← Back to catalogue
Published

CH-124 Sea King

vr.tr.ch-124-sea-king · thing-q2716284

Enable an agent to recognise the CH-124 Sea King aircraft type, distinguish its configurations, and determine what evidence is needed to assess an example's capabilities, condition and permitted use.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

6 bundles · 11 layers · 18 findings · 29 questions

Identity and configuration Establish what qualifies as CH-124 and which configuration a claim describes.

Designation boundary

Separate CH-124 identity from family resemblance and name matching.

Documentary type identification

Require traceable designation evidence and explicit relations to neighbouring aircraft types.

  1. Which manufacturer and Canadian service records establish CH-124 identity and any earlier designation? provenance
  2. Which related Sea King designations are distinct types rather than aliases of this entry? boundary

Configuration lineage

Attach equipment and limitations to dated configuration baselines.

Variant and modification applicability

Distinguish a designation suffix, an embodied modification and a temporary mission fit.

  1. Which documented CH-124 variants and modification programmes changed equipment or approved roles? definition
  2. What records establish the configuration of a particular serial at a specified date? provenance
Airframe and flight capability Describe the maritime airframe and the configuration-dependent ability to produce lift and carry loads.

Maritime airframe

Record hull, landing gear and dimensional evidence relevant to maritime use.

Geometry and water-landing boundary

Separate measurable geometry and documented emergency water-landing provisions from assumptions about routine water operation.

  1. What dimensions apply with the rotor and tail deployed, and what reference points define each measurement? measurement
  2. What documented restrictions govern emergency water landing, flotation and subsequent recovery? boundary

Power and loading

Relate engine and transmission configuration to aircraft loading and environmental conditions.

Conditional performance envelope

Require applicable performance evidence rather than treating maximum speed, range or payload as simultaneous capabilities.

  1. Which engine and transmission installations and ratings apply to each documented baseline? provenance
  2. How do approved mass, balance, hover and endurance limits depend on fuel, equipment and atmospheric conditions? measurement
Shipboard integration Capture the folding, securing and ship-interface conditions needed to assess embarkation.

Folding and stowage

Distinguish deployed geometry, stowed geometry and verified mechanism states.

Fold state and clearance

Record rotor and tail positions together with applicable locking, clearance and handling requirements.

  1. What folded envelope and movement clearances are documented for the applicable configuration? measurement
  2. What indications, interlocks or inspections establish that folding and locking states permit the proposed handling action? action

Deck interface

Connect aircraft fittings and approved handling arrangements to a specified ship.

Embarkation compatibility

Treat compatibility as a documented aircraft-ship relationship with equipment and operating limits.

  1. Which securing, recovery-assistance and traversing interfaces are fitted and approved for the aircraft configuration? definition
  2. Which aircraft-ship clearance and limitation records support embarkation on the proposed vessel? provenance
Mission fit and role Describe supported roles through evidence about installed equipment and its serviceability.

Maritime sensing

Represent configuration-dependent maritime detection and surveillance equipment.

Sensor fit evidence

The RCAF profile lists acoustic and surface-search equipment; the model must resolve applicability by configuration and date. [RCAF aircraft profile](https://www.canada.ca/en/air-force/services/aircraft/ch-124.html)

  1. Which acoustic, radar and electro-optical systems were installed in each documented configuration? provenance
  2. What evidence distinguishes installed, serviceable, removed and display-only sensor equipment? definition

Role equipment and crew

Connect a proposed role to its required aircraft fit, loading and crew functions.

Role eligibility

Represent role eligibility through documented prerequisites, including stores interfaces where applicable.

  1. Which equipment, cabin arrangements and crew functions are required for each documented transport, rescue or maritime role? definition
  2. What configuration approval and serviceability evidence is needed before attributing a particular role to an example? action
Continued integrity and disposition Assess technical evidence, authority and preservation status across the aircraft's lifecycle.

Maintenance and airworthiness

Link condition claims to applicable technical publications and inspected evidence.

Maintenance evidence and limitations

Require traceable inspection, component-life and defect records for maritime structures, rotor systems and powertrain.

  1. Which issuing authorities, technical publications and mandatory instructions govern the example and proposed use? provenance
  2. Which corrosion, fatigue, rotor, transmission or folding-system findings require inspection, restriction or repair under those documents? action
  3. Which specified fuels, lubricants and preservation consumables apply to the installed equipment and storage state? definition

Retirement and preservation

Separate fleet retirement from each surviving aircraft's subsequent condition and authority.

Post-service status

National Defence announced retirement by the end of 2018 and disposal plans including display and training; subsequent status requires aircraft-specific evidence. [Retirement announcement](https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2018/11/canadian-armed-forces-honour-the-long-serving-ch-124-sea-king-helicopter.html)

  1. What dated records establish transfer, demilitarisation, preservation or dismantling of the example? provenance
  2. What separate evidence permits static display, ground movement, powered demonstration or flight in its present jurisdiction? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Kinds and varieties

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Identifiers and schemes

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Typical measurements

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Failure modes and hazards

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Regional variation

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of CH-124 Sea King this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ

What it is Filled

The CH-124 Sea King was Canada's military maritime helicopter variant of the Sikorsky S-61/SH-3 Sea King family, a twin-turboshaft, amphibious rotorcraft used primarily for shipborne anti-submarine warfare.

In scope

  • CH-124 designation, type identity and configuration lineage
  • Maritime airframe, propulsion and folding arrangements
  • Aircraft interfaces with shipboard handling and accommodation
  • Configuration-dependent mission equipment and capabilities
  • Maintenance evidence, operating limitations and retirement disposition

Out of scope

  • King as a title, person or unrelated registry concept
  • Other Sea King aircraft types except for identification and lineage links
  • CH-148 Cyclone design and operation
  • Individual aircraft ownership, flight logs and component histories as standalone records
  • Warship design, squadron organisation and mission planning
  • Detailed weapon employment procedures and independent models of carried equipment

Why it exists Filled

Enable an agent to recognise the CH-124 Sea King aircraft type, distinguish its configurations, and determine what evidence is needed to assess an example's capabilities, condition and permitted use.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Require documentary identification as CH-124; a Sea King silhouette or name alone does not establish the Canadian type.
  • Check the combination of shipborne helicopter configuration, folding rotor and tail, amphibious hull and twin turboshaft propulsion; these corroborate identity but are not unique identifiers. [RCAF aircraft profile](https://www.canada.ca/en/air-force/services/aircraft/ch-124.html)
  • Separate the aircraft's documented configuration from equipment visible today; removed mission equipment does not by itself change type identity.
  • Treat CH-148 Cyclone as a separate successor type, not a CH-124 configuration. [National Defence retirement announcement](https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2018/11/canadian-armed-forces-honour-the-long-serving-ch-124-sea-king-helicopter.html)

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Present a different variant or a composite airframe as an original of this type.
  • Operate or start a preserved airframe without the keeper's authority and airworthiness approval.
  • Misrepresent accident records or the people involved in them.
  • Disclose personal details of crews beyond what official records publish.

Only with a human decision

  • Restoring, moving or altering a preserved airframe.
  • Attributing an accident or rescue to a named crew member.

May

  • Identify an airframe, photograph or museum example as this maritime helicopter type.
  • Describe its shipborne anti-submarine and rescue roles from official and historical sources.
  • Distinguish it from other variants of the same helicopter family.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Long service with ageing aircraft raised public debate about risk to crews.
  • Accidents and rescues involve real people and their families.

Who is affected

  • Former aircrew and families
  • Museum visitors
  • People rescued at sea

Owners Filled

Steward

The museum or owner of a preserved airframe; the operating air force kept service records.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q17476643 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.ch-124-sea-king
  • Wikidata: Q2716284 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2716284)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Documented designation and configuration: CH-124 designation, documented suffix, modification baseline and effective date; unknown where unverified
  • Aircraft identity evidence: Links to manufacturer identity, service serial records and configuration documentation
  • Deployed and stowed envelope: Length, width and height in m, with rotor and tail positions specified
  • Mass and loading envelope: Mass in kg and centre-of-gravity position in the applicable manual's reference system
  • Propulsion and transmission baseline: Installed engine models, ratings with units and rating conditions, and transmission configuration
  • Fold and securing state: Rotor and tail: deployed, folded, transitioning or unknown; locking and securing evidence recorded separately
  • Mission equipment fit: Dated links to installed, removed or inoperative sensors, communications and role equipment
  • Maintenance exposure: Flight hours, component cycles and calendar intervals, each with record date
  • Disposition and operating authority: Documented service, storage, instructional, display, dismantled or other disposition; operating authority assessed separately

Recognition required Filled

  • Large twin-turboshaft helicopter with a boat-shaped hull for water landings.
  • Five-blade main rotor and side sponsons housing the main landing gear.
  • Military markings and serial numbers settle the individual airframe.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Identify a candidate aircraft and link it to the CH-124 type using documentary evidence.
  • Compare dated configurations and explain differences in supported mission roles.
  • Assess deck, hangar or display accommodation against verified aircraft geometry.
  • Identify missing maintenance or authority evidence before proposing movement, restoration or operation.
  • Record preservation and demilitarisation changes without losing the aircraft's historical identity.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Ageing airframes and systems demanded heavy maintenance in late service.
  • Shipboard operations in rough seas carry high crash risk.
  • Preserved airframes may hold residual fluids and hazardous materials.

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • The Aeronautics Act, enacted by the Parliament of Canada, provides the statutory framework for Canadian military aviation, including the airworthiness oversight relevant to this aircraft during military service.

Context of use required Filled

  • This aircraft type served aboard Canadian naval vessels and from shore bases for maritime operations, particularly submarine detection and tracking.
  • It also supported search and rescue, surveillance and transport tasks according to its equipment and configuration.
  • Surviving examples are encountered in museum collections, preservation work and historical technical records.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q2716284: CH-124 Sea King - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Sikorsky CH-124 Sea King - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Which authoritative records settle CH-124 designation aliases, variant boundaries and serial-specific modification histories?
  • Which configuration-controlled manuals establish folded dimensions, loading limits and performance conditions behind public summary figures?
  • Which aircraft-ship approvals specify recovery-assistance interfaces, handling requirements and operating limitations?
  • Which technical publications establish applicable inspection intervals, component lives, failure responses and consumable specifications?
  • What verified post-retirement records establish surviving examples' configurations, dispositions and any present operating authority?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q2716284/spec.json