{ "model": { "rank": 6441, "code": "thing-q40237", "model_id": "vr.tr.golden-raspberry-awards", "name": "Golden Raspberry Awards", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise the Golden Raspberry Awards, assess the authority and current status of its award claims, and decide how those claims may be recorded or used.", "family": "Thing Registry", "category": "Information and virtual systems", "status": "research-draft", "kind": "thing", "plane": "INF", "domain": "INF.MED", "industry": "", "version": "", "url": "/models/thing/q40237/", "tier": 2, "score": 60, "payload": { "layer": "wikidata", "aliases": [], "aliasCount": 0, "merged": 0, "knownIn": 60, "facets": null, "markers": [], "lexicalClass": "", "senseRank": null, "alsoRegisteredAs": null, "source": { "dataset": "wikidata", "item": "Q40237", "url": "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q40237", "license": "CC0 1.0" } }, "research": { "vercy": "1.0-draft", "publication": { "status": "research-draft", "adjudicationStatus": "unreviewed", "publishableCanonical": false, "generatedAt": "2026-09-07T14:35:48Z", "providers": [ "Codex", "Grok" ], "missingProviders": [], "pass": 2, "cost": { "grok": { "usd": 0.01325728, "turns": 1, "seconds": 157.9, "error": null }, "codex": { "seconds": 73.3, "error": "Reading additional input from stdin...\nOpenAI Codex v0.153.3\n--------\nworkdir: R:\\02_PROJECTS\\02_Meta_Models_Platforms\\Ver.cy\\current\\thing-registry-backlog\nmodel: gpt-6-astra\nprovider: openai\napproval: never\nsandbox: read-only\nreasoning effort: none\nreasoning summaries: none\nsession id: 01a07c47-b686-7d22-9e42-e6ecd2a27a5d\n--------\nuser\nYou are drafting a Vercy meta-model for one registered thing. Answer as JSON only, no prose around it.\n\nThing: Golden Raspberry Awards\nRegistry id: vr.tr.golden-raspberry-awards\nPlane / domain: INF / INF.MED\nRegistry definition: (none recorded)\nNames folded in" } } }, "metaModel": { "id": "THING-Q40237", "registryId": "vr.tr.golden-raspberry-awards", "name": "Golden Raspberry Awards", "version": "0.1.0-research.1", "entryKind": "thing", "family": "Thing Registry", "domain": [ "INF.MED" ], "status": "research-draft" }, "canonicalUrl": "https://ver.cy/models/thing/q40237/", "model": { "registry_id": "vr.tr.golden-raspberry-awards", "name": "Golden Raspberry Awards", "purpose": "Enable an AI agent to recognise the Golden Raspberry Awards, assess the authority and current status of its award claims, and decide how those claims may be recorded or used.", "definition": "An annual, member-voted satirical film prize run by the Golden Raspberry Award Foundation (founded by publicist John J. B. Wilson; first presented in 1981) that names the previous year's worst widely released motion pictures, performances, and related credits, usually as a counter-event to the Academy Awards.", "scope_statement": "This model owns the Golden Raspberry Awards as a named satirical film-award institution, including its edition boundaries, category meanings, selection authority, nominations, results and subsequent corrections.", "in_scope": [ "Identity of the Golden Raspberry Awards and attribution of Razzie-branded award claims", "Edition-specific eligibility, categories and selection procedures", "Nomination and award decisions tied to particular films, performances or other credited contributions", "Announcement, correction, withdrawal and rescission histories", "The distinction between satirical award judgments and factual claims about recipients" ], "out_of_scope": [ "Complete film descriptions, production histories and distribution records", "Biographies, identities and general reputations of nominated people", "Other film awards and their independent selection processes", "General measures of cinematic quality, audience satisfaction or commercial performance", "Detailed event logistics, ticket sales and venue operations" ], "distinguishing_features": [ "An award claim must be attributable to the Golden Raspberry Awards; a generic worst-film list or independently organised parody award does not qualify.", "A nomination and an award result are distinct decisions; the presence of a film or person on a nominee list does not establish a win.", "A claim must preserve the category's actual meaning: an exceptional or rehabilitative category must not automatically be interpreted as a worst-achievement judgment.", "The institution, an annual edition, a ceremony and a physical trophy are related but distinguishable referents; identifying one does not establish the state of the others.", "An award expresses a category-specific selection judgment and does not by itself establish objective poor quality, professional misconduct or recipient acceptance." ], "characteristics": [ { "name": "Award-claim authority", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Officially evidenced | independently reported | unattributed | disputed", "why_it_matters": "Determines whether an agent can present a claim as an institutional decision or must qualify its attribution." }, { "name": "Edition time basis", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Named edition linked to its eligibility interval, announcement dates and ceremony date where applicable", "why_it_matters": "Prevents confusion between the year of eligible film releases and the year an award was announced or presented." }, { "name": "Category judgment", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented category label, evaluated contribution and satirical or other stated intent", "why_it_matters": "Keeps differently purposed categories from being flattened into an undifferentiated negative judgment." }, { "name": "Decision status", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Proposed | nominated | awarded | corrected | withdrawn | rescinded | unresolved, where supported by evidence", "why_it_matters": "Allows an agent to distinguish historical announcements from currently valid decisions." }, { "name": "Award target", "kind": "relation", "unit_or_values": "Category decision linked to the named film, person, performance, pairing, ensemble or other expressly designated target", "why_it_matters": "Prevents an award for one contribution from being attributed to an entire career, production or cast." }, { "name": "Selection basis", "kind": "category", "unit_or_values": "Documented voter eligibility, nomination mechanism, final selection mechanism and any category-specific exceptions; unknown where unavailable", "why_it_matters": "Supports assessment of what a result represents without assuming industry-wide or public consensus." }, { "name": "Decision evidence date", "kind": "measurement", "unit_or_values": "Calendar date with recorded precision", "why_it_matters": "Supports time-specific answers when nominations, results or institutional statements change." }, { "name": "Recipient response", "kind": "state", "unit_or_values": "Acknowledged | accepted | declined | contested | no verified response", "why_it_matters": "Separates the institution's award decision from a recipient's participation or endorsement." } ], "affordances": [ "Resolve whether a Razzie-related reference denotes the institution, a particular edition, a category decision or a trophy.", "Check a nomination or win against attributable evidence and report its current status.", "Trace a decision to the exact film or contribution named in its category.", "Compare editions while preserving changes in category meaning and selection rules.", "Update a claim after an official correction or rescission while retaining its announcement history.", "Produce a qualified description that separates award judgment, recipient response and independently established facts." ] }, "sources": [ { "id": "wikipedia-gra", "title": "Golden Raspberry Awards (Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation)", "url": "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Raspberry_Awards", "what_it_supports": "Founding date and founder, category inventory, Oscar-weekend timing, notable in-person acceptances, and the main public chronology of the ceremony.", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "razzies-official", "title": "The Razzies (Golden Raspberry Award Foundation)", "url": "https://www.razzies.com/", "what_it_supports": "Official category names, paid open membership and balloting, trophy description, and how the Foundation currently frames the show.", "url_status": "live" }, { "id": "wilson-2005", "title": "The Official Razzie Movie Guide: Enjoying the Best of Hollywood's Worst (John Wilson, Warner Books, 2005)", "url": "", "what_it_supports": "Founder's account of the 1981 living-room origin, the gold-sprayed raspberry-on-reel trophy, and the negative canon the organization promotes." } ], "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "razzie-identity-and-authority", "name": "Razzie identity and authority", "description": "Establishes which institution and authorised decisions a Golden Raspberry Awards reference concerns.", "rationale": "The informal Razzie name and the wider practice of satirical film criticism make institutional attribution essential.", "layers": [ { "id": "institutional-reference", "name": "Institutional reference", "description": "Distinguishes the award institution from related events, objects and unofficial uses of its name.", "findings": [ { "id": "golden-raspberry-reference-boundary", "name": "Golden Raspberry reference boundary", "description": "Record what a reference actually denotes before attaching award history or institutional authority to it.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does this reference denote the Golden Raspberry Awards institution, an edition, a ceremony, a category decision or a physical trophy?", "kind": "definition", "id": "golden-raspberry-reference-boundary-q01" }, { "text": "What evidence connects this use of Golden Raspberry or Razzie terminology to the registered institution rather than an unrelated parody?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "golden-raspberry-reference-boundary-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "selection-and-announcement-authority", "name": "Selection and announcement authority", "description": "Records who can select, announce and revise decisions for the relevant edition or category.", "findings": [ { "id": "authorised-razzie-decisions", "name": "Authorised Razzie decisions", "description": "Treat the authority behind an award decision as something to establish for its context rather than infer from publicity.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which organisation or authorised representative issued this nomination, result or revision, and where is the announcement evidenced?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "authorised-razzie-decisions-q01" }, { "text": "Who was entitled to nominate or select recipients for this edition and category, and were any exceptions documented?", "kind": "definition", "id": "authorised-razzie-decisions-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "edition-and-category-boundaries", "name": "Edition and category boundaries", "description": "Locates each decision within the correct eligibility period and the category meaning applicable at that time.", "rationale": "A release year can differ from an announcement year, and category labels or intentions can change between editions.", "layers": [ { "id": "edition-time-and-eligibility", "name": "Edition time and eligibility", "description": "Separates edition identity from ceremony timing and records the rules governing eligible work.", "findings": [ { "id": "eligible-film-period", "name": "Eligible film period", "description": "Record the edition's own time and release boundaries without assuming that the ceremony year defines eligibility.", "questions": [ { "text": "What edition designation and eligible release interval apply, and how do these relate to nomination, result and ceremony dates?", "kind": "measurement", "id": "eligible-film-period-q01" }, { "text": "What documented release, distribution or other eligibility rules explain why this film or contribution belongs to this edition?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "eligible-film-period-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "category-meaning-and-continuity", "name": "Category meaning and continuity", "description": "Preserves the intended judgment and historical boundaries of recurring, exceptional and renamed categories.", "findings": [ { "id": "category-specific-judgment", "name": "Category-specific judgment", "description": "Record what the category evaluates and whether comparison with similarly named categories is justified.", "questions": [ { "text": "What does this category claim to recognise, and does its stated purpose support describing the result as a worst-achievement judgment?", "kind": "definition", "id": "category-specific-judgment-q01" }, { "text": "Is this a continuing, renamed, one-off or otherwise exceptional category, and what evidence supports connecting it to categories in other editions?", "kind": "boundary", "id": "category-specific-judgment-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "nominations-results-and-targets", "name": "Nominations, results and targets", "description": "Captures the award decision, its exact target and the evidence distinguishing nomination from selection.", "rationale": "Razzie claims can mislead when a nomination becomes a reported win or a narrowly named contribution becomes a judgment about a whole person or film.", "layers": [ { "id": "decision-stage", "name": "Decision stage", "description": "Distinguishes announced nominees, selected recipients and any other documented decision stages.", "findings": [ { "id": "nomination-versus-award", "name": "Nomination versus award", "description": "Record only the decision stage established by evidence and preserve shared or exceptional outcomes.", "questions": [ { "text": "Does the evidence establish a nomination, a selected recipient or another explicitly named stage?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "nomination-versus-award-q01" }, { "text": "Does the announced outcome name one recipient, joint recipients, a tie or another arrangement that must be preserved when reporting it?", "kind": "definition", "id": "nomination-versus-award-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "credited-award-target", "name": "Credited award target", "description": "Links a decision to the exact work, performance or collective contribution designated by the award.", "findings": [ { "id": "target-attribution-limits", "name": "Target attribution limits", "description": "Preserve the wording and reach of the award attribution, especially where a category names multiple people or contributions.", "questions": [ { "text": "Which film, person, role, pairing, ensemble or other target is expressly named, and what source resolves ambiguous titles or credits?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "target-attribution-limits-q01" }, { "text": "What may an agent accurately attribute to each named target without extending the category judgment to unnamed collaborators or unrelated work?", "kind": "action", "id": "target-attribution-limits-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "revision-reception-and-responsible-use", "name": "Revision, reception and responsible use", "description": "Tracks changes to decisions and keeps institutional judgments separate from recipient responses and broader factual claims.", "rationale": "A satirical award can remain widely reported after revision, and publicity can blur winning, accepting and endorsing an award.", "layers": [ { "id": "decision-revision-history", "name": "Decision revision history", "description": "Maintains both the historical announcement and the latest evidenced institutional position.", "findings": [ { "id": "current-standing-after-revision", "name": "Current standing after revision", "description": "Record the scope, date and authority of any correction, withdrawal or rescission.", "questions": [ { "text": "Has an authorised statement changed this nomination, result or category, and what precisely did it change?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "current-standing-after-revision-q01" }, { "text": "How should an agent state the original decision and its present standing without presenting a withdrawn or rescinded claim as current?", "kind": "action", "id": "current-standing-after-revision-q02" } ] } ] }, { "id": "recipient-response-and-claim-limits", "name": "Recipient response and claim limits", "description": "Separates award status from acceptance, attendance, reaction and unsupported conclusions about quality or character.", "findings": [ { "id": "satirical-judgment-and-recipient-agency", "name": "Satirical judgment and recipient agency", "description": "Attribute the award's judgment to its selectors and independently establish any response by the recipient.", "questions": [ { "text": "What attributable evidence establishes that the recipient acknowledged, accepted, declined or contested the award?", "kind": "provenance", "id": "satirical-judgment-and-recipient-agency-q01" }, { "text": "What wording lets an agent report the category judgment without treating it as objective proof of poor quality, misconduct or recipient endorsement?", "kind": "action", "id": "satirical-judgment-and-recipient-agency-q02" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "evidence-and-external-alignment", "name": "Evidence and external alignment", "description": "What the world already says about this thing, gathered so the model can be checked against it.", "rationale": "A model that cannot be lined up against existing standards, identifiers and practice cannot be adopted by anyone who already uses them.", "layers": [ { "id": "reported-evidence", "name": "Reported evidence", "description": "Findings from the breadth pass, kept separate from the structural claims.", "findings": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds", "name": "Kinds and varieties", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Worst Picture", "Worst lead performance (Worst Actor / Worst Actress)", "Worst supporting performance (Worst Supporting Actor / Worst Supporting Actress)", "Worst Director", "Worst Screenplay", "Worst Prequel, Remake, Rip-off or Sequel", "Worst Screen Combo (formerly Worst Screen Couple)", "Razzie Redeemer Award and other special or discontinued citations (e.g. Worst Original Song, career-achievement barbs)" ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-kinds-q01", "text": "Which of these kinds and varieties hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-identifiers", "name": "Identifiers and schemes", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "scheme": "Wikipedia", "value_or_pattern": "Golden Raspberry Awards", "note": "Stable English-article title for the institution and ceremony; the matching Wikidata Q-number was not verified in this pass." }, { "scheme": "official website", "value_or_pattern": "razzies.com", "note": "Golden Raspberry Award Foundation public site and current ballot/ceremony branding." }, { "scheme": "common short name", "value_or_pattern": "Razzie / Razzies", "note": "Trade and press short form for both the ceremony and the trophy." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-identifiers-q01", "text": "Which of these identifiers and schemes hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation", "name": "Standards and regulation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Nomination, eligibility, and ballot procedure is internal to the Golden Raspberry Award Foundation; it is not an AMPAS, ISO, or statutory film-award standard." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-standards-and-regulation-q01", "text": "Which of these standards and regulation hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-real-world-use", "name": "Real-world use", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Entertainment press treats nominations and winners as a yearly \"worst of Hollywood\" news peg, usually on Oscar weekend.", "A few recipients have accepted in person as self-deprecation or image management (notably Halle Berry for Catwoman in 2005 and Sandra Bullock for All About Steve in 2010).", "Film history and popular criticism use Razzie \"worst picture\" winners as a negative canon (e.g. Showgirls, Battlefield Earth, Jack and Jill).", "Anyone who pays the Foundation membership fee may vote, unlike academy-restricted prizes.", "The physical award - a golf-ball-sized raspberry on a Super 8 reel, spray-painted gold - is presented and photographed as a joke object." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-real-world-use-q01", "text": "Which of these real-world use hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-measurements", "name": "Typical measurements", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "quantity": "Advertised trophy production cost", "typical_range": "about 4.97", "unit": "USD" }, { "quantity": "Ceremony edition (first show 1981)", "typical_range": "1-46", "unit": "edition number" }, { "quantity": "Competitive categories in a typical year", "typical_range": "8-12", "unit": "count" }, { "quantity": "Nominees listed per category", "typical_range": "5", "unit": "count" } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-measurements-q01", "text": "Which of these typical measurements hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards", "name": "Failure modes and hazards", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Charges of punching down: ballots have been criticized for targeting women, people of color, and already-mocked performers rather than powerful industrial failure.", "Factual nomination errors (wrong credit, ineligible title, or a person not in the film).", "Nomination of minors, later withdrawn after public criticism.", "Talent, publicists, and studios treating the citation as harassment and refusing engagement.", "\"Worst\" as a criterion collapsing camp flops, box-office disasters, and morally disliked films into one list.", "Founder- and volunteer-centric organization whose calendar and credibility depend on Oscar-weekend press attention." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-failure-modes-and-hazards-q01", "text": "Which of these failure modes and hazards hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-regional-variation", "name": "Regional variation", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ "Ballots are overwhelmingly oriented to U.S. theatrical and later streaming releases; non-English-language films rarely contend unless they had a prominent U.S. rollout.", "The Razzie name and ceremony are not franchised nationally; other countries' \"worst film\" lists are separate press traditions.", "News coverage is strongest in U.S. and U.K. entertainment media; elsewhere it is often reported only when a local star is named.", "Eligibility and \"Hollywood\" framing have lagged the globalization of streaming premieres." ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-regional-variation-q01", "text": "Which of these regional variation hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] }, { "id": "evidence-neighbours", "name": "Neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart", "description": "Reported by the breadth pass; each item needs checking against its source before it becomes normative.", "evidence": [ { "name": "Academy Awards (Oscars)", "difference": "AMPAS prestige prizes for cinematic excellence; Razzies are a private satirical inverse and are not an Academy production." }, { "name": "Golden Globe Awards", "difference": "A \"Golden\" film/TV prize from a journalists' body that honors perceived achievement, not failure." }, { "name": "Stinkers Bad Movie Awards", "difference": "A defunct parallel \"worst of\" ballot (Hastings Bad Cinema Society), not the Razzie Foundation's show." }, { "name": "Rotten Tomatoes \"rotten\" label", "difference": "A critic-aggregation score threshold, not a member-voted awards ceremony or trophy." }, { "name": "Blowing a raspberry / the raspberry fruit", "difference": "The slang jeer and the fruit that inspired the joke trophy, not the awards institution." } ], "questions": [ { "id": "evidence-neighbours-q01", "text": "Which of these neighbouring kinds and how to tell them apart hold for the sense of Golden Raspberry Awards this model covers, and on what evidence?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "openQuestions": [ "Which official archives and institutional records provide the most complete, authoritative account of editions, nominees, results and later revisions?", "How have voter eligibility, nomination procedures and final selection mechanisms changed, and which categories have used exceptions?", "What release and distribution eligibility rules apply across different periods, especially where release dates or markets create edition ambiguity?", "Which categories have been renamed, discontinued, introduced for a single occasion or assigned a purpose other than identifying a worst achievement?", "Which nominations, results or categories have been officially corrected, withdrawn or rescinded, and what exact scope and effective date did each statement establish?" ], "statistics": { "bundles": 5, "layers": 9, "findings": 16, "questions": 24 } }, "draft": { "generator": "vr.draft.v3", "status": "draft-generated", "researched": false, "archetype": "work, medium or creative form", "method": "Written from the archetype playbook - what this kind of thing needs beyond identity and provenance - and from the structure that recurred across 6,333 models already researched by two engines. Applied to this entry by rule. No source was read for this thing and no claim here is researched. This entry carries no facets of its own, so they were inferred from its domain - a guess about a whole domain applied to one thing.", "facetsInferred": true, "nextPass": "A researcher replaces this draft with a sourced specification. Treat every sentence below as a proposal to argue with.", "purpose": "Give an agent a durable, checkable way to recognise a Golden Raspberry Awards, record what state it is in, and decide what may be done with it.", "whatItIs": "Enable an AI agent to recognise the Golden Raspberry Awards, assess the authority and current status of its award claims, and decide how those claims may be recorded or used.", "characteristics": { "substance": "information", "origin": "conceptual", "agency": "inert" }, "whatYouCanDoWithIt": [ "read and interpreted", "observed and measured" ], "distinguishingFeatures": [ "Described in 60 Wikipedia languages, which is a measure of how widely the thing is known, not of how important it is." ], "openQuestionsForResearch": [ "Which of the bundles below does a real task actually need, and which are ceremony?", "What does this thing have that the facets do not capture at all?", "Which neighbouring kind is most often confused with a Golden Raspberry Awards, and on what evidence are they told apart?" ], "whatItIsMadeOf": "content that has to be carried by something else", "physicalCharacter": [ "Does nothing on its own; everything it does, something else did to it.", "These come from the domain this entry sits in rather than from the entry itself, so treat them as a first guess about the whole domain applied to one thing." ], "whatCanBeDoneWithIt": [ "read it and act on what it says", "observe it, measure it, record its state" ], "howItIsRecognised": [ "What is seen is a copy or a performance, not the work. Recognising the work means recognising the content through whatever is carrying it." ], "relatedModels": [], "standing": "Described in 60 Wikipedia languages, which measures how widely it is written about rather than how important or how common it is.", "structure": { "bundles": [ { "id": "identity-and-classification", "name": "Identity, naming and classification", "description": "How an agent tells one Golden Raspberry Awards from another, and a Golden Raspberry Awards from things that resemble it.", "rationale": "Recognition comes before every other claim. Without stable identity nothing else in the model can be trusted to be about the same thing twice.", "layers": [ { "id": "naming-and-identifiers", "name": "Names and identifiers", "description": "The names this thing goes by and the identifiers that survive translation and time.", "findings": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases", "name": "Preferred name, aliases and local names", "description": "Which name to use, which names mean the same thing, and which merely sound similar.", "questions": [ { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the name of a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the name of a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "preferred-name-and-aliases-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the name of a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers", "name": "Stable identifiers and external keys", "description": "Identifiers that keep pointing at this kind of thing across systems and languages.", "questions": [ { "id": "stable-identifiers-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an identifier for a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an identifier for a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stable-identifiers-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an identifier for a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "classification-and-granularity", "name": "Classification and granularity", "description": "Where a Golden Raspberry Awards sits among kinds, and how finely a task needs to cut it.", "findings": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents", "name": "Kind, parents and neighbouring kinds", "description": "The classes this thing belongs to and the ones it is next to.", "questions": [ { "id": "kind-and-parents-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the kind of a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the kind of a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "kind-and-parents-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the kind of a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features", "name": "Distinguishing features", "description": "What separates a Golden Raspberry Awards from the things most often confused with it.", "questions": [ { "id": "distinguishing-features-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes what distinguishes a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about what distinguishes a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "distinguishing-features-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once what distinguishes a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "state-and-lifecycle", "name": "State and lifecycle", "description": "The states a Golden Raspberry Awards passes through and the events that move it between them.", "rationale": "Most decisions about a thing depend on what state it is in now, which is a claim with a time on it, not a property.", "layers": [ { "id": "lifecycle-stages", "name": "Lifecycle stages", "description": "From coming into existence to ceasing to be one of these.", "findings": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions", "name": "Stages and transitions", "description": "The stages worth naming and what moves a Golden Raspberry Awards between them.", "questions": [ { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the lifecycle of a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the lifecycle of a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "stages-and-transitions-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the lifecycle of a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "observations-and-status", "name": "Observations and current status", "description": "What is observed about a Golden Raspberry Awards, how often and by whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "observation-record", "name": "Observation record", "description": "How an observation of a Golden Raspberry Awards is recorded so that it can be superseded rather than overwritten.", "questions": [ { "id": "observation-record-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes an observation of a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about an observation of a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "observation-record-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once an observation of a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "content-and-access", "name": "Content, encoding and access", "description": "What a Golden Raspberry Awards says, how it is encoded and who may read it.", "rationale": "An informational thing carries content that can be copied, versioned and withheld, none of which its physical carrier explains.", "layers": [ { "id": "content-and-encoding", "name": "Content and encoding", "description": "The content itself, its format and its language.", "findings": [ { "id": "content-and-format", "name": "Content, format and language", "description": "What a Golden Raspberry Awards contains and in what form it is held.", "questions": [ { "id": "content-and-format-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the content of a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the content of a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "content-and-format-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the content of a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "access-and-rights", "name": "Access, rights and retention", "description": "Who may read, copy or change it, and for how long it is kept.", "findings": [ { "id": "access-rules", "name": "Access rules and retention", "description": "The permissions attached to a Golden Raspberry Awards and the period it survives.", "questions": [ { "id": "access-rules-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes access to a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about access to a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "access-rules-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once access to a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "work-and-manifestation", "name": "Work, version and copy", "description": "Which level of Golden Raspberry Awards a statement is about.", "rationale": "The work, the edition, the file and the copy in hand are four things; rights and content attach to different ones.", "layers": [ { "id": "levels", "name": "Levels of the thing", "description": "Work, expression, manifestation and item, in plain terms.", "findings": [ { "id": "level-rules", "name": "What belongs at each level", "description": "Which facts hold for the work and which only for one copy.", "questions": [ { "id": "level-rules-q01", "text": "For Golden Raspberry Awards, which facts belong to the work itself, which to a version, and which to a single copy?", "kind": "boundary" }, { "id": "level-rules-q02", "text": "What identifier exists at each level, and which one is being cited?", "kind": "definition" } ] } ] }, { "id": "versions", "name": "Versions, editions and variants", "description": "How versions differ and which is canonical to whom.", "findings": [ { "id": "version-record", "name": "Versions and canonicity", "description": "Differences that matter and who calls one authoritative.", "questions": [ { "id": "version-record-q01", "text": "Which versions or editions of Golden Raspberry Awards exist, and how do they differ substantively?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "version-record-q02", "text": "Who treats which version as authoritative, and for what purpose?", "kind": "provenance" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "authorship-and-rights", "name": "Authorship, rights and permitted use", "description": "Who made Golden Raspberry Awards and what may be done with it.", "rationale": "Rights are jurisdictional, time-limited and attached to a level, and an agent that ignores that will copy what it may not.", "layers": [ { "id": "authorship", "name": "Authorship and contribution", "description": "Who contributed what, and in what capacity.", "findings": [ { "id": "contribution-record", "name": "Contributors and roles", "description": "The people and bodies behind it, with their roles.", "questions": [ { "id": "contribution-record-q01", "text": "Who authored or contributed to Golden Raspberry Awards, in what roles, and how is that attested?", "kind": "provenance" }, { "id": "contribution-record-q02", "text": "Where authorship is disputed or anonymous, what is recorded instead?", "kind": "boundary" } ] } ] }, { "id": "rights", "name": "Rights and permissions", "description": "Which rights subsist, where, until when, and what they permit.", "findings": [ { "id": "rights-record", "name": "Rights, term and permitted acts", "description": "The regime in force and what it allows.", "questions": [ { "id": "rights-record-q01", "text": "What rights subsist in Golden Raspberry Awards, in which jurisdictions, and until when?", "kind": "definition" }, { "id": "rights-record-q02", "text": "Which acts are permitted without further permission, and which must an agent refuse?", "kind": "action" } ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "provenance-and-evidence", "name": "Provenance, evidence and time", "description": "Where every claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards came from and when it held.", "rationale": "A claim without a source and a time cannot be superseded, only overwritten, and an agent that overwrites loses the ability to explain itself.", "layers": [ { "id": "source-and-authority", "name": "Source and authority", "description": "Who said it, on what evidence, and how strongly.", "findings": [ { "id": "claim-provenance", "name": "Claim provenance and confidence", "description": "The authority behind each claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards and how confident it is.", "questions": [ { "id": "claim-provenance-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes a claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about a claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "claim-provenance-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once a claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] }, { "id": "time-and-versions", "name": "Time, versions and supersession", "description": "When a claim was true, when it was learnt, and what replaced it.", "findings": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession", "name": "Validity period and supersession", "description": "How an old claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards is retired without being erased.", "questions": [ { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q01", "text": "What identifies and describes the validity of a claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards, and in what units or vocabulary?", "kind": "definition", "answer_data": [ "identifiers", "types and classes", "values with units", "explicit unknowns" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q02", "text": "Who or what asserted this about the validity of a claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards, by which method, and when was it true?", "kind": "provenance", "answer_data": [ "authority", "method", "evidence", "event time", "knowledge time" ] }, { "id": "validity-and-supersession-q03", "text": "What may an agent decide or do once the validity of a claim about a Golden Raspberry Awards is known, and what must it refuse?", "kind": "action", "answer_data": [ "permitted actions", "preconditions", "refusals", "escalation" ] } ] } ] } ] } ] }, "statistics": { "bundles": 6, "layers": 12, "findings": 14, "questions": 38 } } } }