← Back to catalogue
Research draft

agnosticism

vr.tr.agnosticism · XCT.STA

Let an agent explain agnosticism and its varieties, relay its history and philosophical arguments from academic sources with attribution, describe how it relates to theism and atheism, and distinguish agnosticism from atheism, deism, scepticism and indifference.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain agnosticism and its varieties, relay its history and philosophical arguments from academic sources with attribution, describe how it relates to theism and atheism, and distinguish agnosticism from atheism, deism, scepticism and indifference.

The view that the existence of God or the divine is unknown or unknowable, or that claims about it cannot be justified, a term coined by Thomas Huxley in 1869, held in forms ranging from strong agnosticism, which holds such knowledge impossible, to weak agnosticism, which suspends judgement, and combined with belief or disbelief as agnostic theism, which believes without claiming knowledge, and agnostic atheism; agnosticism concerns knowledge rather than belief and is distinct from atheism and from religious indifference.

What it is for: Not applicable; a philosophical position.

It can be explain the position; relay history and arguments; describe relations to belief; distinguish related positions.

Distinguishing features

About knowledge, not belief

Strong and weak forms

Compatible with theism or atheism

Huxleyan origin

What it looks like

Not a visible object; a stance on knowledge of the divine.

Physical character

term coined: 1869 year - Thomas Huxley

self-identified agnostics in surveys: varies note - often a few percent

How it is recognised

Position that the divine is unknown or unknowable

Strong and weak agnosticism, agnostic theism, agnostic atheism

Atheism concerns belief; deism affirms a creator; apatheism is indifference

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms, as an epistemic stance

belief

was coined by - in 1869

Thomas Henry Huxley

is contrasted with - which concerns belief

atheism

is combined in - with belief in God

agnostic theism

In practice

Families and kinds

strong or hard agnosticism

weak or soft agnosticism

agnostic theism

agnostic atheism

apathetic agnosticism

ignosticism as a related view

Standards and regulation

No regulation; freedom of belief protections

Failure modes and hazards

Confusing agnosticism with atheism

Presenting one definition as the only one

Disrespect toward believers or non-believers

Also called

agnostic theism

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What agnosticism is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is agnosticism, and how does it differ from atheism, deism, scepticism and indifference? definition
  2. Is the question about the philosophical position or about personal belief? boundary

Varieties

Varieties.

Varieties

Varieties.

  1. What are strong and weak agnosticism, agnostic theism and agnostic atheism? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific variety? action
History History.

Attribution.

Origins

Origins.

Origins

Origins.

  1. How did Huxley coin the term, and what earlier thinkers held similar views, as historians describe? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Thinkers

Thinkers.

Thinkers

Thinkers.

  1. How have Kant, Spencer, Russell and others contributed to agnostic thought, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Arguments Arguments.

Attribution.

For

Arguments for.

For

For.

  1. What arguments support agnosticism, from limits of knowledge to evidential balance, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

Against

Criticisms.

Against

Against.

  1. What criticisms do theists and atheists make of agnosticism, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits philosophy of religion? action
Context Society and religion.

Context.

Society

Demographics.

Society

Society.

  1. How many people identify as agnostic, and how do surveys measure it? provenance
  2. Which entry fits irreligion? action

Religion

Agnosticism within religions.

Religion

Religion.

  1. How do some religious traditions accommodate agnostic stances, as their thinkers describe? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific tradition? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should agnostic theism be a separate primary entry?
  • How should philosophical sources be linked?
  • How should survey data on self-identification be recorded?