{ "model": { "rank": 4304, "code": "thing-q22719", "model_id": "vr.tr.astronautics", "name": "astronautics", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise astronautics as a field of knowledge, assess the applicability and maturity of its knowledge, and select appropriate methods for analysing spaceflight.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q22719/", "tier": 2, "score": 76, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "military astronautics", "Czechoslovak astronautics", "correction maneuver", "space environment" ], "aliasCount": 4, "merged": 4, "knownIn": 76, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q22719", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22719", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T19:55:12Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 22.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087bc-2eb4-72c2-bb30-a6f19e54947c\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: astronautics\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.KNW\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 695 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001 reg", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 60.7, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a087bc-2ea8-7492-b784-c3d4f7319e6e\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: astronautics\nRegistry id: vr.tr.astronautics\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.KNW\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q22719", "registryId": "vr.tr.astronautics", "name": "astronautics", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q22719/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.astronautics", "name": "astronautics", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise astronautics as a field of knowledge, assess the applicability and maturity of its knowledge, and select appropriate methods for analysing spaceflight.", "definition": "Astronautics is the science and engineering of flight beyond Earth's atmosphere, encompassing the design, operation, navigation and control of spacecraft and their missions.", "scope_statement": "This model owns astronautics as the scientific and engineering discipline concerned with spaceflight, including its subject matter, methods, evidence, internal specialisations and conventional boundaries; it does not own individual missions, vehicles, organisations or practitioners.", "in_scope": [ "Definitions and conventions that distinguish astronautics from neighbouring disciplines", "Knowledge of spaceflight dynamics, trajectories, guidance and control", "Engineering knowledge concerning spacecraft, propulsion and operation in space environments", "Methods for mission analysis, verification and assessment of technical maturity", "Disciplinary classifications, educational coverage and institutional recognition" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Individual spacecraft, launch vehicles and their component inventories", "Execution records and operational status of particular space missions", "Astronauts and other practitioners as people or occupational roles", "Astronomy concerned with observing and explaining celestial phenomena independently of spaceflight", "Space agencies, companies, societies and publications as individual entities", "Space law, policy and economics as independent disciplines" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Its central questions concern enabling, analysing or conducting spaceflight; studying celestial objects alone does not establish astronautics coverage.", "Compared with aeronautics, its methods must address flight beyond sustained atmospheric aerodynamic support, while retaining atmospheric launch and return interfaces.", "Compared with astrodynamics, it includes vehicle engineering, propulsion, environmental constraints and mission operations as well as motion.", "Compared with aerospace engineering, it identifies the spaceflight portion of a broader field; the exact disciplinary boundary requires a named convention.", "A spacecraft or mission is an application of astronautics; the field itself consists of organised knowledge, methods and recognised areas of inquiry." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Adopted disciplinary definition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Source-attributed definition with inclusions, exclusions and date", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an agent from treating one institution's scope convention as universal." }, { "name": "Spaceflight regime coverage", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Launch and ascent; orbital flight; transfer and escape; interplanetary flight; entry, descent and landing; other explicitly defined regimes", "why_it_matters": "Identifies where a method or body of knowledge applies." }, { "name": "Specialisation relationships", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named subfields and neighbouring disciplines, with source-supported relation types", "why_it_matters": "Supports navigation between astronautics and narrower or overlapping knowledge models." }, { "name": "Method applicability conditions", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Physical assumptions, environmental bounds, reference frames, timescales and neglected effects", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an analysis method is appropriate for a proposed spaceflight problem." }, { "name": "Knowledge validation state", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed; analytically assessed; simulated; ground tested; flight demonstrated; contested, with evidence and context", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes theoretical feasibility from demonstrated performance without assigning one maturity level to the whole field." }, { "name": "Classification placement", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Classification scheme, edition, code, label and mapping scope", "why_it_matters": "Allows comparison across catalogues without inventing a single authoritative classification." }, { "name": "Institutional recognition", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Relevant curricula, professional societies, journals and reference works, with the coverage each supports", "why_it_matters": "Provides evidence of disciplinary organisation while keeping institutions separate from the field." } ], "affordances": [ "Classify a knowledge claim or research problem as central, overlapping or outside astronautics under an explicit scope convention.", "Route a spaceflight question to relevant specialisations and identify dependencies between them.", "Select analysis methods whose assumptions match the flight regime and available evidence.", "Compare competing technical claims using validation context, uncertainty and demonstrated applicability.", "Identify missing knowledge or verification evidence before a proposed concept informs mission design.", "Map astronautics coverage across curricula, reference works and classification schemes." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "disciplinary-identity", "name": "Disciplinary identity", "description": "The meaning and boundaries of astronautics as organised knowledge about spaceflight.", "rationale": "An agent needs to distinguish the field from adjacent sciences, broader engineering categories and its physical applications.", "layers": [ { "id": "spaceflight-subject", "name": "Spaceflight subject", "description": "The subject matter that makes a knowledge claim astronautical.", "findings": [ { "id": "adopted-spaceflight-scope", "name": "Adopted spaceflight scope", "description": "Record the definition used and how it treats launch, space transit, orbital operation and return.", "questions": [ { "text": "What definition of astronautics is adopted, and which spaceflight activities does it include?", "kind": "definition", "id": "adopted-spaceflight-scope-q01" }, { "text": "Which reference establishes this definition, and for what institutional or historical context?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "adopted-spaceflight-scope-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-disciplines", "name": "Neighbouring disciplines", "description": "Explicit relations to aeronautics, aerospace engineering, astrodynamics and astronomy.", "findings": [ { "id": "disciplinary-overlap-rules", "name": "Disciplinary overlap rules", "description": "Record whether an adjacent area is treated as a subfield, parent field, shared method or external dependency.", "questions": [ { "text": "Under the adopted convention, how does astronautics relate to aerospace engineering and astrodynamics?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "disciplinary-overlap-rules-q01" }, { "text": "What makes an atmospheric-flight or celestial-science topic relevant to astronautics in this case?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "disciplinary-overlap-rules-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "flight-dynamics-and-control", "name": "Flight dynamics and control", "description": "Knowledge for describing, predicting and controlling motion during spaceflight.", "rationale": "Spaceflight reasoning depends on dynamical regimes and assumptions that cannot be transferred indiscriminately between problems.", "layers": [ { "id": "trajectory-methods", "name": "Trajectory methods", "description": "Models of translational motion and the conditions under which they apply.", "findings": [ { "id": "dynamical-model-applicability", "name": "Dynamical model applicability", "description": "Record the regime, force model, coordinate conventions and approximation limits of trajectory methods.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which flight regimes and force assumptions does this trajectory method cover?", "kind": "definition", "id": "dynamical-model-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "Which reference frames, time conventions and error measures are required to interpret its predictions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "dynamical-model-applicability-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "navigation-guidance-and-attitude", "name": "Navigation, guidance and attitude", "description": "Methods for estimating flight state and controlling translational or rotational behaviour.", "findings": [ { "id": "estimation-and-control-conditions", "name": "Estimation and control conditions", "description": "Record the sensing, actuation and timing assumptions behind navigation and control knowledge.", "questions": [ { "text": "What observations, actuator capabilities and communication delays does the method assume?", "kind": "definition", "id": "estimation-and-control-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence is needed before applying it to rendezvous, pointing or autonomous flight?", "kind": "action", "id": "estimation-and-control-conditions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "space-system-engineering-knowledge", "name": "Space system engineering knowledge", "description": "Engineering principles connecting propulsion, vehicle functions and space-environment constraints.", "rationale": "Astronautics extends beyond motion to whether a flight system can perform and survive its intended functions.", "layers": [ { "id": "propulsion-and-resource-coupling", "name": "Propulsion and resource coupling", "description": "Knowledge of propulsion choices and their interactions with mission resources.", "findings": [ { "id": "propulsion-trade-methods", "name": "Propulsion trade methods", "description": "Record methods relating propulsion performance to mass, power, operating duration and trajectory requirements.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which propulsion assumptions and performance measures govern the proposed comparison?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "propulsion-trade-methods-q01" }, { "text": "How must an agent account for coupled mass, power and flight-time constraints when using this method?", "kind": "action", "id": "propulsion-trade-methods-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "environment-and-vehicle-functions", "name": "Environment and vehicle functions", "description": "Knowledge linking flight environments to thermal, electrical, structural and communication functions.", "findings": [ { "id": "environmental-applicability", "name": "Environmental applicability", "description": "Record which environmental effects a method addresses and which spacecraft functions depend on its results.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which vacuum, radiation, thermal, charging or atmospheric effects are material to this knowledge claim?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "environmental-applicability-q01" }, { "text": "What environmental ranges and exposure durations bound the supporting evidence?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "environmental-applicability-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "mission-feasibility-and-assurance", "name": "Mission feasibility and assurance", "description": "Methods for integrating astronautical knowledge into mission concepts and assessing whether conclusions are sufficiently supported.", "rationale": "An agent must connect disciplinary knowledge to decisions without confusing an analysis result with an operationally demonstrated capability.", "layers": [ { "id": "mission-architecture-reasoning", "name": "Mission architecture reasoning", "description": "Methods for connecting objectives, flight phases and interacting technical constraints.", "findings": [ { "id": "integrated-feasibility-conditions", "name": "Integrated feasibility conditions", "description": "Record how mission-analysis methods combine trajectory, vehicle and operational assumptions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which mission phases and interfaces must be considered together to assess feasibility?", "kind": "definition", "id": "integrated-feasibility-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "Which assumptions require re-evaluation when the destination, payload or crew requirement changes?", "kind": "action", "id": "integrated-feasibility-conditions-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "verification-and-demonstration", "name": "Verification and demonstration", "description": "The evidential relationship between analysis, simulation, testing and flight experience.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-maturity-and-transfer", "name": "Claim maturity and transfer", "description": "Record validation evidence for specific claims and limits on transferring that evidence to another mission context.", "questions": [ { "text": "Was the claim supported by analysis, simulation, ground testing or flight demonstration, and where is that evidence documented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "claim-maturity-and-transfer-q01" }, { "text": "What differences in environment, scale or operating conditions prevent direct reuse of the result?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "claim-maturity-and-transfer-q02" }, { "text": "What additional verification would make the claim suitable for the intended decision?", "kind": "action", "id": "claim-maturity-and-transfer-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "knowledge-organisation-and-recognition", "name": "Knowledge organisation and recognition", "description": "How astronautics is classified, taught and represented in recognised knowledge sources.", "rationale": "The field's boundaries are partly conventional, so an agent needs traceable evidence of how knowledge communities organise it.", "layers": [ { "id": "classification-and-curricula", "name": "Classification and curricula", "description": "Mappings between astronautics and external classification or educational structures.", "findings": [ { "id": "documented-field-placement", "name": "Documented field placement", "description": "Record scheme-specific classifications and curriculum coverage without assuming exact equivalence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which verified classification labels and codes cover astronautics, in which scheme editions?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "documented-field-placement-q01" }, { "text": "Does a cited curriculum teach astronautics explicitly or embed its subjects within aerospace engineering?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "documented-field-placement-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reference-and-community-coverage", "name": "Reference and community coverage", "description": "Evidence from reference works, journals and professional communities about the field's scope.", "findings": [ { "id": "source-authority-and-coverage", "name": "Source authority and coverage", "description": "Record what each disciplinary source actually supports, including its specialisation and temporal limits.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which read handbooks, reviews, journal scope statements or society documents substantiate the proposed coverage?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "source-authority-and-coverage-q01" }, { "text": "Which astronautical specialisations or emerging methods are absent from those sources?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "source-authority-and-coverage-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The listed kinds are established subfields, not a single formal or mutually exclusive taxonomy.", "Standards editions and legal applicability require verification for a particular mission; the Outer Space Treaty primarily establishes obligations for states.", "The discipline itself has no meaningful typical measurement range; quantities such as delta-v, thrust and orbital altitude belong to particular systems or missions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Astrodynamics and trajectory design", "Spacecraft systems engineering", "Space propulsion", "Spacecraft guidance, navigation and control", "Human spaceflight engineering", "Space mission design and operations" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC)", "value_or_pattern": "629.4", "note": "Class for astronautics; a library classification rather than a unique identifier for the discipline." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) recommendations standardize space communications and mission data exchange.", "European Cooperation for Space Standardization (ECSS) standards address space engineering, management and product assurance.", "ISO 24113, issued by the International Organization for Standardization, specifies space debris mitigation requirements.", "The United Nations Outer Space Treaty establishes foundational international obligations governing state activities in outer space." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Designing and operating communications, navigation and Earth observation satellites", "Planning launch, orbital transfer, rendezvous and reentry trajectories", "Developing robotic lunar and planetary exploration missions", "Engineering crewed spacecraft, habitats and life support systems", "Planning spacecraft disposal and collision avoidance" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Launch or propulsion failures that prevent a spacecraft from reaching its intended trajectory", "Navigation or control errors causing loss of attitude, missed encounters or unintended atmospheric entry", "Thermal, radiation, electrical or software failures that disable spacecraft systems", "Collisions with debris or other spacecraft and fragmentation that creates additional debris", "Loss of pressure, life support or radiation protection during human spaceflight" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Russian and some other national traditions commonly use the term cosmonautics for substantially the same field.", "European programmes commonly use ECSS standards, while United States programmes commonly use NASA or other agency requirements; applicability depends on the programme and contract.", "Launch licensing, spectrum authorization and reentry oversight depend on national jurisdiction within international treaty frameworks." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Aeronautics", "difference": "Aeronautics concerns flight within an atmosphere; astronautics concerns spaceflight, although launch and reentry involve both." }, { "name": "Aerospace engineering", "difference": "Aerospace engineering encompasses engineering for both atmospheric and space flight; astronautics concentrates on spaceflight and also includes its scientific methods." }, { "name": "Astronomy", "difference": "Astronomy studies celestial objects and phenomena; astronautics develops and operates the means of travelling and working in space." }, { "name": "Astrodynamics", "difference": "Astrodynamics studies and predicts spacecraft motion; it is a component of astronautics rather than the whole discipline." }, { "name": "Space science", "difference": "Space science investigates physical phenomena in and beyond space; astronautics supplies spacecraft and mission capabilities that may serve those investigations." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of astronautics this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which authoritative definition should anchor this registry entry, especially at the boundary between astronautics and aerospace engineering?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already cover astronautics, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Which classification codes and editions explicitly cover astronautics, and which only cover broader or narrower subjects?", "How should the adopted scope place human spaceflight, planetary surface operations and in-space manufacturing relative to neighbouring models?", "Which read reference works and institutional sources provide sufficient coverage to validate or revise these proposed bundles?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 18, "questions": 29 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a astronautics, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise astronautics as a field of knowledge, assess the applicability and maturity of its knowledge, and select appropriate methods for analysing spaceflight.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: military astronautics, Czechoslovak astronautics, correction maneuver, space environment.", "4 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 76 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a astronautics, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "military astronautics", "Czechoslovak astronautics", "correction maneuver", "space environment" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 76 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 4 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one astronautics from another, and a astronautics from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a astronautics sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a astronautics from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a astronautics passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a astronautics between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a astronautics, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a astronautics is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a astronautics says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a astronautics contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a astronautics and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What astronautics studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does astronautics take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does astronautics establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where astronautics is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark astronautics as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place astronautics, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a astronautics came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a astronautics and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a astronautics is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a astronautics, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a astronautics, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a astronautics is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }