{ "model": { "rank": 1463, "code": "thing-q34749", "model_id": "vr.tr.social-science", "name": "social science", "purpose": "Let an agent handle the social sciences as a family of disciplines with methods and evidence standards, and locate questions within the right discipline.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q34749/", "tier": 2, "score": 145, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "cognitive elite fraudster", "public health nutrition", "intersectionality", "Mythical norm", "patent law", "European patent law", "patent law of the European Union", "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sciences", "Pacific Peoples sciences", "educational sciences", "premilitary instruction", "social data science", "transport law", "jurisprudence", "educational psychosociology", "leadership studies", "geromics", "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture, language and history", "Māori media, film, animation and photography", "Māori religion and religious studies", "Māori peoples, society and community", "geography of crime", "reproductive studies", "Christian studies", "indigenous studies", "railway law", "law and economics", "public health", "family science", "gerontology", "Relationship science", "criminal justice", "socio-economic geography and spatial management", "communication science", "history and philosophy of the social sciences", "commerce, management, tourism and services", "organization and management", "welfare studies", "rural social sciences", "communication studies" ], "aliasCount": 285, "merged": 287, "knownIn": 145, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.social-science", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q34749", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q34749", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T05:35:33Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 1, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q34749", "registryId": "vr.tr.social-science", "name": "social science", "version": "0.2.0-wave.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q34749/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.social-science", "name": "social science", "purpose": "Let an agent handle the social sciences as a family of disciplines with methods and evidence standards, and locate questions within the right discipline.", "definition": "The group of academic disciplines that study human society and social relationships, such as sociology, economics, political science, anthropology, psychology, law and geography.", "what_it_is_for": "Understanding societies and informing policy.", "affordances": [ "research and teach it", "inform policy with evidence", "survey and analyse populations", "evaluate programmes" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Studies society and social relations", "Uses quantitative and qualitative methods", "Evidence is often contested and context-bound", "Overlaps with humanities and natural sciences" ], "appearance": "Departments, journals, surveys, datasets and reports.", "visual_identification": [ "Discipline labels and journals", "Survey and administrative data", "Interdisciplinary fields such as public health nutrition" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "sociology", "economics", "political science", "anthropology", "social psychology", "law and legal studies", "human geography" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "has kind", "target": "economics and psychology", "why": "disciplines" }, { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "science", "why": "field" }, { "relation": "studies", "target": "society", "why": "subject" }, { "relation": "informs", "target": "government and policy", "why": "use" } ], "identifiers": [ { "scheme": "field classification", "value_or_pattern": "OECD FORD 5 Social sciences", "note": "research classification" } ], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Research ethics for human participants", "Official statistics codes of practice", "Data protection law" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Overgeneralising from small or biased samples", "Ideological framing presented as findings", "Replication problems" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "discipline", "name": "Discipline", "description": "Which field.", "rationale": "Discipline locates questions.", "layers": [ { "id": "field", "name": "Field", "description": "Sociology, economics, etc.", "findings": [ { "id": "field-finding", "name": "Field", "description": "The discipline.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which social science discipline addresses this question?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Which neighbouring fields are relevant?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "approach", "name": "Approach", "description": "Theoretical approach.", "findings": [ { "id": "approach-finding", "name": "Approach", "description": "Theoretical perspective.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which theoretical approach is used?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "What alternatives exist?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "methods", "name": "Methods", "description": "How evidence is produced.", "rationale": "Methods decide what can be concluded.", "layers": [ { "id": "data", "name": "Data", "description": "Surveys, interviews, records.", "findings": [ { "id": "data-finding", "name": "Data", "description": "Data sources.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which data were used, and how representative are they?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "How were participants protected?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "analysis", "name": "Analysis", "description": "Quantitative or qualitative.", "findings": [ { "id": "analysis-finding", "name": "Analysis", "description": "Analytic method.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which analytic methods were used?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Do they support causal claims?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "findings", "name": "Findings", "description": "What is known.", "rationale": "Findings vary in strength and context.", "layers": [ { "id": "strength", "name": "Strength", "description": "Replication.", "findings": [ { "id": "strength-finding", "name": "Strength", "description": "Robustness of findings.", "questions": [ { "text": "How robust and replicated is the finding?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "text": "In which contexts does it hold?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "debate", "name": "Debate", "description": "Contestation.", "findings": [ { "id": "debate-finding", "name": "Debate", "description": "Scholarly debate.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where do scholars disagree?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "How should both sides be represented?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "use", "name": "Use", "description": "Policy and practice.", "rationale": "Social science informs decisions.", "layers": [ { "id": "policy", "name": "Policy", "description": "Evidence for policy.", "findings": [ { "id": "policy-finding", "name": "Policy", "description": "Policy relevance.", "questions": [ { "text": "How is this evidence used in policy?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "What caveats apply?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "ethics", "name": "Ethics", "description": "Human participants.", "findings": [ { "id": "ethics-finding", "name": "Ethics", "description": "Ethical safeguards.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which ethics approvals were needed?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is personal data protected?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should disciplines be separate entries?", "How should agents present contested social science findings?", "The registry entry has merged aliases such as patent law; should they be split off?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a social science, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent handle the social sciences as a family of disciplines with methods and evidence standards, and locate questions within the right discipline.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: cognitive elite fraudster, public health nutrition, intersectionality, Mythical norm, patent law, European patent law, patent law of the European Union, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sciences, Pacific Peoples sciences, educational sciences, premilitary instruction, social data science.", "287 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 145 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a social science, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "cognitive elite fraudster", "public health nutrition", "intersectionality", "Mythical norm", "patent law", "European patent law", "patent law of the European Union", "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sciences", "Pacific Peoples sciences", "educational sciences", "premilitary instruction", "social data science" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 145 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 287 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one social science from another, and a social science from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a social science sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a social science from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a social science passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a social science between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a social science, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a social science is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a social science says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a social science contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a social science and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What social science studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does social science take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does social science establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where social science is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark social science as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place social science, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a social science came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a social science and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a social science is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a social science, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a social science, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a social science is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }