{ "model": { "rank": 17218, "code": "thing-q3769186", "model_id": "vr.tr.judgment-q3769186", "name": "judgment", "purpose": "Let an agent explain what a judgment is and how it is made, help people find and read judgments, explain enforcement and appeal in general terms, and describe specific cases neutrally, without giving legal advice.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.KNW", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q3769186/", "tier": 2, "score": 31, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "declaratory judgment", "judgement", "Court Adjudications of People's Republic of China", "final judgment", "Yeboah v. Karikari", "Embalinks Telecom Services Ltd v. Cal Bank Ltd", "Child Rights International Vrs The Attorney-General", "Living Faith World Outreach Centre & 2 Ors v. The Registrar-general &4 Ors", "Elikplim L. Agbemava Vrs Attorney General", "Mochcom Limited Vrs Cypress Investments Ltd.", "The Republic Vrs Kayode and 3 Ors", "Dr Amanda Odoi Vrs The Speaker Of Parliament", "Yamoah Vrs Yeboah", "Antwi Vrs Appiahen", "Nimfa Vrs Quaison and 2 Ors", "Food Sovereignty Vrs Attorney-General", "Tassah Vrs Adzi and 4 Ors", "Markin Vrs Speaker of Parliament and Attorney General", "Ntaadu Vrs Boakye", "Adehe Vrs Mensah and 2 Ors", "Nyamekye Vrs F.K.A Company", "Djangmah Vrs Dorkutso and Anor", "Dr Prince Obiri Korang Vrs Attorney General", "Abou-Chedid Vrs West African Company Limited and 2 Ors", "Agbale Vrs Ladzagla and 2 Ors", "Danquah Vrs Ahadzi and Anor", "Nduom and 2 Ors Vrs Bank Of Ghana and 2 Ors", "Baddoo and 3 Ors Vrs Okpeli and 5 Ors", "Allotey Vrs Electricity Company Limited", "Klu Vrs Youth Employment Agency", "Amoquandoh III and 2 Ors Vrs Mensah and 5 Ors", "Ocancey & Ors Vrs Fianko-Awuku & 3 Ors", "Anthony Asomani @ Anthony Awuah Vrs The Republic", "O’Svan Boye Limited Vrs Anagbo", "Cyril Robert Halm Vrs Multichoice Ghana limited and Anor", "Ebusuapayin Kwame Atta Vrs Ebusuapanyin Kwaku Amoesi", "Mama Adesi Company Ltd Vrs Universal Merchant Bank Ltd", "Sino Africa Development Company Ltd Vrs Royal Bell Investments Limited &Anor", "Yoo Mart Limited Vrs Standard Chartered Bank", "Gyasi Vrs Mining Building Contractors Limited" ], "aliasCount": 58, "merged": 59, "knownIn": 31, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": "vr.tr.judgment-attribute", "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q3769186", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3769186", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-11T19:59:16Z", "providers": [ "Claude" ], "breadth": "written by Claude from model knowledge without web access - no source was read, every claim is a lead to verify", "pass": 2, "wave": 2, "engine": "claude" }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q3769186", "registryId": "vr.tr.judgment-q3769186", "name": "judgment", "version": "0.2.0-wave.2", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.KNW" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q3769186/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.judgment-q3769186", "name": "judgment", "purpose": "Let an agent explain what a judgment is and how it is made, help people find and read judgments, explain enforcement and appeal in general terms, and describe specific cases neutrally, without giving legal advice.", "definition": "The formal decision of a court on the matters before it, resolving the rights and liabilities of the parties in civil cases or determining guilt in criminal cases, including final, interim and declaratory judgments, with written reasons in many systems; judgments are enforceable, appealable and, in common law systems, sources of precedent.", "what_it_is_for": "Resolving disputes and cases through courts.", "affordances": [ "explain types of judgment", "find and read published judgments", "explain enforcement and appeals in general terms", "describe specific judgments neutrally" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Court decision", "Binding on the parties", "Appealable", "Precedential in some systems" ], "appearance": "Not physical; written decisions and court orders.", "visual_identification": [ "Decision of a court", "Reasons and orders", "A settlement is agreed by the parties, not decided by a court" ], "physical_properties": [], "families_and_kinds": [ "final judgments", "interim and interlocutory judgments", "declaratory judgments", "default and summary judgments", "appellate judgments" ], "related_models": [ { "relation": "is a kind of", "target": "court decision", "why": "category" }, { "relation": "includes", "target": "sentence", "why": "criminal penalty" }, { "relation": "is a", "target": "sources of law", "why": "case law" }, { "relation": "is issued by", "target": "court", "why": "authority" } ], "identifiers": [], "standards_and_regulation": [ "Civil and criminal procedure rules", "Rules on publication and anonymisation of judgments", "Enforcement and appeal rules" ], "failure_modes_and_hazards": [ "Agents giving legal advice", "Misreading judgments", "Naming private individuals without care" ], "in_scope": [], "out_of_scope": [], "characteristics": [] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "understand", "name": "Understand", "description": "What a judgment is.", "rationale": "Types and structure.", "layers": [ { "id": "types", "name": "Types", "description": "Kinds of judgment.", "findings": [ { "id": "types-finding", "name": "Types", "description": "Types.", "questions": [ { "text": "What kind of judgment is this, and what does it decide?", "kind": "definition" }, { "text": "Is it final or interim?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "reading", "name": "Reading", "description": "Reading a judgment.", "findings": [ { "id": "reading-finding", "name": "Reading", "description": "Reading.", "questions": [ { "text": "How is a judgment structured, and how can its reasoning and orders be identified?", "kind": "action" }, { "text": "What is the ratio in a precedent system?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "find", "name": "Find", "description": "Locating judgments.", "rationale": "Databases.", "layers": [ { "id": "search", "name": "Search", "description": "Case law databases.", "findings": [ { "id": "search-finding", "name": "Search", "description": "Search.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where can this judgment be found, in official or free case law databases?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "How is it cited?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] }, { "id": "privacy", "name": "Privacy", "description": "Anonymisation.", "findings": [ { "id": "privacy-finding", "name": "Privacy", "description": "Privacy.", "questions": [ { "text": "Are parties anonymised, and how should private individuals in judgments be referred to?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "text": "Which publication rules apply?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "after", "name": "After", "description": "Enforcement and appeal.", "rationale": "General information.", "layers": [ { "id": "enforce", "name": "Enforce", "description": "Enforcing a judgment.", "findings": [ { "id": "enforce-finding", "name": "Enforce", "description": "Enforcement.", "questions": [ { "text": "How can a judgment be enforced here, in general terms?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Is the user asking for legal advice on their own case?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "appeal", "name": "Appeal", "description": "Appeals.", "findings": [ { "id": "appeal-finding", "name": "Appeal", "description": "Appeals.", "questions": [ { "text": "How and within what time can a judgment be appealed?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Where can legal help be found?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "cases", "name": "Cases", "description": "Specific judgments.", "rationale": "Neutral description.", "layers": [ { "id": "describe", "name": "Describe", "description": "Describing a case.", "findings": [ { "id": "describe-finding", "name": "Describe", "description": "Describing a case.", "questions": [ { "text": "What did the court decide in this case, according to the judgment itself?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Are commentary and criticism attributed?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "significance", "name": "Significance", "description": "Precedent and impact.", "findings": [ { "id": "significance-finding", "name": "Significance", "description": "Significance.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is the significance of this judgment as precedent or policy?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "text": "Has it been followed or overruled?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Should each judgment type be a separate entry?", "How should case law databases be linked?", "How should enforcement rules be localised?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 4, "layers": 8, "findings": 8, "questions": 16 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "discipline or field of knowledge", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a judgment, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Let an agent explain what a judgment is and how it is made, help people find and read judgments, explain enforcement and appeal in general terms, and describe specific cases neutrally, without giving legal advice.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: declaratory judgment, judgement, Court Adjudications of People's Republic of China, final judgment, Yeboah v. Karikari, Embalinks Telecom Services Ltd v. Cal Bank Ltd, Child Rights International Vrs The Attorney-General, Living Faith World Outreach Centre & 2 Ors v. The Registrar-general &4 Ors, Elikplim L. Agbemava Vrs Attorney General, Mochcom Limited Vrs Cypress Investments Ltd., The Republic Vrs Kayode and 3 Ors, Dr Amanda Odoi Vrs The Speaker Of Parliament.", "59 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 31 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a judgment, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says" ], "howItIsRecognised": [], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "declaratory judgment", "judgement", "Court Adjudications of People's Republic of China", "final judgment", "Yeboah v. Karikari", "Embalinks Telecom Services Ltd v. Cal Bank Ltd", "Child Rights International Vrs The Attorney-General", "Living Faith World Outreach Centre & 2 Ors v. The Registrar-general &4 Ors", "Elikplim L. Agbemava Vrs Attorney General", "Mochcom Limited Vrs Cypress Investments Ltd.", "The Republic Vrs Kayode and 3 Ors", "Dr Amanda Odoi Vrs The Speaker Of Parliament" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 31 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 59 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one judgment from another, and a judgment from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a judgment sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a judgment from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a judgment passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a judgment between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a judgment, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a judgment is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a judgment says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a judgment contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a judgment and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "subject-and-method", "name": "Subject matter and method", "description": "What judgment studies and how it establishes anything.", "rationale": "A field is identified by its questions and its methods, and those are what distinguish it from the fields next to it.", "layers": [ { "id": "subject", "name": "Subject matter", "description": "The questions it takes as its own.", "findings": [ { "id": "subject-record", "name": "Questions and objects of study", "description": "What it is about, stated so a neighbouring field can be told apart.", "questions": [ { "id": "subject-record-q01", "text": "What questions and objects does judgment take as its own?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "subject-record-q02", "text": "Which questions does it share with a neighbouring field, and who claims them?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "method", "name": "Method and evidence", "description": "How claims are established and what counts as evidence.", "findings": [ { "id": "method-record", "name": "Methods and standards of evidence", "description": "The methods used and what they are taken to establish.", "questions": [ { "id": "method-record-q01", "text": "By what methods does judgment establish claims, and what counts as sufficient evidence?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "method-record-q02", "text": "What kind of claim can this field not settle, and where should an agent look instead?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "institutions-and-classification", "name": "Institutions and classification", "description": "Where judgment is practised and how catalogues place it.", "rationale": "The institutional footprint is the evidence that a field exists as a field rather than as a topic.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutions", "name": "Institutional markers", "description": "Societies, journals, degrees and departments.", "findings": [ { "id": "institution-record", "name": "Bodies and venues", "description": "Where the field organises itself.", "questions": [ { "id": "institution-record-q01", "text": "Which societies, journals or degrees mark judgment as an established field?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "institution-record-q02", "text": "What would show that it is emerging or dissolving rather than established?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification", "name": "Classification schemes", "description": "Where library and research classifications put it.", "findings": [ { "id": "classification-record", "name": "Codes and their disagreements", "description": "The classification codes that place it, and where they differ.", "questions": [ { "id": "classification-record-q01", "text": "Which classification schemes place judgment, under what codes?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "classification-record-q02", "text": "Where do those schemes disagree about its scope?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a judgment came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a judgment and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a judgment is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a judgment, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a judgment, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a judgment is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }