← Back to catalogue
Research draft

official language

vr.tr.official-language · INF.MED

Let an agent explain official language status and its varieties, relay examples and legal frameworks from language policy sources with attribution, describe the difference between official, national and state languages, and distinguish official status from majority use and from de facto official languages.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain official language status and its varieties, relay examples and legal frameworks from language policy sources with attribution, describe the difference between official, national and state languages, and distinguish official status from majority use and from de facto official languages.

A language given special legal status in a country, state or organisation, used in government, courts, education and official documents, whether as the sole official language, one of several co-official languages, an additional official language for particular regions or purposes, or the working languages of international bodies such as the six official languages of the United Nations and the 24 of the European Union; many countries, such as India with its scheduled languages or Kyrgyzstan with Kyrgyz as state language and Russian as official, distinguish between state, official and national languages.

What it is for: Not applicable; a legal status.

It can be explain the status; relay examples and frameworks; describe distinctions; distinguish from de facto use.

Distinguishing features

Legal designation

Government use

Sole or co-official

Varies by level

What it looks like

Not a visible object; a legal designation.

Physical character

UN official languages: 6 count

EU official languages: 24 count

countries with no de jure official language: several count - such as the United States federally

How it is recognised

Language with legal status in government

Sole and co-official languages, additional official languages, state languages, EU and UN official languages, languages with official status in India

A national language may be symbolic; a de facto official language has no law; a majority language may lack status

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms, as a status

language

is set by - and constitutions

language policy

is exemplified by - six languages

official languages of the United Nations

is contrasted with - a symbolic or cultural designation

national language

In practice

Families and kinds

sole official languages

co-official languages and linguistic co-officiality

additional and regional official languages

state languages as in Kyrgyzstan

official languages of international organisations such as the UN and EU

scheduled and official languages in India

Standards and regulation

Constitutions and language laws

EU regulation 1 of 1958 on languages

UN rules of procedure on official and working languages

European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages

Failure modes and hazards

Confusing official, national and state languages

Assuming majority languages are official

Political framing of language disputes

Also called

linguistic co-officialityState language of Kyrgyzstanofficial languages of the European Unionadditional official languageofficial languages of the United NationsLanguages with official status in Indiaofficial languages of Puducherryofficial languages of Russiasemi-offical languageSchedule languages of India

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What an official language is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is an official language, and how does it differ from national, state and de facto official languages? definition
  2. Is the question about the status in general or a specific country or organisation? boundary

Kinds

Kinds.

Kinds

Kinds.

  1. What are sole, co-official, additional and regional official languages? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific kind? action
Examples Examples.

Sources.

Countries

Countries.

Countries

Countries.

  1. How do India, Kyrgyzstan, Switzerland, Canada and other countries define official languages? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Organisations

International organisations.

Organisations

Organisations.

  1. What are the official and working languages of the UN and EU, and how are they used? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Policy Policy and rights.

Attribution.

Rights

Language rights.

Rights

Rights.

  1. What rights does official status confer for citizens, courts and education? provenance
  2. Which entry fits linguistic rights? action

Debates

Debates.

Debates

Debates.

  1. What debates surround official language choices and minority languages, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary
Context History and data.

Context.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did the idea of official languages develop with nation states? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of language policy? action

Data

Data.

Data

Data.

  1. Where are lists of official languages by country maintained? provenance
  2. Which entry fits list of official languages by country? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should the EU and UN official languages be separate primary entries?
  • How should language policy sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific countries and organisations; should they be split off?