← Back to catalogue
Research draft

language policy

vr.tr.language-policy · INF.MED

Let an agent explain language policy and its instruments, relay national and organisational policies from official sources, present debates on rights and unification with attribution, and distinguish language policy from language planning and linguistics.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain language policy and its instruments, relay national and organisational policies from official sources, present debates on rights and unification with attribution, and distinguish language policy from language planning and linguistics.

The set of decisions by states, organisations or companies about which languages are used, taught, promoted or restricted in government, education, media, courts and workplaces, including official language laws, minority language protections, standardisation and linguistic unification, the multilingual policy of the European Union, national policies such as those of Norway, Sweden and Israel, and corporate language policies; language policy is studied in sociolinguistics and is often politically contested.

What it is for: Managing language use in public and organisational life.

It can be explain instruments and kinds; relay specific policies; present debates neutrally; distinguish from related concepts.

Distinguishing features

Status, corpus and acquisition dimensions

Legal instruments

Rights dimension

Political contestation

What it looks like

Not a visible object; laws, regulations and organisational rules.

How it is recognised

Decisions about language use and status

Official languages, minority rights, education, corporate policies

Language planning is the implementation; linguistics describes languages

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

policy

is implemented by - the practical side

language planning

is studied by - the field

sociolinguistics

is governed by - in Europe

European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages

In practice

Families and kinds

official and national language laws

minority and indigenous language protections

education language policies

supranational policies such as the European Union multilingualism

national policies of Norway, Sweden, Israel and others

corporate language policies

linguistic unification and standardisation projects

Standards and regulation

National constitutions and language laws

European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages

UN declarations on minority and indigenous rights

EU regulation on official languages

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting contested policies as settled

Suppression of minority languages

Stale legal information

Confusing policy with planning

Also called

language policy of the European Unioncorporate language policylanguage policy in Israellinguistic unificationlanguage policy in Norwaylanguage policy in Swedenlanguage policy in Denmarklanguage policy in the Spanish Empirelanguage policy in Colombialanguage policy in Rwandalanguage policy in Canadalanguage policy in RussiaTelugu language policylanguage policy in Belgiumlanguage policy in modern JapanNorwegianizationlanguage policy in the Soviet Unionlinguicidelanguage policy in Finlandderussificationlanguage policy in Francelanguage policy in Ukrainelanguage policy in Kazakhstanlanguage policy in Latvialanguage policies of Canada's provinces and territorieslanguage policies of Francoist SpainLanguage law of SlovakiaJapanese script reformstate language

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What language policy is.

Definition.

Definition

Definition and dimensions.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is language policy, and what are its status, corpus and acquisition dimensions? definition
  2. Is the question about policy, planning or linguistics? boundary

Instruments

Instruments.

Instruments

Instruments.

  1. What instruments do policies use, from official status to education and media rules? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific instrument? action
Cases Policies by country and organisation.

Sources.

National

National policies.

National

National.

  1. What are the language policies of countries such as Norway, Sweden and Israel, from official sources? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the specific country? action

Organisations

EU and corporate policies.

Organisations

Organisations.

  1. How do the European Union and companies set language policy? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance
Debate Rights and debates.

Attribution.

Rights

Language rights.

Rights

Rights.

  1. What rights frameworks protect minority languages, and how are they applied, with attribution? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

Unification

Unification and standardisation.

Unification

Unification.

  1. What debates surround linguistic unification and standardisation, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Context Research and history.

Context.

Research

Research.

Research

Research.

  1. How do sociolinguists study language policy and its effects? provenance
  2. Which entry fits sociolinguistics? action

History

History.

History

History.

  1. How have language policies developed with nation-building and decolonisation, as historians describe? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the history of language policy? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should national policies be separate entries?
  • How should legal sources be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases naming specific policies and a corporate sense; should they be split off?