{ "model": { "rank": 1891, "code": "thing-q37707", "model_id": "vr.tr.haiku", "name": "haiku", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a candidate haiku, assess it against its declared poetic tradition and intended use, and decide how to interpret, revise, translate or present it without erasing meaningful ambiguity.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q37707/", "tier": 2, "score": 123, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [ "socially conscious haiku", "free-form haiku", "non-seasonal haiku", "haiku in languages other than Japanese", "proletarian haiku", "life circumstance haiku", "Naththaipookkal" ], "aliasCount": 7, "merged": 7, "knownIn": 123, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q37707", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q37707", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-06T22:03:37Z", "providers": [ "Codex" ], "missingProviders": [ "Grok" ], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": null, "turns": null, "seconds": 2.2, "error": "Error: Internal error: {\n \"message\": \"API error (status 402 Payment Required): Grok Build usage balance exhausted\",\n \"http_status\": 402\n}", "retried": true }, "codex": { "seconds": 66, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a078be-999c-7363-811b-8d3673faf057\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: haiku\nRegistry id: vr.tr.haiku\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded into this entry: (none)\n\nA Vercy model" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q37707", "registryId": "vr.tr.haiku", "name": "haiku", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q37707/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.haiku", "name": "haiku", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a candidate haiku, assess it against its declared poetic tradition and intended use, and decide how to interpret, revise, translate or present it without erasing meaningful ambiguity.", "definition": "", "scope_statement": "This model owns an individual haiku as a concise poetic work, its relevant versions, its proposed genre identity, and the linguistic and contextual evidence needed to assess its form, imagery, juxtaposition and readiness for a stated use.", "in_scope": [ "The poem's exact wording, language, lineation, punctuation and significant spacing", "Its claimed haiku tradition and evidence supporting or challenging that classification", "Its sound pattern, compression, images, seasonal references and internal turn or cut", "Interpretations grounded in the poem, including unresolved ambiguity", "Relationships among originals, revisions and translations", "Haiku-specific assessment and proposed interventions for a declared audience or venue" ], "out_of_scope": [ "An author's biography, identity record or complete body of work", "Anthologies, journals and publication platforms as managed collections", "Linked-verse sequences as complete works, beyond the candidate poem's relationship to them", "Haibun prose and haiga visual composition as complete composite works", "Season-word dictionaries and regional calendars as independently maintained reference resources", "Contracts, licensing instruments and publication transactions" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "Check the claimed tradition and its criteria: a three-line layout or a 5-7-5 syllable count alone does not establish haiku identity.", "Distinguish Japanese sound-unit counting from syllable counting in other languages before judging a numerical form requirement.", "Inspect whether concrete images, an internal turn or a relationship between perceptions do poetic work beyond merely distributing a statement across short lines.", "When senryu is a plausible alternative label, examine treatment of human behaviour, seasonal context and the relevant community's classification rather than treating humour or a human subject as decisive.", "Determine whether the text is offered as an independent poem, a historical hokku or a verse within a linked sequence before assigning its work boundary." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Claimed haiku tradition", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Named linguistic, historical, community or venue convention; unspecified; disputed", "why_it_matters": "Determines which expectations can fairly guide recognition and assessment." }, { "name": "Textual establishment", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Draft; author-confirmed version; sourced transcription; uncertain transcription", "why_it_matters": "Prevents accidental formatting or transcription changes from becoming poetic evidence." }, { "name": "Sound-unit profile", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Counts by segment, with counting unit, pronunciation assumptions and uncertainty stated", "why_it_matters": "Allows form assessment without equating Japanese sound units with another language's syllables." }, { "name": "Visible arrangement", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "One line; three lines; other arrangement; significant spacing or typography described", "why_it_matters": "Records how visual segmentation directs pacing and interpretation." }, { "name": "Seasonal anchoring", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Attested season word; contextual seasonal cue; disputed cue; none identified; unassessed", "why_it_matters": "Separates evidenced seasonal associations from assumptions based on unfamiliar climates or conventions." }, { "name": "Cut or turn", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Lexically marked; punctuation-marked; syntactic or semantic; multiple candidates; not identified", "why_it_matters": "Makes the poem's pauses and relationships between perceptions available for analysis." }, { "name": "Image relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Text-supported relationship among images or perceptions, with alternative readings where needed", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of resonance without imposing a single paraphrase." }, { "name": "Version relationship", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Original; revision of; translation of; adaptation of; relationship unresolved", "why_it_matters": "Keeps judgments about wording, sound and imagery attached to the version actually examined." }, { "name": "Use readiness", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Unassessed; revision proposed; ready for declared use; unresolved requirements", "why_it_matters": "Connects evaluation to a specific purpose rather than an unsupported universal quality score." } ], "affordances": [ "Assess a candidate's haiku classification against a named tradition and explain uncertain boundaries.", "Annotate sound counts, seasonal cues, images and possible cuts with textual evidence.", "Compare revisions for changes in compression, pacing, imagery and interpretive openness.", "Compare translations while separating retained effects from language-dependent substitutions.", "Propose targeted revisions that respect the author's stated constraints and preserve the source version.", "Prepare a presentation or submission variant after checking the applicable form and attribution requirements." ] }, "sources": [], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "haiku-identity", "name": "Haiku identity", "description": "Establishes what work is being assessed and why haiku is the proposed genre.", "rationale": "Haiku recognition depends on poetic context and tradition as well as visible brevity.", "layers": [ { "id": "tradition-and-criteria", "name": "Tradition and criteria", "description": "Locates the candidate within the conventions used to assess it.", "findings": [ { "id": "declared-haiku-frame", "name": "Declared haiku frame", "description": "Records the proposed tradition, the source of that designation and the criteria actually applicable to this poem.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which linguistic, historical or contemporary haiku tradition is claimed for this poem?", "kind": "definition", "id": "declared-haiku-frame-q01" }, { "text": "Who supplied that classification, and which stated criteria support it?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "declared-haiku-frame-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "neighbouring-forms", "name": "Neighbouring forms", "description": "Examines plausible alternative classifications and the poem's independence.", "findings": [ { "id": "genre-and-work-boundary", "name": "Genre and work boundary", "description": "Records whether senryu, another short-poem form or a linked-verse role offers a competing account of the text.", "questions": [ { "text": "What evidence favours haiku over senryu or another short-poem classification, and where does that distinction remain disputed?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "genre-and-work-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "Is this an independent poem or a verse whose identity depends on its position in a sequence or composite work?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "genre-and-work-boundary-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "wording-sound-and-space", "name": "Wording, sound and space", "description": "Captures the exact linguistic material and its audible and visible organisation.", "rationale": "A small wording, punctuation or spacing change can substantially alter a haiku's rhythm and readings.", "layers": [ { "id": "established-text", "name": "Established text", "description": "Identifies the version and presentation being analysed.", "findings": [ { "id": "exact-poem-presentation", "name": "Exact poem presentation", "description": "Records wording, script, line breaks, punctuation and meaningful spacing separately from editorial additions.", "questions": [ { "text": "What source establishes this wording and layout, and which features remain uncertain?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "exact-poem-presentation-q01" }, { "text": "Are any title, translation gloss, line breaks or punctuation supplied by an editor rather than part of this version of the poem?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "exact-poem-presentation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rhythm-and-compression", "name": "Rhythm and compression", "description": "Examines sound segmentation and the work performed by each phrase.", "findings": [ { "id": "counting-and-verbal-economy", "name": "Counting and verbal economy", "description": "Records defensible sound counts and identifies wording whose removal or alteration would change rhythm, imagery or meaning.", "questions": [ { "text": "What is the sound-unit count of each segment under an explicit counting method, and which pronunciations make it uncertain?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "counting-and-verbal-economy-q01" }, { "text": "Which words appear necessary to the poem's effects, and what would a proposed compression gain or lose?", "kind": "action", "id": "counting-and-verbal-economy-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "images-and-season", "name": "Images and season", "description": "Examines the poem's perceived scene and its possible seasonal or cultural anchoring.", "rationale": "An agent needs to distinguish what the poem evokes from contextual associations that require external evidence.", "layers": [ { "id": "perceived-scene", "name": "Perceived scene", "description": "Identifies sensory particulars, events and perspective without inventing a surrounding story.", "findings": [ { "id": "image-and-observation", "name": "Image and observation", "description": "Records what can be perceived in the text and what remains inference about its speaker, place or occasion.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which words establish sensory particulars, movement or a change in attention?", "kind": "definition", "id": "image-and-observation-q01" }, { "text": "Which details of the scene are explicit, and which depend on an inferred observer, location or autobiographical event?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "image-and-observation-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "seasonal-associations", "name": "Seasonal associations", "description": "Distinguishes conventional season words from local cues and reader assumptions.", "findings": [ { "id": "seasonal-evidence", "name": "Seasonal evidence", "description": "Records proposed seasonal references, their geographic and cultural context, and the evidence for their associations.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does a consulted season-word reference or relevant commentary attest the proposed association in the poem's tradition?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "seasonal-evidence-q01" }, { "text": "How do location, hemisphere, calendar or multiple seasonal cues complicate the proposed season?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "seasonal-evidence-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "cut-and-resonance", "name": "Cut and resonance", "description": "Examines how the poem divides, connects and leaves meaning open.", "rationale": "Assessment must account for the relationship between perceptions and the effects of omission, beyond sound counts.", "layers": [ { "id": "internal-articulation", "name": "Internal articulation", "description": "Locates possible pauses, cuts and turns and describes their textual mechanisms.", "findings": [ { "id": "cut-location-and-effect", "name": "Cut location and effect", "description": "Records candidate cuts without assuming that every line ending is a cut or that every haiku must display the same mechanism.", "questions": [ { "text": "Where does the poem invite a pause or turn, and is the evidence lexical, grammatical, typographic or semantic?", "kind": "definition", "id": "cut-location-and-effect-q01" }, { "text": "Does the proposed cut coincide with a line break, cross it or remain ambiguous under plausible readings?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "cut-location-and-effect-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "interpretive-openness", "name": "Interpretive openness", "description": "Connects images and omissions to supported readings.", "findings": [ { "id": "resonance-and-reading-limits", "name": "Resonance and reading limits", "description": "Records how images or perceptions interact and where explanations would exceed the text.", "questions": [ { "text": "What contrast, echo, shift of scale or other relationship connects the poem's perceptions, and which words support that reading?", "kind": "definition", "id": "resonance-and-reading-limits-q01" }, { "text": "Which alternative readings remain plausible, and what added explanation would close an ambiguity the poem currently preserves?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "resonance-and-reading-limits-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions-and-interventions", "name": "Versions and interventions", "description": "Supports responsible comparison, revision, translation and presentation of this haiku.", "rationale": "Interventions can change genre-relevant features, so an agent must identify both the intended gain and the poetic cost.", "layers": [ { "id": "cross-version-effects", "name": "Cross-version effects", "description": "Tracks changes in the poem's effects across revisions and languages.", "findings": [ { "id": "revision-and-translation-tradeoffs", "name": "Revision and translation tradeoffs", "description": "Relates versions and records changes to sound, cuts, seasonal associations, imagery and ambiguity.", "questions": [ { "text": "What original or prior version does this text derive from, and who made the revision, translation or adaptation?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "revision-and-translation-tradeoffs-q01" }, { "text": "Which poetic effects are retained, changed or lost, and what evidence supports those judgments?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "revision-and-translation-tradeoffs-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "purpose-bound-assessment", "name": "Purpose-bound assessment", "description": "Evaluates readiness and selects interventions against an explicit use.", "findings": [ { "id": "haiku-use-decision", "name": "Haiku use decision", "description": "Records the intended audience or venue, applicable constraints and the smallest justified intervention.", "questions": [ { "text": "For the intended reading, workshop or submission, which haiku conventions and presentation requirements must this version satisfy?", "kind": "definition", "id": "haiku-use-decision-q01" }, { "text": "Should this version be retained, annotated, revised or translated, and which observed issue or intended effect justifies that action?", "kind": "action", "id": "haiku-use-decision-q02" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which researched authorities and practitioner communities should ground the model's treatment of Japanese-language and other-language haiku traditions?", "How should the model represent contested haiku-senryu boundaries without imposing one community's classification on another?", "Which sound-counting methods are appropriate for the languages covered, and how should pronunciation disagreements be recorded?", "Which seasonal reference resources adequately cover different regions, calendars and contemporary seasonal usage?", "How should the model accommodate experimental, visual or digitally presented haiku whose boundaries challenge an individual textual-work model?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 10, "findings": 10, "questions": 20 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a haiku, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise a candidate haiku, assess it against its declared poetic tradition and intended use, and decide how to interpret, revise, translate or present it without erasing meaningful ambiguity.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Names folded into this entry, which a task may need to split apart again: socially conscious haiku, free-form haiku, non-seasonal haiku, haiku in languages other than Japanese, proletarian haiku, life circumstance haiku, Naththaipookkal.", "7 finer distinctions are held as aliases rather than separate entries, because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it.", "Described in 123 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a haiku, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [ { "relation": "covers", "note": "Finer kinds folded into this entry because telling them apart needs a task that asks for it. Each is a model waiting to be split out when one does.", "targets": [ "socially conscious haiku", "free-form haiku", "non-seasonal haiku", "haiku in languages other than Japanese", "proletarian haiku", "life circumstance haiku", "Naththaipookkal" ] } ], "standing": "Described in 123 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is. 7 finer distinctions are held inside this entry as names rather than as separate models.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one haiku from another, and a haiku from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a haiku sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a haiku from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a haiku passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a haiku between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a haiku, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a haiku is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a haiku says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a haiku contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a haiku and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of haiku a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For haiku, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of haiku exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made haiku and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to haiku, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in haiku, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a haiku came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a haiku and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a haiku is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a haiku, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a haiku, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a haiku is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }