interpersonal relationship
Let an agent discuss interpersonal relationships neutrally and supportively by type, dynamics, rights and help, without judgement and with safety resources for abuse.
Research draft, second pass
A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.
written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify
Researched by: Claude
Purpose and description
Let an agent discuss interpersonal relationships neutrally and supportively by type, dynamics, rights and help, without judgement and with safety resources for abuse.
A connection between two or more people, such as family ties, friendships, romantic partnerships, working relationships and community bonds, shaped by interaction, commitment and social norms.
What it is for: Social connection, support, family life and cooperation.
It can be understand relationship types; improve communication; find counselling or mediation; get help in abusive situations.
Distinguishing features
Connection between people
Many forms and norms
Some have legal recognition
Can be supportive or harmful
What it looks like
Not physical; shown in interactions and commitments.
How it is recognised
Types: family, friendship, romantic, work
Legal forms such as marriage or civil partnership
Registry aliases include explicit terms that are not shown here
Related models
is a kind of - category
includes - forms
is supported by - services
is protected by - law
In practice
Families and kinds
family relationships
friendships
romantic and intimate partnerships
professional relationships
community and patronage ties
Standards and regulation
Family law
Domestic abuse law
Council of Europe Istanbul Convention
Failure modes and hazards
Missing signs of coercive control or abuse
Judgemental language
Explicit content (out of scope)
Also called
+55
Where this came from
wikidata · CC0 1.0
Drafted structure
Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.
Type Which relationship.
Types differ.
Kind
Family, friendship, partnership.
Kind
Relationship type.
- What kind of relationship is it? definition
- Which specific entry fits? action
Legal form
Recognition.
Legal
Legal recognition.
- Does the relationship have legal recognition here? provenance
- What rights follow? boundary
Dynamics How it works.
Healthy relationships need care.
Communication
Skills.
Communication
Communication.
- What helps communication in this relationship? action
- Where can counselling be found? action
Boundaries
Consent and respect.
Boundaries
Boundaries.
- Are boundaries and consent respected? boundary
- How can they be discussed? action
Safety Abuse.
Safety comes first.
Abuse
Warning signs.
Abuse
Abuse.
- Are there signs of abuse or coercive control, and which helplines and emergency services apply? boundary
- Is someone in immediate danger? boundary
Children
Protection.
Children
Child protection.
- Are children affected, and who should be contacted? boundary
- Which services protect them? action
Support Help.
Help is available.
Services
Counselling and mediation.
Services
Support services.
- Which counselling or mediation services are available? action
- Are they free? boundary
Separation
Legal help.
Separation
Separation.
- Where can someone get advice on separation? action
- Who can help with children arrangements? action
What the second pass must settle
- Should relationship types be separate entries?
- Should explicit registry aliases be hidden on the page?
- How should support services be localised?