← Back to catalogue
Research draft

haiku

vr.tr.haiku · INF.MED

Enable an AI agent to recognise a candidate haiku, assess it against its declared poetic tradition and intended use, and decide how to interpret, revise, translate or present it without erasing meaningful ambiguity.

Thing Registry Information and virtual systems

Research draft, second pass

A second pass drafted this model: the structure a model of this thing needs, and what is known about it in the world. The line under this one says how the second half was obtained - researched against sources, or recalled without web access, in which case nothing here was read anywhere and every claim is a lead to verify. Unreviewed either way.

Researched by: Codex

Purpose and description

Enable an AI agent to recognise a candidate haiku, assess it against its declared poetic tradition and intended use, and decide how to interpret, revise, translate or present it without erasing meaningful ambiguity.

It can be Assess a candidate's haiku classification against a named tradition and explain uncertain boundaries.; Annotate sound counts, seasonal cues, images and possible cuts with textual evidence.; Compare revisions for changes in compression, pacing, imagery and interpretive openness.; Compare translations while separating retained effects from language-dependent substitutions.; Propose targeted revisions that respect the author's stated constraints and preserve the source version.; Prepare a presentation or submission variant after checking the applicable form and attribution requirements..

Distinguishing features

Check the claimed tradition and its criteria: a three-line layout or a 5-7-5 syllable count alone does not establish haiku identity.

Distinguish Japanese sound-unit counting from syllable counting in other languages before judging a numerical form requirement.

Inspect whether concrete images, an internal turn or a relationship between perceptions do poetic work beyond merely distributing a statement across short lines.

When senryu is a plausible alternative label, examine treatment of human behaviour, seasonal context and the relevant community's classification rather than treating humour or a human subject as decisive.

Determine whether the text is offered as an independent poem, a historical hokku or a verse within a linked sequence before assigning its work boundary.

Scope

+ The poem's exact wording, language, lineation, punctuation and significant spacing

+ Its claimed haiku tradition and evidence supporting or challenging that classification

+ Its sound pattern, compression, images, seasonal references and internal turn or cut

+ Interpretations grounded in the poem, including unresolved ambiguity

+ Relationships among originals, revisions and translations

+ Haiku-specific assessment and proposed interventions for a declared audience or venue

- An author's biography, identity record or complete body of work

- Anthologies, journals and publication platforms as managed collections

- Linked-verse sequences as complete works, beyond the candidate poem's relationship to them

- Haibun prose and haiga visual composition as complete composite works

- Season-word dictionaries and regional calendars as independently maintained reference resources

- Contracts, licensing instruments and publication transactions

Characteristics

Claimed haiku tradition
Named linguistic, historical, community or venue convention; unspecified; disputed Determines which expectations can fairly guide recognition and assessment.
Textual establishment
Draft; author-confirmed version; sourced transcription; uncertain transcription Prevents accidental formatting or transcription changes from becoming poetic evidence.
Sound-unit profile
Counts by segment, with counting unit, pronunciation assumptions and uncertainty stated Allows form assessment without equating Japanese sound units with another language's syllables.
Visible arrangement
One line; three lines; other arrangement; significant spacing or typography described Records how visual segmentation directs pacing and interpretation.
Seasonal anchoring
Attested season word; contextual seasonal cue; disputed cue; none identified; unassessed Separates evidenced seasonal associations from assumptions based on unfamiliar climates or conventions.
Cut or turn
Lexically marked; punctuation-marked; syntactic or semantic; multiple candidates; not identified Makes the poem's pauses and relationships between perceptions available for analysis.
Image relationship
Text-supported relationship among images or perceptions, with alternative readings where needed Supports assessment of resonance without imposing a single paraphrase.
Version relationship
Original; revision of; translation of; adaptation of; relationship unresolved Keeps judgments about wording, sound and imagery attached to the version actually examined.
Use readiness
Unassessed; revision proposed; ready for declared use; unresolved requirements Connects evaluation to a specific purpose rather than an unsupported universal quality score.

Also called

socially conscious haikufree-form haikunon-seasonal haikuhaiku in languages other than Japaneseproletarian haikulife circumstance haikuNaththaipookkal

Where this came from

wikidata · CC0 1.0

Drafted structure

Bundle to layer to finding to question, as the second pass will find it: 5 bundles · 10 layers · 10 findings · 20 questions.

Haiku identity Establishes what work is being assessed and why haiku is the proposed genre.

Haiku recognition depends on poetic context and tradition as well as visible brevity.

Tradition and criteria

Locates the candidate within the conventions used to assess it.

Declared haiku frame

Records the proposed tradition, the source of that designation and the criteria actually applicable to this poem.

  1. Which linguistic, historical or contemporary haiku tradition is claimed for this poem? definition
  2. Who supplied that classification, and which stated criteria support it? provenance

Neighbouring forms

Examines plausible alternative classifications and the poem's independence.

Genre and work boundary

Records whether senryu, another short-poem form or a linked-verse role offers a competing account of the text.

  1. What evidence favours haiku over senryu or another short-poem classification, and where does that distinction remain disputed? boundary
  2. Is this an independent poem or a verse whose identity depends on its position in a sequence or composite work? boundary
Wording, sound and space Captures the exact linguistic material and its audible and visible organisation.

A small wording, punctuation or spacing change can substantially alter a haiku's rhythm and readings.

Established text

Identifies the version and presentation being analysed.

Exact poem presentation

Records wording, script, line breaks, punctuation and meaningful spacing separately from editorial additions.

  1. What source establishes this wording and layout, and which features remain uncertain? provenance
  2. Are any title, translation gloss, line breaks or punctuation supplied by an editor rather than part of this version of the poem? boundary

Rhythm and compression

Examines sound segmentation and the work performed by each phrase.

Counting and verbal economy

Records defensible sound counts and identifies wording whose removal or alteration would change rhythm, imagery or meaning.

  1. What is the sound-unit count of each segment under an explicit counting method, and which pronunciations make it uncertain? measurement
  2. Which words appear necessary to the poem's effects, and what would a proposed compression gain or lose? action
Images and season Examines the poem's perceived scene and its possible seasonal or cultural anchoring.

An agent needs to distinguish what the poem evokes from contextual associations that require external evidence.

Perceived scene

Identifies sensory particulars, events and perspective without inventing a surrounding story.

Image and observation

Records what can be perceived in the text and what remains inference about its speaker, place or occasion.

  1. Which words establish sensory particulars, movement or a change in attention? definition
  2. Which details of the scene are explicit, and which depend on an inferred observer, location or autobiographical event? boundary

Seasonal associations

Distinguishes conventional season words from local cues and reader assumptions.

Seasonal evidence

Records proposed seasonal references, their geographic and cultural context, and the evidence for their associations.

  1. Does a consulted season-word reference or relevant commentary attest the proposed association in the poem's tradition? provenance
  2. How do location, hemisphere, calendar or multiple seasonal cues complicate the proposed season? boundary
Cut and resonance Examines how the poem divides, connects and leaves meaning open.

Assessment must account for the relationship between perceptions and the effects of omission, beyond sound counts.

Internal articulation

Locates possible pauses, cuts and turns and describes their textual mechanisms.

Cut location and effect

Records candidate cuts without assuming that every line ending is a cut or that every haiku must display the same mechanism.

  1. Where does the poem invite a pause or turn, and is the evidence lexical, grammatical, typographic or semantic? definition
  2. Does the proposed cut coincide with a line break, cross it or remain ambiguous under plausible readings? boundary

Interpretive openness

Connects images and omissions to supported readings.

Resonance and reading limits

Records how images or perceptions interact and where explanations would exceed the text.

  1. What contrast, echo, shift of scale or other relationship connects the poem's perceptions, and which words support that reading? definition
  2. Which alternative readings remain plausible, and what added explanation would close an ambiguity the poem currently preserves? boundary
Versions and interventions Supports responsible comparison, revision, translation and presentation of this haiku.

Interventions can change genre-relevant features, so an agent must identify both the intended gain and the poetic cost.

Cross-version effects

Tracks changes in the poem's effects across revisions and languages.

Revision and translation tradeoffs

Relates versions and records changes to sound, cuts, seasonal associations, imagery and ambiguity.

  1. What original or prior version does this text derive from, and who made the revision, translation or adaptation? provenance
  2. Which poetic effects are retained, changed or lost, and what evidence supports those judgments? boundary

Purpose-bound assessment

Evaluates readiness and selects interventions against an explicit use.

Haiku use decision

Records the intended audience or venue, applicable constraints and the smallest justified intervention.

  1. For the intended reading, workshop or submission, which haiku conventions and presentation requirements must this version satisfy? definition
  2. Should this version be retained, annotated, revised or translated, and which observed issue or intended effect justifies that action? action

What the second pass must settle

  • Which researched authorities and practitioner communities should ground the model's treatment of Japanese-language and other-language haiku traditions?
  • How should the model represent contested haiku-senryu boundaries without imposing one community's classification on another?
  • Which sound-counting methods are appropriate for the languages covered, and how should pronunciation disagreements be recorded?
  • Which seasonal reference resources adequately cover different regions, calendars and contemporary seasonal usage?
  • How should the model accommodate experimental, visual or digitally presented haiku whose boundaries challenge an individual textual-work model?