← Back to catalogue
Research draft

Uto-Aztecan

vr.tr.uto-aztecan · INF.MED

Let an agent explain the Uto-Aztecan family, relay classification, geography, history and revitalisation from linguistic sources with debates attributed, describe the named branches and languages, and distinguish Uto-Aztecan from Mayan, Oto-Manguean and Athabaskan families and from ethnic or political groupings.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify

Researched by: Claude

Purpose and description

Let an agent explain the Uto-Aztecan family, relay classification, geography, history and revitalisation from linguistic sources with debates attributed, describe the named branches and languages, and distinguish Uto-Aztecan from Mayan, Oto-Manguean and Athabaskan families and from ethnic or political groupings.

A family of about 30 or more indigenous languages of western North America and Mesoamerica, spoken from Oregon and Idaho to El Salvador, conventionally divided into Northern Uto-Aztecan, including Numic languages such as Shoshone and Comanche and Hopi, and Southern Uto-Aztecan, including Taracahitic and Cahitan languages such as Yaqui and Mayo, Tepiman languages such as O odham, and Nahuan languages such as Nahuatl, the language of the Aztecs and still spoken by more than 1.5 million people; the Acaxee language is extinct. The internal division into northern and southern branches is debated, and many languages are endangered.

What it is for: Classifying related indigenous languages.

It can be explain classification and branches; relay geography and history; describe named branches; relay revitalisation.

Distinguishing features

Wide geographic range

Nahuatl as largest language

Debated subgrouping

Many endangered languages

What it looks like

Not a physical object; shown on language maps.

Physical character

Nahuatl speakers: more than 1.5 million note - Mexican census, check current

range: Oregon to El Salvador note

proposed homeland debates: Great Basin or Mesoamerica note - attributed

How it is recognised

Indigenous language family of western North America and Mexico

Acaxee, Nahuan, Cahitan, Northern Uto-Aztecan, Southern Uto-Aztecan, Taracahitic

Mayan languages are a separate family; Oto-Manguean is another Mexican family; Athabaskan includes Navajo; ethnic groups are not languages

Related models

is a kind of - in registry terms

language family

includes -

Nahuatl

includes -

Comanche language

is contrasted with -

Mayan languages

In practice

Families and kinds

Numic languages

Hopi

Tepiman languages

Taracahitic and Cahitan languages

Nahuan languages

Standards and regulation

ISO 639 language codes

Mexican General Law of Linguistic Rights of Indigenous Peoples of 2003

Native American Languages Act of 1990

Failure modes and hazards

Presenting debated subgroups as settled

Stale speaker numbers

Treating extinct and living languages alike

Also called

AcaxeeNahuanCahitanNorthern Uto-AztecanSouthern Uto-AztecanTaracahiticPochutla NahuatlCazcanCoracholTubarOpata-EudevePimanZacatlán-Ahuacatlán-Tepetzintla NahuatlPochutecSoutheastern Puebla NahuatlCentral Puebla Nahuatl

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions.

Understand What Uto-Aztecan is.

Attribution.

Definition

Definition.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is the Uto-Aztecan family, and how does it differ from Mayan, Oto-Manguean and Athabaskan families? definition
  2. Is the question about a specific language, classification or revitalisation? boundary

Branches

Named branches.

Branches

Branches.

  1. What are Northern and Southern Uto-Aztecan, Nahuan, Cahitan and Taracahitic groups, and what was Acaxee? definition
  2. Which entry fits the specific branch? action
Linguistics Classification.

Attribution.

Subgrouping

Subgrouping debates.

Subgrouping

Subgrouping.

  1. What do linguists argue about the north-south division, with positions attributed? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance

Homeland

Homeland debate.

Homeland

Homeland.

  1. What hypotheses exist about the Uto-Aztecan homeland and maize spread? provenance
  2. Which sources are cited? provenance
Languages Languages today.

Regulation.

Nahuatl

Nahuatl.

Nahuatl

Nahuatl.

  1. How is Nahuatl spoken and taught today? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Nahuatl? action

Revitalisation

Revitalisation.

Revitalisation

Revitalisation.

  1. What revitalisation work exists for Hopi, Comanche and other languages? provenance
  2. Is the information current? boundary
Context History.

Context.

Aztec

Classical Nahuatl.

Aztec

Aztec.

  1. How was Classical Nahuatl written and documented after the Spanish conquest? provenance
  2. Which entry fits Classical Nahuatl? action

Code talkers

Comanche code talkers.

Code talkers

Code talkers.

  1. How did Comanche code talkers serve in the Second World War? provenance
  2. Which entry fits code talker? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Should the Northern and Southern branches be treated as valid subgroups or areal groupings?
  • How should Glottolog and Ethnologue data be linked?
  • Should Acaxee be a separate entry?