{ "model": { "rank": 3458, "code": "thing-q234213", "model_id": "vr.tr.adultery", "name": "adultery", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to assess whether a reported act falls within an explicitly identified definition of adultery, represent uncertainty, and determine appropriate handling without treating an allegation as an established fact.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q234213/", "tier": 2, "score": 85, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 85, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.adultery", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q234213", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q234213", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:49:00Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 23.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c56-df58-76a0-b71a-15d284d9b37a\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: adultery\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: ACT.ACT\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 546 things:\n# Batch 003: 1001 registe", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 77.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c56-df6c-7f32-be93-049474191aef\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: adultery\nRegistry id: vr.tr.adultery\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContex" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q234213", "registryId": "vr.tr.adultery", "name": "adultery", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q234213/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.adultery", "name": "adultery", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to assess whether a reported act falls within an explicitly identified definition of adultery, represent uncertainty, and determine appropriate handling without treating an allegation as an established fact.", "definition": "Adultery is sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than that person's spouse, with its precise boundaries and moral or legal significance varying across traditions and jurisdictions.", "scope_statement": "This model owns adultery as an ACT-plane act classification involving sexual conduct, a participant's marital relationship to someone outside that conduct, and a specified interpretive framework; it records competing definitions rather than presuming a universal sexual, marital, legal, or religious boundary.", "in_scope": [ "Reported acts and the participants' marital relationships at the time", "Definitions of adultery and the authorities or communities that hold them", "Framework-specific boundaries around qualifying sexual conduct", "Relationships between marital exclusivity, permission, concealment, and adultery classification", "Evidence, disputed classifications, and context-specific responses" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Marriage formation, validity, and dissolution as complete processes", "Infidelity outside marriage as a broader category", "Sexual assault and coercion as independently modelled acts", "Divorce proceedings, criminal proceedings, and religious disciplinary systems", "General relationship counselling or judgments about a person's character" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Identify whether at least one participant had a relevant marital relationship with someone outside the reported sexual conduct; do not equate all relationship infidelity with adultery.", "Check whether the reported conduct meets the named framework's sexual-act threshold; emotional attachment or online interaction must not qualify merely by analogy.", "Evaluate marital permission and adultery classification separately: whether permission changes classification depends on the framework.", "Separate an act classified as adultery from a suspicion, accusation, admission, or institutional finding about that act.", "Record voluntariness and attributed responsibility separately; being subjected to sexual violence must not be treated as evidence of voluntary marital betrayal." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Interpretive framework", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Named legal, religious, community, interpersonal, or research definition; version and applicability specified", "why_it_matters": "Determines which marital relationships and sexual acts qualify." }, { "name": "Marital relationship at act time", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Participant linked to spouse or spouses, with relevant dates and recognized, disputed, or unknown status", "why_it_matters": "Classification depends on relationships when the act occurred, rather than only on present status." }, { "name": "Reported conduct", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Framework-relevant conduct category; unspecified; disputed; unknown", "why_it_matters": "Allows comparison with a definition without collecting unnecessary intimate detail." }, { "name": "Voluntariness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Reported voluntary; reported coerced; capacity questioned; disputed; unknown, separately for each participant", "why_it_matters": "Prevents assumptions that every participant willingly engaged in the reported act." }, { "name": "Marital agreement and permission", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Relevant exclusivity agreement and any permission, including scope, timing, and disputed or unknown status", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes breaches of relationship agreements from classifications imposed by other frameworks." }, { "name": "Knowledge of marital status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Reported known; reportedly misrepresented; disputed; unknown, separately for each participant", "why_it_matters": "Some assessments of responsibility depend on what each participant knew." }, { "name": "Claim status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Alleged; admitted; corroborated in specified respects; contested; institutionally determined; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Keeps the evidential standing of a report separate from its substantive classification." }, { "name": "Framework-relative classification", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Meets specified definition; does not meet specified definition; indeterminate; framework inapplicable", "why_it_matters": "Supports different conclusions under different definitions without collapsing them into one verdict." } ], "affordances": [ "Compare a reported act against multiple explicitly attributed definitions of adultery.", "Identify missing marital, temporal, or conduct information needed for classification.", "Explain why adultery, broader infidelity, and breach of a relationship agreement may receive different classifications.", "Maintain separate accounts of allegations, evidence, participant knowledge, and institutional determinations.", "Identify which proposed responses require verified authority, additional evidence, or referral to a neighbouring model." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "definitions-and-sexual-boundaries", "name": "Definitions and sexual boundaries", "description": "Represent what a particular framework means by adultery and which conduct it includes.", "rationale": "The missing registry definition must not be replaced with an unattributed universal rule.", "layers": [ { "id": "definition-holders", "name": "Definition holders", "description": "Locate definitions within the authorities, communities, or research practices that use them.", "findings": [ { "id": "attributed-adultery-definition", "name": "Attributed adultery definition", "description": "Record each candidate definition with its holder, source, scope, and applicable period; these remain research targets until verified.", "questions": [ { "text": "How does this framework define adultery, and whose marriage must be involved?", "kind": "definition", "id": "attributed-adultery-definition-q01" }, { "text": "Which source establishes this definition, and for which community, jurisdiction, or study is it applicable?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "attributed-adultery-definition-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "qualifying-conduct", "name": "Qualifying conduct", "description": "Resolve the sexual-act threshold without assuming that every form of infidelity meets it.", "findings": [ { "id": "sexual-act-threshold", "name": "Sexual-act threshold", "description": "Distinguish conduct explicitly included by a definition from emotional, digital, attempted, or other conduct whose inclusion requires support.", "questions": [ { "text": "What conduct is sufficient to count as adultery under this definition?", "kind": "definition", "id": "sexual-act-threshold-q01" }, { "text": "How does the framework distinguish qualifying acts from emotional affairs, sexual messaging, attempts, or fantasies?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "sexual-act-threshold-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "marital-relations-and-timing", "name": "Marital relations and timing", "description": "Establish the marital relationships relevant to the reported act at the time it occurred.", "rationale": "Adultery classification requires a marital reference point and cannot be inferred from current relationship labels.", "layers": [ { "id": "relevant-marriages", "name": "Relevant marriages", "description": "Represent participants, spouses, and framework-specific recognition of their relationships.", "findings": [ { "id": "marital-reference-point", "name": "Marital reference point", "description": "Identify the marital relationship against which the conduct is assessed, allowing disputed recognition and multiple spouses.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which participant was married to whom, and does the selected framework recognize that marriage?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "marital-reference-point-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports the relevant marital relationship without relying solely on an accuser's description?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "marital-reference-point-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "relationship-transitions", "name": "Relationship transitions", "description": "Position the act relative to marriage, separation, dissolution, and disputed transitions.", "findings": [ { "id": "act-time-marital-status", "name": "Act-time marital status", "description": "Preserve uncertainty about dates and distinguish separation from whatever event the framework recognizes as ending marital relevance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is the supported time interval for the act relative to the relevant marital transitions?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "act-time-marital-status-q01" }, { "text": "How does this framework treat separation, pending dissolution, or a disputed marriage at that time?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "act-time-marital-status-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "agreement-agency-and-knowledge", "name": "Agreement, agency, and knowledge", "description": "Separate marital expectations, voluntary participation, and knowledge of marital status.", "rationale": "A marital connection alone does not establish an agreement breach or equal responsibility among participants.", "layers": [ { "id": "marital-exclusivity", "name": "Marital exclusivity", "description": "Describe relevant relationship agreements and their relationship to external definitions.", "findings": [ { "id": "permission-and-agreement-breach", "name": "Permission and agreement breach", "description": "Record whether the conduct breached an applicable relationship agreement separately from whether a framework calls it adultery.", "questions": [ { "text": "What exclusivity agreement or permission reportedly applied to this conduct at the time?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "permission-and-agreement-breach-q01" }, { "text": "Does permission alter adultery classification in this framework, or only the assessment of agreement breach?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "permission-and-agreement-breach-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "participant-agency", "name": "Participant agency", "description": "Assess voluntariness and knowledge individually rather than attributing a shared intention.", "findings": [ { "id": "individual-participation-and-awareness", "name": "Individual participation and awareness", "description": "Keep coercion, capacity, deception about marital status, and voluntary conduct distinct in each participant's account.", "questions": [ { "text": "What supports or disputes voluntary participation and awareness of the relevant marriage for each person?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "individual-participation-and-awareness-q01" }, { "text": "How does the framework distinguish act classification from responsibility when coercion, incapacity, or deception is reported?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "individual-participation-and-awareness-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "allegations-evidence-and-classification", "name": "Allegations, evidence, and classification", "description": "Connect adultery claims to supported facts and explicit decision criteria.", "rationale": "Accusations about intimate conduct require careful separation of reported events, interpretations, and determinations.", "layers": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance", "description": "Track who asserts what and which parts of the claim the available material supports.", "findings": [ { "id": "support-for-adultery-allegations", "name": "Support for adultery allegations", "description": "Distinguish direct accounts, admissions, indirect indications, and repeated reports without assuming that any category settles the claim.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who reported the conduct, on what basis, and which elements remain inferred rather than observed?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "support-for-adultery-allegations-q01" }, { "text": "Which marital, sexual-conduct, timing, and agency elements are supported, contradicted, or still unknown?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "support-for-adultery-allegations-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "framework-relative-decisions", "name": "Framework-relative decisions", "description": "Produce bounded classifications and preserve disagreement between frameworks.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-with-unresolved-elements", "name": "Classification with unresolved elements", "description": "Record the conclusion, definition applied, decision standard, and missing elements rather than converting uncertainty into a categorical allegation.", "questions": [ { "text": "Under the stated decision standard, do the supported facts meet every required element of the selected definition?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "classification-with-unresolved-elements-q01" }, { "text": "What additional information could change the classification, and should the present result remain indeterminate?", "kind": "action", "id": "classification-with-unresolved-elements-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "responses-disclosure-and-consequences", "name": "Responses, disclosure, and consequences", "description": "Connect a bounded classification to authorized handling and documented consequences.", "rationale": "An adultery label does not itself authorize disclosure, punishment, or assumptions about harm.", "layers": [ { "id": "contextual-consequences", "name": "Contextual consequences", "description": "Distinguish reported relationship effects from consequences asserted by institutions or normative frameworks.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-attribution", "name": "Consequence attribution", "description": "Record actual, anticipated, and prescribed consequences separately, with their evidential or authoritative basis.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which consequences are reported to have occurred, and which are predictions or prescriptions associated with an adultery classification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "consequence-attribution-q01" }, { "text": "Which consequences require a separate legal, religious, or relationship process before any action is justified?", "kind": "action", "id": "consequence-attribution-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "handling-intimate-allegations", "name": "Handling intimate allegations", "description": "Limit recording and disclosure to the authorized task while preserving the status of disputed claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "authorized-use-of-adultery-records", "name": "Authorized use of adultery records", "description": "Determine who may receive the assessment and what minimum information is needed, including any reported risk associated with disclosure.", "questions": [ { "text": "What authority and task purpose justify recording or sharing this adultery allegation or assessment?", "kind": "action", "id": "authorized-use-of-adultery-records-q01" }, { "text": "How should disclosure preserve uncertainty and account for any reported risk of retaliation or exposure of intimate information?", "kind": "action", "id": "authorized-use-of-adultery-records-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "This describes the general marital-sexual sense, not a particular jurisdiction's legal definition.", "Single and double adultery are traditional distinctions rather than a universal contemporary classification.", "Current legal status, qualifying conduct and evidence requirements require jurisdiction-specific verification; no sources were consulted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Single adultery: only one participant is married", "Double adultery: both participants are married to other people" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The Ten Commandments prohibit adultery in Jewish and Christian scriptural traditions." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Classifying conduct in religious ethics and teachings about marriage", "Describing a breach of marital sexual exclusivity", "Classifying conduct under legal systems that attach consequences to extramarital intercourse", "Studying marital relationships and sexual behaviour" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Treating a culturally specific definition as universal", "Conflating sexual intercourse with emotional or online infidelity", "Assuming adultery necessarily entails deception or lack of a spouse's consent", "Stigma, retaliation or violence arising from allegations", "Unequal treatment based on sex, gender or marital status" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Legal systems differ in whether adultery carries criminal consequences, civil consequences or no distinct legal consequence.", "Religious and customary traditions differ over qualifying acts, marital status and evidentiary requirements.", "Some historical definitions treated a married woman's extramarital intercourse differently from a married man's." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Infidelity", "difference": "Infidelity concerns breaches of relationship expectations and can include unmarried relationships or nonsexual conduct; adultery specifically depends on marriage." }, { "name": "Fornication", "difference": "In traditions distinguishing these categories, fornication concerns intercourse between unmarried people, whereas adultery involves a married participant." }, { "name": "Consensual non-monogamy", "difference": "Consensual non-monogamy depends on partners' agreement; some definitions of adultery classify extramarital intercourse regardless of that agreement." }, { "name": "Bigamy", "difference": "Bigamy concerns entering another marriage while already married; adultery does not require another marriage." }, { "name": "Emotional affair", "difference": "An emotional affair involves intimacy understood to violate relationship expectations without necessarily involving sexual intercourse." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of adultery this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which reference works and primary sources should anchor the registry's default definition while preserving legal, religious, interpersonal, and research differences?", "How do selected frameworks treat sexual conduct beyond intercourse, digital activity, and nonphysical affairs?", "How do selected frameworks recognize marriages, multiple spouses, separation, and disputed dissolution when classifying an act?", "How do selected frameworks distinguish spousal permission, voluntary participation, and ignorance of marital status in classification and responsibility?", "Which operational definitions and evidence standards are used in research, and how can their results be compared without treating self-reports as verified acts?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 17, "questions": 27 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a adultery, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to assess whether a reported act falls within an explicitly identified definition of adultery, represent uncertainty, and determine appropriate handling without treating an allegation as an established fact.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 85 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a adultery, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 85 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one adultery from another, and a adultery from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a adultery sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a adultery from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a adultery passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a adultery between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a adultery, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a adultery is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a adultery proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a adultery, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a adultery and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a adultery consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a adultery takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What adultery is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of adultery are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is adultery operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of adultery and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of adultery?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as adultery?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a adultery came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a adultery and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a adultery is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a adultery, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a adultery, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a adultery is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }