{ "model": { "rank": 3364, "code": "thing-q2526135", "model_id": "vr.tr.security", "name": "security", "purpose": "Let an agent handle security by asset, threat, measure, rights and proportionality, giving defensive guidance only.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Cross-cutting context", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "XCT", "domain": "XCT.STA", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q2526135/", "tier": 2, "score": 87, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Escort bureau", "border control", "MacCarthy's Rust Border Post", "Automated Border Control system", "grit bin", "security checkpoint", "national security policy", "security measures", "operations security", "security assurance", "data security", "Wahlen plan", "malware detection", "tokenization", "USB flash drive security", "laser safety", "Audience scanning", "kidSAFE", "hostile vehicle mitigation", "crowd control", "suppression of a demonstration", "road safety", "security management", "perimeter security", "emotional security", "pedestrian safety", "tunnel safety", "mobile phone use while driving", "identity and access management", "insider threat management", "misuse detection", "texting while driving", "food security", "community food security", "food security in India", "food security in Ethiopia", "food security in Madagascar", "food security in Mozambique", "food security in Mexico", "food security in Chad" ], "aliasCount": 123, "merged": 123, "knownIn": 87, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.security-act", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q2526135", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2526135", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T06:57:21Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 1, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q2526135", "registryId": "vr.tr.security", "name": "security", "version": "0.2.0-wave.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "XCT.STA" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q2526135/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.security", "name": "security", "purpose": "Let an agent handle security by asset, threat, measure, rights and proportionality, giving defensive guidance only.", "definition": "The condition of being protected from danger, harm or threats, for people, property, organisations, information or states, and the measures that provide it, such as guards, checkpoints and border control.", "what_it_is_for": "Protecting people, assets and information.", "affordances": [ "assess risks and threats", "apply proportionate measures", "respond to incidents", "protect rights while securing" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Freedom from threat", "Physical, information, national and personal", "Measures must be proportionate", "Securities as financial instruments are separate" ], "appearance": "Locks, guards, checkpoints, fences, cameras and procedures.", "visual_identification": [ "Security checkpoints and staff", "Access control systems", "Financial securities are a different sense" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "physical security", "information and cyber security", "border and national security", "personal security", "food and energy security (extended senses)" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "condition", "why": "state" }, { "relation": "is threatened by", "target": "crime and cyberattack", "why": "threats" }, { "relation": "is provided by", "target": "police and security services", "why": "providers" }, { "relation": "is confused with", "target": "security (finance)", "why": "another sense" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "ISO/IEC 27001", "ISO 31000 risk management", "Private security licensing", "Human rights law on proportionality" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Security theatre without real protection", "Disproportionate intrusion", "Single points of failure" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "scope", "name": "Scope", "description": "What is secured.", "rationale": "Scope decides measures.", "layers": [ { "id": "asset", "name": "Asset", "description": "People, property, data.", "findings": [ { "id": "asset-finding", "name": "Asset", "description": "Protected asset.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is being protected?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "How valuable or sensitive is it?", "kind": "measurement" } ] } ] }, { "id": "threat", "name": "Threat", "description": "Risks.", "findings": [ { "id": "threat-finding", "name": "Threat", "description": "Threats.", "questions": [ { "text": "What threats are realistic?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "How likely and severe?", "kind": "measurement" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "measures", "name": "Measures", "description": "Protection.", "rationale": "Measures must fit the risk.", "layers": [ { "id": "controls", "name": "Controls", "description": "Physical and technical.", "findings": [ { "id": "controls-finding", "name": "Controls", "description": "Controls.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which controls are in place?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Do they address the threats?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "standards", "name": "Standards", "description": "Frameworks.", "findings": [ { "id": "standards-finding", "name": "Standards", "description": "Standards.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which standard guides the measures?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is it certified?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "incidents", "name": "Incidents", "description": "Response.", "rationale": "Incidents need response.", "layers": [ { "id": "response", "name": "Response", "description": "Plans.", "findings": [ { "id": "response-finding", "name": "Response", "description": "Incident response.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is the incident response plan?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "Who must be notified?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "lessons", "name": "Lessons", "description": "Improvement.", "findings": [ { "id": "lessons-finding", "name": "Lessons", "description": "Lessons learned.", "questions": [ { "text": "What was learned from past incidents?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "What changed?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights", "description": "Proportionality.", "rationale": "Security must respect rights.", "layers": [ { "id": "proportionality", "name": "Proportionality", "description": "Balance.", "findings": [ { "id": "proportionality-finding", "name": "Proportionality", "description": "Proportionality.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is the measure proportionate to the risk?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "Are less intrusive options available?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "oversight", "name": "Oversight", "description": "Accountability.", "findings": [ { "id": "oversight-finding", "name": "Oversight", "description": "Oversight.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who oversees security measures?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "How can people complain?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should security kinds be separate entries?", "How should the finance sense be split off?", "How should proportionality be recorded?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a security, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent handle security by asset, threat, measure, rights and proportionality, giving defensive guidance only.", "characteristics": { "substance": "abstract", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Escort bureau, border control, MacCarthy's Rust Border Post, Automated Border Control system, grit bin, security checkpoint, national security policy, security measures, operations security, security assurance, data security, Wahlen plan.", "123 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 87 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a security, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "an abstraction with no physical instance", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Escort bureau", "border control", "MacCarthy's Rust Border Post", "Automated Border Control system", "grit bin", "security checkpoint", "national security policy", "security measures", "operations security", "security assurance", "data security", "Wahlen plan" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 87 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 123 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one security from another, and a security from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a security sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a security from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a security passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a security between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a security, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a security is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What security is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of security are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is security operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of security and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of security?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as security?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a security came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a security and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a security is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a security, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a security, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a security is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 12, "questions": 32 } } } }