{ "model": { "rank": 6575, "code": "thing-q329777", "model_id": "vr.tr.appeal", "name": "appeal", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise an appeal as a communicated request for support or action, assess its credibility and current status, and determine how it may be answered or circulated.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q329777/", "tier": 2, "score": 59, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Administrative Reconsideration", "administrative appeal", "administrative appeals", "appeal from the Crown Court", "interlocutory appeal", "Vejartin" ], "aliasCount": 6, "merged": 7, "knownIn": 59, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q329777", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q329777", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-09T23:03:04Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 16.1, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08868-5212-77b0-aeea-4b41fc2064d0\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: appeal\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: INF.MED\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 1001 things:\n# Batch 007: 1001 register", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 52, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.4\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a08868-521f-7230-ad76-a1797d984d5f\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: appeal\nRegistry id: vr.tr.appeal\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext fo" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q329777", "registryId": "vr.tr.appeal", "name": "appeal", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q329777/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.appeal", "name": "appeal", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise an appeal as a communicated request for support or action, assess its credibility and current status, and determine how it may be answered or circulated.", "definition": "An appeal is a communicative work addressed to an audience that requests help, support or action and presents reasons for responding.", "scope_statement": "This model provisionally owns appeal as an informational work that asks an audience to respond to a stated need, cause or concern; the INF / INF.MED placement suggests this sense, but the registry lacks a definition that confirms it.", "in_scope": [ "The appeal's stated need, intended audience and requested response", "The issuer, represented beneficiaries and authority claimed to speak for them", "Claims, evidence and persuasive framing within the appeal", "Versions, translations and distribution manifestations of the appeal", "Response routes, deadlines and communicated changes to the appeal's status" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Legal proceedings seeking review of a decision, pending confirmation of the registry sense", "Appeal as attractiveness or aesthetic preference", "The wider campaign or organisation that issues the appeal", "The underlying emergency, dispute or social condition", "Individual donations, payment processing and delivery of assistance", "General theories of persuasion and rhetorical appeals" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "A recipient can identify a response being sought, such as donating, signing, volunteering or supplying information; merely describing a need does not establish an appeal.", "The communication connects its requested response to a need, cause or concern, although whether commercial solicitations qualify remains unresolved.", "The appeal is a communicative work that may recur across letters, recordings and web pages; a carrier or individual copy is not automatically a separate appeal.", "An appeal may belong to a campaign, but its requested response and message can be identified independently of the campaign's wider activities.", "A request to a reviewing authority to overturn a decision requires disambiguation before this provisional media-oriented model is applied." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Requested response", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Donation; signature; volunteering; information; advocacy; other specified response; unclear", "why_it_matters": "Identifies the action the communication seeks and whether an agent can meaningfully help a recipient respond." }, { "name": "Issuer and represented beneficiary", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Links to issuing parties, intended beneficiaries and evidence of representation", "why_it_matters": "Separates who makes the request from who is supposed to benefit." }, { "name": "Intended audience", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named recipients, audience groups or an unrestricted public", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether the recipient is addressed and which response conditions apply." }, { "name": "Claim support", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Per claim: unchecked; supported; partly supported; disputed; contradicted; unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Keeps persuasive force separate from evidential support." }, { "name": "Response window", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Not yet open; open; expired; withdrawn; closed; unknown, with any stated dates and time zone", "why_it_matters": "Prevents presenting an obsolete request as currently actionable." }, { "name": "Requested target", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Optional stated amount and unit, such as currency, signatures, volunteers or items, with target period", "why_it_matters": "Makes the requested scale explicit without assuming every appeal has a numerical goal." }, { "name": "Appeal version lineage", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Original, revision, translation, adaptation or reproduction linked to an identified appeal", "why_it_matters": "Supports comparison of changing claims, deadlines and response instructions." } ], "affordances": [ "Extract the requested response, beneficiary, audience and deadline while preserving ambiguity.", "Check consequential claims and flag missing or conflicting support.", "Compare circulating versions for altered requests, payment destinations or deadlines.", "Locate and assess the issuer's stated response route before helping a user act.", "Summarise or translate the appeal while preserving its conditions and attribution.", "Identify expired, withdrawn or superseded appeals before recommending further circulation." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "need-and-request", "name": "Need and requested response", "description": "Connect the condition presented by the appeal to the response sought from its audience.", "rationale": "An agent must distinguish what the appeal says is needed from what it actually asks recipients to do.", "layers": [ { "id": "stated-need", "name": "Stated need", "description": "Identify the concern and intended benefit that motivate the request.", "findings": [ { "id": "need-beneficiary-link", "name": "Need and beneficiary link", "description": "Record whose situation the appeal describes and how the requested response is supposed to help, treating this connection as the issuer's claim until checked.", "questions": [ { "text": "What need or concern does this appeal present, and who is said to benefit?", "kind": "definition", "id": "need-beneficiary-link-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence supports the claimed connection between the requested response and the intended benefit?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "need-beneficiary-link-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "response-specification", "name": "Response specification", "description": "Establish what a recipient would have to do to answer the appeal.", "findings": [ { "id": "action-and-conditions", "name": "Requested action and conditions", "description": "Record the requested contribution or conduct, any target, and conditions such as eligibility, location or timing.", "questions": [ { "text": "What concrete response is requested, and which recipients are eligible or able to provide it?", "kind": "action", "id": "action-and-conditions-q01" }, { "text": "Does the appeal specify an amount, quantity or deadline, and in what units or time zone?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "action-and-conditions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "voice-and-persuasion", "name": "Voice and persuasion", "description": "Assess who is speaking, whom they represent and how they argue for a response.", "rationale": "The credibility of an appeal depends on attribution and claim support, while its emotional framing can influence recipients independently of either.", "layers": [ { "id": "issuer-authority", "name": "Issuer and authority", "description": "Separate authorship, endorsement, publication and beneficiary representation.", "findings": [ { "id": "representation-basis", "name": "Basis of representation", "description": "Record the parties behind the appeal and the evidence for any claim that they speak for its beneficiaries.", "questions": [ { "text": "Who authored, issued and endorsed the appeal, and where are those attributions documented?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "representation-basis-q01" }, { "text": "What establishes permission or authority to speak for named beneficiaries or use their testimony?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "representation-basis-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "claims-and-framing", "name": "Claims and framing", "description": "Separate checkable assertions from values, testimony and emotional persuasion.", "findings": [ { "id": "grounds-for-response", "name": "Grounds for responding", "description": "Identify the claims that materially support the request, including urgency, likely impact and any asserted consequences of inaction.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which claims about urgency, scale or expected impact have evidence that can be checked independently?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "grounds-for-response-q01" }, { "text": "Which parts express values or emotional framing rather than factual claims, and does the appeal make that distinction clear?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "grounds-for-response-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "appeal-identity-and-circulation", "name": "Appeal identity and circulation", "description": "Track the appeal across revisions, languages, formats and channels.", "rationale": "An agent must recognise repeated publication of one appeal and detect changes that affect what recipients are being asked to believe or do.", "layers": [ { "id": "work-and-version-boundaries", "name": "Work and version boundaries", "description": "Distinguish the appeal from its campaign, expressions and individual copies.", "findings": [ { "id": "request-continuity", "name": "Continuity of the request", "description": "Compare purpose, beneficiary and requested response to judge whether an item reproduces, revises or replaces an existing appeal.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this a copy, translation, revision or new appeal, and what evidence establishes that relationship?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "request-continuity-q01" }, { "text": "Have the beneficiary, requested action or central justification changed enough to require separate identification?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "request-continuity-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "distribution-integrity", "name": "Distribution integrity", "description": "Trace circulating copies to attributable versions and identify meaningful alterations.", "findings": [ { "id": "copy-origin-and-reuse", "name": "Copy origin and permitted reuse", "description": "Record where a copy came from, whether its actionable details match an attributable version, and what permissions govern further distribution.", "questions": [ { "text": "Can this copy be traced to the issuer, and do its response destination and deadline match the issuer's version?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "copy-origin-and-reuse-q01" }, { "text": "What permissions or restrictions apply to republishing, translating or adapting the appeal and its included images or testimony?", "kind": "action", "id": "copy-origin-and-reuse-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "response-and-closure", "name": "Response and closure", "description": "Determine whether and how the appeal remains actionable, and what is known about its completion.", "rationale": "A persuasive appeal can remain in circulation after its response route changes, its deadline passes or its stated need is met.", "layers": [ { "id": "response-route", "name": "Response route", "description": "Assess the route through which a recipient is asked to contribute or participate.", "findings": [ { "id": "destination-and-commitment", "name": "Destination and commitment", "description": "Identify the receiving party and the practical commitments associated with answering the appeal.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence links the response form, contact address or payment destination to the appeal's issuer or authorised recipient?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "destination-and-commitment-q01" }, { "text": "What money, information, time or continuing commitment would a response require, and what user authorisation is needed before acting?", "kind": "action", "id": "destination-and-commitment-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "status-and-results", "name": "Status and reported results", "description": "Track whether the request is still current and distinguish reported participation from demonstrated benefit.", "findings": [ { "id": "closure-and-outcome-evidence", "name": "Closure and outcome evidence", "description": "Record dated notices of extension, completion, withdrawal or replacement, together with the basis for any reported results.", "questions": [ { "text": "What dated evidence establishes whether this appeal is still open, closed, withdrawn or superseded?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "closure-and-outcome-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Do reported results measure responses received, resources delivered or benefits achieved, and how were those measures obtained?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "closure-and-outcome-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "No sense is recorded; the definition provisionally interprets appeal as a communicative work, consistent with the supplied domain and batch context.", "The registry's original description should be checked to exclude judicial review, attractiveness and rhetorical techniques as intended senses.", "The listed kinds overlap by purpose and are not a formal classification; no universal identifier scheme or appeal-specific standard is asserted." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of appeal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Fundraising appeal", "Humanitarian appeal", "Public appeal for information", "Political appeal" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of appeal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Soliciting donations for charitable work or emergency relief", "Requesting information about missing people or events", "Mobilising support for a cause", "Calling on institutions or individuals to take specified action" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of appeal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Misleading claims about the need, beneficiary or intended use of contributions", "Impersonation of legitimate organisations or beneficiaries", "Emotional manipulation that obscures relevant facts", "Disclosure of sensitive information about people featured in the appeal", "An unclear request or response mechanism that prevents the audience from acting" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of appeal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "petition", "difference": "A petition formally requests action from an authority and may collect signatures; an appeal need not use either mechanism." }, { "name": "advertisement", "difference": "An advertisement promotes an offering or message through advertising channels; an appeal is defined by its request for help, support or action." }, { "name": "open letter", "difference": "An open letter is defined by public availability despite an identified addressee; it may contain an appeal but need not." }, { "name": "judicial appeal", "difference": "A judicial appeal seeks review of a decision through a legal procedure, rather than naming a general persuasive communication." }, { "name": "appeal campaign", "difference": "A campaign coordinates activities and potentially many messages; an individual appeal is a communicative work within or outside such a campaign." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of appeal this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the registry's source identify appeal as a public request, a legal appeal, a rhetorical technique or another sense?", "Does an existing Vercy world model already own this concept, requiring a registry link instead of a separate publication?", "Should this entry include private requests and commercial solicitations, or only appeals addressed to a public audience for a cause or need?", "What changes to the beneficiary, requested response or justification distinguish a new appeal from a revision of the same work?", "Which identifiers and work-expression-manifestation conventions are appropriate for appeals across letters, broadcasts, recordings and web publications?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 13, "questions": 21 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a appeal, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise an appeal as a communicated request for support or action, assess its credibility and current status, and determine how it may be answered or circulated.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Administrative Reconsideration, administrative appeal, administrative appeals, appeal from the Crown Court, interlocutory appeal, Vejartin.", "7 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a appeal, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Administrative Reconsideration", "administrative appeal", "administrative appeals", "appeal from the Crown Court", "interlocutory appeal", "Vejartin" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 59 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 7 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one appeal from another, and a appeal from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a appeal sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a appeal from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a appeal passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a appeal between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a appeal, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a appeal is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a appeal says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a appeal contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a appeal and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of appeal a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For appeal, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of appeal exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made appeal and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to appeal, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in appeal, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a appeal came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a appeal and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a appeal is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a appeal, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a appeal, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a appeal is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }