{ "model": { "rank": 6291, "code": "thing-q319763", "model_id": "vr.tr.inferiority-complex", "name": "inferiority complex", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to record and assess a reported pattern of felt inferiority, distinguish it from nearby experiences, and identify proportionate support without treating the label as a diagnosis.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Activities and processes", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "ACT", "domain": "ACT.ACT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q319763/", "tier": 2, "score": 61, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "colonial mentality", "Gharbzadegi" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 61, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q319763", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q319763", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T13:37:29Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.00323, "turns": 1, "seconds": 17.1, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 67.8, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c15-8c00-7a31-9d11-af032f3fbe5d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: inferiority complex\nRegistry id: vr.tr.inferiority-complex\nPlane / domain: ACT / ACT.ACT\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q319763", "registryId": "vr.tr.inferiority-complex", "name": "inferiority complex", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "ACT.ACT" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q319763/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.inferiority-complex", "name": "inferiority complex", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to record and assess a reported pattern of felt inferiority, distinguish it from nearby experiences, and identify proportionate support without treating the label as a diagnosis.", "definition": "An inferiority complex is a persistent, affectively charged pattern of self-evaluation in which a person experiences themselves as fundamentally inadequate relative to others or to an internalized standard, and organizes behavior around compensating for, concealing, or avoiding that felt deficiency.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the evidence, meaning, context, persistence, responses and consequences of a person's reported or provisionally identified inferiority pattern; it does not establish their actual worth, diagnose a disorder or infer hidden motives from behaviour alone.", "in_scope": [ "The person's meaning of being inferior and the standards or comparison groups involved", "The breadth, persistence and situational triggers of perceived inadequacy", "How perceived shortcomings become conclusions about personal worth or standing", "Avoidance, reassurance seeking or compensatory striving when their connection to felt inferiority is supported", "Effects on participation, relationships and personally valued activities", "Uncertainty, alternative explanations and boundaries for supportive action" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Diagnosis and treatment of depressive, anxiety, personality or other mental disorders", "Independent assessment of competence, performance or learning needs", "Bullying, discrimination and coercion as external events requiring their own records", "General self-esteem outside the specific inferiority pattern", "Standalone models of shame, envy, embarrassment or perfectionism", "Acute safety assessment and crisis response" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Determine whether the account concerns a bounded skill gap or extends to being a lesser person; record the extension rather than assuming it.", "Check whether the experience recurs or persists across relevant occasions; one disappointment or embarrassing comparison is insufficient evidence for an enduring pattern.", "Identify any comparison standard and the meaning of falling below it; low confidence about a task does not by itself establish felt inferiority.", "Separate anticipated poor performance from anticipated exposure as inadequate, lesser or undeserving; both may occur, but they are different claims.", "Require reported or otherwise supported connections between felt inferiority and avoidance or compensatory behaviour; ambition, modesty and withdrawal alone do not identify this pattern." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Identification basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Self-description, attributed by another person, provisional interpretation, contested or unspecified", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an observer's interpretation from becoming an established property of the person." }, { "name": "Inferiority meaning", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Perceived lack of competence, worth, belonging, attractiveness, status, moral adequacy or a person-defined meaning; multiple values permitted", "why_it_matters": "Identifies what being inferior means in this particular account." }, { "name": "Comparison reference", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Relationship to named peers, groups, idealised figures, personal ideals or internalised standards", "why_it_matters": "Makes the reference point explicit and allows its relevance and fairness to be examined." }, { "name": "Generalisability of self-judgment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Single task, one life domain, several domains, whole-person judgment or unclear", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes local uncertainty from broader conclusions about personal worth." }, { "name": "Recurrence and persistence", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Reported occasions per stated observation period and estimated duration, with recall uncertainty", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of a recurring pattern without inventing a diagnostic threshold." }, { "name": "Reported intensity", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Person-defined rating with explicit anchors, time and context; no assumed clinical cutoff", "why_it_matters": "Allows within-person tracking while preserving the meaning of the rating." }, { "name": "Response linkage", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Connection between an inferiority experience and a response, marked as reported, observed sequence, hypothesised or disputed", "why_it_matters": "Separates evidence of association from unsupported claims about motivation." }, { "name": "Current course", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Currently active, intermittent, easing, historically reported or unclear, with a stated assessment period", "why_it_matters": "Avoids turning a past or temporary experience into a permanent identity." }, { "name": "Participation impact", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "No reported restriction, restricted choices, missed valued activities, sustained disruption or unclear, supported by examples", "why_it_matters": "Connects the experience to concrete consequences rather than relying on the label alone." } ], "affordances": [ "Elicit the person's meaning of inferiority and build a provisional account they can correct.", "Map triggering situations, comparisons, self-judgments and subsequent responses.", "Compare episodes and exceptions to assess breadth, persistence and change.", "Distinguish supported observations from inferred motives and competing explanations.", "Offer consent-based reflection or practical support tied to the person's goals and current circumstances.", "Recognise when distress or disruption exceeds the agent's role and offer help accessing qualified support." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "adler-understanding-human-nature", "title": "Understanding Human Nature (inferiority feeling and compensation)", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferiority_complex", "what_it_supports": "Adlerian origin: organ inferiority, inferiority feeling, compensation, and the complex as an organizing style of life.", "url_status": "live" } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "meaning-and-identification", "name": "Meaning and identification", "description": "Records what inferiority means here and how the pattern came to be identified.", "rationale": "The label alone cannot establish either the person's experience or the validity of an observer's interpretation.", "layers": [ { "id": "label-and-account", "name": "Label and account", "description": "Separates the person's account from labels applied by others.", "findings": [ { "id": "basis-for-identification", "name": "Basis for identification", "description": "Record who introduced the label, their supporting examples and whether the person accepts it.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who described this as an inferiority complex, and what experiences or observations supported that description?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "basis-for-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Does the person accept this description, reject it or prefer different language?", "kind": "definition", "id": "basis-for-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-of-inferiority", "name": "Content of inferiority", "description": "Identifies the perceived shortcoming and the conclusion drawn from it.", "findings": [ { "id": "shortcoming-to-self-judgment", "name": "Shortcoming to self-judgment", "description": "Record whether a perceived deficit remains specific or becomes a judgment about worth, standing or entitlement to belong.", "questions": [ { "text": "In what respect does the person feel inferior, and what does that imply about them in their own words?", "kind": "definition", "id": "shortcoming-to-self-judgment-q01" }, { "text": "Where does this judgment stop: a task, a domain or the person as a whole?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "shortcoming-to-self-judgment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "comparisons-and-context", "name": "Comparisons and context", "description": "Records the standards, situations and social conditions surrounding felt inferiority.", "rationale": "An agent needs to understand what the person is comparing and what is happening around them before interpreting the experience.", "layers": [ { "id": "comparison-standards", "name": "Comparison standards", "description": "Identifies reference groups and rules for judging adequacy.", "findings": [ { "id": "reference-and-adequacy-rule", "name": "Reference and adequacy rule", "description": "Record the comparison target and the standard the person believes they must meet to count as adequate.", "questions": [ { "text": "Against whom or what is the person judging themselves, including any ideal they cannot name as a real person?", "kind": "definition", "id": "reference-and-adequacy-rule-q01" }, { "text": "What would count as being adequate, and does that standard change after success?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reference-and-adequacy-rule-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "situational-and-social-conditions", "name": "Situational and social conditions", "description": "Distinguishes triggering events, actual treatment and interpretations of those events.", "findings": [ { "id": "trigger-and-treatment-evidence", "name": "Trigger and treatment evidence", "description": "Record situations that evoke inferiority while preserving evidence of exclusion, humiliation or unequal opportunity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which situations evoke the experience, and what specifically happened in the most recent example?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "trigger-and-treatment-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence concerns actual treatment by others, and what concerns the person's interpretation or expectation?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "trigger-and-treatment-evidence-q02" }, { "text": "Does the situation call for practical protection, access or skills support alongside reflection on self-judgment?", "kind": "action", "id": "trigger-and-treatment-evidence-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "pattern-and-responses", "name": "Pattern and responses", "description": "Records recurrence, exceptions and responses associated with feeling inferior.", "rationale": "Recognition requires a pattern over time, while judging its state requires knowing how the person responds and what follows.", "layers": [ { "id": "course-and-exceptions", "name": "Course and exceptions", "description": "Tracks how often the experience occurs, how long it lasts and where it is absent.", "findings": [ { "id": "recurrence-with-counterexamples", "name": "Recurrence with counterexamples", "description": "Record repeated episodes alongside contexts in which the person can tolerate comparison or feel adequate.", "questions": [ { "text": "Over the stated period, how often has felt inferiority occurred and how long has it tended to last?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "recurrence-with-counterexamples-q01" }, { "text": "When does the person encounter a similar comparison without concluding that they are lesser?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "recurrence-with-counterexamples-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "avoidance-and-compensation", "name": "Avoidance and compensation", "description": "Examines responses without assigning hidden motives from their outward form.", "findings": [ { "id": "response-function-and-aftermath", "name": "Response function and aftermath", "description": "Record whether withdrawal, reassurance seeking, self-deprecation, competition or striving is linked to felt inferiority, and its immediate and later effects.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does the person do after feeling inferior, and what evidence connects that response to the experience?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "response-function-and-aftermath-q01" }, { "text": "Does the response bring relief, preserve participation or create later costs according to concrete examples?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "response-function-and-aftermath-q02" }, { "text": "Could the same behaviour reflect enjoyment, preference, realistic caution or another motive?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "response-function-and-aftermath-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequences-and-support", "name": "Consequences and support", "description": "Connects the inferiority pattern to valued activities and permissible supportive actions.", "rationale": "An agent needs a basis for deciding whether support is wanted, what it should address and when another form of help is appropriate.", "layers": [ { "id": "costs-and-valued-participation", "name": "Costs and valued participation", "description": "Records what the pattern changes in the person's everyday choices and relationships.", "findings": [ { "id": "restriction-and-desired-change", "name": "Restriction and desired change", "description": "Record concrete restrictions or distress and the person's preferred changes, without equating conventional achievement with recovery.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which valued activities, relationships or opportunities have been restricted, and how is that connection supported?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "restriction-and-desired-change-q01" }, { "text": "What would the person like to do differently even if some feelings of inadequacy remained?", "kind": "action", "id": "restriction-and-desired-change-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "support-and-role-boundaries", "name": "Support and role boundaries", "description": "Determines acceptable assistance, review criteria and limits of the agent's involvement.", "findings": [ { "id": "agreed-support-and-review", "name": "Agreed support and review", "description": "Record consent for support, a person-chosen aim and conditions for revising the approach or seeking qualified help.", "questions": [ { "text": "What assistance does the person want: listening, examining a comparison, practical problem-solving or help finding professional support?", "kind": "action", "id": "agreed-support-and-review-q01" }, { "text": "What observable change would make that assistance useful, and when should its effects be reviewed?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "agreed-support-and-review-q02" }, { "text": "What distress, disruption or uncertainty makes the proposed assistance exceed the agent's competence or agreed role?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "agreed-support-and-review-q03" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Primary (organ-inferiority / constitutional) inferiority complex", "Secondary (social-comparison) inferiority complex", "Superiority-compensatory presentation (masking inferiority)", "Inferiority feelings (normal, situational) versus inferiority complex (pathological, organizing)", "Cultural / status inferiority (class, caste, colonial, minority)", "Intellectual / academic inferiority complex", "Physical / appearance inferiority complex", "Professional / competence inferiority complex" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of inferiority complex this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "How should the registry distinguish everyday use of inferiority complex from specific theoretical uses, and should those uses share one operational definition?", "What evidence supports a reliable boundary between this construct, broadly low self-esteem, shame and social-evaluative anxiety?", "Which assessment methods, if any, are validated for the intended populations, languages and settings?", "How should culturally specific comparison standards and actual social disadvantage affect interpretation without either individualising mistreatment or dismissing personal distress?", "What longitudinal evidence would justify describing particular responses as maintaining the inferiority pattern rather than merely accompanying it?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 9, "questions": 20 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "abstract concept", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a inferiority complex, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to record and assess a reported pattern of felt inferiority, distinguish it from nearby experiences, and identify proportionate support without treating the label as a diagnosis.", "characteristics": { "substance": "activity", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: colonial mentality, Gharbzadegi.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a inferiority complex, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "something that happens over time", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Nothing to see. What is recognised is an instance of it, and which instances count is exactly what is argued about." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "colonial mentality", "Gharbzadegi" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 61 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one inferiority complex from another, and a inferiority complex from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a inferiority complex sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a inferiority complex from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a inferiority complex passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a inferiority complex between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a inferiority complex, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a inferiority complex is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "process-and-outcome", "name": "Process, inputs and outcome", "description": "How a inferiority complex proceeds, what it needs and what it leaves behind.", "rationale": "An activity is known by its steps and its results, and both have to be recordable while it is still running.", "layers": [ { "id": "steps-and-sequence", "name": "Steps and sequence", "description": "The steps of a inferiority complex, their order and what may run in parallel.", "findings": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions", "name": "Steps, preconditions and completion", "description": "What has to be true before each step of a inferiority complex and what marks it done.", "questions": [ { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a step of a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a step of a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "steps-and-preconditions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a step of a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-results", "name": "Inputs, resources and results", "description": "What a inferiority complex consumes and what it produces.", "findings": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs", "name": "Inputs, outputs and side effects", "description": "The resources a inferiority complex takes and the results it leaves, wanted or not.", "questions": [ { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the inputs and results of a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the inputs and results of a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "inputs-and-outputs-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the inputs and results of a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "definitions-in-contest", "name": "Definitions and who holds them", "description": "What inferiority complex is taken to mean, and by whom.", "rationale": "When a field disagrees about a concept, the disagreement is the content. A model that picks one definition silently destroys the information.", "layers": [ { "id": "competing-definitions", "name": "Competing definitions", "description": "The main readings and the traditions behind them.", "findings": [ { "id": "definition-map", "name": "Definitions and their holders", "description": "Each definition with the school or body that holds it.", "questions": [ { "id": "definition-map-q01", "text": "Which definitions of inferiority complex are in use, and which tradition or body holds each?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "definition-map-q02", "text": "What turns on the difference between them in practice?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "operationalisation", "name": "Operationalisation", "description": "How it is measured or applied when it has to be.", "findings": [ { "id": "operational-record", "name": "Measures and proxies", "description": "Instruments and indicators used to stand in for it.", "questions": [ { "id": "operational-record-q01", "text": "How is inferiority complex operationalised or measured in practice, and by what instrument?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "operational-record-q02", "text": "What does that operationalisation leave out, and when does that matter?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "instances-and-use", "name": "Instances, use and consequence", "description": "What counts as an instance of inferiority complex and what follows from calling something that.", "rationale": "Applying a concept is an act with consequences, so a model must say what the label licenses and what it does not.", "layers": [ { "id": "instances", "name": "What counts as an instance", "description": "Clear cases, borderline cases and non-cases.", "findings": [ { "id": "instance-tests", "name": "Tests for an instance", "description": "What would settle whether something falls under it.", "questions": [ { "id": "instance-tests-q01", "text": "What would settle whether something is an instance of inferiority complex?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "instance-tests-q02", "text": "Which borderline cases are argued about, and on what grounds?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "consequence", "name": "Consequence of application", "description": "Rights, duties or decisions that follow from the label.", "findings": [ { "id": "consequence-record", "name": "What the label licenses", "description": "What an agent may do once something is classified this way.", "questions": [ { "id": "consequence-record-q01", "text": "What follows practically once something is treated as inferiority complex?", "kind": "action" }, { "id": "consequence-record-q02", "text": "What must an agent not infer from the label alone?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a inferiority complex came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a inferiority complex and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a inferiority complex is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a inferiority complex, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a inferiority complex, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a inferiority complex is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }