{ "model": { "rank": 3708, "code": "thing-q3733836", "model_id": "vr.tr.apricot", "name": "apricot", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise an apricot plant, assess its development and growing conditions, and choose appropriate care, propagation or harvest actions while distinguishing the organism from its fruit.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Physical world and living systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "PHY", "domain": "PHY.MAT", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q3733836/", "tier": 2, "score": 82, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "Isfarak", "Mohtobi" ], "aliasCount": 2, "merged": 2, "knownIn": 82, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.apricot-food", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q3733836", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3733836", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:56:58Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "breadth": "recalled by Codex without web access - no source was read", "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "seconds": 30.6, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c5e-0b28-7502-9466-61980818e431\n--------\nuser\nDescribe what is already known about one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: apricot\nSense to describe: (none recorded)\nDomain code: PHY.LIV\nAlso known as: (none)\n\n\nContext for this batch of 801 things:\n# Batch 004: 1001 register", "usd": 0, "recall": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 87.2, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c5e-0bf1-7762-9abb-178954b2a4da\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: apricot\nRegistry id: vr.tr.apricot\nPlane / domain: PHY / PHY.LIV\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\n\nContext " } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q3733836", "registryId": "vr.tr.apricot", "name": "apricot", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "PHY.LIV" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q3733836/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.apricot", "name": "apricot", "purpose": "Enable an agent to recognise an apricot plant, assess its development and growing conditions, and choose appropriate care, propagation or harvest actions while distinguishing the organism from its fruit.", "definition": "Apricot here denotes Prunus armeniaca L. (1753), a deciduous fruit-tree species in the rose family Rosaceae, cultivated for its edible drupes, rather than the harvested fruit alone.", "scope_statement": "This model owns apricot as a living plant under registry entry vr.tr.apricot, provisionally centred on Prunus armeniaca; it distinguishes taxon, cultivar, population and individual plant, and treats attached fruit as a developmental structure rather than a separate food product.", "in_scope": [ "Apricot identity, taxonomic evidence and cultivar attribution", "Individual plant identity, including scion and rootstock where grafted", "Life stages, seasonal dormancy, flowering and fruit development", "Growing conditions, reproductive compatibility and plant health", "Propagation, care and readiness to harvest attached fruit" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Detached apricots as food, including storage, grading and processing", "Apricot kernels, kernel oil and their consumption or toxicological assessment", "Peaches, plums and interspecific hybrids as independently identified plants", "Orchard businesses, land ownership and agricultural machinery", "General soil, weather and pathogen models beyond their relations to an apricot plant" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Require evidence connecting the plant to an apricot taxon or documented cultivar; an orange stone fruit alone does not establish identity.", "Use the combination of leaves, flowers, fruit surface, fruit seam and stone morphology to distinguish apricot from peach and plum; record which structures were actually examined.", "Separate a living apricot plant from a detached fruit sold as an apricot by recording the entity being observed and whether the fruit remains attached.", "Distinguish a named cultivar propagated vegetatively from a seedling descended from that cultivar; parentage alone does not establish cultivar identity.", "Check for grafting and hybrid ancestry before assigning the same identity to roots, canopy and root suckers." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Entity level", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "taxon | cultivar | population | individual plant", "why_it_matters": "Prevents species-level range or conservation claims from being mistaken for observations about an individual tree." }, { "name": "Taxonomic identification", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "accepted name, authority, taxonomic reference, identifier and identification confidence", "why_it_matters": "Anchors the meaning of apricot and exposes unresolved species or hybrid assignments." }, { "name": "Cultivar and propagation origin", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "documented cultivar | uncertain cultivar | seedling; grafted | own-root | unknown", "why_it_matters": "Supports expectations about fruit traits, reproduction and whether propagation preserves cultivar identity." }, { "name": "Scion-rootstock relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "scion identity, rootstock identity, graft location and evidence", "why_it_matters": "Allows canopy behaviour, root responses and suckers to be attributed to the correct plant component." }, { "name": "Seasonal developmental stage", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "dormant | bud swelling | flowering | fruit set | fruit enlargement | ripening | postharvest | leaf fall", "why_it_matters": "Makes care and risk assessment depend on the observed stage rather than a fixed calendar." }, { "name": "Winter chilling and subsequent warmth", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "chill accumulation and heat accumulation, each with named calculation model and observation interval", "why_it_matters": "Supports investigation of bud development and flowering without treating different chill metrics as interchangeable." }, { "name": "Cold exposure at vulnerable stages", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "minimum temperature in °C, duration in hours and observed bud, flower or fruit stage", "why_it_matters": "Connects cold exposure to the structures actually at risk and to subsequent damage checks." }, { "name": "Pollination relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "cultivar compatibility evidence, flowering overlap, nearby pollen sources and observed pollinator activity", "why_it_matters": "Helps explain fruit set without assuming all apricot cultivars have identical pollination requirements." }, { "name": "Root-zone condition", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "moisture observation, drainage condition, measurement method and duration", "why_it_matters": "Distinguishes water shortage from prolonged saturation when assessing decline or irrigation needs." }, { "name": "Attached fruit maturity", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "cultivar-referenced colour, firmness, sampling date and intended harvest use", "why_it_matters": "Supports harvest decisions without equating surface colour alone with readiness." } ], "affordances": [ "Identify and label an apricot plant while preserving uncertainty about cultivar or ancestry.", "Compare a site's seasonal conditions with documented requirements of the proposed cultivar and rootstock.", "Monitor buds, flowers and developing fruit to investigate frost injury or poor fruit set.", "Plan stage-appropriate watering, pruning and crop-load management using local guidance.", "Select propagation material with recorded identity and health provenance.", "Assess attached fruit for harvest and transfer harvested material to a food-product model." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "apricot-identity", "name": "Apricot identity", "description": "Establishes which apricot entity is represented and the evidence supporting its name.", "rationale": "The common name can refer to a plant, a fruit or plants with uncertain cultivar and hybrid identities.", "layers": [ { "id": "taxon-and-common-name", "name": "Taxon and common name", "description": "Resolves the registry label against botanical identity.", "findings": [ { "id": "supported-apricot-identification", "name": "Supported apricot identification", "description": "Record the proposed taxon, identifying observations and reference used; retain unresolved alternatives.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this registry entry mean Prunus armeniaca specifically or a broader set of plants called apricot?", "kind": "definition", "id": "supported-apricot-identification-q01" }, { "text": "Which examined leaves, flowers, fruits or stones and which identification reference support the assignment?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "supported-apricot-identification-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "individual-and-cultivar", "name": "Individual and cultivar", "description": "Separates botanical identity from cultivar labels and graft composition.", "findings": [ { "id": "cultivar-and-graft-provenance", "name": "Cultivar and graft provenance", "description": "Represent a cultivar label as an evidenced attribution and identify scion and rootstock separately where applicable.", "questions": [ { "text": "What nursery, accession or propagation record supports the cultivar name?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "cultivar-and-graft-provenance-q01" }, { "text": "Is the observed shoot part of the apricot scion, an own-root plant or a rootstock sucker?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cultivar-and-graft-provenance-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "seasonal-development", "name": "Seasonal development", "description": "Tracks establishment, dormancy and the progression from buds to fruit.", "rationale": "An apricot plant's condition and available actions depend strongly on developmental stage and seasonal timing.", "layers": [ { "id": "establishment-and-dormancy", "name": "Establishment and dormancy", "description": "Records establishment history and winter-to-spring development.", "findings": [ { "id": "developmental-readiness", "name": "Developmental readiness", "description": "Distinguish a newly established or juvenile plant from an established reproductive plant, and track bud development against measured seasonal conditions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What planting, propagation and prior flowering records establish the plant's developmental history?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "developmental-readiness-q01" }, { "text": "What bud stages and chill accumulation were observed, using which dates and chill model?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "developmental-readiness-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "flowering-and-fruit-set", "name": "Flowering and fruit set", "description": "Connects flowering, pollen availability and retained young fruit.", "findings": [ { "id": "reproductive-sequence", "name": "Reproductive sequence", "description": "Record flowering overlap, pollination evidence and fruit retention separately so poor set does not imply a single unverified cause.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence establishes this cultivar's pollination requirements and the availability of compatible flowers at the same time?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "reproductive-sequence-q01" }, { "text": "How many sampled flowers produced retained fruit, and when was retention assessed?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "reproductive-sequence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "site-and-environment", "name": "Site and environment", "description": "Relates the apricot plant to its geographic setting, seasonal temperatures and root zone.", "rationale": "Planting suitability requires cultivar- and site-specific evidence, while occurrence records must distinguish native, cultivated and escaped plants.", "layers": [ { "id": "geographic-and-population-context", "name": "Geographic and population context", "description": "Separates where a plant occurs from claims about native range and conservation.", "findings": [ { "id": "occurrence-origin", "name": "Occurrence origin", "description": "Record location and evidence of planting or spontaneous establishment without inferring native status from presence.", "questions": [ { "text": "Is this occurrence planted, escaped, naturalised or considered wild, and what evidence supports that classification?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "occurrence-origin-q01" }, { "text": "Does a cited range or conservation assessment apply to this taxon and population rather than to cultivated apricots generally?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "occurrence-origin-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "temperature-and-root-zone", "name": "Temperature and root zone", "description": "Records environmental exposures relevant to buds, flowers and roots.", "findings": [ { "id": "site-exposure-and-response", "name": "Site exposure and response", "description": "Pair temperature and soil-water observations with plant stage and observed response before judging site suitability.", "questions": [ { "text": "What minimum temperatures and exposure durations coincided with bud opening, flowering or young fruit development?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "site-exposure-and-response-q01" }, { "text": "What drainage and moisture observations support changing irrigation or the planting location?", "kind": "action", "id": "site-exposure-and-response-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "health-and-cultivation", "name": "Health and cultivation", "description": "Supports evidence-based investigation of decline and management of the growing plant.", "rationale": "Apricot symptoms must be interpreted by affected structure, graft context and season before interventions are selected.", "layers": [ { "id": "symptoms-and-diagnosis", "name": "Symptoms and diagnosis", "description": "Locates damage and separates observations from causal diagnoses.", "findings": [ { "id": "localised-health-evidence", "name": "Localised health evidence", "description": "Record symptoms such as gum exudation, dieback or damaged fruit as observations whose causes remain to be established.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which tissues show symptoms, when did symptoms begin, and are they above or below the graft?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "localised-health-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "What examination or diagnostic evidence distinguishes infection, pests, physical injury and environmental stress?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "localised-health-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "canopy-and-propagation-management", "name": "Canopy and propagation management", "description": "Links pruning, crop-load decisions and propagation to plant identity and condition.", "findings": [ { "id": "justified-cultivation-action", "name": "Justified cultivation action", "description": "Specify an intervention's purpose, seasonal basis and expected result, including whether propagated offspring must preserve cultivar identity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What canopy structure, fruit load and local seasonal guidance justify the proposed pruning or thinning action?", "kind": "action", "id": "justified-cultivation-action-q01" }, { "text": "Must propagation preserve the named cultivar, and what source-material identity and health evidence are required?", "kind": "action", "id": "justified-cultivation-action-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "fruit-development-and-harvest", "name": "Fruit development and harvest", "description": "Tracks attached apricots through maturity and defines the handoff at harvest.", "rationale": "Fruit provides evidence about the plant and supports harvest decisions, but harvested food has a separate lifecycle.", "layers": [ { "id": "attached-fruit-assessment", "name": "Attached fruit assessment", "description": "Assesses maturity and defects in relation to cultivar and intended use.", "findings": [ { "id": "harvest-readiness-evidence", "name": "Harvest readiness evidence", "description": "Combine cultivar-referenced maturity observations and sampling across the canopy rather than relying on colour alone.", "questions": [ { "text": "What colour, firmness and other documented maturity indicators were measured, and which cultivar-specific reference interprets them?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "harvest-readiness-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "Does the sampled fruit meet the harvest criteria for the intended use, and how variable is maturity across the plant?", "kind": "action", "id": "harvest-readiness-evidence-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "harvest-handoff", "name": "Harvest handoff", "description": "Preserves plant provenance when attached fruit becomes a harvested lot.", "findings": [ { "id": "plant-to-product-boundary", "name": "Plant-to-product boundary", "description": "Keep harvest effects and yield with the plant while linking detached fruit to a separate product record.", "questions": [ { "text": "At which recorded harvest event does the fruit leave this organism model and enter a harvested-food model?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "plant-to-product-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Which plant or plot, cultivar attribution and harvest date identify the resulting fruit lot?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "plant-to-product-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes", "name": "Check these first", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "The organism sense is inferred from PHY.LIV; the registry supplies no explicit sense.", "Native-range boundaries and domestication history require checking because ancient cultivation and naturalisation complicate their reconstruction.", "GBIF and NCBI identifiers, current IUCN status and assessment year, and the current UNECE standard edition have not been verified." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-confidence-notes-q01", "text": "Which of these check these first hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Blenheim cultivar", "Moorpark cultivar", "Tilton cultivar" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Botanical nomenclature", "value_or_pattern": "Prunus armeniaca L.", "note": "Species name attributed to Linnaeus, published in 1753." }, { "scheme": "GBIF taxon key", "value_or_pattern": "Numeric taxon identifier", "note": "The exact identifier and accepted taxonomic treatment require verification." }, { "scheme": "NCBI Taxonomy", "value_or_pattern": "Numeric TaxID", "note": "The exact identifier is not supplied from recall." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, adopted through International Botanical Congresses, governs the scientific name.", "UNECE Standard FFV-02, issued by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, addresses commercial quality of fresh apricots." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Orchard cultivation for fresh fruit.", "Production of dried fruit, preserves, canned fruit and juice.", "Breeding for fruit quality, flowering time and disease resistance." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Mature tree height", "typical_range": "Approximately 3-10, depending on rootstock, pruning and growing conditions", "unit": "m" }, { "quantity": "Fruit diameter", "typical_range": "Approximately 3-6, with substantial cultivar variation", "unit": "cm" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Early flowering exposes blossoms and developing fruit to spring frost.", "Inadequate winter chilling can disrupt bud break and flowering.", "Brown rot caused by Monilinia fungi can damage blossoms and fruit.", "Waterlogged soil can cause root injury and favour root diseases.", "Kernels contain cyanogenic compounds and can cause cyanide poisoning if consumed." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ "Cultivars differ in chilling requirements and flowering time, affecting suitability for different climates.", "Central Asian apricot diversity includes forms selected for drying and kernel characteristics.", "The common name can also cover related cultivated Prunus species; regional usage does not always identify P. armeniaca precisely." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Apricot fruit", "difference": "The fruit is a reproductive organ harvested from the tree; the species includes whole organisms across their life stages." }, { "name": "Japanese apricot", "difference": "Prunus mume is a distinct species, despite sharing the common-name element 'apricot'." }, { "name": "Peach", "difference": "Prunus persica is a separate species; its leaves are typically narrower and its stone more deeply sculptured." }, { "name": "Apricot cultivar", "difference": "A cultivar is a selected cultivated form within the crop, not the species as a whole." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of apricot this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Does the source registry intend the apricot plant, the edible fruit or a broader common-name concept, and does an existing world model already own that scope?", "Which accepted taxonomic treatment, binomial authority and publication date, GBIF identifier and NCBI taxonomy identifier should anchor this entry?", "How should the model delimit other apricot-named species and interspecific hybrids without creating unsupported registry splits?", "What native-range evidence and current IUCN assessment, including assessment year and assessed taxon, apply to the resolved scope?", "Which authoritative regional and cultivar-specific sources establish chilling requirements, pollination compatibility, health-management practices and harvest criteria?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 11, "findings": 19, "questions": 29 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "chemical substance or material", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a apricot, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an agent to recognise an apricot plant, assess its development and growing conditions, and choose appropriate care, propagation or harvest actions while distinguishing the organism from its fruit.", "characteristics": { "substance": "material", "origin": "natural", "agency": "inert", "mobility": "varies" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "observed and measured", "consumed or used up" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: Isfarak, Mohtobi.", "2 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 82 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a apricot, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "matter you can touch", "physicalCharacter": [ "Mobility varies between examples.", "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "observe it, measure it, record its state", "use it up, and then need more of it" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "Not recognisable by sight in any reliable way. Appearance varies with grade, form and additives; identification is by label, by documentation, or by assay." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "Isfarak", "Mohtobi" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 82 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 2 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one apricot from another, and a apricot from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a apricot sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a apricot from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "form-and-composition", "name": "Form, composition and condition", "description": "What a apricot is made of, what shape and size it takes, and what state it is in.", "rationale": "A physical thing can be measured, and a model that cannot record its measurements cannot support any decision that depends on them.", "layers": [ { "id": "form-and-dimensions", "name": "Form and dimensions", "description": "Shape, size, mass and the ranges these take across examples.", "findings": [ { "id": "measurable-dimensions", "name": "Measurable dimensions and their units", "description": "The quantities worth recording and the units they are recorded in.", "questions": [ { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the dimensions of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the dimensions of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "measurable-dimensions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the dimensions of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "material-and-composition", "name": "Material and composition", "description": "Materials, parts and how they are put together.", "findings": [ { "id": "parts-and-materials", "name": "Parts and materials", "description": "What a apricot is built from and which parts are replaceable.", "questions": [ { "id": "parts-and-materials-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the composition of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "parts-and-materials-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the composition of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "parts-and-materials-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the composition of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "condition-and-integrity", "name": "Condition and integrity", "description": "Wear, damage, health and the difference between working and broken.", "findings": [ { "id": "condition-assessment", "name": "Condition, damage and health", "description": "How the condition of a apricot is judged and by whom.", "questions": [ { "id": "condition-assessment-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the condition of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "condition-assessment-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the condition of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "condition-assessment-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the condition of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "place-and-movement", "name": "Place and movement", "description": "Where a apricot is, how it got there and where it may go (varies).", "rationale": "A thing that can move needs its position recorded with a time, or every later claim about it is about a place it has left.", "layers": [ { "id": "location-and-placement", "name": "Location and placement", "description": "Position, containment and the reference frame the position is given in.", "findings": [ { "id": "position-and-frame", "name": "Position, container and reference frame", "description": "Where a apricot is, and what that position is measured against.", "questions": [ { "id": "position-and-frame-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the location of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the location of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "position-and-frame-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the location of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "movement-and-transfer", "name": "Movement and transfer", "description": "How a apricot is carried, installed or relocated.", "findings": [ { "id": "movement-events", "name": "Movement events and constraints", "description": "What counts as a movement, what records it and what limits it.", "questions": [ { "id": "movement-events-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the movement of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the movement of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "movement-events-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the movement of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a apricot passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a apricot between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a apricot, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a apricot is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "use-and-operation", "name": "Use and operation", "description": "What can be done with a apricot and what it takes to do it.", "rationale": "An agent that can recognise a thing but not act on it has only half a model.", "layers": [ { "id": "intended-use", "name": "Intended use and function", "description": "What a apricot is for, and what it is used for anyway.", "findings": [ { "id": "function-and-purpose", "name": "Function, purpose and misuse", "description": "The function a apricot performs and the uses that fall outside it.", "questions": [ { "id": "function-and-purpose-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the use of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "function-and-purpose-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the use of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "function-and-purpose-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the use of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "handling-and-procedure", "name": "Handling and procedure", "description": "The steps, skills and tools involved in using a apricot.", "findings": [ { "id": "procedures-and-skills", "name": "Procedures, skills and required tools", "description": "What an agent needs before it can act on a apricot at all.", "questions": [ { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes handling a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about handling a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "procedures-and-skills-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once handling a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "supply-and-consumption", "name": "Supply and consumption", "description": "Quantities, rates and what running out means.", "findings": [ { "id": "consumption-and-stock", "name": "Consumption, stock and replenishment", "description": "How much of a apricot there is and how fast it goes.", "questions": [ { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the supply of a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the supply of a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "consumption-and-stock-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the supply of a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "composition-and-identity", "name": "Composition, grade and chemical identity", "description": "What apricot is made of and how pure the thing in hand is.", "rationale": "Grade decides what a substance may be used for, so a model that records only the name cannot support any decision about use.", "layers": [ { "id": "chemical-identity", "name": "Chemical identity", "description": "Formula, structure and the registry numbers that name it unambiguously.", "findings": [ { "id": "identity-record", "name": "Identity and registry numbers", "description": "What identifies this substance across suppliers and regulators.", "questions": [ { "id": "identity-record-q01", "text": "What formula, structure and registry identifiers name apricot unambiguously?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "identity-record-q02", "text": "Which related substances share a name in common use but not an identifier?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "grade-and-impurities", "name": "Grade, purity and impurities", "description": "The specification a batch meets and what else is in it.", "findings": [ { "id": "specification", "name": "Specification and assay", "description": "How purity is stated and measured, and which impurities matter.", "questions": [ { "id": "specification-q01", "text": "What grades of apricot exist, how is purity assayed, and which impurities are limited?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "specification-q02", "text": "Which use requires which grade, and what happens when a lower grade is substituted?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "properties-and-behaviour", "name": "Properties and behaviour", "description": "How apricot behaves under conditions an agent can measure or change.", "rationale": "Physical constants are the part of a substance model that transfers between contexts, and each needs its unit and its conditions.", "layers": [ { "id": "physical-constants", "name": "Physical constants", "description": "Values that hold for the pure substance, with their conditions.", "findings": [ { "id": "constants-record", "name": "Constants and conditions", "description": "The quantities worth recording and the state they apply in.", "questions": [ { "id": "constants-record-q01", "text": "What are the defining physical constants of apricot, in what units and under what conditions?", "kind": "measurement" }, { "id": "constants-record-q02", "text": "Which of these values change with grade or form rather than being fixed?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "stability-and-reactivity", "name": "Stability and reactivity", "description": "What it reacts with, degrades into, and how it is stored.", "findings": [ { "id": "incompatibilities", "name": "Incompatibilities and degradation", "description": "What must not meet it, and what it becomes over time.", "questions": [ { "id": "incompatibilities-q01", "text": "What is apricot incompatible with, and what does it degrade into under storage?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "incompatibilities-q02", "text": "What storage and handling does that require, and who is competent to do it?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "hazard-and-regulation", "name": "Hazard classification and regulation", "description": "How apricot can harm, and what the law says about holding and moving it.", "rationale": "A substance model without its hazard class and its regulatory identity is unusable in exactly the situations that matter.", "layers": [ { "id": "hazard-class", "name": "Hazard classification", "description": "Classified hazards, exposure limits and protective measures.", "findings": [ { "id": "classified-hazards", "name": "Classified hazards and limits", "description": "The classification, the scheme it belongs to, and the limits set.", "questions": [ { "id": "classified-hazards-q01", "text": "How is apricot classified for hazard, under which scheme, and what exposure limits apply?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classified-hazards-q02", "text": "What protection does handling require, and what must an agent refuse to do without it?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "regulatory-identity", "name": "Regulatory identity and control", "description": "Registration, restriction and transport rules by jurisdiction.", "findings": [ { "id": "controls", "name": "Controls and jurisdiction", "description": "Where it is restricted and what the restriction attaches to.", "questions": [ { "id": "controls-q01", "text": "Which registrations, restrictions or transport rules cover apricot, and where?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "controls-q02", "text": "Does the control attach to the substance, its concentration, or its intended use?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a apricot came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a apricot and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a apricot is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a apricot, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a apricot, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a apricot is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 9, "layers": 20, "findings": 22, "questions": 60 } } } }