← Back to catalogue
Published

will

vr.tr.will · thing-q364340

Let an agent explain will as volition and decision capacity, present philosophical, psychological, legal and religious treatments with attribution, keep the sense distinct from the testamentary will, and route questions about legal capacity to lawyers and clinicians.

Thing Registry Cross-cutting context XCT.STA

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

4 bundles · 8 layers · 8 findings · 16 questions

Concept What will means.

Definition

Definition and senses.

Definition

Definition.

  1. What is will as volition, and how does it differ from desire, intention and the testamentary will? definition
  2. Is the question about volition or about a testamentary will? boundary

Degrees

Degrees of will.

Degrees

Degrees.

  1. How do velleity, resolve and commitment differ as degrees of will? definition
  2. Which entry fits intention? action
Philosophy Philosophy.

Free will

Free will debates.

Freewill

Freewill.

  1. What positions exist on free will, from libertarian to compatibilist and hard determinist, with attribution? provenance
  2. Is the presentation neutral? boundary

History

History of the concept.

History

History.

  1. How did Augustine, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche and others treat the will? provenance
  2. Which references are standard? provenance
Mind Psychology and law.

Psychology

Willpower and self-control.

Psychology

Psychology.

  1. What does research say about self-control and decision-making, with findings attributed? provenance
  2. Which entry fits self-control? action

Capacity

Legal capacity.

Capacity

Capacity.

  1. How do laws define decision-making capacity and valid declarations of will, in general terms? provenance
  2. Is the user asking about a specific person capacity, which needs a lawyer or clinician? boundary
Culture Religion and culture.

Religion

Religious concepts.

Religion

Religion.

  1. How do traditions such as Hindu sankalpa and Christian theology treat the will, with attribution? provenance
  2. Is the presentation respectful? boundary

Language

Language.

Language

Language.

  1. How is the concept expressed across languages, and where do senses diverge? provenance
  2. Which entry fits the other sense? action

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Cross-cutting context
Entry kind
thing
Plane
XCT
Domain
XCT.STA
Other names and narrower kinds
declaration of will, necessary capacity, decision-making ability, velleity, Sankalpa, cognitive faculty

What it is Filled

In the sense recorded here, the faculty or capacity by which a person decides and initiates action, also called volition, together with the state of having decided, as in a declaration of will; will is discussed in philosophy as the seat of choice and the subject of debates about free will, in psychology as self-control and decision-making ability, in law as the capacity required for valid acts, and in religious traditions such as the Hindu concept of sankalpa. The testamentary will, a document disposing of property at death, is a different sense.

Why it exists Filled

Let an agent explain will as volition and decision capacity, present philosophical, psychological, legal and religious treatments with attribution, keep the sense distinct from the testamentary will, and route questions about legal capacity to lawyers and clinicians.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Volition and decision
  • Subject of free will debates
  • Legal capacity concept
  • Homonym with the testamentary will

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Act against a person's clearly expressed will on matters that are theirs to decide.
  • Manipulate a person's choices by exploiting weakness or bias.
  • Treat a person as lacking will or capacity without a proper assessment.
  • Confuse will as volition with a testamentary will in legal advice.

Only with a human decision

  • Acting on behalf of a person whose capacity to decide is in doubt.

May

  • Explain will as volition and its treatment in philosophy, psychology and law.
  • Ask for and respect a person's declared choice before acting for them.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Respect for a person's will is the basis of consent and autonomy.
  • Persuasive systems can steer choices people believe are their own.

Who is affected

  • People making decisions
  • People with impaired capacity

Owners Filled

Steward

Nobody: a faculty of each person; courts and guardians act only where law provides.

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q706622 - registry parent class

related

  • intention - in registry terms
  • cognitive faculty - a mental capacity
  • free will - the philosophical problem
  • testament - the legal document sense

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.will
  • Wikidata: Q364340 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q364340)

Direct properties not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

Plane XCT: no invented physical properties.

Recognition optional Filled

  • Faculty of deciding and initiating action
  • Studied in philosophy, psychology, law and religion
  • A testamentary will is a legal document, a separate sense
  • Not a visible object; expressed in decisions and actions.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • explain the concept and its senses
  • present philosophical debates with attribution
  • relay psychological and legal concepts in general terms
  • keep senses distinct

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Confusing volition with the testamentary will
  • Presenting free will debates as settled
  • Agents assessing personal legal capacity

Standards and interfaces required Filled

  • Mental capacity laws defining decision-making ability
  • Civil law rules on declarations of will and consent

Context of use required Filled

  • Not applicable; a mental faculty and state.
  • will as volition in philosophy
  • free will and determinism debates
  • willpower and self-control in psychology
  • decision-making capacity in law and medicine
  • declaration of will in civil law
  • weak forms such as velleity
  • sankalpa and other religious concepts of resolve

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q364340: will - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Will (philosophy) - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Should free will and mental capacity be the primary linked entries?
  • How should philosophical references be linked?
  • The registry entry has merged aliases from law, psychology and religion; should they be split off?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q364340/spec.json