← Back to catalogue
Published

Organ of Tömösváry

vr.tr.organ-of-t-m-sv-ry · thing-q3755529

Enable an agent to recognize an organ of Tömösváry, document its anatomical condition, and evaluate sensory-function claims without confusing it with neighbouring head structures.

Thing Registry Physical world and living systems PHY.OBJ

Bundle → Layer → Finding → Questions Filled

5 bundles · 9 layers · 11 findings · 19 questions

Organ identity and boundaries Determine whether a reported head structure belongs to this registered organ concept.

Anatomical recognition

Locate the candidate in the head and establish its observed boundaries.

Postantennal candidate

Record head landmarks and bilateral observations before assigning an organ identity.

  1. Where is the candidate relative to the antennal socket and other identifiable head landmarks? definition
  2. What corresponding structure is visible on the opposite side, and could damage or orientation explain a mismatch? measurement

Anatomical lookalikes

Separate the organ from nearby eyes, cuticular features and supporting articulations.

Tentorial and ocular exclusion

Require evidence that the candidate is neither an ocellus nor a head-support articulation; the latter has caused published misidentifications in Polydesmida. [Primary anatomical study](https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48438)

  1. Does internal examination connect the apparent pit to the tentorium rather than to sensory tissue? boundary
  2. Which anatomical observations distinguish this candidate from an adjacent ocellus or ordinary cuticular depression? boundary
Sensory apparatus morphology Describe the external structure and the internal evidence for a sensory apparatus.

External form and scale

Capture calibrated organ shape without conflating orientation or preparation effects with biological differences.

Rim, opening and covering

Document the observed outline, surface covering and dimensions separately for each side.

  1. What are the organ's length, width and opening dimensions in a specified viewing plane? measurement
  2. Which rim or covering features remain identifiable across views, and which may result from preparation? measurement

Internal sensory organization

Assess receptor tissue and neural connections using appropriately resolved observations.

Receptors and innervation

Separate directly observed sensory components from anatomical expectations imported from another species.

  1. What receptor cells or associated tissue are actually resolved, and by which imaging or sectioning method? provenance
  2. Has a nerve connection been traced from this organ, and where does the direct observation end? boundary
Occurrence and comparative interpretation Relate organ observations to specimens and taxa without assuming universal presence or common ancestry.

Specimen-level occurrence

Record the material examined and the strength of presence or absence evidence.

Presence versus nondetection

Keep an unsuccessful search distinct from anatomically supported absence.

  1. Which identified specimens, developmental stages and head sides were examined? provenance
  2. Was resolution and anatomical coverage sufficient to support absence rather than nondetection? measurement

Terminology and homology

Manage cross-taxon comparisons without turning shared names into proof of equivalence.

Comparative character assignment

Track the anatomical meaning of each author's terminology and the evidence supporting comparison.

  1. Does this source use temporal organ or postantennal organ for the same bounded structure modeled here? definition
  2. What evidence beyond position and naming supports homology between the compared organs? boundary
Function, condition and investigation Assess organ condition and investigate sensory roles through discriminating observations.

Modality and response

Represent candidate stimuli as testable hypotheses with organ-specific evidence requirements.

Localized sensory evidence

Evaluate proposed responses to humidity, chemical or mechanical stimuli without assigning any modality universally.

  1. Which stimulus was varied, over what range, and what response was measured directly at the organ or its nerve? measurement
  2. What controls distinguish the candidate organ's contribution from antennal, ocular or other sensory responses? boundary

Integrity and next observation

Use organ condition and the unresolved identification question to select further examination.

Interpretable organ condition

Record obstruction, injury and preparation effects before treating appearance or response as representative.

  1. Could damage, contamination, fixation or collapse explain the observed form or missing response? measurement
  2. Would additional surface imaging, internal reconstruction or physiological recording best resolve the specific uncertainty? action
Evidence and external alignment What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.

Reported evidence

Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.

Check these first

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these check these first hold for the sense of Organ of Tömösváry this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Real-world use

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Organ of Tömösváry this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart

Recalled without web access and unsourced; every item is a lead to verify.

  1. Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Organ of Tömösváry this model covers, and on what evidence? provenance

Classifiers Filled

Family
Thing Registry
Category
Physical world and living systems
Entry kind
thing
Plane
PHY
Domain
PHY.OBJ

What it is Filled

The organ of Tömösváry is a paired sensory structure on the head near the antennal bases in certain myriapods, whose function remains incompletely resolved and may differ among groups.

In scope

  • Identification of candidate organs relative to antennal bases and other head landmarks
  • External morphology, internal sensory anatomy and documented innervation
  • Presence, absence, bilateral variation and condition in identified specimens
  • Evidence supporting proposed sensory modalities
  • Taxon-specific terminology and explicit limits on homology claims

Out of scope

  • Whole-organism taxonomy, distribution and conservation assessments
  • Complete anatomy and physiology of antennae, eyes and other sensory organs
  • Head-capsule mechanics and tentorial anatomy beyond differential identification
  • Whole-animal habitat preferences and behaviour except as evidence in organ-specific experiments
  • Independent models of hexapod postantennal organs or pseudocelli whose equivalence remains disputed

Why it exists Filled

Enable an agent to recognize an organ of Tömösváry, document its anatomical condition, and evaluate sensory-function claims without confusing it with neighbouring head structures.

Distinguishing features Filled

  • Check for a discrete structure behind or near the antennal base in the position documented for the examined taxon; head position alone is insufficient for identification.
  • Examine corresponding left and right head regions because the organ is described as paired, while recording unilateral damage or incomplete visibility separately.
  • Distinguish the candidate from an ocellus using structural evidence rather than its rounded appearance or proximity to eyes.
  • Exclude a tentorial articulation: a study of four polydesmidan species identified the supposed organ as part of the head's supporting articulation. [Primary anatomical study](https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48438)
  • Require anatomical support before equating structures called temporal or postantennal organs across different arthropod groups.

What robots and AI may and may not do Filled

Must not

  • Present a proposed function as established fact.
  • Harm or kill living myriapods for observation when preserved specimens would serve.
  • Collect protected species or from protected habitats without permission.
  • Apply findings from one group of myriapods to all groups without evidence.

Only with a human decision

  • Collecting live animals for study.
  • Experiments on living animals.

May

  • Describe the organ of Tomosvary and its place on the heads of certain myriapods, citing sources.
  • State clearly that its function is not fully resolved.

Moral aspects Filled

  • Invertebrate welfare still matters in collection and experiment.
  • Overstating unresolved science misleads students and readers.

Who is affected

  • Myriapods
  • Researchers and students
  • Habitats where they are collected

Owners Filled

Steward

Nobody owns the animals in the wild; museums and laboratories answer for specimens they hold.

Master systems

  • Natural history collection catalogues
  • Species occurrence databases

Links to other meta-models Filled

parent

  • Q3355930 - registry parent class

What else AI and robots need to interact with it Filled

Identity and identifiers required Filled

  • Vercy registry: vr.tr.organ-of-t-m-sv-ry
  • Wikidata: Q3755529 (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3755529)

Direct properties required Filled

  • Bearer and anatomical occurrence: Specimen identifier, taxon identification, developmental stage and left or right side
  • Detection status: Confirmed present; provisionally identified; not detected; confirmed absent within examined material; unobservable
  • Head position: Position relative to antennal socket, head margin, nearby eyes when present and tentorial landmarks
  • External configuration: Observed outline, rim, depression, opening and surface covering, with image reference
  • Organ dimensions: Length, width and opening dimensions in µm; optional dimensionless ratio to a named head landmark
  • Sensory tissue and neural connection: Observed receptor tissue, associated nerve and traced destination; unresolved where unexamined
  • Structural integrity: Apparently intact; obstructed; deformed; damaged; preparation-altered; indeterminate
  • Functional evidence status: Untested hypothesis; anatomical inference; whole-animal association; organ-localized response; controlled causal evidence

Recognition required Filled

  • A small paired ring or pit on the head near the base of each antenna.
  • Usually needs magnification or electron microscopy to see clearly.

Capabilities and actions required Filled

  • Locate and annotate candidate organs on calibrated head images.
  • Compare left and right occurrences and flag damage, asymmetry or incomplete observation.
  • Select imaging or sectioning needed to distinguish sensory anatomy from a tentorial articulation.
  • Encode presence and morphology as taxonomic characters with explicit evidence and uncertainty.
  • Design controlled tests of candidate sensory responses while accounting for other receptors.
  • Revise identifications and functional assignments when stronger anatomical or experimental evidence becomes available.

Hazards and failure modes required Filled

  • Misidentification of the structure in specimens.
  • Unnecessary harm to animals collected for study.

Standards and interfaces not applicable Not applicable

Not applicable

No organ-specific standard, law or official classification governing this anatomical structure is applicable.

Context of use required Filled

  • The organ of Tomosvary is encountered during anatomical examination of certain myriapods and in comparative accounts of arthropod sensory structures.
  • Its presence, position and morphology can support taxonomic descriptions and comparisons between groups.
  • Research examines its possible sensory roles, but a single established function should not be assumed across all groups.

Sources Filled

  1. Wikidata item Q3755529: Organ of Tömösváry - identity and sense of the item
  2. Wikipedia: Organ of Tömösváry - general description of the item

Open questions

  • Which sensory modalities have direct organ-specific experimental support in each bearer taxon, and which remain anatomical or behavioural hypotheses?
  • Are structures called Tömösváry organs homologous across the relevant myriapod lineages, and how should proposed hexapod counterparts be related?
  • Which historical presence records require re-examination for confusion with tentorial articulations or other head structures?
  • How do organ dimensions, internal organization and visibility vary across developmental stages and moulting states?
  • What combination of external and internal characters permits reliable identification in taxa with limited anatomical documentation?

Machine files

Provenance

thing registry research (pass 2) · unreviewed

Built from: models/things/publications/thing-q3755529/spec.json