← Back to catalogue
Research draft

qualia

vr.tr.qualia · XCT.QLT

Let an agent explain qualia and their role in philosophy of mind, present arguments for and against their existence and irreducibility with attribution, relate them to consciousness research, and separate the philosophical concept from everyday talk of experience.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain qualia and their role in philosophy of mind, present arguments for and against their existence and irreducibility with attribution, relate them to consciousness research, and separate the philosophical concept from everyday talk of experience.

The subjective, qualitative properties of conscious experience, such as the redness of red, the taste of coffee or the felt quality of pain, considered as what it is like to have an experience, and extended in ordinary use to lived and conscious experience including significant experiences such as achievement or trauma; qualia are central to debates in philosophy of mind about consciousness, physicalism and the explanatory gap, and are described here with positions attributed.

What it is for: Subjective qualities of experience.

It can be explain the concept; present arguments with attribution; relate to consciousness research; separate everyday senses.

Distinguishing features

Subjectivity

Qualitative character

Contested existence

Explanatory gap

What it looks like

Not physical; a philosophical concept.

How it is recognised

What it is like to have an experience

Qualitative, subjective

Sensation is the physiological process; perception is interpretation

Related models

is a kind of - category

qualitative property

is related to - perception and meaning

sense

is related to - a physical property contrasted with experience of colour

polarization

is related to - experience and its biological basis

biology of depression

In practice

Families and kinds

sensory qualia such as colour and taste

bodily qualia such as pain

emotional qualia

lived experience in everyday usage

qualia in thought experiments

Standards and regulation

Academic standards in philosophy

No regulation

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting one position as settled

Confusing philosophical and everyday senses

Treating personal experiences reported by users as philosophical examples without care

Also called

lived experiencesense of achievementtraumatic experiencewitnessing abuseconscious experiencetragic triadpeak experienceexposure to deathaspect of sound

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What qualia are.

Philosophy.

Concept

Concept.

Concept

Concept.

  1. What are qualia, and how do philosophers characterise their subjectivity and qualitative character? provenance
  2. Is the philosophical concept or everyday lived experience meant? boundary

Arguments

Thought experiments.

Arguments

Arguments.

  1. What do thought experiments such as the inverted spectrum, the knowledge argument and zombies claim, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits philosophy of mind? action
Debate Debates.

Attribution.

Existence

Do qualia exist?

Existence

Existence.

  1. What do realists, eliminativists and functionalists argue about qualia, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation balanced? boundary

Physicalism

Physicalism and the explanatory gap.

Physicalism

Physicalism.

  1. How do qualia figure in debates about physicalism, the hard problem and the explanatory gap? provenance
  2. Which entry fits consciousness? action
Science Science and experience.

Context.

Neuroscience

Consciousness research.

Neuroscience

Neuroscience.

  1. How do neuroscience and psychology study conscious experience, and what do they say about qualia? provenance
  2. Which findings are contested? boundary

Lived

Lived experience.

Lived

Lived.

  1. How is lived experience used in phenomenology, research and everyday language, and how should personal accounts be handled with care? provenance
  2. Is someone describing distressing personal experience, needing support? boundary
Learn History and teaching.

Education.

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How did the concept of qualia develop from Lewis through Nagel, Jackson and Dennett? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Teach

Teaching.

Teach

Teaching.

  1. How can qualia be taught in philosophy courses? action
  2. Which misconceptions arise? provenance

What the second pass must settle

  • Should consciousness be a separate entry?
  • How should key papers be linked?
  • How should neuroscience resources be linked?