operation, and selected release." } ], "affordances": [ "Resolve a document's license notice to an evidenced GNU FDL release and selection basis.", "Extract preservation declarations and flag conflicting or incomplete notices.", "Construct an operation-specific checklist for copying, editing, translating, or combining documents.", "Assess a distribution package and its Transparent-copy arrangements.", "Identify missing permissions or evidence before proceeding with reuse.", "Trace a termination, cure, or historical relicensing claim to dated supporting records." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "fsf-gfdl-1.3", "title": "GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.3", "url": "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html", "what_it_supports": "Canonical license text, definition of the work, invariant sections, cover texts, copyleft conditions, and the 1.3 relicensing clause.", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "fsf-gfdl-why", "title": "Why publishers should use the GNU FDL", "url": "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-gfdl.html", "what_it_supports": "FSF rationale: the license is for documentation of free software and other useful documents, and how invariant sections are meant to be used.", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "wikimedia-licensing", "title": "Wikimedia Foundation licensing update / GFDL and CC BY-SA dual licensing", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Real-world mass use on Wikipedia; the 2008-2009 move from GFDL-only to dual GFDL / CC BY-SA 3.0, which motivated GFDL 1.3.", "url_status": "dead" }, { "id": "spdx-gfdl", "title": "SPDX License List - GNU Free Documentation License identifiers", "url": "https://spdx.org/licenses/", "what_it_supports": "Stable machine identifiers GFDL-1.1, GFDL-1.2, GFDL-1.3 and the -invariants / -no-invariants variants used in software and documentation packaging.", "url_status": "live" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "license-and-grant-resolution", "name": "License and grant resolution", "description": "Record the operative text and its attachment to a document.", "rationale": "A GNU FDL label alone cannot establish the applicable conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "release-identification", "name": "Release identification", "description": "Separate the registered license family from a selected release.", "findings": [ { "id": "operative-text", "name": "Operative text", "description": "Capture the inspected text and clause locations; version 1.3 is available in [SPDX's license-text record](https://spdx.org/licenses/GFDL-1.3-only.html).", "questions": [ { "text": "Which published release does the supplied text match, and where was that text inspected?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "operative-text-q01" }, { "text": "Is the artifact the license text, a document license notice, or a translation of either?", "kind": "definition", "id": "operative-text-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "document-attachment", "name": "Document attachment", "description": "Connect the grant to an identified document edition.", "findings": [ { "id": "notice-and-version-choice", "name": "Notice and version choice", "description": "Record notice scope, declaring authority, and the evidence supporting release selection.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which notice applies to this edition and its included components, and who placed it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "notice-and-version-choice-q01" }, { "text": "What notice wording or proxy statement supports choosing the proposed GNU FDL version?", "kind": "action", "id": "notice-and-version-choice-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "invariants-and-cover-declarations", "name": "Invariants and cover declarations", "description": "Record document-specific restrictions on sections and cover passages.", "rationale": "These declarations can change which edits and publication packages are feasible.", "layers": [ { "id": "section-designations", "name": "Section designations", "description": "Connect declared titles to actual document sections.", "findings": [ { "id": "invariant-section-assessment", "name": "Invariant Section assessment", "description": "Record designation evidence, section content, and unresolved qualification issues.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which exact titles does the notice designate as invariant, and where are their corresponding sections?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "invariant-section-assessment-q01" }, { "text": "Does each designated section qualify as a Secondary Section under the selected release?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "invariant-section-assessment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "cover-passages", "name": "Cover passages", "description": "Track the wording and origin of each required cover passage.", "findings": [ { "id": "cover-text-inventory", "name": "Cover Text inventory", "description": "Record side, sequence, word count, and permission evidence for proposed changes.", "questions": [ { "text": "What Front-Cover and Back-Cover Texts are declared, and what is each passage's word count?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "cover-text-inventory-q01" }, { "text": "Who added each passage, and what permits its proposed addition or replacement?", "kind": "action", "id": "cover-text-inventory-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "copying-and-transparent-access", "name": "Copying and Transparent access", "description": "Assess a particular distribution package and delivery arrangement.", "rationale": "Medium, quantity, and editability affect the conditions an agent must check.", "layers": [ { "id": "distribution-package", "name": "Distribution package", "description": "Inspect the actual copies and accompanying material.", "findings": [ { "id": "copying-conditions", "name": "Copying conditions", "description": "Record notice inclusion, restrictions, copy counts, and cover treatment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Do the copies carry the required license and notices, and do delivery terms or technical controls introduce restrictions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "copying-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "How many copies are planned in each medium, and which quantity or cover conditions does that trigger?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "copying-conditions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "editable-copy-access", "name": "Editable-copy access", "description": "Assess representation and any continuing access obligation.", "findings": [ { "id": "transparent-copy-evidence", "name": "Transparent-copy evidence", "description": "Record editability tests, delivery method, and availability dates.", "questions": [ { "text": "What inspection demonstrates that the proposed Transparent copy is complete and straightforward to revise?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "transparent-copy-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "If Transparent-copy provision is required, how will it be delivered and through what date must network access be maintained?", "kind": "action", "id": "transparent-copy-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "modification-and-translation", "name": "Modification and translation", "description": "Assess an edited or translated document against its source edition.", "rationale": "A reuse decision needs a comparison of changed content and preserved material.", "layers": [ { "id": "modified-edition-record", "name": "Modified edition record", "description": "Track the proposed edition's title, credits, notices, and history.", "findings": [ { "id": "editorial-obligation-check", "name": "Editorial obligation check", "description": "Record a clause-linked comparison between source and output.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which title, authorship, publisher, copyright, licensing, and History changes are needed for this modified edition?", "kind": "action", "id": "editorial-obligation-check-q01" }, { "text": "How are acknowledgements, dedications, disclaimers, endorsements, and prior Transparent-copy locations treated?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "editorial-obligation-check-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "translation-permissions", "name": "Translation permissions", "description": "Distinguish translated document content from translated protected material and legal notices.", "findings": [ { "id": "translation-treatment", "name": "Translation treatment", "description": "Record original-language retention and any special permission relied upon.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the translation retain or replace any Invariant Section, and what permission supports replacement?", "kind": "action", "id": "translation-treatment-q01" }, { "text": "Which original license, notice, and disclaimer texts accompany their translations?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "translation-treatment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "combination-and-license-boundaries", "name": "Combination and license boundaries", "description": "Assess reuse alongside other documents and under alternative grants.", "rationale": "Combining content requires a different assessment from distributing independent works together.", "layers": [ { "id": "assembly-classification", "name": "Assembly classification", "description": "Identify how source documents participate in the resulting work.", "findings": [ { "id": "combination-collection-or-aggregate", "name": "Combination, collection, or aggregate", "description": "Record the assembly classification and resulting document-level obligations.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence supports treating the output as a combined document, collection, aggregate, or extraction?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "combination-collection-or-aggregate-q01" }, { "text": "How will the output handle incompatible version choices, colliding invariant titles, histories, and license-copy placement?", "kind": "action", "id": "combination-collection-or-aggregate-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "alternative-license-route", "name": "Alternative license route", "description": "Separate additional grants from historical GNU FDL relicensing claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "relicensing-evidence", "name": "Relicensing evidence", "description": "Record the exact authority, dates, and material covered by any alternative-license claim.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the alternative license supported by a separate rights-holder grant or a claimed version 1.3 MMC relicensing event?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "relicensing-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "For an MMC claim, what evidence establishes eligibility, incorporation dates, and republication within the historical deadline?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "relicensing-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "permission-continuity-and-cure", "name": "Permission continuity and cure", "description": "Track whether an actor can rely on the grant for a proposed operation.", "rationale": "Possession of a licensed copy does not settle an actor's permission state after a violation.", "layers": [ { "id": "operation-assessment", "name": "Operation assessment", "description": "Bind the decision to an actor, edition, operation, and release.", "findings": [ { "id": "permission-basis", "name": "Permission basis", "description": "Separate evidenced satisfaction of conditions from incomplete assessment.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which selected-release clauses support this actor's proposed copying, modification, or distribution?", "kind": "action", "id": "permission-basis-q01" }, { "text": "Which conditions are evidenced, unmet, or still unresolved for that operation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "permission-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "termination-and-reinstatement", "name": "Termination and reinstatement", "description": "Record violation and cure evidence for each relevant rights holder.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-state-timeline", "name": "Rights-state timeline", "description": "Track dated events without importing reinstatement rules from another release.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence dates the violation, cessation, notification, cure, and any final termination?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "rights-state-timeline-q01" }, { "text": "Under the selected release, what supports provisional or permanent reinstatement for each rights holder?", "kind": "action", "id": "rights-state-timeline-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "GFDL 1.1 (March 2000) - first public version", "GFDL 1.2 (November 2002) - clarifications, still widely seen on older manuals", "GFDL 1.3 (November 2008) - adds a time-limited mass-relicensing path to CC BY-SA 3.0 for wiki-style sites", "GFDL with invariant sections and/or cover texts - the restricted form used in many GNU manuals", "GFDL with no invariant sections and no cover texts - the form required for Wikimedia relicensing eligibility", "GFDL-only (no dual license) vs dual-licensed GFDL + another license (commonly CC BY-SA)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Wikidata", "value_or_pattern": "Q22169", "note": "item 'GNU Free Documentation License'" }, { "scheme": "SPDX License Identifier", "value_or_pattern": "GFDL-1.1, GFDL-1.2, GFDL-1.3, plus -invariants-only / -no-invariants / -or-later suffixes", "note": "canonical machine names on the SPDX License List" }, { "scheme": "FSF / GNU license URL", "value_or_pattern": "https://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3.html (and fdl-1.2, fdl-1.1)", "note": "canonical human-readable texts" }, { "scheme": "OSI / license-list short name", "value_or_pattern": "not OSI-approved as an open-source *software* license; treated as a documentation license", "note": "OSI list does not include GFDL as a software license" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "GNU Free Documentation License 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 - Free Software Foundation (copyright license, not a statute)", "SPDX License List identifiers for GFDL variants - Linux Foundation / SPDX", "Copyright law of the United States (title 17 U.S.C.) and Berne Convention implementations - the legal substrate the license sits on", "Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use (post-2009) - dual-licensing of Wikimedia content as GFDL 1.3 and CC BY-SA 3.0" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "License notice in GNU software manuals (Texinfo/PDF/HTML) published by the FSF, often with invariant 'GNU Manifesto' or similar sections and front/back cover texts.", "Historical and residual license of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia wikis (2002-2009 GFDL-only; thereafter dual-licensed GFDL 1.3 + CC BY-SA 3.0, with new edits effectively under CC BY-SA).", "Packaging metadata: Debian, Fedora, and other distributions tag documentation files with SPDX GFDL-1.x[-invariants|-no-invariants][-or-later] in debian/copyright or RPM license fields.", "Printed and online textbooks and HOWTOs (Linux Documentation Project era, some university lecture notes) that required copyleft for the text but allowed invariant political or philosophical sections.", "Reuse of Wikipedia material in books and mirrors: the GFDL's 'title page', invariant-section, and cover-text rules made commercial paper reprints awkward, which is why Wikimedia moved to CC BY-SA." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "license version", "typical_range": "1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3", "unit": "version identifier" }, { "quantity": "count of invariant sections", "typical_range": "0 (wiki-eligible) to a handful (GNU manuals often 1-3)", "unit": "section" }, { "quantity": "length of front-cover / back-cover texts", "typical_range": "GFDL 1.3 allows up to 5 words front, 25 words back", "unit": "word" }, { "quantity": "transparent-copy requirement threshold", "typical_range": "if more than 100 copies of an opaque (e.g. printed) edition are published, a machine-readable transparent copy must be provided or offered", "unit": "copy" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Invariant sections and cover texts make the work incompatible with Creative Commons and with many documentation reuse pipelines; combining GFDL-with-invariants text into a CC BY-SA work is generally not allowed.", "The 'transparent copy' and title-page obligations are easy to miss when reprinting or bundling, producing an invalid distribution rather than a licensed one.", "Version skew: a work licensed 'GFDL 1.2 only' cannot use the 1.3 wiki-relicensing clause; 'or any later version' vs a pinned version changes relicensing options.", "Secondary liability / notice stripping: removing the GFDL notice, invariant sections, or acknowledgements terminates the license grant for that copy.", "Practical unusability for collaborative wikis: history-preservation and invariant-section rules were a major reason Wikipedia dual-licensed and now prefers CC BY-SA for new contributions.", "Confusion with GPL: applying GFDL to software source, or GPL to a manual, yields a document/software license mismatch that distributors then mis-tag." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "The license text is English-authentic; unofficial translations exist but FSF states that only the English original is legally binding, so courts outside English-speaking jurisdictions interpret a foreign-language original plus a non-binding translation.", "Wikimedia projects: English Wikipedia and most large Wikipedias completed the 2009 dual-licensing; some smaller projects and non-Wikimedia GFDL wikis never did, so GFDL-only dumps still circulate.", "Debian and some European distributions historically treated GFDL-with-invariant-sections as non-free documentation; GFDL-without-invariants is usually accepted in main. US-centric GNU/FSF practice still ships manuals with invariants.", "Moral-rights jurisdictions (much of continental Europe) may constrain waiver/modification of author attribution even where GFDL permits modification of the body text." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "GNU General Public License (GPL)", "difference": "GPL is a software copyleft license (source, object, corresponding source). GFDL is a documentation copyleft license with invariant sections and cover texts; the two are not the same grant and are not automatically interchangeable." }, { "name": "GNU Free Documentation License vs Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)", "difference": "Both are copyleft-ish. CC BY-SA has no invariant sections or cover-text machinery. GFDL 1.3 added a one-time bridge to CC BY-SA 3.0 for mass-modified wiki sites under strict conditions; ordinary GFDL works do not become CC BY-SA." }, { "name": "GNU Lesser / Library GPL or AGPL", "difference": "Those are software licenses. A document under GFDL is not licensed as software; linking or combining rules of LGPL/AGPL do not apply to the manual text." }, { "name": "CC BY (attribution only) or CC0 / public domain", "difference": "Those permit non-share-alike reuse and, for CC0, relicensing. GFDL requires derivatives to stay under GFDL (copyleft) and to keep invariant matter." }, { "name": "Open Publication License (OPL) / old OpenContent licenses", "difference": "Pre-GFDL documentation licenses; some allowed publisher option clauses that GFDL forbids. Historical Linux documentation sometimes used OPL rather than GFDL." }, { "name": "GFDL 'or later' vs a pinned version", "difference": "Not a different license family, but a different grant: '1.3 or any later version' lets the FSF's future versions apply; a pinned '1.2 only' work cannot use 1.3's CC BY-SA relicensing clause." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of GNU Free Documentation License this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this license concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Which earlier GNU FDL releases require explicit clause comparisons before this draft can support version-specific decisions beyond version 1.3?", "What review criteria should resolve disputed Secondary Section designations and ambiguous Transparent-copy representations?", "How should copy quantities and continuing availability obligations be assessed across digital editions, mirrors, retailers, and repeated distribution runs?", "What evidence standard should establish historical MMC relicensing eligibility or holder-specific reinstatement when notices and archives are incomplete?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 7, "layers": 13, "findings": 20, "questions": 32 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a GNU Free Documentation License, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to identify the GNU Free Documentation License, resolve its application to a work, and assess the conditions and evidence needed for a proposed reuse.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 108 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a GNU Free Documentation License, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 108 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one GNU Free Documentation License from another, and a GNU Free Documentation License from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a GNU Free Documentation License sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a GNU Free Documentation License from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a GNU Free Documentation License passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a GNU Free Documentation License between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a GNU Free Documentation License, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a GNU Free Documentation License is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a GNU Free Documentation License says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a GNU Free Documentation License contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a GNU Free Documentation License and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of GNU Free Documentation License a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For GNU Free Documentation License, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of GNU Free Documentation License exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made GNU Free Documentation License and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to GNU Free Documentation License, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in GNU Free Documentation License, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a GNU Free Documentation License came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a GNU Free Documentation License and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a GNU Free Documentation License is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a GNU Free Documentation License, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a GNU Free Documentation License, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a GNU Free Documentation License is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }