← Back to catalogue
Published

cross-country equestrianism

vr.tr.cross-country-equestrianism · thing-q2483906

Enable an agent to recognise cross-country equestrian activity, assess a horse-rider combination against its course and governing conditions, and identify permitted participation, judging, and intervention actions.

Thing Registry Activities and processes ACT.EVT

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 19 findings · 40 questions

Discipline and test boundaries Identify which form of cross-country activity is occurring and which requirements govern it.

Activity identity

Establish the activity's defining task and relationship to neighbouring disciplines.

Cross-country task

Record whether the intended task is cross-country obstacle riding and whether the occurrence is a phase, standalone test, or practice session.

  1. What prescribed terrain and obstacle-negotiation task identifies this as cross-country equestrianism? definition
  2. Does this occurrence belong to an eventing competition, a standalone competition, or schooling? boundary

Governing context

Locate the applicable rules and the temporal boundaries of the occurrence.

Applicable test specification

Associate the declared class and occurrence with a rules edition, schedule, and issuing authority.

  1. Which authority, rules edition, class specification, and local amendments govern this test? provenance
  2. What date, local time zone, and actual start and finish evidence delimit this session or attempt? measurement
  3. Which requirements change if this is schooling rather than a judged test? boundary
Combination readiness Represent whether this horse and rider may undertake this particular cross-country task.

Partnership eligibility

Identify the entered combination and evidence supporting admission to the test.

Entry and qualification

Separate horse requirements, rider requirements, and any requirements that must be met together.

  1. Which horse and rider are entered, and what evidence confirms their identities? provenance
  2. Which qualifications must each possess individually, and which must this combination have achieved together? boundary
  3. Who has authority to confirm eligibility or reject the start? action

Course-specific preparation

Relate demonstrated preparation and current checks to the intended course.

Readiness evidence

Record relevant obstacle experience, conditioning evidence, equipment checks, and unresolved preparation concerns without inferring fitness from entry acceptance.

  1. What recent evidence supports this combination's preparation for the distance, terrain, water, and technical combinations presented? provenance
  2. Which required tack and rider protective-equipment checks have been completed, by whom? provenance
  3. What unresolved readiness concern requires assessment before this combination starts? action
Course and obstacle demands Describe the route and the physical and technical tasks imposed on a combination.

Route and terrain

Represent required passages and the terrain connecting them.

Course traversal

Distinguish the official route specification from a rider's planned and actual path.

  1. Where are the start, finish, compulsory passages, and ordered obstacles on the current approved course? definition
  2. What measured distance, gradients, turns, and footing transitions affect effort and approach control? measurement
  3. Which course revision was inspected and communicated to this rider? provenance

Obstacle configuration

Capture individual jumping tasks, linked elements, and permitted alternatives.

Technical obstacle task

Record obstacle geometry, approach and landing conditions, element relationships, and any specified deformable or frangible components.

  1. What dimensions, profiles, water conditions, and approach or landing constraints define each jumping effort? measurement
  2. Which numbered or lettered elements form one obstacle, and which alternatives constitute a permitted completion? boundary
  3. What inspection evidence establishes the obstacle and any safety mechanism as ready for use? provenance
Attempt and judging Reconstruct what the combination did and how that performance became an outcome.

Pace and time

Relate course progress to the applicable timing conditions.

Timed progress

Preserve starts, finishes, progress observations, and authorised interruptions before deriving a timing result.

  1. What prescribed speed, optimum time, time limit, and any too-fast provisions apply to this class? measurement
  2. What raw start, finish, hold, and restart records establish the effective elapsed time? provenance
  3. Which timing adjustments were authorised, and under which rule? provenance

Obstacle decisions and outcome

Turn supported observations into rule-specific decisions and an attempt status.

Incident adjudication

Capture obstacle completion, alleged refusals or run-outs, falls, route errors, and mechanism activations without treating every observation as an automatic penalty.

  1. What was observed at the identified obstacle or element, and which official, recording, or witness supports it? provenance
  2. How does the applicable rule classify the observation, including any disputed flag passage or alternative route? boundary
  3. Who may issue, review, or amend the resulting decision? action

Phase result

Record completion status and itemised penalties while preserving whether the result is provisional, contested, or confirmed.

  1. Did the combination complete, retire, withdraw, or receive elimination, and what decision establishes that status? provenance
  2. How are the obstacle, time, and other penalties derived under the identified rules edition? measurement
  3. What cross-country result may be passed to the parent eventing model, and with what confirmation status? action
Welfare and course control Represent changing conditions, welfare observations, and authority to interrupt participation.

Operational course state

Track whether the route remains available for further attempts.

Course condition response

Associate deterioration, obstruction, damaged obstacles, or response activity with time-specific course restrictions.

  1. What current observations identify compromised footing, visibility, obstacles, or access for responders? provenance
  2. Which section and combinations are affected, and from what time? boundary
  3. Who may hold starts, stop combinations, modify the course, or authorise reopening? action

Combination welfare and continuation

Link horse and rider observations to qualified assessment and participation decisions.

Welfare intervention

Record observed distress, fatigue, injury concerns, or dangerous riding together with the authorised response and follow-up status.

  1. What horse or rider signs were observed, at what point in the attempt, and by whom? provenance
  2. Which applicable rule or qualified assessment requires stopping, examination, or exclusion from further participation? action
  3. What post-attempt assessment or clearance remains outstanding before any subsequent participation? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Kinds and varieties

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Standards and regulation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of cross-country equestrianism this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Activities and processes
Entry kind
thing
Plane
ACT
Domain
ACT.EVT

What it is Filled

Cross-country equestrianism is a timed riding discipline in which a horse-and-rider combination negotiates a marked outdoor course of predominantly fixed obstacles across varied terrain, principally as the cross-country phase of eventing.

In scope

  • Mounted traversal of a prescribed cross-country jumping course
  • Horse-rider combination readiness and participation status
  • Terrain, obstacle sequences, alternative routes, and course conditions
  • Pacing, obstacle negotiation, timing, and observed incidents
  • Cross-country judging, attempt outcomes, and welfare interventions

Out of scope

  • Dressage performance and scoring
  • Show-jumping performance and scoring
  • Whole-event administration and aggregate eventing classification
  • Horse breeding, ownership, and general veterinary diagnosis
  • Endurance riding, racing, hunting, and recreational trail riding as separate activities

Why it exists Filled

Enable an agent to recognise cross-country equestrian activity, assess a horse-rider combination against its course and governing conditions, and identify permitted participation, judging, and intervention actions.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • The activity centres on a mounted horse-rider combination negotiating terrain and cross-country obstacles, characteristically fixed obstacles, rather than simply covering a distance. Reference: [FEI Eventing Rules, 2024, Chapter 9](https://inside.fei.org/system/files/2024%20FEI%20Eventing%20Rules_Clean%20version.pdf).
  • A competitive attempt is assessed through course completion, obstacle performance, and timing under an identified ruleset; arrival order alone does not define success.
  • When part of eventing, cross-country is a distinct phase alongside dressage and jumping, so a cross-country result is not the complete eventing result. Reference: [FEI Eventing](https://www.fei.org/eventing).
  • An organised course supplies required passages and obstacle order; riding over incidental natural obstacles on a trail is insufficient by itself to identify a cross-country test.
  • Schooling can share cross-country obstacles and riding demands without producing a formally judged competition result.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Advise a rider to attempt fences beyond the combination's training and qualification.
  • Downplay rider or horse falls, injuries or deaths when reporting.
  • Help a horse compete while unfit, lame or medicated against the rules.
  • Publish riders' private health details beyond official disclosure.

Only with a human decision

  • Stopping or eliminating a combination on welfare or safety grounds.
  • Approving a course design or fence for competition.

May

  • Report courses, results and rules from the governing bodies' official sources.
  • Describe the discipline and its safety measures for learners.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Horse and rider falls in this discipline have caused deaths, so welfare and safety rules matter.
  • The horse cannot consent; its welfare is the rider's and organizer's duty.

Who is affected

  • Horses
  • Riders
  • Officials and spectators

Owners Filled

Steward

The national equestrian federation and event organizer for each competition.

Master systems

  • Federation horse and rider registers
  • Competition results records

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q112685094 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.cross-country-equestrianism
  • Wikidata: Q2483906 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2483906)

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

  • Activity format: eventing phase | standalone competition | schooling | other declared format
  • Governing specification: governing body, rules edition, class specification, and applicable local amendments
  • Horse-rider combination: identified horse paired with identified rider for a particular attempt
  • Course demand: distance in m; elevation change in m; obstacle and jumping-effort counts recorded separately
  • Obstacle profile: declared types and combinations, including water, ditch, bank, drop, narrow obstacle, and spread
  • Timing specification: prescribed speed in m/min, optimum time in s, and time limit in s where applicable
  • Effective elapsed time: s, with raw timing and authorised adjustments
  • Course availability: awaiting inspection | open | held | modified | closed
  • Combination participation status: pending clearance | cleared | started | held | completed | retired | eliminated | withdrawn
  • Cross-country penalty assessment: penalty points separated by obstacle, time, and other applicable grounds; decision status recorded separately

Plane ACT: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • A horse and rider galloping across open country over solid fences, ditches and water.
  • Riders wearing body protectors and helmets, with numbered bibs.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Classify an activity as competitive cross-country, schooling, or an adjacent riding activity using its course and purpose.
  • Compare documented combination eligibility and preparation with the declared course demands.
  • Inspect required passages and alternative routes to support a permitted route and pacing plan.
  • Record obstacle observations, timing evidence, and decisions for a reconstructable attempt record.
  • Flag conditions requiring an authorised official, instructor, veterinarian, or medical responder to assess continuation.
  • Produce a provisional or confirmed cross-country outcome and link it to the encompassing eventing result.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Rotational falls in which the horse lands on the rider.
  • Injuries and deaths of horses on course.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • FEI Eventing Rules, Federation Equestre Internationale.

Context of use required Filled

  • Cross-country equestrianism is encountered at eventing competitions and dedicated training grounds with marked outdoor obstacle courses.
  • It tests a horse-and-rider combination's endurance, jumping ability and judgment across varied terrain within prescribed competition conditions.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q2483906: cross-country equestrianism - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Cross-country riding - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Does the registry intend the discipline broadly, only the eventing cross-country phase, or a class of individual competitive occurrences, given its ACT.EVT placement and missing definition?
  • Should standalone hunter trials, arena cross-country, and indoor adaptations fall within this entry or remain linked neighbouring activities?
  • Which jurisdictions and current rules editions must the completed model support, particularly for eligibility, timing, obstacle incidents, equipment, and mandatory stopping?
  • Which recognised course-inspection and combination-readiness evidence can support decisions without implying that clearance guarantees safety?
  • Does an existing Vercy world model already cover this concept, and which course, horse, rider, and eventing models should supply shared information?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q2483906/spec.json